Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Cancer / February 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Seeking info on side effects-Xeloda and Gemcitabine

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
irishfolker - 07 Jan 2005 15:17 GMT
Hi all;

My wife is getting ready to undergo chemo treatment for metastatic gall
bladder cancer with Gemcitabine and Xeloda.  She has been assured by 2
oncologists that the side effects should be minimal, but after reading
information I've found on the internet, she's pretty worried.  The fact
sheets sound pretty dire.  Does anybody have any personal experiences
with these drugs they can share?

Thanks in advance

Jeff
Steph - 07 Jan 2005 17:08 GMT
> Hi all;
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Jeff

Most people tolerate them pretty well.
A more important question is "What is the aim of the treatment"
irishfolker - 07 Jan 2005 17:23 GMT
In February 2003, she had her gall bladder removed due to gallstones.
It was sent for pathological examination and early stage 1 cancer was
found.  As a precaution, she had part of her liver and the nearby lymph
nodes removed a month later.  At the time, they didn't suggest either
chemo or radiation, just semiannual monitoring.  In September 2004, a
spot showed up on the tip of her liver, which turned out to be
malignant, a drop metastasis.  One of her ovaries also had a similar
lesion.  Both ovaries and 20% of her liver were removed in late
October.  She had some infection after the surgery, with 2 wounds which
we are packing daily and are shrinking quite nicely.

The oncologist is recommending a combination of Gencitabine and Xeloda
to make sure there is nothing left of the cancer.  He seems pretty
positive in his prognosis.

BTW, I'll be offline after 4:30 EST and over the weekend, but I'll be
back on Monday.

Jeff
J - 09 Jan 2005 11:14 GMT
> In February 2003, she had her gall bladder removed due to gallstones.
> It was sent for pathological examination and early stage 1 cancer was
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> to make sure there is nothing left of the cancer.  He seems pretty
> positive in his prognosis.

What exactly did he say?  Did someone write down or tape what he said?
Did he use words like "response" or ???.
J
J - 13 Jan 2005 10:55 GMT
> In February 2003, she had her gall bladder removed due to gallstones.
> It was sent for pathological examination and early stage 1 cancer was
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> BTW, I'll be offline after 4:30 EST and over the weekend, but I'll be
> back on Monday.

How's the packing going, Jeff,
Keep in touch as you are able.
J
irishfolker - 13 Jan 2005 19:21 GMT
The packing is going pretty well.  One of the wounds is almost healed,
less than a quarter-inch deep.  The other is about an inch and a half
long and an inch deep (give or take).  A month ago, the large one took
an entire 4x4 sheet of calcium alginate dressing and the other took a
half sheet.  Now one third of a sheet handles both.

We go for a PET/CT scan and another meeting with the onco tomorrow.
We'll see what he has come up with and we have a page of questions for
him.  We are pretty confident since everything that has shown up has
been completely removed.  Hopefully, the chemo is just a clean sweep to
mop up any survivors.  Since the escaped cells took a year and a half
to become evident last time, the near term prognosis is pretty good I
think.

Jeff
J - 16 Jan 2005 15:31 GMT
> The packing is going pretty well.  One of the wounds is almost healed,
> less than a quarter-inch deep.  The other is about an inch and a half
> long and an inch deep (give or take).  A month ago, the large one took
> an entire 4x4 sheet of calcium alginate dressing and the other took a
> half sheet.  Now one third of a sheet handles both.

Well, that's progression. (this somewhat reminds me of Dash's husband's
situation - a different type of liver cancer and subsequent healing from
the surgery). I'm not sure I'd want to start chemo immediately (if it was
me).

> We go for a PET/CT scan and another meeting with the onco tomorrow.
> We'll see what he has come up with and we have a page of questions for
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> to become evident last time, the near term prognosis is pretty good I
> think.

