 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Cancer / December 2004Alternative medicine
If it worked against cancer, it would not be "alternative" anymore. It would be used conventionally. J > If it worked against cancer, it would not be "alternative" anymore. > It would be used conventionally. > J Hi J, I see that John has gone off his meds again. I thought that mental institutions did not have Interenet access; guess I was wrong. Jerry > > If it worked against cancer, it would not be "alternative" anymore. > > It would be used conventionally. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > I see that John has gone off his meds again. I thought that mental > institutions did not have Interenet access; guess I was wrong. Jerry, I'm so pleased to hear from you (another cancer survivor). Many blessings of the season to you and your family. May you have continued health, prosperity and peace for the coming new year. J > Jerry, I'm so pleased to hear from you (another cancer survivor). > Many blessings of the season to you and your family. > May you have continued health, prosperity and peace for the coming new > year. > J J, Glad to be back. Hope all is well for you. I wish everyone in the group the very best. I am disappointed to see that there are still some people that think it is their duty to harrass the cancer patients and caregivers in the group. Personally, I have enough problems without them distracting me. I am going on five years since the diagnosis of cancer in both kidneys. I am doing well and the CT scans are good. I have just finished some consulting work for a company in the West Indies. prior to that I did some work for companies in Canada and the US. Have been very busy, but have a short break for the holiday season. I will read some of the group's messages as time permits. I hope to catch up with current events. Jerry > Glad to be back. Hope all is well for you. I wish everyone in the group the > very best. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > I will read some of the group's messages as time permits. I hope to catch > up with current events. I always feel some sense of comfort when I know you're reading, Jerry, (ie I feel hope when I see your name pops up in the posts). Then I know that you're getting a good look at what's happening... I realize that your work puts demands on you that don't permit you to stay abreast of the newsgroup. Distraction, you've nailed it. It takes away from my focus and time. I sure would like to spend more time on support. (then having to counter-argue /point or otherwise somehow fend them off). Some of us get frustrated that there's not one good way to "plonk" them out of here. Some cannot do it (Google/AOL/webtv), so it's frustrating for those who do plonk, because I still have to "counterargue" points, and then those who plonk probably get frustrated with our replies... I won't keep you, since you'll be doing some reading. I'll watch for your posts. It's so good to hear that your scans are still clear. My best to you, J > Glad to be back. Hope all is well for you. I wish everyone in the group > the [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > Jerry Happy Holidays and glad you are doing well. Alex > If it worked against cancer, it would not be "alternative" anymore. > It would be used conventionally. > J LOL. That is THE BIGGEST LIE IN MEDICINE. http://www.whale.to/m/therapies.html > If it worked against cancer, it would not be "alternative" anymore. > It would be used conventionally. > J by "alternative medicine" they mean an alternative to mainstream medicine. >> If it worked against cancer, it would not be "alternative" anymore. >> It would be used conventionally. >> J > >by "alternative medicine" they mean an alternative to mainstream >medicine. If it worked, it would be adopted by the mainstream medical community. > >> If it worked against cancer, it would not be "alternative" anymore. > >> It would be used conventionally. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > If it worked, it would be adopted by the mainstream medical community. A safe, inexpensive treatment that anyone can do at home which the medical industry would gladly spend millions certifying so they could give up billions in revenues because they are so nice. You are so gullable. More like: the doctor is imprisoned and some of his patients murdered to look like it was his fault, and if he gained enough recognition the mainstream press condemns and discredits him. >>>> If it worked against cancer, it would not be "alternative" anymore. >>>> It would be used conventionally. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > look like it was his fault, and if he gained enough recognition the > mainstream press condemns and discredits him. Willcox, Are you high on drugs? Jerry >> >> If it worked against cancer, it would not be "alternative" anymore. >> >> It would be used conventionally. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > look like it was his fault, and if he gained enough recognition the > mainstream press condemns and discredits him. The simplest answer is almost always the correct one. Rather than the victim of a massive pharma conspiracy involving every doctor and regulator in the world, maybe it's more likely that he's just a shill out to make a few bucks off the desperate. >> A safe, inexpensive treatment that anyone can do at home which the >> medical industry would gladly spend millions certifying so they could >> give up billions in revenues because they are so nice. >> >> You are so gullable. You know, that word isn't in the dictionary. At least not spelled that way. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.