Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Cancer / August 2004
Bone Metastasis (Part 4) - Treating Bone Metastasis
|
|
Thread rating:  |
J - 19 Aug 2004 11:23 GMT http://tinyurl.com/3sncm American Cancer Society - Reference Material Treating Bone Metastasis Detailed Guide: Bone Metastasis How Is Bone Metastasis Treated?
Treatment options for people with bone metastases depend on where the primary cancer developed, which bones it has spread to, and whether any bones are severely weakened or broken. Other factors will also be considered, such as specific features of the cancer cells (in the case of breast cancer, whether they contain estrogen receptors), your general state of health, and which treatments you have already received.
Most doctors feel the most important treatment for bone metastases is treatment directed against the cancer. This is usually done with systemic therapies, such as chemotherapy or hormonal therapy,that are taken by mouth or injected. Also, bisphosphonate therapy can help to make diseased bones stronger and help prevent fractures. It is used to supplement the chemotherapy or hormonal therapy for bone metastasis. Systemic therapies enter the bloodstream, and can therefore reach cancer cells that have spread throughout the body. If this is successful, then the symptoms of the bone metastases will go away and new symptoms are not likely to develop soon.
It also may be important to treat the bone problems. Local treatments such as radiation therapy can relieve the pain in a bone area by destroying the cancer. Sometimes a bone such as your femur (thigh bone) might look as if it is close to breaking. Your doctor will recommend that you have a surgical procedure to prevent this. In this procedure, a doctor, usually an orthopedic surgeon places a thin steel rod in the bone. It is much easier to prevent a damaged femur from breaking than to repair it after it has broken.
This section begins with a summary of the types of systemic treatments used for patients with metastatic cancers. For more detailed information about treatment of metastatic cancer based on a specific type of cancer, please refer to our information on each cancer type. The information on metastatic cancer will be included in the sections on treatment of advanced cancer, stage IV cancer, or recurrent cancer. The second part of this section contains information that focuses specifically on treatment of bone metastases.
Systemic Therapy
Chemotherapy: Chemotherapy uses anticancer drugs that are usually injected into a vein or taken by mouth. These drugs enter the bloodstream and can reach cancer that has spread. Chemotherapy is used as the main treatment to cure some metastatic cancers such as lymphomas and germ cell tumors of the ovaries, testicles, or placenta. Combining chemotherapy with other treatments can often cure some children's cancers such as Wilms tumor and osteosarcoma.
Chemotherapy drugs kill cancer cells but also damage some normal cells. Therefore, careful attention must be given to avoiding or minimizing side effects, which depend on the type of drugs, the amount taken, and the length of treatment. Temporary side effects might include nausea and vomiting, loss of appetite, loss of hair, and mouth sores. Because chemotherapy can damage the blood-producing cells of your bone marrow, you may have low blood cell counts. Low blood cell counts can result in:
* An increased chance of infection (caused by a shortage of white blood cells) * Bleeding or bruising after minor cuts or injuries (caused by a shortage of blood platelets) * Fatigue (caused by low red blood cell counts).
Most side effects disappear once treatment is stopped. There are remedies to prevent or control many of the temporary side effects of chemotherapy. For example, drugs can be given to prevent or reduce nausea and vomiting (these are called antiemetic drugs). For more information on chemotherapy, please see "Understanding Chemotherapy: a Guide for Patients and Families."
Hormone therapy: Estrogen, a hormone produced by women's ovaries, promotes growth of some breast cancers, particularly those cancers with detectable amounts of estrogen receptor protein. Likewise, androgens such as testosterone, which are produced by the testicles, promote growth of most prostate cancers. There are several types of hormone therapy:
* One strategy is to remove the organs that produce hormones. Removing the ovaries or testicles is a hormone therapy option for patients with breast cancer or prostate cancer, respectively. * More often, drugs can be given to keep hormones from being produced (a common approach to hormone therapy for prostate cancer).
* Other drugs can be given to prevent the hormones from affecting the cancer cells For example, drugs such as tamoxifen block hormone effects on breast cancers and anti-androgens block hormone effects on prostate cancer. * Side effects depend on the type of hormone treatments used, but may include hot flashes, blood clots, loss of libido (sex drive), and increased risk of other cancers
Immunotherapy: Immunotherapy is a systemic therapy that helps a patient's immune system recognize and destroy cancer cells more effectively. Several types of immunotherapy are used to treat patients with metastatic cancer, including cytokines, monoclonal antibodies, and tumor vaccines. Most of these are still experimental. These treatments are discussed in detail in American Cancer Society documents on immunotherapy and the specific types of cancer for which this approach is useful. For more information on immunotherapy, please see "Immunotherapy."