A list of questions is a good idea.
How did things go, Jeff?
J
PS I know that posting through Google isn't easy, but if you could
bottom-post (post your reply below quoted text) and keep some of the quoted
text at the top, it would help.
irishfolker - 17 Jan 2005 14:26 GMT
J said:
> Well, that's progression. (this somewhat reminds me of Dash's husband's
> situation - a different type of liver cancer and subsequent healing from
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> A list of questions is a good idea.
> How did things go, Jeff?

Things went very well.  We got the answers we wanted to all of our
questions.  Dr. K said that with these dosages, there shouldn't be any
real interferance with healing or any other significant problems.  In
fact, we have stopped packing one of the sores since it is too small to
get any packing in there any more.  After one day of just putting a
dressing on top of it it looks excellent.  The other one I think is so
far along that nothing could stop the healing now.  Of course, we'll
monitor it closely.  I've become an expert in wound care now (not that
I ever wanted to).

We've been given the go-ahead for all of our plans for the next few
months, essentially anything she's got energy for is OK.  This includes
camping which surprised us.

The chemo plan is:  6-8 21-day cycles of:
Xeloda 1500mg twice a day for 14 days and 7 days off
Gemzar on day 1 and day 8

This starts on Friday (Jan 21)

On Thursday she is getting a port installed for the Gemzar.

The doctor is pretty confident that this will handle things.  At least
as confident as it is possible to be with the dearth of literature on
her particular situation.  Gall bladder cancer is rarely caught at
Stage 1; it's usually found at Stage 4, when it's time to get your
affairs in order.

All in all, we're feeling pretty positive about the whole thing.

Thanks for listening

Jeff

BTW, is this a bit easier?  I'm still getting used to the interface
here.
Guess Who - 17 Jan 2005 15:48 GMT
> We've been given the go-ahead for all of our plans for the next few
> months, essentially anything she's got energy for is OK.  This includes
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Jeff

Glad to see that you are planning some fun stuff to do.  Positive attitude
does help! Alex
J - 17 Jan 2005 17:55 GMT
> Things went very well.  We got the answers we wanted to all of our
> questions.  Dr. K said that with these dosages, there shouldn't be any
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> Stage 1; it's usually found at Stage 4, when it's time to get your
> affairs in order.

Hello Jeff,
Really I think your wife is metastatic gall bladder cancer, not Stage I, so
it's good she's on a treatment plan. Let's see if we can get Steph to
comment. I'm trying three ways.

Given Barbara's description of how Chris is able to tolerate same
treatment, there's no doubt in my mind that you'll be camping this summer.
:-)
That's excellent news.

You did very well with the packing. The younger we are, the better we heal.
I know from experience. I had the long incision type of gall bladder
removal when I was 21 or 22.  I was "raring to go" within two weeks of the
surgery, but my body put some brakes on. I was back at work (IIRC) 4 weeks
from the surgery, when they'd told me take 6.  TThe female surgeron said
she'd just started a new technique of "sewing up" and not to worry about
scarring (which I'd never even thought of - I just wanted the dang thing
out). She was right.  Barely perceptible - someone would have to use a
magnifying glass to see it's there. (sorry for digressing).

Excellint on the quoting text. Thank you.

Keep in touch,
J
I"ve added gallbladder cancer to the subject line (in case there's others
reading). Some readers only check the subject lines
(Something to remember if/when you start a new subject)
irishfolker - 17 Jan 2005 18:45 GMT
> Hello Jeff,
> Really I think your wife is metastatic gall bladder cancer, not Stage I, so
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> :-)
> That's excellent news.

Yeah, I know it's metastatic now, but when her gallbladder was removed
in 2003, it was early stage 1.

> You did very well with the packing. The younger we are, the better we heal.
> I know from experience. I had the long incision type of gall bladder
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> out). She was right.  Barely perceptible - someone would have to use a
> magnifying glass to see it's there. (sorry for digressing).

