Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Cancer / April 2004
Colon Cancer
|
|
Thread rating:  |
MAC - 30 Mar 2004 02:21 GMT My mom just had a colonoscopy SAT and they found a tumor 10 feet in and couldn't proceed further. She had breast cancer 4 years ago and successfully beat that, it's in remission. She's 75 years old but is very active physcially and mentally, sharp as a tac and never tires. She can walk for miles. The only indication that something was wrong some blood in her stool about 3 weeks ago and that her recent blood test came back that she was slightly anemic. Her Oncologist called me today and it looks like Cancer from the scoping but we haven't recieved the biopsy yet. I love her dearly and I'm an emotional wreck over this. I don't want to lose her yet, she is so full of life. Anyone help shed some light on my distress? I've found it very comforting reading this NG the last couple of days.
Steph - 30 Mar 2004 03:44 GMT > My mom just had a colonoscopy SAT and they found a tumor 10 feet in and > couldn't proceed further. She had breast cancer 4 years ago and successfully [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > life. Anyone help shed some light on my distress? I've found it very > comforting reading this NG the last couple of days. Many people with colon cancer are cured by surgery...........
Emily - 30 Mar 2004 20:16 GMT steph@vancouver.island said...
> I love her dearly and I'm > an > > emotional wreck over this. I don't want to lose her yet, she is so full of > > life. Anyone help shed some light on my distress? I've found it very > > comforting reading this NG the last couple of days.
> Many people with colon cancer are cured by surgery........... ...Including my brother-in-law. He has a colostomy bag and reckons it's not nearly as bad as most people think. In fact in many ways it's given him his life back, because he'd had so much of the colon removed that food and stuff was going straight through him, giving him no respite from the 'little room'. The biggest problem he has, and it's one your mother won't have, is getting high waisted trousers to cover the bag. Your mother, if she finds herself in that position, can wear loose, drop-waisted dresses or she can fasten skirts higher up under her ribcage. Don't worry, chances are she'll be OK.
MAC - 30 Mar 2004 22:30 GMT Thanks all! Went to see her Oncologist for a consultation, and we were able to get an appointment today for a CAT scan. We faced the fear today and joked about it. Now waiting for pathalogy and CAT scan results. The only concern and anger I have is why didn't her Oncologist set up a colonoscopy the last 4 years since her bout with breast cancer? I did ask her Oncologist this and her answer was she was giving my mom a fecal occult test which was negative for blood last June! Was that prudent given my mom's history?
> steph@vancouver.island said... > > I love her dearly and I'm [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > fasten skirts higher up under her ribcage. Don't worry, chances are > she'll be OK. J - 30 Mar 2004 22:58 GMT > Thanks all! Went to see her Oncologist for a consultation, and we were able > to get an appointment today for a CAT scan. We faced the fear today and [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > test which was negative for blood last June! Was that prudent given my > mom's history? Hello MAC, Breast cancer is usually a hormone related cancer. Breast cancer usually spreads to bone, lung, liver and/or brain. Colon cancer is not (hormone related). One of the small bowel cancers might be.
So I think the way it goes, is fecal occult (probably annual for seniors), but every 5 years colonoscopy for those with a strong family history of colon cancer. (although this has been debated a number of times). The other I suppose is to monitor one's bowel movements and if there's a change, bring it to the attention of one's doctor without being neurotic about it, because as we age, our digestion changes somewhat and so too the bowel movements. But if there's a blockage now (for the scope), surely there were some earlier signs?
It's a tough balance to be on the watch for and catch early. Best, J
MAC - 31 Mar 2004 04:17 GMT Thanks! Went with her to get a CAT scan today after we consulted with her Oncologist. I looked over her blood test results and noticed her CEA was low, 1.6! Her Doc commented that was a positive sign. Does that mean it might not be cancerous even though it looked like it during the scoping?. or does it mean that it hasn't metasisized? is this a good sign? We are still waiting for the pathology report.