Radiation Therapy
Radiation therapy uses high-energy rays or particles to destroy cancer cells or slow their rate of growth. Radiation therapy can be used to cure primary cancers that have not spread too far from their original site. When a cancer has metastasized to bones, radiation is used to relieve ( palliate ) symptoms.
External beam radiation: The most common way to deliver radiation to a bone metastasis is to carefully focus a beam of radiation from a machine outside the body. This is known as external beam radiation. To reduce the risk of side effects, doctors carefully figure out the exact dose and aim the beam as accurately as they can to hit the target.
External beam radiation therapy for bone metastasis can sometimes be given in one dose but most radiation oncologists (doctors who specialize in radiation therapy) prefer to give the radiation in 5 to 15 doses. Each treatment lasts only a few minutes. External beam radiation is an excellent option if you have 1 or 2 metastases that are causing symptoms. But if there are many metastases scattered throughout the body, treatment is more difficult. In rare cases, some patients can benefit from radiation therapy of the entire upper or lower half of their body. A few weeks later, the other half of the body can be treated.
Internal radiation, interstitial radiation, or brachytherapy: Another method of delivering radiation is to place (implant) metal rods or tiny pellets (sometimes called "seeds") that contain radioactive materials in or near the cancer. This method is called internal radiation, interstitial radiation, or brachytherapy. This approach is useful in treating some primary cancers and some metastases, but it is not often used for treating bone metastasis.
For more information on radiation therapy, please see "Understanding Radiation Therapy: A Guide for Patients and Families."
[my note: or ask Steph]
Steph - 19 Aug 2004 17:04 GMT > http://tinyurl.com/3sncm > American Cancer Society - Reference Material > Treating Bone Metastasis > Detailed Guide: Bone Metastasis > How Is Bone Metastasis Treated? Unfortunately, a very "American" view of the subject. The treatment which is a) most effective and b) least toxic and c) most common and d) cheapest is halfway down the list. "Most doctors believe....." I don't think so
J - 19 Aug 2004 19:33 GMT > > http://tinyurl.com/3sncm > > American Cancer Society - Reference Material [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > a) most effective and b) least toxic and c) most common and d) cheapest is > halfway down the list. Well, it's not cheap if it's not covered by Medicare or their insurances and perhaps that's part of why the American view leans towards other treatments first?
> "Most doctors believe....." I don't think so Well, you've snipped the subject that you were referring to.
As an aside or to update you, I've seen Tim, on the BC newsgroup, recently or previously, mention that "Radiation can usually only be done once to each site without risking serious collateral damage." So, he's on holiday at the moment, but I posted to ask him when he returns, if he could crosspost a thread and discuss these issues with you. Yet, I'm pretty sure I've seen you say there's "no limit". I sure wish we could clear this and other issues up. I also see women on the BC newsgroup, afraid of radiation therapy (after lumpectomy or mastectomy). So I think a crossposted thread would be very helpful. Please wait for him, before replying here.
As an aside, (vaginal cancer thread), what are your thoughts about internal radiation therapy for vaginal cancer where the patient has had an injection of "injectable solid silicone implant " for incontinence? No problem? Are you radiation oncologists trained or experienced with working around such materials?
J
Steph - 20 Aug 2004 02:51 GMT > > > http://tinyurl.com/3sncm > > > American Cancer Society - Reference Material [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > perhaps that's part of why the American view leans towards other treatments > first? It certainly is covered by medicaid, and the HMOs love radiotherapy, because it is so cheap and efficient. The literature is all there about cost-efficiency compared to chemotherapy.
> > "Most doctors believe....." I don't think so > > Well, you've snipped the subject that you were referring to. No, they were saying that it's best to treat the cancer, and that should take care of the bone met. It won't, at least not expeditiously. Why not treat the bone met, then the cancer?
> As an aside or to update you, I've seen Tim, on the BC newsgroup, recently or > previously, mention that "Radiation can usually only be done once to each site [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > mastectomy). So I think a crossposted thread would be very helpful. Please wait > for him, before replying here. There certainly is a limit, but the notion that palliative radiation can be done only once at any site is simply nonsense. Radical curative dose can only be given once to a particular site (usually)
> As an aside, (vaginal cancer thread), what are your thoughts about internal > radiation therapy for vaginal cancer where the patient has had an injection of > "injectable solid silicone implant " for incontinence? No problem? Are you > radiation oncologists trained or experienced with working around such materials? > > J Shouldn't be any problem at all. No different from irradiating near an artificial hip, or tooth fillings!