The doctors have been quite impressed with her healing rate.  BTW,
she's 47 and I'm 50.  Her first time with cancer, my second as
caregiver.  My first wife passed away in 1992 from brain cancer.  I
also have a cat with one leg amputated from a sarcoma.  I tell people
that I'm a carrier; if not that, then at least a risk factor.

> Excellint on the quoting text. Thank you.

Thanks  for the suggestion.

> Keep in touch,
> J
> I"ve added gallbladder cancer to the subject line (in case there's others
> reading). Some readers only check the subject lines
> (Something to remember if/when you start a new subject)

Thanks for the advice.

BTW, my sister (who has at least as weird a sense of humor as me)
thinks the meds would make a great fantasy show:  Xeloda, Warrior
Princess of Gemzar!

Love it!

Jeff
J - 17 Jan 2005 19:16 GMT
> Yeah, I know it's metastatic now, but when her gallbladder was removed
> in 2003, it was early stage 1.

Thank you for clarifying Jeff.

> The doctors have been quite impressed with her healing rate.  BTW,
> she's 47 and I'm 50.

Now I'm impressed !  I thought you both were younger. After 50 they tell me
it's all downhill...
Naw..I'm just kidding, I'm only 29 <just kidding> but I have friends
approaching 50 and they're getting a little creaky. ;-)

> Her first time with cancer, my second as
> caregiver.  My first wife passed away in 1992 from brain cancer.  I
> also have a cat with one leg amputated from a sarcoma.

I'm sorry to hear about your first wife Jeff.
And your cat? I read and see they do quite well even after amputation.

> I tell people that I'm a carrier; if not that, then at least a risk
> factor.
>
> BTW, my sister (who has at least as weird a sense of humor as me)
> thinks the meds would make a great fantasy show:  Xeloda, Warrior
> Princess of Gemzar!

Did I say welcome? <smile> Humour is always welcome on this newsgroup.
Some situations are so grim, it's hard to not get "down", so post anytime
and update us about Xeloda, Warrior Princess of Genzar ! (lol)
Best,
J
irishfolker - 17 Jan 2005 21:21 GMT
Now I'm impressed !  I thought you both were younger. After 50 they
tell me
> it's all downhill...
> Naw..I'm just kidding, I'm only 29 <just kidding> but I have friends
> approaching 50 and they're getting a little creaky. ;-)

Some mornings I think I can actually hear my joints complain!

> I'm sorry to hear about your first wife Jeff.

Thanks

> And your cat? I read and see they do quite well even after amputation.

She's still the queen of the house, just ask her!

> Did I say welcome? <smile> Humour is always welcome on this newsgroup.
> Some situations are so grim, it's hard to not get "down", so post anytime
> and update us about Xeloda, Warrior Princess of Genzar ! (lol)

If I wasn't joking, I would be in the corner in a fetal position,
sucking my thumb.  Life goes on, and it's mostly good.

Glad I found this place.  It's a place to talk with people who really
understand.

Jeff
J - 01 Feb 2005 08:18 GMT
> Some mornings I think I can actually hear my joints complain!
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Glad I found this place.  It's a place to talk with people who really

How are you Jeff and the Warrior Princess?
J
irishfolker - 01 Feb 2005 13:15 GMT
> How are you Jeff and the Warrior Princess?

Not too bad.  The Xeloda seems to be having very little in the way of
side effects.  The Gemzar, on the other hand, knocks her down on the
second day following the treatment.  She gets the IV on Friday and is
flat on her back most of the day Sunday.  We're hoping that will lessen
as she continues to recover from the surgery and gets used to the
drugs.

Her spirits are good and we're making plans for the week between
treatments when we figure she'll be more energetic.

Jeff
J - 01 Feb 2005 15:51 GMT
> Not too bad.  The Xeloda seems to be having very little in the way of
> side effects.  The Gemzar, on the other hand, knocks her down on the
> second day following the treatment.  She gets the IV on Friday and is
> flat on her back most of the day Sunday.  We're hoping that will lessen
> as she continues to recover from the surgery and gets used to the
> drugs.