> > My mom just had a colonoscopy SAT and they found a tumor 10 feet in and > > couldn't proceed further. She had breast cancer 4 years ago and [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > > Many people with colon cancer are cured by surgery........... Steph - 31 Mar 2004 08:45 GMT > Thanks! > Went with her to get a CAT scan today after we consulted with her [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > that it hasn't metasisized? is this a good sign? > We are still waiting for the pathology report. CEA is a very blunt tool. Don't lend it too much weight
MAC - 31 Mar 2004 11:16 GMT I thought so. Thanks Steph
> > Thanks! > > Went with her to get a CAT scan today after we consulted with her [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > CEA is a very blunt tool. Don't lend it too much weight J - 30 Mar 2004 11:08 GMT > My mom just had a colonoscopy SAT and they found a tumor 10 feet in and > couldn't proceed further. She had breast cancer 4 years ago and successfully [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > life. Anyone help shed some light on my distress? I've found it very > comforting reading this NG the last couple of days. Hello MAC, Welcome to alt.support.cancer
I think it's normal to go into panic or shock to hear the word "cancer" (especially again), but if it causes you too much distress, do talk to your doctor. Sometimes a mild antianxiety might help you through, especially with sleeping. You want to be strong and supportive for your mother.
Dad's colon cancer was cured by surgery. He had no chemo after and no radiation but it must have been very early cancer and he had a Resection and colostomy. (sparing you the long version)
They'll likely run some pre-operative tests to make sure your mom's in good enough shape for surgery. After the surgery, there may be changes in bowel function, so I'm posting two web sites which explain a bit about both. http://cancerweb.ncl.ac.uk/cancernet/200008.html http://www3.mdanderson.org/depts/hcc/summer99/surgarticle.htm
Keep in touch and let us know when the pathology is in and the surgery schedule. J
MAC - 30 Mar 2004 15:34 GMT Thanks guys. I'm on 10mg Paxil now for a month to deal with my anxiety. Going in to see her Oncologist this morning to set up CT scan and surgery etc...will keep you guys updated. She's the kind of MOM who will stay strong so not to panic her sons, so you're so right I need to keep it togther. Best regards, MAC
> > My mom just had a colonoscopy SAT and they found a tumor 10 feet in and > > couldn't proceed further. She had breast cancer 4 years ago and successfully [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > schedule. > J Shardik - 01 Apr 2004 19:16 GMT MAC, Make sure a colorectal surgeon does your mom's surgery, not a general surgeon. Outcomes can be significantly better. There's also an excellent email support group with hundreds of been-there-done-that people who can be of tremendous support and information resource! It's only for colorectal cancer patients, caregivers, friends. Shar
> Thanks guys. > I'm on 10mg Paxil now for a month to deal with my anxiety. [quoted text clipped - 51 lines] > > schedule. > > J MAC - 02 Apr 2004 04:24 GMT THANK YOU ! with all my heart! I asked her GI and he told me the surgeon he's recommending has been specially trainned in TUMOR removal and is well qualified. Supposedly he has done many of these. However I'll make I'll make sure he has. I'll check the link below you provided.
> MAC, > Make sure a colorectal surgeon does your mom's surgery, not a general [quoted text clipped - 64 lines] > > > schedule. > > > J McHale33 - 04 Apr 2004 20:25 GMT Thanks for the insight! I just filled out an online consultation form for Sloan Kettering. The specilize in Cancer only and their surgeons perform high volume specialty surgeries. THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU!!!!
> MAC, > Make sure a colorectal surgeon does your mom's surgery, not a general [quoted text clipped - 64 lines] > > > schedule. > > > J Shardik - 01 Apr 2004 19:27 GMT Oops, forgot to post link . . .
http://listserv.acor.org/archives/colon.html
MAC - 31 Mar 2004 04:19 GMT I really appreciate it!!! THANK YOU! I will let you guy's know!
> > My mom just had a colonoscopy SAT and they found a tumor 10 feet in and > > couldn't proceed further. She had breast cancer 4 years ago and successfully [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > schedule. > J J - 30 Mar 2004 23:06 GMT > My mom just had a colonoscopy SAT and they found a tumor 10 feet in and > couldn't proceed further. She had breast cancer 4 years ago and successfully [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > life. Anyone help shed some light on my distress? I've found it very > comforting reading this NG the last couple of days. Did they really say 10 feet? (unless it varies and/or stretches when they do the scope? <rhetorical>) It says here (and most websites) that the colon is 5 to 6 feet long http://www.muschealth.com/ddc/organ/col.htm
hmmm...scratching my head over that one. J
MAC - 31 Mar 2004 03:54 GMT Yes 10 feet in! and he couldn't check the other 20 feet?