J - 20 Aug 2004 11:38 GMT > > > > http://tinyurl.com/3sncm > > > > American Cancer Society - Reference Material [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > It certainly is covered by medicaid, Well you'll have to see what I posted (to show you Alex's comment on that).
> and the HMOs love radiotherapy, because it is so cheap and efficient. I can believe that.
> The literature is all there about cost-efficiency compared to chemotherapy. If you have literature (web sites) that show what is or isn't covered in the US (and under which circumstance HMO, Medicaid, Medicare, Hospice etc), I'd sure appreciate seeing them and they have to be current, because I believe Alex said some changes occured a few years back.. J
Steph - 20 Aug 2004 16:02 GMT > > > > > http://tinyurl.com/3sncm > > > > > American Cancer Society - Reference Material [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > some changes occured a few years back.. > J The literature I'm talking about is about radiotherapy, not the us system
J - 21 Aug 2004 21:06 GMT > "J" <suture@anon.anon> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > The literature I'm talking about is about radiotherapy, not the us system Thanks for clarifying, Steph, J
J - 20 Aug 2004 11:40 GMT > "J" <suture@anon.anon> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Shouldn't be any problem at all. > No different from irradiating near an artificial hip, or tooth fillings! Well, that's certainly good to hear. Thank you, Steph, J
J - 20 Aug 2004 11:45 GMT > "J" <suture@anon.anon> wrote in message > No, they were saying that it's best to treat the cancer, and that should [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > done only once at any site is simply nonsense. Radical curative dose can > only be given once to a particular site (usually) I would have to cross-post the specific post, so you can enter into the discussion. However, when I've tried to do that before, I've been maligned by some on the breast cancer newsgroup for "taking their info/exchanges" to another newsgroup. I'm sure Tim wouldn't mind, but there's some "buttinski's" who seem to find this practice objectionable. Will you be here to defend me? :P
(I'm tired of getting blamed, when all I'm trying to do is help patients (get to you to ) understand what is or isn't possible with radiation therapy). J
smicker - 20 Aug 2004 19:00 GMT >> As an aside, (vaginal cancer thread), what are your thoughts about >internal [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >Shouldn't be any problem at all. >No different from irradiating near an artificial hip, or tooth fillings! Hi Steph. I hope you will not mind me butting in here but have you any idea if the MRI and CT scans can take place efficiently with the macro plastique in place? What can be done if it shields the cancer from the scans? It is my wife who has the vaginal cancer:-( smicker
Steph - 21 Aug 2004 05:44 GMT > >> As an aside, (vaginal cancer thread), what are your thoughts about > >internal [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > scans? It is my wife who has the vaginal cancer:-( > smicker Plastic won't have any impact at all on the CT or MRI. It would be kind, however, to let the radiologist know that it's there.........
smicker - 21 Aug 2004 15:50 GMT smicker butted in rudely asking
>> Hi Steph. I hope you will not mind me butting in here but have you any >> idea if the MRI and CT scans can take place efficiently with the macro [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >It would be kind, however, to let the radiologist know that it's >there......... Yes I am making every attempt so get this info into place. The radiologist will definitely know. Thanks for your post and your valued information. smicker
J - 21 Aug 2004 21:12 GMT > > http://tinyurl.com/3sncm > > American Cancer Society - Reference Material [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > halfway down the list. > "Most doctors believe....." I don't think so So if we said "most doctors in the US believe"...? (I can't change their web page, I post 'em as I find them). J
Steph - 21 Aug 2004 21:41 GMT > > > http://tinyurl.com/3sncm > > > American Cancer Society - Reference Material [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > (I can't change their web page, I post 'em as I find them). > J I'm not even sure that's true. Maybe "most people who write nonsense for the American Cancer Society"?
radgray - 19 Aug 2004 18:53 GMT good morning, in your text I have read ,( is about hormone blockade )I quote :" and increased risk of other cancer" This is concerning me about a prostate cancer , and a recurrence after radiotherapy .....(but bone metastasis are not evident , but the M.D. after all control exams which are negatives and the PSA at 8.8 .... THe point is : I had a surgery for years ago concerning a stomach adenoK , and the anapath.was very bad (the worse) does that new treatment can reative the cells concerning the anastomosis or elsewhere. many thanks and best regards Yours Radgray
J - 19 Aug 2004 22:57 GMT > good morning, > in your text I have read ,( is about hormone blockade )I quote :" and [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Yours Radgray Hello Radgray, Thanks for your post. I think your best solution is to post to news:alt.support.cancer.prostate Please tell them more details about the treatment that you think you should have and what imaging tests you've had and what treatments you've had. They may have other possible solutions for you. They may also be able to point you to parts of the body that should be checked or other procedures that might be just as good as the one that you think that you cannot afford.
