Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Cancer / May 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Avastin question

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Joe-46er - 13 Apr 2004 18:30 GMT
I was on  the usual folfox regimen with a clinical trial of a med
named PZ something or other added. It is an angiogenesis (?)  med
that, like avaistin, prevents tumors from building their own capillary
system.

Anyway, my white cell count went through the flood into the basement
and I was immediately taken off everything for 5 weeks until my white
cell count went back up. But it didn't go up quite enough for the
trial protocol and I was taken off the PZ-?.

So I asked my onc if I could go on avastin instead. He said no, my
first and latest scan a month ago showed shrinkage of my tumors by 50%
and that avastin was not indicated in such a report.

I'm CRC stage 4 with mets to liver and near lung. The PZ-? program was
for someone exactly like me ... stage 4 CRC also on folfox. Isn't that
what avastin is also for?

I'm back on a modified folfox regimen that is many years old. I would
like to be on the latest cutting edge of treatment.

Thanks.

_________________________________

"Take a little 5FU, leucovorin and oxaliplatin for thy stomach's sake." -- 1 Timothy 5:23 (adapted)
J - 13 Apr 2004 19:42 GMT
> I was on  the usual folfox regimen with a clinical trial of a med
> named PZ something or other added. It is an angiogenesis (?)  med
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Thanks.

Hi Joe,
Well I searched Trials on Avastin and this came up.

http://www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/digestpage/bevacizumab
The National Cancer Institute (NCI) has temporarily suspended the enrollment of patients in a clinical
trial that is evaluating bevacizumab (Avastin™), an investigational antiangiogenic agent, for patients
with locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer who are no longer benefiting from standard
treatments. The study reached its initial accrual goal on October 31, 2003. Per the study protocol,
enrollment will be suspended until sufficient evidence of anti-tumor activity is demonstrated.

Based on an interim analysis in February 2004, there does not appear to be sufficient number of
responses to warrant re-opening the trial for additional patient accrual. However, patients already
enrolled in the study who have stable disease will continue to be observed for response to Avastin;
researchers expect the next decision point regarding the status of this trial in late March. If there
is evidence of clinical benefit and the agent is not commercially available at that time, the study
will re-open for enrollment.

This treatment referral center trial (TRC-0301) was developed by NCI's Cancer Therapy Evaluation
Program (CTEP) in collaboration with Genentech, Inc., the manufacturer of bevacizumab. The trial
enrolled patients who had previously received both oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapy
regimens, but were no longer benefiting from these standard therapies. Patients in the trial receive
bevacizumab in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin.

For information about clinical trials that are currently enrolling patients with metastatic colorectal
cancer, contact the NCI's Cancer Information Service toll-free, Monday through Friday, 9 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., at 1-800-4-CANCER (1-800-422-6237) for information in English or Spanish. The number for callers
with TTY equipment is 1-800-332-8615.

Also there's http://www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/developments/newly-approved-treatments
On February 26, 2004, the FDA approved bevacizumab (Avastin®, a trademark of Genentech, Inc.) as a
first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer - cancer that has spread to other
parts of the body. "

So does that mean if it's now approved for first-line treatment, that all trials have stopped?
I wonder if you can call the number above and ask?

There's others on that "newly approved treatments" list. They show the responses, the doses, the side
effects etc. (if you wanted to cut loose from trials and pay or insurance).

If the answer to above is "yes", (ie there's no more trials for newly approved treatments), that list
will tell you what you cannot get through clinical trials (I think).

Then the next question would be "what else is happening in clinical trials" to which your situation
would apply?
I don't know if this helps or not.
J
J - 13 Apr 2004 19:49 GMT
PS I forgot this about Avastin
http://www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/results/bevacizumab-and-colorectal-cancer0601
Other clinical trials have shown that a different treatment approach known as FOLFOX (oxaliplatin plus
fluorouracil plus leucovorin ) produces a similar improvement in survival compared to IFL, and is
currently used as the standard therapy for colorectal cancer patients.

So it seems to be saying that if that's the best you got with Folfox, you cannot expect better with
Avastin?
J
Holden - 14 Apr 2004 06:45 GMT
<snip>

>So I asked my onc if I could go on avastin instead. He said no, my
>first and latest scan a month ago showed shrinkage of my tumors by 50%
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>I'm back on a modified folfox regimen that is many years old. I would
>like to be on the latest cutting edge of treatment.

<snip>

Hi Joe,

I don't understand either why your onc says it's not indicated.  The
prescribing info says:

"AVASTIN, used in combination with intravenous 5-fluorouracil-based
chemotherapy, is indicated for first-line treatment of patients with
metastatic carcinoma of the colon or rectum.

