Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Breast Cancer / March 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Woohoo!  Markers down!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
allan grossman - 25 Mar 2004 13:40 GMT
Hi, guys -

We went to see Dr. Smiley yesterday and after half a dozen weeks of
Herceptin Deborah's CEA has dropped from 4.9 to 4.6 and her CA15-3
from 61 to 41.

I was a bit skeptical about Herceptin working a second time around but
it appears to be doing the trick.  We added Navelbine to the mix now
so we're officially back on chemo but so far results are promising.

Deborah was a little tired after treatment but is okay so far.  The
day after Herceptin is usually worst for the slight allergic reaction
she's had and Dr. Smiley couldn't really explain why she's reacting
this time and didn't three years ago but each treatment seems to get a
little easier.

Anyway, life is good.  So far we're still hitting this thing with
everything we've got - so Deborah is taking daily Arimidex and monthly
Zoladex in addition to weekly Herceptin and Navelbine on day 1 and 8
of a 21 day cycle.

I guess there's still a bit of fight left in the girl.  We really
needed some good news.

The only down side was re Deborah's dental implants.  Dr, Smiley and
Deborah's oral surgeon decided not to do the implants anytime soon so
she's kinda stuck with a couple of plates instead of the high-tech
stuff she had planned.  Maybe we can revisit this when we get off
chemo.

But all in all, woohoo!
L Bucciarelli - 25 Mar 2004 14:28 GMT
allan,

Thanks so much for sharing this good news.  I'm thrilled for you and
Deborah.

Praying that it continues!
Take care.
...lisa
Mary Fisher - 25 Mar 2004 15:08 GMT
> Hi, guys -
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> But all in all, woohoo!

I'm very, very pleased for you both. Bugger the implants, they can wait.

Love,

Mary
Barb - 25 Mar 2004 22:34 GMT
> Hi, guys -
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> But all in all, woohoo!

Hi Allan,
It sure is great to hear that Deborah is doing ok on the current regimen and
that the markers are showing improvement!  Give her my best wishes and most
positive thoughts for continued good result.  Take good care of each other!

Barb
alexk - 26 Mar 2004 01:45 GMT
Wonderful news ! A co worker had surgery for implants a month ago and still
not back to work yet!

> Hi, guys -
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> But all in all, woohoo!
Kaye301 - 29 Mar 2004 14:35 GMT
<< We went to see Dr. Smiley yesterday and after half a dozen weeks of
Herceptin Deborah's CEA has dropped from 4.9 to 4.6 and her CA15-3
from 61 to 41.

I was a bit skeptical about Herceptin working a second time around but
it appears to be doing the trick.  We added Navelbine to the mix now >>

Allan, that's fantastic--so glad to hear.  I wasn't skeptical about the
Herceptin and Navelbine working again--'cause it had still been working at the
time it was discontinued, wasn't it?  I might have been skeptical had it
stopped working back then.  However, I have heard of chemo drugs still working
on some of the cancer cells s even if they still don't work on all of 'em.  It
is such an individual and 'tricky' disease to treat.  One size does NOT fit
all....
Kaye301 - 29 Mar 2004 14:38 GMT
Allan wrote: <<  CA15-3
from 61 to 41. >>

Just wondering if you knew what the difference was between CA 15-3 and CA
27.29.  I  know that some dr'/hospitals measure the latter instead of the
former--but was not able to find out how they were actually different, if at
all, in terms of what is actually being assessed.   I am not even sure why a
swich was made unless they are the same and one test is less expensive to run
than the other???
allan grossman - 30 Mar 2004 01:54 GMT
>Just wondering if you knew what the difference was between CA 15-3 and CA
>27.29.  I  know that some dr'/hospitals measure the latter instead of the
>former--but was not able to find out how they were actually different, if at
>all, in terms of what is actually being assessed.   I am not even sure why a
>swich was made unless they are the same and one test is less expensive to run
>than the other???

They measure two different proteins but the normal range is the same
(0-29 mcg/ml).  Here's an interesting read -

http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/full/45/5/630

Signature

we see things not as they are, but as we are.
-- Anais Nin

A. P. Thorsen - 29 Mar 2004 18:48 GMT
> Hi, guys -
>
> We went to see Dr. Smiley yesterday and after half a dozen weeks of
> Herceptin Deborah's CEA has dropped from 4.9 to 4.6 and her CA15-3
> from 61 to 41.

Yay, Yay, YAY, *YAY*!

<cheerleader> Beat it back, beat it back, waaaaaaay back! </cheerleader>

This is great news; thanks for sharing.  Here's hoping for more of the
same, and better, in weeks to come.

Best to you both,

Ann T.
Remove 'dontsendspam' from address to reply by email
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.