Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Breast Cancer / January 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Answers needed

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
mag - 25 Jan 2004 14:14 GMT
Hello! Someone newly diagnosed with "Colloid carcinoma or Mucinous
carcinoma" in the breast is in need of info. Anyone out there with that?
The lump was removed. Next step is Sentinel Lymph Node biopsy and radiation.
1) Can an MRI spot whether or not it has gone beyond the mass membrane?
2) Mammostat: Is putting a tube in the lump and injecting it with
radiation 2x a day for 5 days as effective as radiating the breast for 3
or 6 wks? Is it painful?
3) Is radiation always necessary after a lumpectomy?
4) What are the chances it can recur in the same or other breast?
5) Would a masectomy eliminate all chances of reoccurrance?
6) Can a colloid carcinoma occur elsewhere?
7) Does anyone know what's in MAC (Managed Anesthesia Cure). This person
got a migraine and nausea for 2 days afterwards. Is there an anesthesis
info website or newsgroup?
8) What makes the body produce an excessive amount of estrogen (the
cause for this)
9) What treatment alternatives are available (Essiac? Flaxseed oil? A
mushroom immune booster?)
    Thanks. Send replies to:         mag@sover.net
alexk - 25 Jan 2004 16:10 GMT
Colliod carcinoma of the breast in one of the rarer forms of breast cancer.
The good news is that it is slow growing. Your MRI question I didn't
understand ? are you asking if the tumor has spread ? It can sometimes
detect but it is not 100% accurate. Mammostat is a fairly new procedure and
the studies have shown it is as effective but due to newest of the procedure
it doesn't have  the numbers to show it as equal  traditional radiation.
The chances are always higher once a woman has been diagnosed for a
secondary cancer but for an accurate assessment you need to check with your
oncologist. With lumpectomy you always have a chance of  a local recurrence
which is about 8-30% with mastectomy it is rare to have reccurence since
most of the breast tissue has been removed. As far as recurrence - you need
to ask your doc, who will look at the total equation, tumor size, estrogen
status, node status, etc.
Estrogen , is your tumor estrogen positive ( not all are ) ? And I don't
know if it is excessive amount estrogen or just a tumor that responds tp
estrogen.
Radiation is always necessary after removal otherwise your tumor will recur.
Don't knwo anytihing about migraines.
ALex

> Hello! Someone newly diagnosed with "Colloid carcinoma or Mucinous
> carcinoma" in the breast is in need of info. Anyone out there with that?
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> mushroom immune booster?)
> Thanks. Send replies to:         mag@sover.net
Kaye301 - 25 Jan 2004 16:37 GMT
mag wrote: << 3) Is radiation always necessary after a lumpectomy?
5) Would a masectomy eliminate all chances of reoccurrance? >>

Radiation significantly reduces risk of local recurrence after lumpectomy.
Latest research now suggests that radiation after mastectomy also further
lowers risk of recurrence.

<< 4) What are the chances it can recur in the same or other breast?

It depends on the type of cancer as well as variations of that type of cancer
itself.  There is no way to predict with 100% certainty. As far as chances--if
there is a chance of it occuring 25% and you are the one that it happens
to--then your chance was 100%.  Statistically, you should not get breast
cancer--the highest incidence reported in some areas is  out of 8 which is
12.5% chance...
I know my response was not particularly helpful--but really it is hard to
predict and no way to know for sure...Again, it depends on the type of cancer
and individual characteristics of the tumor--and not all of that is yet
understood and/or known...
Kaye301 - 25 Jan 2004 16:52 GMT
Mag wrote: << Hello! Someone newly diagnosed with "Colloid carcinoma or
Mucinous
carcinoma" in the breast is in need of info.  >>
Alex wrote: Colliod carcinoma of the breast in one of the rarer forms of breast
cancer.
The good news is that it is slow growing. Your MRI question I didn't
understand ? are you asking if the tumor has spread ? It can sometimes
detect but it is not 100% accurate. Mammostat is a fairly new procedure and
the studies have shown it is as effective but due to newest of the procedure
it doesn't have  the numbers to show it as equal  traditional radiation.
The chances are always higher once a woman has been diagnosed for a
secondary cancer but for an accurate assessment you need to check with your
oncologist. With lumpectomy you always have a chance of  a local recurrence
which is about 8-30% with mastectomy it is rare to have reccurence since
most of the breast tissue has been removed. As far as recurrence - you need
to ask your doc, who will look at the total equation, tumor size, estrogen
status, node status, etc.
Estrogen , is your tumor estrogen positive ( not all are ) ? And I don't
know if it is excessive amount estrogen or just a tumor that responds tp
estrogen.
Radiation is always necessary after removal otherwise your tumor will recur.
Don't knwo anytihing about migraines.
ALex>>

Please, excuse, when I responded to your post, I had forgotten that you had
written that you had "colloid carcinoma" or "mucinos carcinoma."  Alex is quite
right in that generally it is a slower growing cancer, and it has a relatively
good or better prognosis than most.   She is coming from the position of not
only being an R.N.  but also having had breast cancer herself.
If you have not yet done so, you might want to consider getting a second
opinion if at all possible at a large cancer treatment center--often through a
university or special center.  They review everything, including your pathology
slides.  Take care and wishing you all the best!
Tim Jackson - 25 Jan 2004 18:39 GMT
I'll answer what questions I can below.

Tim Jackson

> Hello! Someone newly diagnosed with "Colloid carcinoma or Mucinous
> carcinoma" in the breast is in need of info. Anyone out there with that?
> The lump was removed. Next step is Sentinel Lymph Node biopsy and radiation.