> > My mom just had a colonoscopy SAT and they found a tumor 10 feet in and > > couldn't proceed further. She had breast cancer 4 years ago and successfully [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > hmmm...scratching my head over that one. > J J - 31 Mar 2004 11:52 GMT > Yes 10 feet in! and he couldn't check the other 20 feet? Ok MAC, So it seems he's telling you he could not check the complete small intestine (which can't be done with a colonoscopy). When you're talking with him about the CT scan results, get clarifications because some people don't understand that there's the colon ( also known as large bowel or large intestine) and the small intestine, which is much longer. This one has a better image http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/screenforlife/terms.htm J
MAC - 01 Apr 2004 05:34 GMT Thanks for all your help, will do. Another question, will the surgery be tramatic and the recovery painful?
> > Yes 10 feet in! and he couldn't check the other 20 feet? > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > This one has a better image http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/screenforlife/terms.htm > J J - 01 Apr 2004 12:25 GMT > Thanks for all your help, will do. > Another question, will the surgery be tramatic and the recovery painful? Hello MAC, Get your pen and writing pad ready and start getting questions and notes ready, OK?
I"ve never had it and Dad was far away when he had his, only wrote and told me/us after. Dad was a partial paraplegic so perhaps he had less pain...but I expect they will help with meds if your mother has any. Dad had the open surgery (long cut through the muscle). Longer time under anesthetic, which has it's risks, longer stay in hospital, longer recovery. There's laparoscopic aka "key-hole" (probaby shorter time under anesthetic and less time in hospital) but here it says
http://www.jhbmc.jhu.edu/Surgery/gensurg/centers/ssat_coloncan.html Operative treatment consists of wide surgical resection of the involved segment of the bowel and its regional lymphatic drainage. Details vary with the location of the primary tumor. Primary anastomosis is possible in elective cases with a prepared bowel. In post-menopausal women, oophorectomy should be recommended because of the combined risks of micro- metastases and primary ovarian cancer.
This one leans towards laproscopic http://www.sls.org/patientinfo/colon.html (some of ) the risks are mentioned there
I think, regardless of what any poster tells you here about their surgery, it's indvidual to each person. After you get the CT results, discuss it with the surgeon what your mother can expect, the known risks etc. Maybe it's (partly) like real estate? location, location, location...and type of surgery
I've had 3 surgeries in my life and have a high degree of confidence in surgeons in Canada. However, for colon surgery, I would take a sheet with me and have "pros" and "cons" of each type of surgery listed. Then listen carefully to what the surgeon says about his plans, your mother's particular risks and ask questions (and take notes).
There seems to be some concern about laproscopic http://www.bupa.co.uk/health_information/html/health_news/160102cancer.html "The question [being asked in these trials] is whether laparoscopy can be as good an operation and be as effective in curing the patient [as open surgery]"
The other thing I would ask is if they can get a good view (and remove) as many lymph nodes as they should with the laproscopic. And whether they can get a good view of possible mets elsewhere (nearby).
Maybe Peter Moran would have some input if he's reading? I think what one of the doctors said recently is that some of the newer surgeons aren't very experienced with the open type of surgery because they may be doing (and/or trained) with the laparoscopic type. So if that's the case with your surgeon (I don't usually believe in getting a 2nd opinion), but in this case, if he has a colleague who is experienced in the open type of surgery, you may want to ask for a consult to hear two views about it. Of course, some depends on the urgency. You don't want to wait too long if she's starting to obstruct and/or not eating.
Hope this helps some. I'm not an expert J
J
clacy - 01 Apr 2004 13:49 GMT > > Thanks for all your help, will do. > > Another question, will the surgery be tramatic and the recovery painful? [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > > There seems to be some concern about laproscopic http://www.bupa.co.uk/health_information/html/health_news/160102cancer.html
> "The question [being asked in these trials] is whether laparoscopy can be as > good an operation and be as effective in curing the patient [as open surgery]" [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > J Mac,
My dad had Duke's C+. His tumour was colo-rectal. He had the surgery, which left him with a colostomy bag (permanently). The surgery didn't seem too bad. He was up and walking the next day, and I can honestly tell you he was in much more pain before the operation, from the tumour.