Yes, well both mention tiredness and getting lots of rest (under "common
side effects").
http://www.cancerbacup.org.uk/Treatments/Chemotherapy/Individualdrugs/Gemcitabine

http://www.cancerbacup.org.uk/Treatments/Chemotherapy/Individualdrugs/Capecitabine

Genzar also mentions "Temporary reduction in the production of blood cells
by the bone marrow This can result in anaemia leading to tiredness; an
increased risk of bruising or bleeding and an increased risk of infection."
(whereas Xeloda mentions it under "less common").

I've had two major surgeries (with probably a lot of blood loss), one much
younger, separated by 12 +\- years to the other. The first (gallbladder) by
far was the worst to recover from, so there must have been more blood loss
and they wouldn't let me eat < I keep harping on that<g> for 4 days.  The
mind wants to get going, but the body won't co-operate until the body's
recovered.  I imagine with your wife's surgeries, closer together
comparatively (to mine) and the subsequent packing, would /might still be
felt in fatigue, in light of the above side effects. And that's why they
say everyone reacts differently to chemo.

There'a a diagram here http://www.umm.edu/liver/liver.htm It also says "The
liver holds about one pint (13 percent) of the body's blood supply at any
given moment".  I wonder if she's lost some of her liver, wher the blood
is...in the rest of the body?  Does removing parts of the liver, make the
BP go up?  (just wondering).

Anyway, I think she should get lots of rest, even on the good days.

> Her spirits are good and we're making plans for the week between
> treatments when we figure she'll be more energetic.

Oh I see, yes, The chemo plan is:  6-8 21-day cycles of.
Hope so, Jeff, hope so.
J
irishfolker - 02 Feb 2005 14:01 GMT
> Genzar also mentions "Temporary reduction in the production of blood cells
> by the bone marrow This can result in anaemia leading to tiredness; an
> increased risk of bruising or bleeding and an increased risk of infection."
> (whereas Xeloda mentions it under "less common").

Interesting.  They put her on iron because she's slightly anemic.  In
fact, she was before the chemo.  We've noticed a little bruising, but
nothing major.  Her wounds are continuing to heal, just a bit slower.
I expect they'll speed up during the week break.

> I've had two major surgeries (with probably a lot of blood loss), one much
> younger, separated by 12 +\- years to the other. The first (gallbladder) by
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> felt in fatigue, in light of the above side effects. And that's why they
> say everyone reacts differently to chemo.

Fortunately, the fatigue seems to last only a couple of days, at least
the worst of it does.  This morning she was feeling much better.  Just
2 more days for this round of the Xeloda!

I think frustration is playing a large part in things, too.  She had
the liver resection (and ovariectomy) on Oct. 27, was recovering
nicely, then they discovered the infection on Nov. 8 and she was
hospitalized for 3 days.  Since then we've been packing the wounds
daily (a visiting nurse for the first 4 weeks, then I've been doing it
ever since).  Then she had the port put in Jan. 20, just as she was
starting to feel a bit energetic and the chemo started on the 21st.
Like I said, frustrating.  As soon as she gets to feeling decent,
something else comes along.  Oh well, there is an end in sight for the
chemo.  Of course, when she recovers, she has to go back to a job she
hates.

> There'a a diagram here http://www.umm.edu/liver/liver.htm It also says "The
> liver holds about one pint (13 percent) of the body's blood supply at any
> given moment".  I wonder if she's lost some of her liver, wher the blood
> is...in the rest of the body?  Does removing parts of the liver, make the
> BP go up?  (just wondering).

I don't know in general, but she had 20 percent of her liver removed,
so that would only account for 2.6 percent of blood supply (20 percent
of 13 percent), so I don't think there was any significant effect.  I
do know that her BP doesn't seem to have been affected; it's always
been low.  My meds are keeping mine in check; I've been on BP meds for
5 1/2 years now (Isn't getting older fun!).

