Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Cancer / April 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

E. coli used to enter and destroy cancer cells

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
MAC - 24 Apr 2004 16:28 GMT
<http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3646745.stm>

Last Updated: Thursday, 22 April, 2004, 01:32 GMT 02:32 UK

E-mail this to a friend    Printable version
GM bacteria used to fight cancer

E.coli was used to "smuggle" the enzyme into cells

A genetically altered version of the food poisoning bug E.coli could be
used to destroy cancer cells, say scientists.

Cancer Research UK experts used a neutralised version of the bacteria to
deliver a cancer-killing enzyme directly into the cells.

It provides scientists with a method of breaking through the previously
impenetrable barriers around the cells.

In tests using E.coli, over 90% of cancer cells were destroyed.

Using bacteria to treat tumours is an innovative new approach to the
problem

Professor Robert Souhami, Cancer Research UK

The bacteria were carrying an enzyme called purine nucleoside
phosphorylase into cancer cells.

It works in conjunction with a powerful anti-cancer drug called 6-MPDR.
The drug cannot be activated until the enzyme is inside the cancer
cells.

When researchers targeted mouse tumours with the bacteria and drug
combination , it appeared to slow down tumour growth and cause large
numbers of cancer cells to die.

'Efficient delivery'

E. coli bacteria are found naturally in the human gut and only a few
strains are harmful.

The research by experts at the Cancer Research UK Molecular Oncology
Unit at Barts and the London Queen Mary's School of Medicine and
Dentistry used a version of E coli that had been modified so it could no
longer grow, divide or cause disease.

Scientists added a gene called invasin, which gives E. coli the power to
enter human cells by passing through their outside membranes - which it
cannot normally do.

They also added a second gene, called listeriolysin O, which instructs
the E.coli bacteria to release the cargo it is carrying once it is
inside the cancer cell.

Dr Georges Vassaux, of the Cancer Research UK Molecular Oncology Unit,
who led the research, said: "It's notoriously difficult to get some
types of therapeutic molecule inside cancer cells, which is why we
turned to living organisms to do the job for us.

"With a few important genetic modifications, we were able to turn
bacteria into efficient delivery capsules, able to penetrate the outside
membrane of cancer cells and protect their precious cargo until safely
inside."

He said the therapy may also attack cancer cells a second way.

"We also think that introducing bacteria into a patient's body, albeit
harmless, neutered ones, will provoke the immune system and help to
direct it against the tumour."

Professor Robert Souhami, Cancer Research UK's director of clinical and
external affairs, said: "Developing new drugs tends to grab the
headlines, but equally important is the development of new systems to
efficiently deliver treatments to cancer cells.

"Using bacteria to treat tumours is an innovative new approach to the
problem and may offer the potential to target cancer cells with a range
of different therapeutic molecules.

"It could open up exciting new avenues of cancer treatment."

The research is published online by the journal Gene Therapy.

E-mail this to a friend    Printable version

LINKS TO MORE HEALTH STORIES
J - 24 Apr 2004 19:16 GMT
> <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3646745.stm>
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> The research is published online by the journal Gene Therapy.

I don't know if this is the most current
http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/medicine/genetherapy.shtml

What is the current status of gene therapy research?
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not yet approved any human gene
therapy product for sale. Current gene therapy is experimental and has not
proven very successful in clinical trials. Little progress has been made
since the first gene therapy clinical trial began in 1990. In 1999, gene
therapy suffered a major setback with the death of 18-year-old Jesse
Gelsinger. Jesse was participating in a gene therapy trial for ornithine
transcarboxylase deficiency (OTCD). He died from multiple organ failures 4
days after starting the treatment. His death is believed to have been
triggered by a severe immune response to the adenovirus carrier.

Another major blow came in January 2003, when the FDA placed a temporary
halt on all gene therapy trials using retroviral vectors in blood stem
cells. FDA took this action after it learned that a second child treated in
a French gene therapy trial had developed a leukemia-like condition. Both
this child and another who had developed a similar condition in August 2002
had been successfully treated by gene therapy for X-linked severe combined
immunodeficiency disease (X-SCID), also known as "bubble baby syndrome."

FDA's Biological Response Modifiers Advisory Committee (BRMAC) met at the
end of February 2003 to discuss possible measures that could allow a number
of retroviral gene therapy trials for treatment of life-threatening diseases
to proceed with appropriate safeguards. FDA has yet to make a decision based
on the discussions and advice of the BRMAC meeting.

