Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Cancer / April 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Diagnosis of colorectal cancer

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
J - 17 Apr 2004 20:00 GMT
<http://www.bccancer.bc.ca/HPI/CancerManagementGuidelines/Gastrointestinal/05.Col
on/5Diagnosis.htm
>

1) Clinico-pathologic Considerations

The diagnosis of colorectal cancer is based upon biopsy usually achieved
at sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy. It is particularly important that the
clinician define the level at which the cancer is found, as this may
have important bearing on subsequent surgical and adjuvant therapy. Any
patient with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer should have a complete
evaluation of the entire colon, preoperatively where possible, because
of the increased risk of finding additional polyps or cancers.

2) Diagnostic Pathology

The vast majority of colorectal malignancies are adenocarcinomas. Rarer
entities (carcinoid, etc) are dealt with in other sections of this
manual. On occasion, therapy may be influenced by knowledge of the
degree of differentiation present. The presence or absence of lymphatic
and vascular invasion in the region of the tumour is increasingly
thought to be of importance and may also ultimately contribute to the
determination of the need for adjuvant therapy.

The histologic report will consist of examination of the fixed specimen
and should include reporting of the cell type and degree of
differentiation, the maximal depth of penetration of the bowel wall ,
the proximal and distal margins, the circumferential margins,
involvement of lymphatics and blood vessels at the proximal, distal, and
apical mesenteric margins, and examination and reporting on lymph nodes
(preferably at least 6-12).

Non-lymph node deposits within the pericolic fat have the same
prognostic significance as involved lymph nodes and these deposits are
recorded as node deposits in the staging of the primary cancer. Patients
in whose specimens no lymph nodes are identified have a higher
recurrence risk than those with no involved nodes, probably by virtue of
understaging.
Jamo - 17 Apr 2004 22:24 GMT
<http://www.bccancer.bc.ca/HPI/CancerManagementGuidelines/Gastrointestinal/0
5.Colon/5Diagnosis.htm>

> 1) Clinico-pathologic Considerations
>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> recurrence risk than those with no involved nodes, probably by virtue of
> understaging.

J,
I want to thank you for this.
I've kept on at Google trying to understand exactly what is going on, but I
think I'm getting overwhelmed and confused by the number (and varieties) of
results that come back. I'm grateful for these posts that clarify matters.
Best,
Morgs
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.