> Anyway, I think she should get lots of rest, even on the good days.

Not much choice involved there.

> > Her spirits are good and we're making plans for the week between
> > treatments when we figure she'll be more energetic.
>
> Oh I see, yes, The chemo plan is:  6-8 21-day cycles of.
> Hope so, Jeff, hope so.

Thanks for the support.  We're learning to deal with it as it goes.
Fortunately, the people at the Oncology Center are really great.  

Jeff
J - 03 Feb 2005 10:09 GMT
> Interesting.  They put her on iron because she's slightly anemic.  In
> fact, she was before the chemo.  We've noticed a little bruising, but
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> chemo.  Of course, when she recovers, she has to go back to a job she
> hates.

Well ! That's something to look forward to (not).
Although they say "do what you love or (learn to) love what you".
I expect many, these days are stuck doing the latter. [I'll skip a rant
about the economy]

> [snip my text]
> I don't know in general, but she had 20 percent of her liver removed,
> so that would only account for 2.6 percent of blood supply (20 percent
> of 13 percent), so I don't think there was any significant effect.

Good point

>  I do know that her BP doesn't seem to have been affected; it's always
> been low.

I'm a "low" too.
Gee, I've don't think I've ever since comparison studies on fatigue/chemo
and lower BP (compared to those who have normal BP or higher BP) on this or
any cancer newsgroup. I could be wrong about that though.

>  My meds are keeping mine in check; I've been on BP meds for
> 5 1/2 years now (Isn't getting older fun!).

Well, it's different and sometimes funner...
In some ways, we can become "the funny aunt" or "uncle", the ones the
younger crowd don't always understand.
Roller-blading in a suit;  what a crock that was. I kept falling, so I'd
aim for grass. <g>

> Thanks for the support.  We're learning to deal with it as it goes.
> Fortunately, the people at the Oncology Center are really great.

Hopefully next week, things will improve .
Keep in touch, Jeff.
J
J - 03 Feb 2005 10:13 GMT
> Jeff:>  My meds are keeping mine in check; I've been on BP meds for
> > 5 1/2 years now (Isn't getting older fun!).
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Roller-blading in a suit;  what a crock that was. I kept falling, so I'd
> aim for grass. <g>

Afterthought. That was approx 8 years ago.
Now I'm wearing a basketball kneepad on my elbow...wear & tear problem, sort of
[chuckle]
J
Steph - 18 Jan 2005 04:23 GMT
>> Things went very well.  We got the answers we wanted to all of our
>> questions.  Dr. K said that with these dosages, there shouldn't be any
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> it's good she's on a treatment plan. Let's see if we can get Steph to
> comment. I'm trying three ways.

I missed the earlier posts, but nobody would suggest chemo for a stage I
gall bladder cancer. Surgery is curative.
Met gall bladder cancer is incurable, so chemo is often proposed, but you
should ask the "questions"
J - 18 Jan 2005 09:13 GMT
> "J" <faked@privacy.net> wrote in message
> >
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> I missed the earlier posts,

In February 2003, she had her gall bladder removed due to gallstones.
It was sent for pathological examination and early stage 1 cancer was
found.  As a precaution, she had part of her liver and the nearby lymph
nodes removed a month later.  At the time, they didn't suggest either
chemo or radiation, just semiannual monitoring.  In September 2004, a
spot showed up on the tip of her liver, which turned out to be
malignant, a drop metastasis.  One of her ovaries also had a similar
lesion.  Both ovaries and 20% of her liver were removed in late
October.  She had some infection after the surgery, with 2 wounds which
we are packing daily and are shrinking quite nicely.

> but nobody would suggest chemo for a stage I
> gall bladder cancer. Surgery is curative.

We seemed to have cleared that up. Jeff is pretty quick on the replying.
In case, you've missed it, some are using surgery(ies) first and/or when chemo
seems to be stopping working.