This operation was followed by chemo and 6 weeks radiation, which had to be given on mainland England, so he was on his own from day-to-day. He said that it was ok at the start, but hurt towards the end of the course, whereas the chemo was awful.
Christmas 2003 Dad was given the all-clear. It came back in July, and he died on 18th Sept 2003. The op/chemo/radiation may or may not have given us extra time - we shall never know if it would have been shorter with out it. But it was his decision to do it and his when he decided to stop.
I wish you and your family all the very,very best. And remember, if you ask your doctors to tell you the truth, generally they will.
Sinead
MAC - 02 Apr 2004 04:17 GMT Thanks for the info, much appreciated! Just spoke with the GI who did her colonoscopy and the tumor is big. He's afraid it will cause obstruction and surgery should be performed ASAP. Because of the size of the tumor Laparoscopic surgery is out of the question according to him. My MOM feels great and she passed stools today about the size of her index finger she explained. Does the size of the Tumor have any correlation to metastasis? Or does the size mean it spread outside the inner colon to the outer layers? or God forbid beyond? I'm sorry to ask so many questions, maybe I'm driving myself crazy!
> > Thanks for all your help, will do. > > Another question, will the surgery be tramatic and the recovery painful? [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > > There seems to be some concern about laproscopic http://www.bupa.co.uk/health_information/html/health_news/160102cancer.html
> "The question [being asked in these trials] is whether laparoscopy can be as > good an operation and be as effective in curing the patient [as open surgery]" [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > J MAC - 02 Apr 2004 04:20 GMT PS tommorrow I should get CAT results, will keep you guys informed.
> Thanks for the info, much appreciated! > Just spoke with the GI who did her colonoscopy and the tumor is big. He's [quoted text clipped - 65 lines] > > > > There seems to be some concern about laproscopic http://www.bupa.co.uk/health_information/html/health_news/160102cancer.html
> > "The question [being asked in these trials] is whether laparoscopy can be > as [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > > > J J - 02 Apr 2004 21:21 GMT > PS tommorrow I should get CAT results, will keep you guys informed. Keep us updated, MAC I'm reading but suspect that the doctors and/or the surgery will answer (most of) your questions. Best, J
MAC - 03 Apr 2004 02:34 GMT I can't scan and copy so I'll type it out: CT Abdomen and Pelvis: with contrast -------------------------------------------------------- Serial axial sections of the abdomen were obtained etc.... The liver is normal in overall size wothout focal abnormality. The spleen is not enlarged. The pancreas is unremarkable. There are no adrenal masses. The kidneys have a normal contrast-enhanced morphology without hydronephrosis. There is no retroperitoneal adenopathy. Sections thru the pelvis show no peivic mass or adenopathy. Sigmoid diverticulosis is noted. There is focal thickening of the wall of the proximal to mid sigmoid. The fat planes around the area are grossly clear. There are no hernias. IMPRESSION: Suspicious thick-walled segment of the proximal sigmoid colon with diverticulosis noted in the area. Correlation with the clinical picture recommended to determine whether this represents a tumor. No metastic process identified.
> > PS tommorrow I should get CAT results, will keep you guys informed. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Best, > J MAC - 03 Apr 2004 02:35 GMT wishful thinking on my part but could this just be diverticulosis? I can't scan and copy so I'll type it out: CT Abdomen and Pelvis: with contrast -------------------------------------------------------- Serial axial sections of the abdomen were obtained etc.... The liver is normal in overall size wothout focal abnormality. The spleen is not enlarged. The pancreas is unremarkable. There are no adrenal masses. The kidneys have a normal contrast-enhanced morphology without hydronephrosis. There is no retroperitoneal adenopathy. Sections thru the pelvis show no peivic mass or adenopathy. Sigmoid diverticulosis is noted. There is focal thickening of the wall of the proximal to mid sigmoid. The fat planes around the area are grossly clear. There are no hernias. IMPRESSION: Suspicious thick-walled segment of the proximal sigmoid colon with diverticulosis noted in the area. Correlation with the clinical picture recommended to determine whether this represents a tumor. No metastic process identified.
