 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Cancer / May 2004Block Senders (filter/killfile) - Suggestion on who to block
Sometimes one or more posters posts to this newsgroup and don't really belong here. To avoid upsets, block them, so you never see their messages. Do not reply to the persons mentioned in these "block messages" posts. It just makes things worse. (as you've perhaps already noticed). How to Block Senders in Outlook Express Highlight/select the post. click on 'message' between 'tools and help' at the top of OE... then click on block sender... from there it is automatically done... it asks you if you want all their messages deleted right now (yes or no) and voila... you will never see another message from that sender. or if doing it the long way of typing (or copying and pasting), block the following poster: poster name: Medical Watch Posting e-mail address: medicalwatch@myway.com For those using Netscape, in my (version of) Netscape, it's Edit, Message Filters on the menu at the top of the message window. J It doesn't work with you since you use cloak your idenity. I have more rules in my outlook box for you then I want to count. Please open a free account such as hotmail accout so those of us who want to block you can. > Sometimes one or more posters posts to this newsgroup and don't really > belong here. [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > J > It doesn't work with you since you use cloak your idenity. I have more rules > in my outlook box for you then I want to count. [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > For those using Netscape, in my (version of) Netscape, it's Edit, > > Message Filters on the menu at the top of the message window. I doubt if votes count much here and I am not sure they should. Use Groups are one place where we can vote with out feet, or more accurately with out typing fingers. I came here a month or so ago seeking advice and the experiences of others because my wife of 33 years had breast cancer. I have received what I was looking for, as well as some advertisements for alternative medicine. I already had more of that than I could use. If others want to try that, fine, but not me, and not (if she listens to me) my wife. My advice, for all who do not like this news group, leave it and find one you do like. There are plenty of them out there. You can find almost anything you want, I think. Just don't try to ruin what this one means to some of us. Gene > It doesn't work with you since you use cloak your idenity. I have more rules > in my outlook box for you then I want to count. > Please open a free account such as hotmail accout so those of us who want > to block you can. If you don't want to read my posts, don't. As soon as you see "poster" J, go to the next post. Besides, posters need to see my posts here, so if they contravene the Charter, they cannot claim that they were not warned (before being reported). J Jean, I am so confused this is an open group, there is nobody to report to...The internet police > > It doesn't work with you since you use cloak your idenity. I have more rules > > in my outlook box for you then I want to count. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > they cannot claim that they were not warned (before being reported). > J > I am so confused this is an open group, there is nobody to report to...The > internet police Your header says address complaints to abuse@comcast.net Your terms of service are: Acceptable Use (AUP) http://comcast.net/terms/use.jsp Amongst others there... "Violation of Acceptable Use Policy Comcast does not routinely monitor the activity of Service accounts for violation of this AUP. However, in our efforts to promote good citizenship within the Internet community, we will respond appropriately if we become aware of inappropriate use of our Service. Newsgroups Messages posted to newsgroups must comply with the written charters or FAQs for those newsgroups as well as any other terms and conditions applicable to any particular newsgroups or provider of newsgroups. Advertisements, solicitations, or other commercial messages should be posted only in those newsgroups whose charters or FAQs explicitly permit them. You are responsible for determining the policies of a given newsgroup before posting to it. Comcast reserves the right to discontinue access to any newsgroup at any time for any reason. Comcast permits users of the Service to download a maximum of one gigabyte (1GB) of newsgroup content in any one month, unless users are subject to a Service plan that permits downloading more newsgroup content. Comcast prefers to advise customers of inappropriate behavior and any necessary corrective action. However, if the Service is used in a way that Comcast or its suppliers, in their sole discretion, believe violate this AUP, Comcast or its suppliers may take any responsive actions they deem appropriate. These actions include, but are not limited to, temporary or permanent removal of content, cancellation of newsgroup posts, filtering of Internet transmissions, and the immediate suspension