> Met gall bladder cancer is incurable, so chemo is often proposed, but you
> should ask the "questions"

So I guess ditto for surgeries...
Thanks,
J
irishfolker - 18 Jan 2005 13:16 GMT
> > Met gall bladder cancer is incurable, so chemo is often proposed, but you
> > should ask the "questions"
>
> So I guess ditto for surgeries...

The mets were both very small and localized (smaller than a
fingernail).  They were also both accessible with one incision
(although it seems a roundabout way to get to the ovaries), so I have
no quarrels with the surgery decision.  The chemo at this point is
precautionary.  If something else shows up, the decisions will be made
based on the facts on the ground at that time.  

Jeff
Steph - 18 Jan 2005 16:10 GMT
>> > Met gall bladder cancer is incurable, so chemo is often proposed,
> but you
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Jeff

I understand, Jeff, but does the oncologist have any evidence that
chemotherapy, even "precautionary", has any benefit?
irishfolker - 18 Jan 2005 16:23 GMT
> I understand, Jeff, but does the oncologist have any evidence that
> chemotherapy, even "precautionary", has any benefit?
Not certain, but I trust his judgement.

Jeff
Guess Who - 19 Jan 2005 02:02 GMT
> Not certain, but I trust his judgement.
>
> Jeff

Sounds good having a trusting relationship with your health provider is a
positive thing, Alex
Steph - 19 Jan 2005 03:21 GMT
>> I understand, Jeff, but does the oncologist have any evidence that
>> chemotherapy, even "precautionary", has any benefit?
> Not certain, but I trust his judgement.
>
> Jeff

Fair enough, but just don't have unrealistic expectations
irishfolker - 19 Jan 2005 13:11 GMT
Thanks for your support
J - 25 Jan 2005 08:12 GMT
> "irishfolker" <irishfolker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Fair enough, but just don't have unrealistic expectations

Hi Steph,
I've never been able to find a gallbladder cancer list at ACOR. (I wonder
why - I would think that early stage GB cancer patients would be there
somewhere).<rhetorical>
Might there be another name for it?
I looked under G (for gallbladder or gastro) and under C ( looking for
bile duct cancer, I guess).

And/or let me ask you this a different way.
In 25 years, have you had met gallbladder cancer patients?
Where does it spread to (other than the liver)? I think we had a patient
last Fall, where it spread to the spine area...

If you have had "met GB" patients, how many survived ? If none, recurrence
occurs approximately (months, years)?
Did some have chemotherapy? Did that change the prognosis?

Sorry for all the questions.
Thanks,
J
Steph - 26 Jan 2005 02:25 GMT
>> "irishfolker" <irishfolker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> Thanks,
> J

I see most GB cancer patients on the Island. 1-2 per year
The majority are locally advanced and unresectable, and only palliative
chemo or rads is appropriate. Liver mets, or direct invasion of the liver is
common.
The occasional early GB cancer is usually cured by surgery, but the surgery
is usually being done for stones or some other problem, and the cancer is an
incidental finding.

Complete surgical resection is full treatment. There is no evidence of
benefit from either radiation or chemo for those.
If surgical resection is incomplete, cure is not possible, and for patients
without symptoms, there is no evidence of benefit from either radiation or
chemo.
J - 17 Jan 2005 17:55 GMT
> In February 2003, she had her gall bladder removed due to gallstones.
> It was sent for pathological examination and early stage 1 cancer was
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> October.  She had some infection after the surgery, with 2 wounds which
> we are packing daily and are shrinking quite nicely.