"J" <FaithBlind@invalid.nul> wrote in message news:406DCB42.A4E77B27@execulink.com... > > > PS tommorrow I should get CAT results, will keep you guys informed. > > > > Keep us updated, MAC > I'm reading but suspect that the doctors and/or the surgery will answer (most > of) your questions. > Best, > J >
MAC - 03 Apr 2004 02:55 GMT Pathology report: A)Left colon Biopsy: Invasive moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma I can't scan and copy so I'll type it out: CT Abdomen and Pelvis: with contrast -------------------------------------------------------- Serial axial sections of the abdomen were obtained etc.... The liver is normal in overall size wothout focal abnormality. The spleen is not enlarged. The pancreas is unremarkable. There are no adrenal masses. The kidneys have a normal contrast-enhanced morphology without hydronephrosis. There is no retroperitoneal adenopathy. Sections thru the pelvis show no peivic mass or adenopathy. Sigmoid diverticulosis is noted. There is focal thickening of the wall of the proximal to mid sigmoid. The fat planes around the area are grossly clear. There are no hernias. IMPRESSION: Suspicious thick-walled segment of the proximal sigmoid colon with diverticulosis noted in the area. Correlation with the clinical picture recommended to determine whether this represents a tumor. No metastic process identified.
"J" <FaithBlind@invalid.nul> wrote in message news:406DCB42.A4E77B27@execulink.com... > > > PS tommorrow I should get CAT results, will keep you guys informed. > > > > Keep us updated, MAC > I'm reading but suspect that the doctors and/or the surgery will answer (most > of) your questions. > Best, > J >
Steph - 03 Apr 2004 03:29 GMT Pathology report: A)Left colon Biopsy: Invasive moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma
You answered your own question. Of course it's not diverticulosis. It's colon cancer, but surgery may be curative
MAC - 03 Apr 2004 04:30 GMT Thanks Steph, Judging from the CAT scan report it looks like it's localized. It's the best of a bad situation, no other organs are affected right now. Hopefully there's no lymp node involvement and she won't need chemo. All point to a curative outcome.
Best Regards to ALL! MAC
"MAC" <vze2q4m4@verizon.net> wrote in message news:CQobc.477$_K3.238@nwrdny01.gnilink.net... Pathology report: A)Left colon Biopsy: Invasive moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma
You answered your own question. Of course it's not diverticulosis. It's colon cancer, but surgery may be curative
Alayne - 02 Apr 2004 07:31 GMT > Thanks for the info, much appreciated! > Just spoke with the GI who did her colonoscopy and the tumor is big. He's [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > forbid beyond? > I'm sorry to ask so many questions, maybe I'm driving myself crazy! No, you're not driving yourself crazy - you are just dealing with something tough!
Take one step at a time, be positive and don't think of tommorrows.
Alayne
J - 17 Apr 2004 01:38 GMT > Does the size of the Tumor have any correlation to metastasis? Or does the > size mean it spread outside the inner colon to the outer layers? or God > forbid beyond? <big snip> Have they done other tests to watch for (or rule out) mets in the lung or the liver? Best J
MAC - 17 Apr 2004 05:26 GMT A Cat Scan was done and all looks good. Her liver, kidneys, look good. The scans show all her organs are fine, no tumors anywhere but in her mid-sigmoid colon.No metastatic process identified. I guess next thing she will need is a chest x-ray?
> > Does the size of the Tumor have any correlation to metastasis? Or does the > > size mean it spread outside the inner colon to the outer layers? or God [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Best > J Jamo - 17 Apr 2004 06:39 GMT > A Cat Scan was done and all looks good. Her liver, kidneys, look good. > The scans show all her organs are fine, no tumors anywhere but in her [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Best > > J I'm curious about this as well. My husband's Cat scan was fine outside of his pelvic area. His surgeon wants an MRI to confirm it. Would an x-ray be more conclusive?
MAC, has your mum's doctor recommended a closer look to confirm there aren't any potential problems?
