I have a great deal of compassion for the patients and care givers that
come here for support. God bless you. May you always feel welcome here.
I am here in alt.support.cancer because I have cancer in both kidneys. I
understand the issues. I have dealt with many of the problems. Contrary to
the opinions of some, I have no desire to moderate this newsgroup.
I am not a doctor. However, I believe strongly in conventional medicine. I
believe that clinical trials and peer review separate valid treatments from
unsafe or ineffective treatments. Please do not waste my time with
testimonials.
I have a deep hatred for medical fraud, which unfortunately is making a
home in alt med. The alt med community appears to care less that they are
being hijacked by quacks. This indifference is causing great harm.
I have an equal dislike for promoters of unproven treatments, also hosted
by alt med. It is becoming difficult to distinguish between alt med and
fraud. I don't have the time or patience to sort them out. So therefore, I
have grouped them and treat them with equal disdain. Alt med, fraud, or
unproven; they are the same in my mind.
I have no love or sympathy for those that would use the alt.support.cancer
newsgroup to promote those unproven treatments--for whatever purposes, real
or imagined. I will oppose all attempts by these loonies to dominate this
newsgroup or saturate it with their propaganda.
Ten years ago I lost a son to suicide. Since that time I have experienced
clinical depression. I am on medication, but the side effects are difficult
at times. In an attempt to alleviate the side effects the dosage is being
adjusted. This may mean that I display anger, which is a layer between
normal and depressed. I am doing my best to correct and control this anger.
If you feel that I am stepping out of the bounds of reasonable behavior,
feel free to bring that to my attention. However, when it comes to
newsgroup loonies there are no limits to what I consider reasonable
behavior. If you feel I have unjustly judged you as a loonie, feel free to
complain. If however, I think you are a loonie looking for some undeserved
slack, the result will be additional pressure. Please consider this before
complaining, as it is my life's work to make life hell for loonies.
I will no longer discuss the Charter or Acceptable Use Policies within the
group, as it appears to distract some from the real issues being discussed.
That does not mean I will stop enforcing the Charter or AUP offline. I plan
to continue filing complaints in the background--when appropriate. As time
permits the complaints will be expanded to include websites run by loonies.
Please feel free to comment.
Have a good day.
Jerry
Guess Who - 30 Dec 2004 21:48 GMT
> If you feel that I am stepping out of the bounds of reasonable behavior,
> feel free to bring that to my attention. However, when it comes to
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Jerry
Happy New Years Jerry! I too hate medical fraud, I have been employed by the
"conventional" medical community my whole career. You have the absolute
right ( like all of us) to report and complain when you feel a post is
offensive, doing it off line will be great.
Wish you a health new year also Alex
Willcox - 31 Dec 2004 02:34 GMT
> I am not a doctor. However, I believe strongly in conventional medicine. I
> believe that clinical trials and peer review separate valid treatments from
> unsafe or ineffective treatments.
The establishment separates competitive treatments and their clinical
trials from you, and any peers who don't go along end up blackedballed
and/or in prison.
Do a websearch for Professor Ivy and Krebiozen
He taught medical school, vice-president of the University of Illinois,
board member of what is now called American Cancer Society, yet
quackwatch.org lists him as a quack :o/
He announced he was beginning clinical trials of Krebiozen; Within days
they moved in and shut him down. He was removed from his post at the
university and blackballed. He was arrested for several felonies and it
took him many years to clear all those charges and his name, with
several government agents being convicted of jury tampering along the
way. This wasn't a single incident, but a systematic suppression of an
alternative to chemo that lasted decades.
Every credible treatment that competes with chemo and radiation get
discredited, condemned and their doctors get imprisoned and run out of
the country.
orping@sympatico.ca - 31 Dec 2004 03:36 GMT
>I have a great deal of compassion for the patients and care givers that
>come here for support. God bless you. May you always feel welcome here.
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
>
>Jerry
Carry on, no one here to take up the slack with your vigor.
I admit to not reading a lot of your and others posts due doe
information overload.
It is easy to get jaded when that information is there again and again
but it will be missed very much once it is no longer available.
(Have experienced that in hobby groups.)
Thanks for all your efforts,
Orping
Alayne - 31 Dec 2004 10:33 GMT
> I have a great deal of compassion for the patients and care givers that
> come here for support. God bless you. May you always feel welcome here.
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
>
> Jerry
I agree and support you Jerry. This newsgroup is full of kind, caring,
compassionate souls and it makes my blood boil when it is used by others to
vent their off the wall beliefs.
I am sorry for your troubles too and hope that life will be kinder to you in
the future. The efforts and time that you and J make to this ng are deeply
appreciated.
Warm Hugs
Alayne
J - 31 Dec 2004 18:14 GMT
> I will no longer discuss the Charter or Acceptable Use Policies within the
> group, as it appears to distract some from the real issues being discussed.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Please feel free to comment.
This doesn't make sense. You want comments but not discuss the Charter.
Is the Charter not to be posted anymore?
Are you planning to report people off newsgroup wi/o the courtesy of warning
them first by posting the Charter to them?
I understand if this message is directed towards known loonies, (if so, fine,
they know about the Charter)
but some blunder in here w/o realizing there's a Charter and they think they're
coming in to do the group a favour with their post.
Or they are patients or loved ones or carers or "dimwits". Are you just going
to report them and have them lose their ISP's w/o warning them first? Doesn't
make sense to me. I think the regulars and newbies need to know how and which
situations you're going to do the reporting.
I have applied the same (posted the Charter/warned) to anyone who seems to fit
the "not appropriate" section in the Charter or the definition of "spam" in the
Miscellaneous section (which really should be in the Charter). I warn them
first with the Charter, then if they insist, I've been reporting them or
forwarding to their posts to you, when you've been less busy and/or not
travelling. Yes, we've lost some patients or loved ones. Other more reasonable
have worked it out with me.
I thought your cancer was in remission. I'm sorry to hear it's back.
Does that mean you'll be here reading the newsgroup posts everyday from now on
? and I no longer have to forward "offenders" posts to you as has been
happening for the past year and a half ? Or are you here just over the
holidays and back to travel and your corporation issues?
J - confused
Jerry - 31 Dec 2004 18:39 GMT
> This doesn't make sense.
It does to me.
When the group gets to the point that members feel forced to leave--due to
over regulation--it is time to think about how members perceive you. I want
the members to respond positively to me. I want the loonies to loathe me.
How hard is that to understand?
Jerry
J - 31 Dec 2004 18:26 GMT
> I will no longer discuss the Charter or Acceptable Use Policies within the
> group, as it appears to distract some from the real issues being discussed.
> That does not mean I will stop enforcing the Charter or AUP offline. I plan
> to continue filing complaints in the background--when appropriate. As time
> permits the complaints will be expanded to include websites run by loonies.
If you mean the "warning" aspect, or reporting aspect, some don't even know
their own AUP's.
I post the link and the relevant paragraph.
Then there's others who wanted to know how to report, so I've been posting the
headers to the offending post and the addresses where to complain to. No one's
indispensable. Either of us could disappear and others here need to know how to
report them (into the future). Three reasons, to show lurkers what will happen
if they do the same. Show patients/loved ones etc, which posts to ignore and
teach those who wish to also complain, to know how to professionallly complain
the way you do so well.
J