Hi Jeff, I saw your new post about being Stage I.
I'm asking Steph about "drop metastasis".  I'm wondering if they downstaged
due to the surguries. Steph and I posted about downstaging just this past
week, if I recall.
<http://www.cancerhelp.org.uk/help/default.asp?page=8010>
Most stage 1 gallbladder cancers are found almost by accident, when someone
is having their gallbladder taken out because of inflammation or
gallstones.  If the cancer is found this early no further treatment is
usually needed. "

J
Barbara - 07 Jan 2005 20:18 GMT
First of all, a note to everyone. This is the "hblites" Barbara whose
friend Chris has pancreatic cancer. AOL stopped their newsgroup service
as of Jan 1, and I haven't been seeing nearly all the messages posted
for some time, it turns out. I'm using google until I find a better
way....it's difficult because I tend to use multiple computers to
access the group. I'm using a different e-mail address for many
reasons.

anyhow, Chris takes Xeloda and Gemzar along with Taxotere. I can't
really separate out the side effects, but they include some leg
swelling (he thinks that one's mostly Taxotere, though), diarrhea and
some nausea, and some burning and swelling of the feet and fingertips.
He's had some low white counts and takes Neuprogen injections, but that
is also usually after the Taxotere treatments.

For the most part, he's been pleased with the chemo and the results,
especially with regards to pain relief and gemcitibine, (Gemzar) has a
reputation for being milder than most chemo drugs.
He did not suffer any hair loss, that was important to him.

Barbara
Andy Erickson - 08 Jan 2005 17:54 GMT
> Hi all;
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Jeff

Hi Jeff,

My wife recently underwent three rounds of Gemzar (Gemcitabine), along
with Cisplatin.  Her red blood cell counts and platelet counts were hit
pretty hard, and she had to have blood transfusions twice.  She's had
Cisplatin before without the Gemzar, and her counts held up much better
then, so it would seem the Gemzar was the main factor in the low red
blood cell & platelet counts.  I'm sure her doctor knows to watch her
counts closely.  

--Andy
Guess Who - 09 Jan 2005 13:37 GMT
> My wife recently underwent three rounds of Gemzar (Gemcitabine), along
> with Cisplatin.  Her red blood cell counts and platelet counts were hit
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> --Andy

Andy what does your wife's oncologist say ?  I am sure the doctor does watch
the blood counts closely that is why they take her blood prior to chemo,
Alex
Andy Erickson - 09 Jan 2005 21:43 GMT
> >...I'm sure her doctor knows to watch her
> > counts closely.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> the blood counts closely that is why they take her blood prior to chemo,
> Alex

Hi Alex, I did not express myself very well... my wife's oncologist does
watch her blood counts carefully.  I meant, above, that I'm sure Jeff's
wife's oncologist knows to do the same for her.

--Andy
J - 09 Jan 2005 11:35 GMT
> My wife is getting ready to undergo chemo treatment for metastatic gall
> bladder cancer with Gemcitabine and Xeloda.  She has been assured by 2
> oncologists that the side effects should be minimal, but after reading
> information I've found on the internet, she's pretty worried.  The fact
> sheets sound pretty dire.  Does anybody have any personal experiences
> with these drugs they can share?

Hello Jeff,
I'm sorry to hear about your wife's cancer.
When Steph mentions the goal of treatment, it's usually (not always),
because of the prognosis and he wants you to consider the following. His
algorithm for treatment decisions
<http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.support.cancer/msg/1b25021ba108fca1?hl=e
n&lr=&ie=UTF-8
>

Print it up and talk with your wife about it.

http://author.emedicine.com/MED/topic2711.htm  Gallbladder cancer.
"Contraindications: As with all cancer operations, diffuse distant
metastatic disease is a contraindication for resection except in rare cases
when palliative resection improves the quality of life."

I read your other post. There's a limit to how many times a person can get
pieces cut out of them or what can be cut out.
If cure isn't possible, you have to start thinking what will (or won't)
help symptoms and quality of life, as difficult a decision that may be.

http://tinyurl.com/5j3jr American Cancer Society
Unfortunately, gallbladder cancer seems to be resistant to chemotherapy,
and for that reason it is not widely or consistently used against this
disease."

Please stay with us. We can be there for you and your wife through these
difficult times.
J
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.