or termination of all or any portion of the Service. During an investigation, Comcast may suspend the account or accounts involved and/or remove or block material that potentially violates this Policy. You expressly authorize Comcast and its suppliers to cooperate with (i) law enforcement authorities in the investigation of suspected legal violations, and (ii) and system administrators at other Internet service providers or other network or computing facilities in order to enforce this Policy. This cooperation may include Comcast providing available personally identifiable information about you to law enforcement or system administrators, including, but not limited to, username, subscriber name, and other account information. Upon termination of your account, Comcast is authorized to delete any files, programs, data and e-mail messages associated with your account." J Jean. Let them decide who is inappropiate with your history on google.... You violate the beloved charter you hold, Get a life, alex > > I am so confused this is an open group, there is nobody to report to...The > > internet police [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] > > J who do I send it to to complain about you? > > I am so confused this is an open group, there is nobody to report to...The > > internet police [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] > > J Someday in the distant future, archeologists digging thru the ruins of alt.support.cancer will discover that "Alexandra Koffman" <akoffman@comcast.net> had this to say on 02 May 2004: > who do I send it to to complain about you? please quit top posting. if you cant figure out how to read headers to determine where to file complaints, chances are the complaint wont be well enough written to make sense.  Signatureofficially recognized SPEWS puppet ISO certification and everything I AM SPEWS (SLAPP PREVENTION ELECTRONIC WHITENOISE SYSTEM) snipped > During an investigation, > J The question or the fact is J wants the truth blocked!!! http://www.cancer-coverup.com/feature/default.htm chapter 1# How is my fat lady doing? I think you need a little more chemo I mean mustard gas!!!! doc > snipped > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > doc doc, You really need to stop sniffing glue and aerosols. Jerry roadmaster103@access4less.net said... > doc Are you the same doc who posts on alt.support.crohns-colitis? > roadmaster103@access4less.net said... > > doc > > Are you the same doc who posts on alt.support.crohns-colitis? No Emily. Different one. "Doc" and his style of writing and posting is different. (and he seems to always post with the same email address. BTW the "doc" here is not a doctor. (and has 3 at least different e-mails) J DownLoad@example.org said... > > roadmaster103@access4less.net said... > > > doc > > > > Are you the same doc who posts on alt.support.crohns-colitis? > > No Emily. Different one. I'm much relieved. I didn't think it was the same one; just wanted to check. The other doc (and I don't think he's a doctor either) is a really nice chap. > snipped > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > doc And you need my motorbike tyre.......... > > It doesn't work with you since you use cloak your idenity. I have more rules > > in my outlook box for you then I want to count. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > they cannot claim that they were not warned (before being reported). > J That's right J, and I'm one of many, who wait for your post's. Hugs, Jill > > > It doesn't work with you since you use cloak your idenity. I have more rules > > > in my outlook box for you then I want to count. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Hugs, > Jill I do too. Sorry I though you were a man! YIKES Lily Mae Someday in the distant future, archeologists digging thru the ruins of alt.support.cancer will discover that "Lily Mae" <lilymae@juno.com> had this to say on 02 May 2004: >> J <MeanMachine@example.com> wrote in message > news:<40957BEC.8BD750C2@execulink.com>... >> > they cannot claim that they were not warned (before being >> > reported). J [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > I do too. Sorry I though you were a man! YIKES > Lily Mae Same here. I propose that we add Sturgeon's law and its related axioms and corollaries to the charter as a tribute to the drifters in and out, rather than worry about taking them seriously. Anyone who would use a kiddie porn domain as part of his forged identity can hardly expect anyone to take him seriously. SignatureSturgeon's Law as applied to discussion lists Axiom #3: "Sturgeon's Law (90% of everything is crap) applies to discussion lists." Corollary #5: "In an unmoderated discussion, no one can agree on what constitutes the 10%." Corollary #6: "Nothing guarantees that the 10% isn't crap, too." > Someday in the distant future, archeologists digging thru the ruins of > alt.support.cancer will discover that "Lily Mae" <lilymae@juno.com> had [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > constitutes the 10%." > Corollary #6: "Nothing guarantees that the 