Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Cancer / May 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

New breakthrough for Cancer Patients --  Lets hope  this  helps

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
drugspills.com - 08 May 2004 03:02 GMT
All Cancer Patients   LOOK at this
http://drugspills.com/celebrex.htm

Celebrex Has Marked Effect on Mesothelioma
http://www.drugspills.com/celebrexnews.htm
J - 08 May 2004 03:13 GMT
> All Cancer Patients   LOOK at this

yawn......
spammer..go spill your drugs somewhere else.
J
drugspills.com - 09 May 2004 01:36 GMT
Hey sorry if you think this is spam, But certainly this is a major
find on mesothelioma.

I will post article  for you sir.  If you feel this is not important
you should really read the facts before you Leap.

:) http://www.drugspills.com/celebrexnews.htm

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - The COX-2 inhibitor Celebrex, usually
prescribed for arthritis, has a marked effect on the asbestos-related
cancer malignant mesothelioma in lab and animal experiments, according
to a report from Italy.
Current treatments for mesothelioma have failed to alter its dismal
prognosis, the authors comment in the International Journal of Cancer,
but one selective COX-2 inhibitor has been shown to stop mesothelioma
cells growing in a lab dish.
This prompted Dr. Alfonso Catalano at the University of Marche in
Ancona and colleagues to assess the effects of Celebrex (a.k.a.
celecoxib) on experimental mesothelioma.
Celecoxib and similar compounds all inhibited proliferation of a
mesothelioma cell line without inhibiting the growth of a normal
mesothelial cell line, the researchers report. Celecoxib was the most
effective of the agents tested.
In mice implanted with mesothelioma, celecoxib treatment significantly
increased average survival from 45 days to 62 days, the researchers
note, and there were three long-term (more than 120 days) survivors
among the treated mice.
"These results provide the first evidence that celecoxib is effective
for the prevention and regression of malignant mesothelioma cells in
experimental models ... and strongly support ongoing clinical trials
in malignant mesothelioma patients," the team concludes.
SOURCE: International Journal of Cancer, April 10, 2004.

> > All Cancer Patients   LOOK at this
>
> yawn......
> spammer..go spill your drugs somewhere else.
> J
Socks the white house cat - 09 May 2004 16:47 GMT
Someday in the distant future, archeologists digging thru the ruins of
alt.support.cancer  will discover that dave@drugspills.com
(drugspills.com) had this to say on 08 May 2004:

> Hey sorry if you think this is spam, But certainly this is a major
> find on mesothelioma.

if you were really sorry that it was spam, you wouldnt have posted it.

also, please stop top posting

Signature

Sturgeon's Law as applied to discussion lists
Axiom #3: "Sturgeon's Law (90% of everything is crap) applies to discussion
lists."
Corollary #5: "In an unmoderated discussion, no one can agree on what
constitutes the 10%."
Corollary #6: "Nothing guarantees that the 10% isn't crap, too."

Sinead - 09 May 2004 18:25 GMT
> Someday in the distant future, archeologists digging thru the ruins of
> alt.support.cancer  will discover that dave@drugspills.com
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> constitutes the 10%."
> Corollary #6: "Nothing guarantees that the 10% isn't crap, too."

J and Socks

I hope this has worked!

Thanks for the help

Sinead
J - 09 May 2004 20:06 GMT
> <snipped other topic>
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Sinead

Sure did Sinead !
this is what we/I see
From: "Sinead" <Sinead@invalid.anon>
Newsgroups: alt.support.cancer

As a quick doublecheck, I went to my browser and typed in invalid.anon (try
that and/or if you ever want to change the part after the @ in your munged
e-mail) and confirmed that it is NOT a legitimate domain name. It it was,
I'd either get a valid website or some message like "this domain is up for
sale". So those aren't wise to use, they may cause traffic on their servers
and cause them to go hunting you down. But yours appears okay to use (and
why I suggested it).

So if you ever want to allow someone to e-mail you, you'd have to post
something like

clacyfeline at cwlittergsy dot catnet (remove the cat stuff and fix the
obvious)
or
clacycorvette at cwbuickgsy dot net (take out the cars and fix the obvious )

;-)

HTH
J
Socks the white house cat - 09 May 2004 22:23 GMT
Someday in the distant future, archeologists digging thru the ruins of
alt.support.cancer  will discover that "Sinead" <Sinead@invalid.anon> had
this to say on 09 May 2004:

> I hope this has worked!

more than adequate.

Signature

Sturgeon's Law as applied to discussion lists
Axiom #3: "Sturgeon's Law (90% of everything is crap) applies to discussion
lists."
Corollary #5: "In an unmoderated discussion, no one can agree on what
constitutes the 10%."
Corollary #6: "Nothing guarantees that the 10% isn't crap, too."

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.