> 1) Can an MRI spot whether or not it has gone beyond the mass membrane?
No, it can't be sure it hasn't, but it could prove it has.
I think the only definite test is microscopic examination after surgery.

> 3) Is radiation always necessary after a lumpectomy?
Yes.

> 4) What are the chances it can recur in the same or other breast?
Moderately high over a lifetime.  Higher than the chance of getting bc in
the first place.  Something in the region of 30-50% off the top on my head.

> 5) Would a masectomy eliminate all chances of reoccurrance?
No.  If cancer has already spread to other body parts then it will make no
difference.  It would reduce the risk of reccurence and almost eliminate the
risk of new primaries.

> 8) What makes the body produce an excessive amount of estrogen (the
> cause for this)
Usually obesity, although I am sure there are other causes.  Estrogen is
produced in the ovaries and in many other body tissues, particularly fat and
muscle.  If you have a lot of fat and muscle then you probably have a lot of
estrogen.  This is particularly true after the menopause, when the regulated
output of estrogen from the ovaries shuts down, and what is considered
excessive is a smaller physical amount.

This is a different issue from "what makes cancers excessively sensitive to
estrogen" (ER+ pathology), which is a genetic mutation in the cancer cell
that involves creating multiple copies of the gene for estrogen receptors,
and so making additional receptors on the cell's surface.

> 9) What treatment alternatives are available (Essiac? Flaxseed oil? A
> mushroom immune booster?)
A plethora.  Most of them are not effective against the cancer, some help to
improve general health and well-being.
Here is a useful reference:
http://www.mdanderson.org/cimer
and follow the link "Reviews of Therapies"
Kaye301 - 26 Jan 2004 13:30 GMT
Tim wrote: << > 4) What are the chances it can recur in the same or other
breast?
Moderately high over a lifetime.  Higher than the chance of getting bc in
the first place.  Something in the region of 30-50% off the top on my head.>>

That sounds right but just wanted to add that different types of breast cancer
are at greater risk for recurrence (at least in the other breast) than others,
particularly invasive lobular.  I found one research article (and this was also
told to me by a second opinion oncologist) that in relation to invasive lobular
it was suggested that the breasts (both) might be regarded as a 'single organ
with two mouths.'

<< > 8) What makes the body produce an excessive amount of estrogen (the
> cause for this)
Usually obesity, although I am sure there are other causes.  Estrogen is
produced in the ovaries and in many other body tissues, particularly fat and
muscle.  If you have a lot of fat and muscle then you probably have a lot of
estrogen.  This is particularly true after the menopause, when the regulated
output of estrogen from the ovaries shuts down, and what is considered
excessive is a smaller physical amount.

This is a different issue from "what makes cancers excessively sensitive to
estrogen" (ER+ pathology), which is a genetic mutation in the cancer cell
that involves creating multiple copies of the gene for estrogen receptors,
and so making additional receptors on the cell's surface.>>

Although the above describes what may happen, there are still some who are ER+
with breast cancer who are not obese. I am not sure that all the involved
mechanisms are understood.  I also find it interesting that although the cancer
cell can be tested for response to estrogen, that estrogen levels themself are
not test.   I am guessing that could be done through a blood test just as one
can test for other hormones such as excess testosterone, which by the way, is
also associated with higher rates of breast cancer in women--although don't
know if that happens after the fact.

> 9) What treatment alternatives are available (Essiac? Flaxseed oil? A
> mushroom immune booster?)
A plethora.  Most of them are not effective against the cancer, some help to
improve general health and well-being.
Here is a useful reference:

Researchers are also finding that certain prescription medications, not
researched for breast cancer but approved for other conditions, may also help
control breast cancer.  If interested, you can do a websearch on google, yahoo,
or ?  Some of these include: statin drugs for lowering cholesterol (i.e.
mevacor or lovastatin)' the NSAID cox 2 inhibitor, Celebrex (which also is an
anti-angiogenesis agent (which may reduce or inhibit the formation of new blood
cells which, if taking place, can feed new tumor cells--or works something like
that--and may also inhibit the hepatic pathway as well); the antibiotic
Doxycycline or Tetracycline (which may help control, repair, (and inhibit?)
with bone metastases;  IV bisphosphonate  (Zometa) at prophylactic dose which
may also prevent/control osteoporosis and possibly prevent or control 'events'
of bone metastases.
In addition, it has also been suggested that drinking an 8 oz. glass of red
grape juice each day may have a protective effect.  I have also read that
supplements of COQ 10 may be helpful along with, Reishi mushroom extract,
Tumeric (cumerin), milk thistle, green tea, and others...
If interested, I have some research information re. some of the above
alternative medication, which I am also taking re. oncologist approval.  I have
no idea if they are helping, although one of my tumor markers which had been
steadily rising over a 21 month period, stabiized right after I started two
alternative medications and steadily decreased over the next 5 or 6 months
until it again stabilized at the low level it was at time of my diagnosis.
Kaye301 - 26 Jan 2004 13:37 GMT
<< > 9) What treatment alternatives are available >>

Also, I forgot to mention that some research suggests that exercise may also
help--am guessing that might help more reduce estrogen levels and would be of
more help in those who are ER+  
I am guessing that regular sleep patterns during the night might help, too
since there may be some connection re. melatonin levels or exposure.  That is
based on relatively newly released research findings that night workers have a
higher risk of developing breast cancer, although am not sure if a definate
causative factor has been identified.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.