 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Cancer / May 2004[Off Topic] Test for J. 3/3
Hello: I will post the same message to check in wich news provider you can read me. Regards, ?. Someday in the distant future, archeologists digging thru the ruins of alt.support.cancer will discover that "?.G." <a@a.com> had this to say on 03 May 2004: > Hello: > I will post the same message to check in wich news provider you can > read me. Regards, > > ?. If you posted a 2/3 message, it didnt get to supernews either. I saw 1/3 and 3/3 fairly quickly.  SignatureSturgeon's Law as applied to discussion lists Axiom #3: "Sturgeon's Law (90% of everything is crap) applies to discussion lists." Corollary #5: "In an unmoderated discussion, no one can agree on what constitutes the 10%." Corollary #6: "Nothing guarantees that the 10% isn't crap, too." "Á.G." wrote: > Hello: > I will post the same message to check in wich news provider you can read me. > Regards, > > Á. Thank you. I see Test # 1/3 and Test # 3/3 J Test messages are expressly forbidden by J's Charter unless "Ignore" is placed in the subject line. "Test messages are prohibited use alt.test instead and put "ignore" in the subject." http://www.cancersupporters.com/asc/charter.html#_Toc45613447 "May we never confuse honest dissent with disloyal subversion" Dwight D. Eisenhower > > Hello: > > I will post the same message to check in wich news provider you can read me. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > I see Test # 1/3 and Test # 3/3 > J > Path: uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-out1.nntp.be!propagator2-sterling!propagator3-cogent!news-in.nuthinbutnews.com!nsnmrro1-lo.nuria.telefonica-data.net!nsnmrro2-lo.nuria.telefonica-data.net!not-for-mail > From: "Á.G." <a@a.com> [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > Á. Using uni-berlin.de and 40Tude Dialog. I see 1/3, 2/3, and 3/3. Jerry Better? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daffman" <Daffman@yeah.right.com> Newsgroups: alt.support.cancer Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 9:16 PM Subject: Re: IGNORE [Off Topic] Test for J. 3/3 > Better? Is this alt.test? Upon rereading the Charter, it clearly says to use alt.test for test messages. "Test messages are prohibited use alt.test instead and put "ignore" in the subject." http://www.cancersupporters.com/asc/charter.html#_Toc45613447 btw- This message is classified by the author as an "occasional rant" made by someone truly touched by cancer and therefore legal under ASC Charter rules. Ranting and raving to vent frustration or a complaint. A rant is usually off-topic, but occasionally concerns one of our topics of discussion. There is nothing wrong with an occasional rant. http://www.cancersupporters.com/asc/charter.html#_Toc45613451 "May we never confuse honest dissent with disloyal subversion" Dwight D. Eisenhower > btw- This message is classified by the author as an "occasional rant" made by someone > truly touched by cancer and therefore legal under ASC Charter rules. > > Ranting and raving to vent frustration or a complaint. A rant is usually off-topic, > but occasionally concerns one of our topics of discussion. There is nothing wrong > with an occasional rant. Then how about you replying to AG's posts so that I can see them? J Poor J.....take care...hope the comp problems fix themselves....our phone company is on strike and I think it screws with my internet....ticks me off....hopefully yours will be better soon Salisha > > btw- This message is classified by the author as an "occasional rant" made by someone > > truly touched by cancer and therefore legal under ASC Charter rules. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Then how about you replying to AG's posts so that I can see them? > J J, Didn't realise you were still having techno. probs. - do you want me to reply to AGs posts so you can see them?? Hugs Alayne Someday in the distant future, archeologists digging thru the ruins of alt.support.cancer will discover that "Alayne" <totallyfake@emailaddress.com> had this to say on 04 May 2004: >> > btw- This message is classified by the author as an "occasional >> > rant" [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > Didn't realise you were still having techno. probs. - do you want me > to reply to AGs posts so you can see them?? I dont think the problems are J's, because other people, including me, reported a failure to see AG's posts under certain circumstances. There was definitely a problem with posts showing up. "Test for J. 2/3" didnt show up in Google Groups either, so there is something the matter with either AG's news reader or his ISP that was used to send that message. Since AG has other alternatives, I'd say that the problem was probably solved. SignatureSturgeon's Law as applied to discussion lists Axiom #3: "Sturgeon's Law (90% of everything is crap) applies to discussion lists." Corollary #5: "In an unmoderated discussion, no one can agree on what constitutes the 10%." Corollary #6: "Nothing guarantees that the 10% isn't crap, too." > I dont think the problems are J's, because other people, including me, > reported a failure to see AG's posts under certain circumstances. There [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Since AG has other alternatives, I'd say that the problem was probably > solved. Well, I hope I could have fixed it up. Now, I am going to read the whole rules and regulations about the newsgroup. I didn?t know tests were not permited. Anyway, not knowing the law doesn?t allow us not to follow it. Thanks, ?. "Á.G." wrote: > > I dont think the problems are J's, because other people, including me, > > reported a failure to see AG's posts under certain circumstances. There [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Á. I think the intent of that (newsgroup and in the Charter) is for newbies who just post a "test" message instead of an intro. In this case, it would have been (I think) possibly not helpful to all migrate over to alt.test, because we're all using different ISP's and newservers from different countries trying to make sure all of us see your posts here. All we'd be proving on alt.test is that we can see your posts over there. (I could be wrong). Anyhow I can see your post, J > Better? LOL Salisha!! Thanks for the laugh!! Hugs, Trish np :) Salisha |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.