There are no known contraindications to the use of AVASTIN."

You may want to consider consulting another oncologist if your current
doctor is unwilling to work with you and to clearly explain his
reasoning.

I'm trying to go the Avastin route myself and am running into some
insurance issues (i.e. insurance doesn't want to pay.)  I suspect that
you could eventually run into the same problem.  There is an entity
called Genentech Access to Care Foundation that helps "qualified
uninsured or underinsured patients receive proper medical treatment".
(Genentech is the maker of Avastin.)  You can find info on the
foundation and the application process at
http://www.avastin.com/avastin/reSummaryPro.m

Maybe there are other readers that might have an idea why your doctor
doesn't want to use Avastin?

Best regards,
Holden
J - 17 Apr 2004 00:07 GMT
> i Joe,
>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> Best regards,
> Holden

Hello Holden, Now I'm worried about Joe, haven't heard back.
Also wondering what your interpretation of "first line treatment" is?
(Perhaps steph will explain)
I thought it means "haven't had any other chemo before", OR the best chemo
for the cancer/stage.
If the former, he would not be eligible for Avastin?
I think Joe has to do clinical trials, if I recall (due to finances, but I
could be wrong on that).

If you run into him, please send him my best wishes and hugs.

J - Hoping for an update
brian walters - 17 Apr 2004 04:58 GMT
Avastin  Single Point of Contact  888-249-4918 The availability for the
uninsured or those whose insurace will not pay for the drug off label.
Some oncs are giving their patients the Avastin off label which are not
part of a clinical trial. Good luck !!! Been dealing with this disease
for almost five years now. Stage IV. It is NOT a one size fits all
disease and I learned to trust myself ... my gut feeling.. regardless of
other peoples intentions or negative feedback. At the end of the day, I
am the only one walking in my shoes except being carried by God part of
the way. In my travels, I have been put down for having the precision
radiation ... it will burn your liver, etc. ... called a harmless loonie
by some in this group. If I listened to others, it would be the BIG 5FU
for me ... five feet under. But thank you God, I am alive today. I have
a lot to be grateful for. Hope this helps in some way.     " All things
are possible. Pass it on. "
J - 17 Apr 2004 13:13 GMT
> <snip> In my travels, I have been put down for having the precision
> radiation ... it will burn your liver, etc.

I cannot remember that.

> ... called a harmless loonie
> by some in this group.

I do remember that and it was one person and I prefer not to name the person
because the person may someday be an important regular contributor to this
newsgroup. Mistakes happen. As I recall, you posted a link (without
explaining that it was not your story) and I concluded was your story. So I
contributed to what happened next. I'm sorry about that but will not watch
you make the story grow like the proverbial fish that got away. It was not
"some" but "one" person.
Please get over it OR use the energy to fight your cancer.
Whatever works for you.
Best,
J
brian walters - 18 Apr 2004 01:20 GMT
Thanks  J  I let go of it a long time ago ....what other people think of
me is none of my business. I focus on the good in my life and not other
peoples negativity. A very great  site for colon cancer is
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/suthercon/  The list creator (
Keith ) who was my friend, mentor and hero passed away this winter. I
really miss him ... he was there for me and I bounced different options
and opinions to him. I believe in alternative, complementary and
traditional treatments and have an open mind. Take care.
J - 18 Apr 2004 02:19 GMT
> Thanks  J  I let go of it a long time ago ....what other people think of
> me is none of my business. I focus on the good in my life and not other
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> and opinions to him. I believe in alternative, complementary and
> traditional treatments and have an open mind. Take care.

Actually I double checked (in the archives) and it wasn't even you being
referred to.
Sorry to hear about your friend Cliff.
Lowkey had the same diagnosis, conventional, survived same amount of time.
He's sorely missed.
J
Joe-46er - 27 Apr 2004 13:42 GMT
Sorry I've been absent from the group. Had another treatment yesterday
and consultation with my onc. I asked him again about Avastin. He said
that if I was psychologically in a frenzy over this, if it was going
to make my total treatment hurt, then he would prescribe it. But he
still went on record as opposed to it, saying that much of the
Genentech info is not quite accurate, and al lot of politicking going
on as the drug companies get bought up and sold in an eye-brow-raising
manner. Said he just came back from a weekend in Chicago on this very
subject and is as convinced as ever that his regimen is correct for
me. He went on to say that this may change if my next scan (5 weeks
away) shows resistance to folfox, but as long as there are positive
signs, he wants to continue as is..