What factors have kept gene therapy from becoming an effective treatment for
genetic disease?
[read the rest please]

https://web.princeton.edu/sites/lsilver/biotech/genetherapy/04ChinaApprovGT.pdf

First gene therapy medicine hits market this month The world's first gene
therapy
medicine Genedicine will hit the market in China this month, according to
top ...
But Peng refutes Genedicine was approved because of the allegedly looser
regulation
of the Chinese authorities, a sen- timent that is echoed by Peng Shang ...
<no idea what the rest says, because PDF's are too much for my computer
system>
J
Holden - 25 Apr 2004 05:51 GMT
<snip>

><no idea what the rest says, because PDF's are too much for my computer
>system>
>J

Hi J,

What symptom do you have with PDFs?  It sounds like your browser may
be crashing/locking up when it trys to open large PDFs.  Does saving a
large PDF to disk from a website work any better than trying to open
it from within the browser?  Just trying to help :-)  Take care.

Holden
J - 25 Apr 2004 17:43 GMT
> <snip>
> ><no idea what the rest says, because PDF's are too much for my computer
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> What symptom do you have with PDFs?  It sounds like your browser may
> be crashing/locking up

bogs down after page one or two, sometimes outright crashes my Netscape or
IE /lockups, have to power down, reboots, scandisk etc etc. major PIA. If I
know that it's only 2 pages, I'm okay but rarely do web pages indicate how
many pages are in the PDF's.

> when it trys to open large PDFs.  Does saving a
> large PDF to disk from a website work any better than trying to open
> it from within the browser?

Yes, I tried it and it works. Does that mean it's my ISP or dialup or phone
line? (if you know).
The only one I could change is the ISP - I'm stuck with the phone line and
dialup out here.

>  Just trying to help :-)  Take care.

Thank you. I created a folder for pdfs and I'll work with that for a while,
but I don't want to save everything I read or "scan through" to see if
there's something helpful to the question, so it's a bit of a PIA that way
also. Hence the queston above.
Thanks much for the tip.
You take care too.
J
Holden - 26 Apr 2004 05:36 GMT
>> <snip>
>> ><no idea what the rest says, because PDF's are too much for my computer
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>You take care too.
>J

Hi J,

Personally, I've never really liked to work with PDFs from within the
browser so I usually save to disk if I want to see the content.  Other
than that (saving to disk), I don't really have much else to suggest.
Whatever is going on though is most likely PC hardware/software
related rather than an ISP issue.

I'm assuming you're running Win95.  One thing to try is to be sure
that you're running the latest version of Acrobat reader that's
compatible with 95.  I believe that would be Reader 5.0.  Another
possibility is browser.  I run Mozilla 1.6 and have been very happy
with it.  It is very "Netscape-like" and is, if I'm not mistaken, the
program that Netscape is based on.    

Only other thing is to be sure to keep your hard disk defragged and
try to run with as much RAM as possible.

HTH

Holden
Jan den Hollander - 26 Apr 2004 07:15 GMT
> > What symptom do you have with PDFs?  It sounds like your browser may
> > be crashing/locking up
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> know that it's only 2 pages, I'm okay but rarely do web pages indicate how
> many pages are in the PDF's.

hmm... Mozilla 4.78? I have similar problems with my ancient version of
Netscape: it bogs down, not just on pdf files, but also web pages with Java
script on it. What I noticed is that even if you end out of Netscape that
there is some dummy process hanging in the background; you need to
cntr/alt/del to kill that background process; after you have done that
things return to normal.
Ultimately, the solution is to kowtow to Bill Gates, and download his latest
version of IE; I have version 6.0 on my compu, and that never gives any
problems. I believe it is a vestige of the old turf war between Netscape and
Microsoft.

Jan
Holden - 26 Apr 2004 23:07 GMT
>> > What symptom do you have with PDFs?  It sounds like your browser may
>> > be crashing/locking up
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
>Jan

Hi J,

If you should decide to go with an IE update, IE 5.5 SP2 is the latest
version thats compatible with Win 95.  It's no longer available on the
Micro$oft website but I did find a link:

http://www.petri.co.il/ie_55_sp2_info.htm

On this page it says that 5.5 SP2 is no longer supported.  That's not
true.  Updates for 5.5 SP2 are still available from MS at:

http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/downloads/archive/default.asp

One thing that may cause trouble though is the fact that Win 95 is no
longer supported by MS; so, any updates to IE 5.5 SP2 may not work or
may work unpredictably for Win95.  Running IE without the latest
security updates is generally a bad idea.  The same applies to the
operating system.