10% isn't crap, too." What puzzles me is he is only targeting this newsgroup (so far). (according to the Google archives) We are not the only newsgroup who has a Charter. This is not the only newsgroup that posters tell others to block certain troublemakers and we're certainly not the only newsgroup who reports posters. Best to continue blocking him. I read about portals years ago and decided why go through a third party to get what I can find myself with many search engines. I'm not into bloatware. J Someday in the distant future, archeologists digging thru the ruins of alt.support.cancer will discover that J <Me333@privacy.net> had this to say on 02 May 2004: > poster name: Medical Watch > Posting e-mail address: medicalwatch@myway.com [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > J Except from addresses are easily forged, and medical watch will probably change his/hers once they realize whom they are associating with. myway.com is best known for harboring nigerian embezzlers and kiddie porn pushers. Or maybe myway.com will complain about his/her/its pulling down the reputation of their domain. For those using xnews, either of these headers in the score file will work for blocking logic even after med watch morphs, although consider blocking on the /24 for the posting host, since I think verizon has several: NNTP-Posting-Host: 4.47.143.104 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net myway would have a valid complaint to verizon based on the forgery of their domain name that results in spam hitting their servers, by myway is so heavily blocked for the kiddie porn spamming itself that it is harder than usual to develop sympathy for them. Signatureofficially recognized SPEWS puppet ISO certification and everything I AM SPEWS (SLAPP PREVENTION ELECTRONIC WHITENOISE SYSTEM) > Someday in the distant future, archeologists digging thru the ruins of > alt.support.cancer will discover that J <Me333@privacy.net> had this to [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > I AM SPEWS > (SLAPP PREVENTION ELECTRONIC WHITENOISE SYSTEM) You just created an enormous case of libel with the "myway.com is best known for harboring nigerian embezzlers and kiddie porn pushers" remarks. Path: nwrddc03.gnilink.net!cyclone2.gnilink.net!cyclone1.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!w n52feed!worldnet.att.net!216.168.1.162!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-post-02!sn-pos t-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <Xns94DDD38EB4B74agent01413mydejacom@216.168.3.44> References: <4094D1F1.8BB420AB@execulink.com> User-Agent: Xnews/06.01.10 IP:216.168.3.44 X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com let the fun begin........ [side note to news.admin.net-abuse.usenet - medicalwatch@myway.com is a known kook. This is his cartooney. Expect an early flameout] Someday in the distant future, archeologists digging thru the ruins of alt.support.cancer will discover that "Medical Watch" <medicalwatch@myway.com> had this to say on 03 May 2004: >> Someday in the distant future, archeologists digging thru the ruins >> of alt.support.cancer will discover that J <Me333@privacy.net> had [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > known for harboring nigerian embezzlers and kiddie porn pushers" > remarks. nope. truth is an absolute defense in a libel case. Further, people who actually file libel cases 1) dont talk about them on usenet first, and 2) actually have a reputation to damage I stand by what I said. Among the posts coming from myway.com posted on the net abuse groups: EMP/ECP Cancelled (Love-shack) ... Bush <bodhnd@midpoint.com> Hairy Bush <hairy@bush.com> Heavenly <akmkr@browngood.com> Helen <lc4790@myway.com> Helena ... Big a.s Fuckin Great Deal of a Porn Site! ... [email] News 610: Paris Hiltun Publishes Personal Porn Video ... Sat, 20 Mar 2004 15:55:41 -0800 From: Cara Julise <Sonice51uc@myway.com> To: Fkj <xxxx> Subject: News 610: Paris Hiltun Publishes Personal Porn Video Date: Sat ... news.admin.net-abuse.sightings - Mar 22, 2004 by 20040322- spam@moensted.dk - [usenet] Spam, BI = 4284.529 (Tom Bridges) Wed Jun 25 ... nospam@savetrees.com (!!!!ANNA NICOLE SMITH) 1 lc4790@myway.com (Helen ... Spam Cancel Report, BI = 8745.000 (Tommy): Fri Jun 13 ... 1 XXX PORN GIRLS DO IT ALL ... 17 dicksucker@whore.com (dicksucker) 16 nipple@lovers.net (Nipple Lovers) 16 c.nt@pumper.com (c.nt Pumper) 16 lc4790@myway.com (Helen ... As to the Nigerian embezzlers: [Email] UCE/419 no loss:Supply Contract To The Government Of ... ... Relevant abuse items: * Bulk, commercial * Nigerian advance fee fraud (419) * Sending software ... email addresses * Email dropbox: okata_mba@myway.com * Voice ... [email] GOOD DAY. ... NANAS 3a-04|" <0iqphvtnru0t@sneakemail.com> Reply-To: "olamartins-at- myway.com |NANAS ... An Irish ship consultant/contractor with the Nigerian National Petroleum ... [email] I need your urgent response. ... 80.179.101.195: abuse@012.net.il abuse@tmicha.net (Third party interested in email source) Contact email address for 419 spam: dan_duke2001@myway.com Network ... [email] PROPOSITION ... ec8a30cb@dclufghcyr> Reply-To: <drsdcvcwiog@myway.com> From: <drsdcvcwiog@myway.com> To ... 