--Joe

>> i Joe,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
>J - Hoping for an update

_________________________________

"Take a little 5FU, leucovorin and oxaliplatin for thy stomach's sake." -- 1 Timothy 5:23 (adapted)
Alex - 28 Apr 2004 17:14 GMT
> Sorry I've been absent from the group. Had another treatment yesterday
> and consultation with my onc. I asked him again about Avastin. He said
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> How are things with the insurance company ? DId you get that straighten out?
Good luck, wishing you well with your next scan. ALex

> >> i Joe,
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
>
> "Take a little 5FU, leucovorin and oxaliplatin for thy stomach's sake." -- 1 Timothy 5:23 (adapted)
J - 28 Apr 2004 21:04 GMT
> Sorry I've been absent from the group. Had another treatment yesterday
> and consultation with my onc. I asked him again about Avastin. He said
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> --Joe

Hi Joe, thanks for the update.
I'm leaning towards trusting your doctor since he seems to know information that's not readily
available to the rest of us and he's open to considering it later. Sounds reasonable to me.

I hope you continue to do well.

Joe, I just did more searches,
You may want to try here (I'm not subscribed) to see what they're saying/claiming
Genentech's Avastin Fails to Meet Main Goal in Trial said Tuesday that its Avastin cancer drug had
failed to meet its primary goal of prolonging survival in a mid-stage trial of patients with metastatic
...
www.latimes.com/ features/health/women/la-fi-genentech26nov26,1,2062966.story?coll=la-health-womens

Another, which I prefer not to post the source web page - check this with your doctor if it fits (or
worse) to what he knows.

"But is it really making a difference? It's making a huge difference in the profits for Genetech, no
doubt. The drug cashes in at over $4,000 a month for just one prescription! That could create hundreds
of millions in profits for Genetech over the next several decades as doctors prescribe this drug that
seemingly stops colon cancer. But does it really?

As it turns out, the drug is only marginally better than taking nothing at all. Even with Genentech's
own drug trials, the overall response rate to the drug was barely higher than the control group. In the
control group, 35% responded. In the Avastin group, the response rate was 45%.

And what does that "response" buy a patient? Does it reverse the colon cancer? Does it buy them a
lifetime of quality living without cancer? Hardly: it buys them an average of five months. That's it:
five months. They live five months longer than the control group. And during these five months, they
get to look forward to an alarming list of side effects like diarrhea, high blood pressure, suppressed
immune function, mouth sores, impaired wound healing, bleeding from the lungs, and even the formation
of holes in the colon.  [end copied text]

J
J - 01 May 2004 11:18 GMT
Hi Joe, to continue this thread, I've tried to find more "opinions" about Avastin (and esp Canadian) to
see what the thinking up here might be.....

so FWIW and perhaps (the 2nd writeup below is) why your oncologist wants you to continue for the time
being on the current protocol..
J

'   Breaking News: B.C. researchers find way to halt cancer's spread
Posted by: Achriel on Tuesday, January 20, 2004 - 12:35 PM
By Pamela Fayerman

B.C. cancer researchers have discovered chemical compounds that starve malignant tumours of the blood
supply they need to grow and spread, setting the stage for drug trials in humans with breast and
prostate cancers.

Depriving tumours of their blood supply -- or anti-angiogenesis -- is a popular field because it is
theoretically a less toxic way of controlling cancer. The function of vital organs is compromised when
tumours grow and spread to other areas of the body. With an anti-angiogenesis drug, the ideal scenario
is that it halts tumour growth and then chemotherapy and/or radiation can be used to finish off the
job, destroying any residual tumour tissue.

There is only one anti-angiogenesis drug (called Avastin) in advanced clinical trials after 30 years of
research pioneered by Boston surgeon Dr. Judah Folkman.

The new B.C. discovery, based on research in mice with prostate tumours, is featured today in the
medical journal Cancer Cell. The cover study is by B.C. Cancer Agency senior scientist Shoukat Dedhar
and nine other Vancouver researchers, including a few from the Prostate Centre at Vancouver Hospital as
well as some from a local biotech company called Kinetek Pharmaceuticals."

and this latter one is a general practitioner who works ("Wellness/checkups/followups is my
understanding) at the local Regional Cancer Centre and also has a web page, which I won't be posting
here.

"Avastin

   Traditional cancer chemotherapy’s main aim is to destroy cancer cells but it also kills healthy
cells in the process. Then a U.S. Navy Surgeon, way back in 1961 discovered a very important element in
the progression on clinical cancer. He called it “angiogenesis” and if refers to the process by which
cancer cells send out chemical messages that lure cells which create new blood channels for the tumour
to feed on. It’s taken over 4 decades for medical pioneers to develop a new form of cancer chemotherapy
called anti-angiogenesis therapy to which cuts of the blood supply to a tumour and, thereby, stops it
from growing.

