Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Breast Cancer / January 2004
What happens AFTER the Tamoxifen??
|
|
Thread rating:  |
bartalo@webtv.net - 12 Jan 2004 23:53 GMT A question just occured to me this weekend and since I am not due to see my Oncologist for 3 months, I hope you folks can educate me about this. He said I am to take the Tamoxifen for 5 years with the hopes that the bc won't return, if I am lucky. BUT ......what happens after the 5 years is up? Will 5 years of Tamoxifen in my system protect my body from bc forever or do I have to restart it again? Do you end up taking it for the rest of your life??
Now Su-Texas....don't you come and give me some scary answer. I have just about gotten up the courage to take this drug. I sent off my RX today to my mail pharmacy so please only post GOOD news! <g But I do want to know what happens so if is a bit negative just put it as positive as you can to make it sound not so bad. Thanks!
Bea.
Gulffritallary - 13 Jan 2004 00:17 GMT >He said I am to take the Tamoxifen for 5 years with the hopes that the >bc won't return, if I am lucky. BUT ......what happens after the 5 >years is up? I'm due to stop Tamoxifen this spring and have the same questions. I'm wondering if I should take Femara?
From the Susan Love website:
Letrozole (Femara) After Tamoxifen: New Data, New Questions
In an early release article published on the New England Journal of Medicine website (www.nejm.org) on October 9, researchers announced that they stopped a randomized trial that had enrolled postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer who had already been treated with five years of tamoxifen after their interim results found letrozole (Femara) to be superior to a placebo.
Studies have shown that taking tamoxifen for five years reduces the risk of recurrence for women with early stage breast cancer, and that the benefit from taking the drug appears to persist even after the drug has been stopped.
But with the introduction of the aromatase inhibitors‹drugs that stop estrogen production and keep estrogen out of breast cells in a way different than tamoxifen does‹another question had to be answered: What would happen if a woman began taking an aromatase inhibitor‹in this case letrozole‹after taking five years of tamoxifen?
To test that question, researchers randomized 5187 women who had finished five years of tamoxifen to either letrozole or a placebo. At the first interim analysis, which was done after women had been in the study for an average of 2.4 years, the researchers found that there had been 75 local or metastatic recurrences of breast cancer or new primary cancers in the other breast in the letrozole group, compared with 132 in the placebo group.
Specifically, In terms of local recurrences (recurrence in the same breast): Letrozole: 14 (0.5%) Placebo: 30 (1.1%)
In terms of distant recurrences (metastases): Letrozole: 47 (1.8%) Placebo: 76 (2.9%)
In terms of new cancers in the other (contralateral) breast: Letrozole 14 (0.5%) Placebo: 26 (1%)
The total: Letrozole: 75 (2.9%) Placebo: 132 (5%)
Another way to say this is that 5% of the women in the placebo group had a recurrence compared to 2.9% of the women who had been given letrozole.
Because this benefit was so clear, the independent data and safety monitoring committee overseeing the study recommended that the trial be stopped so that all of the women enrolled in the study could benefit from letrozole.
But stopping the study raises new questions.
Because the study was stopped early, we don¹t know how long letrozole should be taken to get the maximum benefit. (Very few women in the study actually took letrozole for the full five years.) Also, because the study was stopped early, we don¹t know what the long-term complications of letrozole are. This is a concern because the aromatase inhibitors have been found to increase a woman¹s risk for developing osteoporosis. In fact, the study found that there were new diagnoses of osteoporosis in 5.8 percent of the women in the letrozole group compared with 4.5 percent of the women in the placebo group.
The women who will benefit the most from taking letrozole after tamoxifen will be those who had the highest risk for recurrence before starting on tamoxifen. For those women who have a low risk of recurrence, it will be necessary to weigh the benefit letrozole may provide with the risk of osteoporosis.
Some women may be thinking, why take one drug after the other; why not take them both together? The answer to this question lies in the ATAC trial, which studied tamoxifen and the aromatase inhibitor Arimidex. This trial randomized women to Arimidex, tamoxifen, or Arimidex and tamoxifen together, and found that the women who took both drugs actually had a higher risk for recurrence than did the women who took only Arimidex or tamoxifen.
The bottom line: This is an important study, and letrozole is going to be an important new option for many women who have completed five years of tamoxifen. What we can't forget about, though, are the side effects that accompany letrozole, and those have to be factored into the decision-making process, especially for women at low risk for recurrence.
bell-lady - 15 Jan 2004 04:28 GMT Then there are those of who whose timing allowed us to go on Letrozole FIRST. I haven't had Tamoxifen...guess I'll save that if I need it the 'next' time, which ISN'T going to happen.