4.0 required; * 0.7 -- Message body looks like a Nigerian spam message 2 ... plug myway.com into http://us.openrbl.com, and get the following: Yep, blocked out the ying yang: AS: 208.45.133.0/24 AS14829 Iwon.com Irvington/New York Net 208.45.128-135 QWEST-208-45-128 Newark, New Jersey @qis.qwest.net Results: Positive=5, Negative=27 (2004-05-03 13:59:48 UTC) @ISP/blackholes.us: 208.45/16: 553 ISP QWEST - http://hatcheck.org/google?qwest; http://hatcheck.org/sbl?qwest [Blockparade] DRBL/drbl.all: 208.45.133/24: 553 DRBL weight: 0.8; vote.drbl.vsu.ru@ns.vsu.ru/0.8; Spam from blastdirect.com. 20020525. Blocked by blacklist-admin@vsu.ru BLARS/block.blars.org: INET 127.1.0.64 FIVETEN/excite.com.spam-support: added 2003-01-25; spam support - blastdirect is a division of excite.com SPAMBAG/excite: Blocked - see http://www.spambag.org/cgi-bin/spambag? mailfrom=excite I so look forward to discovery. I suggest that people buy their popcorn futures now before there is a run on them. People who threaten libel lawsuits qualify as cartooneys. People who actually file lawsuits don't discuss them on Usenet. SignatureSturgeon's Law as applied to discussion lists Axiom #3: "Sturgeon's Law (90% of everything is crap) applies to discussion lists." Corollary #5: "In an unmoderated discussion, no one can agree on what constitutes the 10%." Corollary #6: "Nothing guarantees that the 10% isn't crap, too." but, but...then our little nony would have to fess up to a real id..lololol > [side note to news.admin.net-abuse.usenet - medicalwatch@myway.com is a > known kook. This is his cartooney. Expect an early flameout] [quoted text clipped - 105 lines] > constitutes the 10%." > Corollary #6: "Nothing guarantees that the 10% isn't crap, too." ccctournament@yahoo.com phrocrew@yahoo.com ladiest@yahoo.com probivnoi@yahoo.com > > [side note to news.admin.net-abuse.usenet - medicalwatch@myway.com is a > > known kook. This is his cartooney. Expect an early flameout] [quoted text clipped - 105 lines] > > constitutes the 10%." > > Corollary #6: "Nothing guarantees that the 10% isn't crap, too." filk, this has all the earmarks of a budding bogue out! lololol naifs and newts please remain off the game board. mw - ever heard of Hanlon's Razor? you fit both ends of the theorem... > let the fun begin........ oh! it already has youngster, it already has... paul might i suggest that if youreally do work for any of the entities i listed, you might want to check with your higher authority before continuing... i rather suspect that a) they will encourage you to stop, or b) having no connection, you will find no support you really are not going to prevail - but if you wish to post such cartoonys, ok with me... paul > > Someday in the distant future, archeologists digging thru the ruins of > > alt.support.cancer will discover that J <Me333@privacy.net> had this to [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > let the fun begin........ I think Medical watch is starting to sound like porky pig....bada bada bdada tha tha tha that's all folks!!! hahahaha Salisha > Someday in the distant future, archeologists digging thru the ruins of > alt.support.cancer will discover that J <Me333@privacy.net> had this to [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > heavily blocked for the kiddie porn spamming itself that it is harder than > usual to develop sympathy for them. To: Salisha (Daffman), J, Paul, Jerry and their surrogates: Those who agree with "Socks the white house cat" <agent01413@my-deja.com"'s comments in the above post regarding Myway.com ("....myway.com is best known for harboring nigerian embezzlers and kiddie porn pushers"), please show your agreement with "Socks the white house cat" <agent01413@my-deja.com" by posting "Yes" in the reply Someday in the distant future, archeologists digging thru the ruins of alt.support.cancer will discover that "Medical Watch" <medicalwatch@myway.com> had this to say on 03 May 2004: >> Except from addresses are easily forged, and medical watch will >> probably change his/hers once they realize whom they are associating [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > "Socks the white house cat" <agent01413@my-deja.com" by posting "Yes" > in the reply except, unlike medicalwatch, please observe netiquette by snipping extranous parts of the post. Of course, you've probably already blocked s/he/sh.t, as I know will too. Sorry for the bleed over from replying to sh.t's post. It's good to know that I so easily got his goat. However, I promise to quit playing with the troll going forward. SignatureSturgeon's Law as applied to discussion lists Axiom #3: "Sturgeon's Law (90% of everything is crap) applies to discussion lists." Corollary #5: "In an unmoderated discussion, no one can agree on what constitutes the 10%." Corollary #6: "Nothing guarantees that the 10% isn't crap, too." and they said you had no principles...doffing the cap |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.