Best, Morgs
J - 17 Apr 2004 12:49 GMT > "MAC" <vze2q4m4@verizon.net> wrote in message > > A Cat Scan was done and all looks good. Her liver, kidneys, look good. [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > his pelvic area. His surgeon wants an MRI to confirm it. Would an x-ray be > more conclusive? I don't think so. MAC did not clarify what area of his mother that the CT scan covered. In addition, MAC"s mother previously had breast cancer which was treated. In addition, they're planning on looking "further downstream" since they did not get a good look the first time. So I "threw it in" for good measure for MAC to ask about. I don't believe in doing too many investigations, however if they were to find something in the lung area, it might affect the decision making process.
> MAC, has your mum's doctor recommended a closer look to confirm there aren't > any potential problems? So I'll have to leave that for MAC to clarify as to which tests she's already had and ask the doctors if they've "covered all the bases" (as you say above). and Thank you ! PS Sorry if I'm confusing you with my posts. J
MAC - 17 Apr 2004 16:07 GMT > > "MAC" <vze2q4m4@verizon.net> wrote in message > > > A Cat Scan was done and all looks good. Her liver, kidneys, look good. [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > PS Sorry if I'm confusing you with my posts. > J CT Abdomen and Pelvis (with contrast) was done, all was normal other than a suspicious thick walled segment of the proximial sigmoid colon. This is her cancer first identified during colonoscopy. No metastatic process identified. She is going in for another colonoscopy on Monday April 19 to look past this tumor at the rest of her digestic tract. I'm really pissed the first Doctor said it was blocked and couldn't procced any further. It's prudent to have this procedure done so we don't find any further problems which can be corrected during surgery and not require another surgery months from now.
MAC - 17 Apr 2004 16:10 GMT > Have they done other tests to watch for (or rule out) mets in the lung or the > liver? > Best > J Yes the cat scan of pelvis and abdomen. I'll ask about the x-ray of the lungs but the most likely mets would be to the liver and that's normal. I'm sure if the liver was suspect they would have ordered up a chest x-ray.
Simm Webb - 02 Apr 2004 05:11 GMT Many years ago my wife contracted such a tumor, which was discovered by bloody stools. The surgeon would not even let her have time for her birthday which was 4 days off. She was operated the next morning. The surgeon approached me after the operation, and told me that She had removed about a foot of colon from the transverse colon, and that the cancer had not penetrated the colon wall. She then spent her time in recovery, and then at her room, I met her. She saw me and asked me if I had been there all the time, and I replied that no I wasn't there, because I had gone out to spend the morning with hookers. My wife then, even in her drugged stupor looked at the aids and exclaimed "He cannot afford them." When her birthday did arrive, the family gathered and we went to the Clinic (Cleveland) and had a party in her room. We bribed the nurses staff with birthday cake and everyone, especially my wife had a wonderful time. No further treatment was necessary. However, she passed away suddenly in 1999 from something somewhat related to a broken ankle. Anyway, you asked if the surgery was traumatic? Well, while they were in the area, they repaired an umbilical hernia, removed the appendix, and threw in a tummy tuck. My wife spent a couple extra days in the hospital, because of an infection, but she appeared to have no pain at the recovery. From my own experience a month ago, you will have absolutely NO pain, at least until you wake up. I did not have that much pain from my kidney operation, and I have 2 weeks to go before they will consider my healed.. Please, the one thing that got me through my time a month ago was half of the town was praying for me, as well as many people I dealt with. However, in my case, I awoke to cheers and congratulations because, while I was asleep, my daughter presented me with a granddaughter. The recovery staff appeared elated to give me the good news. One other thing, I went under, and in my personal perspective, I was under for only about 10 seconds. I was awake (6 hours later) immediately.
I send my prayers, and hope that this problem has a successful end.
>Thanks for all your help, will do. >Another question, will the surgery be tramatic and the recovery painful? [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/screenforlife/terms.htm >> J Grateful to be back.
Eddie
MAC - 02 Apr 2004 05:25 GMT Thank you for the uplifting post. I'm hoping the cancer hasn't penetrated the wall either. I don't think it has is my gut feeling after reading your wife's experience.
> Many years ago my wife contracted such a tumor, which was discovered by bloody > stools. The surgeon would not even let her have time for her birthday which was [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] > > Eddie
|
|
|