If I've misunderstood and you only have a few months to live, please stay here with us, but I would prefer to see you post over there first and tell them more about you and your prostate cancer. I'll try to watch for your posts over there and see what they reply (to you).
Please/thanks.
all my best, J
Howian - 29 Aug 2004 06:01 GMT Zometa is frequently used to stabilize the bone. Radiation is frequently directed to the bone to relieve pain and discomfort. Chemotherapy is used to treat the underlying cancer.
>Subject: Bone Metastasis (Part 4) - Treating Bone Metastasis >From: J toolbar@example.org [quoted text clipped - 146 lines] > >[my note: or ask Steph] Socks the white house cat - 29 Aug 2004 06:18 GMT Someday in the distant future, archeologists digging thru the ruins of alt.support.cancer will discover that howian@aol.com (Howian) had this to say on 28 Aug 2004:
> Zometa is frequently used to stabilize the bone. Radiation is frequently > directed to the bone to relieve pain and discomfort. > Chemotherapy is used to treat the underlying cancer. Anyone have experience with zometa? what exactly does it do? I'm on it now for a year, once every 3-4 weeks. mets still spreading. 10 rib on my left side seems totally involved. Pain still increasing. I thought it was supposed to strengthen the bone some, but my onc put me on calcium to offset zometa's calcium loss, which seems to contradict that. Then the radiation onc the other day decided I was at risk for breakage in an area that he hadn't treated yet, and threw some more rads at me.
Meanwhile, appetite and weight down. probably unrelated.
 Signature I AM SPEWS (SLAPP PREVENTION ELECTRONIC WHITENOISE SYSTEM) "Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." George W. Bush 8/5/04
J - 29 Aug 2004 11:14 GMT > I AM SPEWS (SLAPP PREVENTION ELECTRONIC WHITENOISE SYSTEM) > "Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop > thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do > we." > George W. Bush 8/5/04 Foot in mouth disease? <g> I wonder if Jay Leno will cover that one? (I sometimes catch snippets of his show if I wake up and the TV is on). J
J - 29 Aug 2004 20:11 GMT > Someday in the distant future, archeologists digging thru the ruins of > alt.support.cancer will discover that howian@aol.com (Howian) had this to [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > Meanwhile, appetite and weight down. probably unrelated. http://www.zometa.com/hcp/center/benefits/solution.jsp Indications:
Prevention of skeletal related events (pathological fractures, spinal compression, radiation or surgery to bone, or tumour-induced hypercalcaemia) in patients with advanced malignancies involving bone.
Treatment of hypercalcaemia of malignancy (HCM).
Dosage: For 'prevention of skeletal related events in patients with advanced malignancies involving bone', the recommended dose is 4 mg (diluted with 100 ml 0.9 % w/v sodium chloride or 5 % w/v glucose solution), given as a 15-minute intravenous infusion every 3 to 4 weeks.
For 'treatment of HCM', the recommended dose is 4 mg given as a single 15- minute intravenous infusion. Patients who show complete response and relapse or who are refractory to initial treatment may be re-treated with Zometa 8 mg given as a single 15-minute intravenous infusion. However, at least one week must elapse before re-treatment to allow for a full response to the initial dose.
No dose adjustment in patients with mild to moderate renal impairment. Patients without hypercalcaemia should also be administered an oral calcium supplement of 500 mg and 400 IU vitamin D daily
Contraindications: Pregnancy, breast-feeding women, patients with clinically significant hypersensitivity to zoledronic acid or other bisphosphonates or any of the excipients in the formulation of Zometa.
Attention should also be paid to the possibility of hypomagnesaemia developing during treatment.
(from another source)... Over half of the bodys magnesium is stored in the bones where it is available to buffer any short-term fluctuation in the plasma ionise component. Early symptoms of magnesium deficiency can include anorexia, nausea, vomiting, weakness and lethargy. More severe deficiency (i.e. plasma concentration less than 0.5 mmol/L) results in paraesthesia, cramps, tetany, irritability and mental confusion.
http://66.223.50.155/main.jsp?type=article&id=534 In clinical trials in patients with bone metastases, ZOMETA was generally well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to other bisphosphonates. The most commonly reported adverse events included flu-like syndrome (fever, arthralgias, myalgias, skeletal pain), fatigue, gastrointestinal reactions, anemia, weakness, cough, dyspnea and edema. Occasionally, patients experienced electrolyte and mineral disturbances, such as low serum phosphate, calcium, magnesium and potassium.