Have you thought about an OS upgrade?  Maybe Win98SE?  :-)  Seriously,
if you do want to look into this, the web page below should help with
info about how long '98 will be supported:

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=LifeAn1

Regards for now,
Holden
J - 27 Apr 2004 01:09 GMT
> Hi J,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> http://www.petri.co.il/ie_55_sp2_info.htm

I have sp 1
This might be a stupid question but there's a zip file there and an exe.
I'm d/loading the latter for 2 hours now and it says 6 more hours.
Was I supposed to d/load the zip or both?
I may have to crash out.
To be continued.
Thanks for your input. (and Jan too)
Gotta do some thinking on all this.
J

> On this page it says that 5.5 SP2 is no longer supported.  That's not
> true.  Updates for 5.5 SP2 are still available from MS at:
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Regards for now,
> Holden
Holden - 27 Apr 2004 04:40 GMT
>> Hi J,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>Gotta do some thinking on all this.
>J

Hi J,

"Thinking" a little on this may be a good idea. :-)  If you haven't
completed d/l of that large file, standby and I'll check it out.
There may be some other issues to consider.  Geez, this updating stuff
is like quicksand! :-)

Holden
J - 27 Apr 2004 11:13 GMT
> "Thinking" a little on this may be a good idea. :-)

I"ve been thinking and stuck in indecision for 4? years..hence why I've still
got Win95 (hehe)
The way I see it, if it works (for the most part) why mess with it? and/or
I'm dealing with knowns (problems) which I could be switching for new and not
so wonderful unknown (problems).
I saw someone on another newsgroup say "I've worked with computers for years
but I just can't handle it anymore".
That's the way I feel, yet letting someone else do it, they put things on I
don't want and don't put things the way I want and don't ask first.
Wait a sec ! Isn't that what MS does ? <smile>

>  If you haven't
> completed d/l of that large file, standby and I'll check it out.

I crashed out and d/l the zip file. However, just as it was finishing I
noticed it's "ie55sp2_nt.zip"
(I did not install it)
Does that mean it's for Windows NT? I've got more "crap" on my computer that
I don't know what it is !
If you say "yes", I'll delete it.

> There may be some other issues to consider.  Geez, this updating stuff
> is like quicksand! :-)

Everything seems to work quite well the way I've got things except the pdf's
(oh and receiving big files, like photos) and yes Jan - Netscape and Java,
but I use IE mostly for surfing.

I think what I'd need is two computers, this one, that's luddite and
minimalist and the other to do fresh installs and if there's mistakes, just
reformat and start fresh again. Maybe that's the answer, but it takes money..

How be I keep thinking about it for 4 more years ? <smile>  (ie don't worry
about it Holden, I'll have to figure it out some day).
J
Holden - 28 Apr 2004 00:23 GMT
>> "Thinking" a little on this may be a good idea. :-)
>
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>about it Holden, I'll have to figure it out some day).
>J

The 80+ MB file (ie55sp2.exe) is a self-extracting zip file that
contains "Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.5 Service Pack 2 and Internet
Tools".  This is apparently the complete installation files for IE 5.5
SP2 for Windows 95, NT, 2000, and ME.  In an earlier message I said
that this version of IE is still being supported.  As it turns out,
that is true, but only for Windows ME.

I haven't been able to figure out what the smaller ~3 MB file is.  The
fact that is has "nt" as part of the file name indicates that it is
probably something intended for Windows NT - probably recycle bin
fodder for you.

If you're generally happy with how things are running, it may be best
to leave well enough alone. I would hate to be the one that suggests
something that breaks your PC.  :-)

Best regards,
Holden
J - 29 Apr 2004 01:08 GMT
> The 80+ MB file (ie55sp2.exe) is a self-extracting zip file that
> contains "Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.5 Service Pack 2 and Internet
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Best regards,
> Holden

Thanks Holden, we have a plan, it's executing it (without me going without a
computer for maybe months) is the problem.  He says "leave the computer with me".
The last time I did that (we lived nearby so I could "nudge" him) 6 months later,
it was working but there were still things not right and still aren't to this day
!  Now we live a distance away so would not be able to drop by and "nudge" (daily
if necessary).
His 2 computers aren't working so I know what his priority will be OR he'll be
using my computer while he waits for his to get fixed. Either way, I would be
without.

Thanks for your help. Will figure it out...eventually.
Pardon my whining <smile>
J
Steph - 26 Apr 2004 18:21 GMT
> <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3646745.stm>
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> In tests using E.coli, over 90% of cancer cells were destroyed.

Interesting research, but that's all.
A single fraction of radiotherapy kills more than 90% of cancer cells too
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.