Femara (Letrozole) is neat. NO side effects to me anyway (su is the only one I believe who did have side effects of subsequence that i remember posting). Yes its post-menopausal only.
Ann in PA
WDW1972 - 13 Jan 2004 00:17 GMT >BUT ......what happens after the 5 >years is up? Will 5 years of Tamoxifen in my system protect my body >from bc forever or do I have to restart it again? Do you end up taking >it for the rest of your life?? Hopefully nothing happens. There isn't anything that can protect your body from bc forever, and all tamoxifen does is reduce the chance. It's been proven to lose it's effectiveness after 5 years, which is why women only take it that long - there's no benefit to taking it longer.
My bc was almost 2 years ago, so I'm able to view it as part of my past. It's not my present, and not my future. When the 5 years is up I'll be glad I don't have to try to remember to take the pills twice a day, and won't bother seeing the oncologist once a year - I'll just be a normal healthy person!
Sue - DivaofDVC aka WDW1972 DVC '97 OKW, Beach Club, Vero Beach, & Hilton Head
Mary Fisher - 13 Jan 2004 20:45 GMT > >BUT ......what happens after the 5 > >years is up? Will 5 years of Tamoxifen in my system protect my body [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > have to try to remember to take the pills twice a day, and won't bother seeing > the oncologist once a year - I'll just be a normal healthy person! I think this is a very sensible post.
I finished my course of something seven months ago and have no worries about the future. If I have a bc recurrence so be it, I deal with life as it happens.
Mary
> Sue - DivaofDVC aka WDW1972 > DVC '97 OKW, Beach Club, Vero Beach, & Hilton Head bartalo@webtv.net - 14 Jan 2004 01:04 GMT >I finished my course of something seven > months ago and have no worries about the > future. If I have a bc recurrence so be it, I > deal with life as it happens.
>Mary I think we all have no choice but to deal with life as it happens, Mary. I am just the type of person who likes to have as much understanding about what is happening to me with a disease as I can. I was thrown into this bc world in 8/2003 unexpectedly and my doctors do not seem to want to be questioned about anything. The Operation, Chemo, Radiation, and now Tamoxifen. I was just curious as to what the next step was in this course of events. Now that I have gotten more info on it, I am content to take the next necessary step.
I am not the type to walk into a strange room unless I know what may be inside. So just consider this question, a "knock" on the door of information. Thanks!
Bea
Mary Fisher - 14 Jan 2004 18:19 GMT > I think we all have no choice but to deal with life as it happens, Mary. But some people don't ... they are always seeking for something better. And that's not just people with bc:-)
> I am just the type of person who likes to have as much understanding > about what is happening to me with a disease as I can. So do I. That's one of the reasons I inhabit this ng.
> I was thrown > into this bc world in 8/2003 unexpectedly and my doctors do not seem to > want to be questioned about anything. That hasn't been my experience in UK. Between them, Dr Susan Love and some people here if anything I've had too much information, there's only so much one can retain.
> The Operation, Chemo, Radiation, > and now Tamoxifen. I was just curious as to what the next step was in > this course of events. I believ that there's no one course, it differs according to the cancer, the patient and the doctors.
> Now that I have gotten more info on it, I am > content to take the next necessary step. That's the way!
> I am not the type to walk into a strange room unless I know what may be > inside. So just consider this question, a "knock" on the door of > information. Thanks! Well, in our case, we're pushed into the room ...
Hugs,
Mary
> Bea allan grossman - 13 Jan 2004 00:18 GMT >A question just occured to me this weekend and since I am not due to see >my Oncologist for 3 months, I hope you folks can educate me about this. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >from bc forever or do I have to restart it again? Do you end up taking >it for the rest of your life?? Bea, if you take Tamoxifen for five years without mets or a recurrence you're done. That's what you could call 'working without a net'. I guess :)
There's no evidence to suggest Tamoxifen longer than five years makes one any safer and there *is* evidence that long-term Tamoxifen increases the likelihood of uterine cancer.
 Signature
allan
spammers can reach me at abuse@localhost humans can reach me at wizard at pointbeing dot com
Lance - 13 Jan 2004 04:46 GMT > A question just occured to me this weekend and since I am not due to > see my Oncologist for 3 months, I hope you folks can educate me about [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > protect my body from bc forever or do I have to restart it again? Do > you end up taking it for the rest of your life?? We can't say that tamoxifen will protect you from recurrence forever, but tamoxifen does appear to have a "persistence" effect after treatment has ended. The Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collarborative Group produced a paper* that demonstrated this effect a few years back.