J - 29 Aug 2004 20:39 GMT > Anyone have experience with zometa? what exactly does it do? http://www.cancerbacup.org.uk/Treatments/Supportivetherapies/Bisphosphonates How bisphosphonates work In normal bone two types of cell (osteoclasts and osteoblasts) work together constantly to shape, rebuild and strengthen existing bone: * osteoclasts destroy old bone * osteoblasts build new bone.
Myeloma and some secondary bone cancers can produce chemicals that make the osteoclasts work harder. This means that more bone is destroyed than rebuilt, and leads to weakening of the affected bone. This can cause pain and means that the bone can fracture or break more easily.
Bisphosphonates target areas of bone where the osteoclast activity is high. They help to re-establish the normal balance of osteoclast and osteoblast activity. This can reduce pain and help to strengthen the bone. It also means that less calcium will be lost from the bones. Bisphosponates do not affect normal bone.
In secondary bone cancer, calcium (which helps to strengthen the bones) can be lost from the damaged bone and can seep into the bloodstream. When the level of calcium in the blood is raised this is known as hypercalcaemia and can cause symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, tiredness, irritability and sometimes confusion. Bisphosphonates can help to reduce high levels of calcium.
Secondary cancer in the bones may cause them to become weakened and in some situations they may break or fracture. Bisphosphonates can help to re-strengthen the bone and reduce the risk of fractures.
Cancer can affect the bones in different ways, and bisphosphonates are not helpful for all cancers that affect the bones.
Possible side effects of the tablets and of an infusion Drop in calcium levels below normal This is extremely rare and usually only temporary.
Increased pain Sometimes pain in the affected bone can temporarily become worse when you first take bisphosphonates. If this happens your doctor can prescribe stronger pain-relieving drugs for you until this side effect wears off.
Possible side effects of the tablets Feeling sick (nausea) or vomiting This is usually mild and can be well controlled with anti-sickness medication.
<end quote>
http://www.upei.ca/people/lopez/Bone-joints/Notes-bone/bone-notes.htm (long -veterinary, hopefully same for humans) There are three cell types in bone tissue admixed with an extracellular matrix.
1. Osteoblasts derive from bone-marrow stromal cells and their main function is to produce a protein called osteoid (bone matrix). Osteoblast activity is dependent on various stimuli such as parathyroid hormones (PTH), and vitamins C and D. Osteoblasts eventually become surrounded by mineralized bone matrix and become osteocytes.
2. Osteocytes reside inside the bone lacunae and are actively involved in the mineral resorption (osteocytic osteolysis) under the stimuli of PTH, vitamin D, calcitonin, etc.
3. Osteoclasts are multinucleated cells derived from blood monocytes (macrophages). Osteoclasts are actively involved in the resorption (lysis) of bone (osteoclastic osteolysis). Osteoclasts are found along the osseous surface undergoing resorption where they produce microscopic bone concavities known as Howship's lacunae. Cellular activity of osteoclasts is also dependent on various stimuli including PTH, vitamin D, calcitonin (negative feedback), PG2, osteoblast-derived factor, etc. <end quote>
So, Tim, on the breast cancer newsgroup posted earlier, that Zometa suppresses lysis. ( resorption of bone - presumably into the wrong part of the body)
Maybe I'm reading the above "wrong", but I think the calcium is both protective (of bone thinning or osteoclasts)...and may be helpful in the building/repair of bone (osteoblastic). So some of the pain may be coming from the "destruction" and some from the body's attempt to "repair".
J - not a medic, so anyone reading should check with theirs..
J - 29 Aug 2004 20:45 GMT > > Anyone have experience with zometa? what exactly does it do? > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Feeling sick (nausea) or vomiting This is usually mild and can be well controlled > with anti-sickness medication. It is important to tell your doctor if these effects develop as medicines can be prescribed to help. Sometimes taking half the dose of the drug in the morning and half in the evening can reduce the side effects. Occasionally the dose of the bisphosphonate may need to be reduced. Your doctor will advise you whether this is necessary.<end quote> J
J - 29 Aug 2004 08:25 GMT > Zometa is frequently used to stabilize the bone. <very very long snip> that was in (Part 5) J
|
|
|