   Very low doses of this therapy can shrink the tumours without the fatigue, nausea and hair loss
that often accompany standard chemotherapy. On February 26/04 the FDA approved the angiogenesis
inhibitor AVASTIN, which in company with mild chemo reduces colon cancer, for example, by 30 to 50
percent. In essence, the future treatments of cancer won’t consist of blowing up every enemy office in
a terrorist cell but just freezing their assets. Hopefully this may turn cancer into just another
chronic condition like diabetes.

   Almost everyone has tiny tumours in his or her body throughout their life but only 1% of these
tumours ever “switched on” through angiogenesis, like grapes creating their own vines. There are 30
know angiogenesis inhibitors in the average North American body versus over 70 in their Japanese
counterpart. Ironically the Japanese lose their protection from cancer when they begin to travel.
Down’s Syndrome patients, who carry an extra chromosome, rarely develop cancer except those from
testicular tissue, because that extra chromosome produces an excess of inhibitor called endothelin.

   Celebrex and Thalidomide are two older drugs used in different settings which have found a new life
as angiogenesis inhibitors. Potentially this will be the key that controls this dreaded disease."
J - 04 May 2004 18:52 GMT
> to continue this thread,

Accidental find...<no date on this article>
http://ovariancancer.jhmi.edu/recurrentqa.cfm
So what are the potential applications of these angiogenesis inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy?
The biologics probably aren't going to be very good at shrinking down bulky tumors, but again, with ovarian
cancer, there is the luxury with most patients, that at some point in time, they will be in a pretty good
remission with low volume and usually nondetectable disease. So the issues are, if chemotherapy is combined
with these, can we prevent that last .1% of cancer cells and prevent a recurrence? These could potentially
be used as either consolidation or maintenance after initial therapy instead of combining them to use them
sequentially. It might be possible to use them as primary treatment for low volume or microscopic disease,
and certainly for women who are felt to be at high risk. Maybe ultimately, these will be able to be used as
a preventive agent.

However, there are potential problems. When you interfere with the formation of blood vessels, you may
interfere with healing. So, certainly after a surgery this is probably not an appropriate thing to use. In
patients who have infections and have to heal, these may be problematic. There has been a higher instance
of vascular events, blood clots, phlebitis, etc. There's also a concern if blood vessels are blocked;
remember that chemotherapy drugs by and large get to tumors by blood vessels, that if you block blood
vessels, maybe you'll have antagonism. Maybe you'll prevent the chemotherapy drugs from getting to them.
So, again, we have to proceed cautiously in the trials with these agents.

One of the things that we know in cancer cells is that cancer cells have a number of genetic mutations. By
and large, the genetic mutations in cancer cells are characterized as oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes.
Cancer is highly associated with oncogenes, which are genes that cause cells to grow. These genes are
either overactive or in excess. Tumor suppressor genes stop cells from growing. Their loss is associated
with cancer.

Bert Vogelstein at our institution elucidates oncogenes and tumor suppressr genes with an analogy of a car:
Oncogenes are like the gas pedal in the car, tumor suppressor genes are like the brake pedal. If your gas
pedal gets stuck, your car will keep going even though we know that intermittently, your car should stop.
These oncogenes activate cells to multiply. Tumor suppressor genes do the opposite; they're analogous to
the brake pedal in our car. When tumor suppressor genes are lost, their normal function, stopping cell
growth, is lost. In cancer cells, both of these usually occur. There are overactive oncogenes, as if the
gas pedal is stuck, and you lose tumor suppressor genes, as if the brake pedal doesn't work. And that's
really what happens in cancer. In gene therapies, what we're trying to do is reintroduce these normal tumor
suppressor genes. In cancer cells, though, what we recognize is that many of the normal genes in the cell
have amplified these oncogenes, which may be targets for therapy.

This scheme just shows you the normal cells. What you can see is that there are a whole variety of these
oncogene products, things that you all may have read or heard about. They can be in the nucleus, they can
be in the cytoplasm of the cell, or they can be in the membrane of the cell. When they're in the membrane
of the cell, they usually have something that binds to them and that transmits a signal to the nucleus that
says replicate the DNA and grow. One of the things that we know in these cells is that when you have a
growth factor receptor (remember, these are things that stimulate cells to grow) that this is like a lock
and key. When you have the lock in the tumor cell and the key comes around, which is the growth factor, it
binds and it transmits that signal to the nucleus that says to grow. Not only in some cases do we have
extra keyholes made, extra locks made, but sometimes tumor cells will also make extra keys. They'll make
extra growth factors and extra growth factor receptors. This is that vicious cycle where a tumor cell can
continuously be telling itself to grow over and over again. One of the things we're trying to do is to
interrupt that signal. [end copied text]
J
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.