Here are two tables of number from that paper. You'll have to edit them to get the columns to line up. I've supplied handy vertical slashes to help.
These numbers are for recurrence-free survival of axillary node positive women. About half the patients took tamox, the remainder took placebos. The numbers for axillary node negative women are higher of course.
After following the patients for 5 years, the following number of patients were recurrence-free:
Yrs trtmnt | Tamox | Placebo 1 | 58.3% | 50.2% 2 | 63.5% | 51.4% 5 | 75.6% | 58.3%
So for the group of women who took a pill for 1 year, 58.3% who took tamox pills were recurrence-free and 50.2% who took placebo pills were recurrence-free at the 5 year mark. For the 2 and 5 year treatment groups, the differences are even larger.
After following the same patients for 10 years, the following number of patients were recurrence-free:
Yrs trtmnt | Tamox | Placebo 1 | 44.2% | 36.7% 2 | 49.5% | 39.5% 5 | 59.7% | 44.5%
Look at the group of women who took tamoxifen for only 1 year. Even though it's been 9 years since they've last taken a tamoxifen pill, they still have an advantage over women who've never taken tamoxifen. Similar statements can be made for the 2 and 5 year tamox treatment groups. This is where the "persistence of tamoxifen benefits" statements come from.
Much more recently, fairly convincing evidence that taking letrozole, or Femara, after tamoxifen can also help BC patients remain recurrence free for at least a few years more was presented at the last SABCS and published** in the New England Journal of Medicine. Letrozole is an aromatase inhibitor (like Arimidex or anastrozole). The results were so good that the trial was ended after only 2.4 years of followup - not the planned 5 years.
The researchers were roundly criticized for ending the trial early by other researchers and patient advocates alike. The problem is that aromatase inhibitors tend to decrease bone density and weaken the patient's bones. How much does it weaken bone? Does it get progressively worse and worse or does it stop after some time? How long does it take? Are there any other long term side effects of profound estrogen depletion produced by letrozole? Is this reduction in recurrence a lasting effect? Is it like tamoxifen where the benefits of taking a pill every day end after a few years?
Well, I guess we'll never know until we do "field testing" on BC patients in general - even then the results could be unclear because there is no control group. One of those field testers could be my wife who stops tamoxifen in a few months. How will you decide what the risks of letrozole are after your 5 years of tamoxifen are up?
Hope this helps, abstract for the NEJM paper is below.
Lance *****
*Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials; Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group;The Lancet; 351(9114), pg 1451
**A Randomized Trial of Letrozole in Postmenopausal Women after Five Years of Tamoxifen Therapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer Goss P. E., et al N Engl J Med 2003; 349:1793-1802, Nov 6, 2003
ABSTRACT
Background In hormone-dependent breast cancer, five years of postoperative tamoxifen therapy -- but not tamoxifen therapy of longer duration -- prolongs disease-free and overall survival. The aromatase inhibitor letrozole, by suppressing estrogen production, might improve the outcome after the discontinuation of tamoxifen therapy.
Methods We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to test the effectiveness of five years of letrozole therapy in postmenopausal women with breast cancer who have completed five years of tamoxifen therapy. The primary end point was disease-free survival.
Results A total of 5187 women were enrolled (median follow-up, 2.4 years). At the first interim analysis, there were 207 local or metastatic recurrences of breast cancer or new primary cancers in the contralateral breast -- 75 in the letrozole group and 132 in the placebo group -- with estimated four-year disease-free survival rates of 93 percent and 87 percent, respectively, in the two groups (P0.001 for the comparison of disease-free survival). A total of 42 women in the placebo group and 31 women in the letrozole group died (P=0.25 for the comparison of overall survival). Low-grade hot flashes, arthritis, arthralgia, and myalgia were more frequent in the letrozole group, but vaginal bleeding was less frequent. There were new diagnoses of osteoporosis in 5.8 percent of the women in the letrozole group and 4.5 percent of the women in the placebo group (P=0.07); the rates of fracture were similar. After the first interim analysis, the independent data and safety monitoring committee recommended termination of the trial and prompt communication of the results to the participants.
Conclusions As compared with placebo, letrozole therapy after the completion of standard tamoxifen treatment significantly improves disease-free survival.
Notice: Because of its potential therapeutic implications, this article was published at www.nejm.org on October 9, 2003. It will appear in the November 6 issue of the Journal.
*Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials; Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group;The Lancet; 351(9114), pg 1451
Erik Friedlander - 13 Jan 2004 16:09 GMT femara is working wonders and seems to be the drug "they" may start perscribing..but I think it's only for post-menapausal women.
http://www.breastcancer.org/letrozole_femara.html
My wife is now on this after being on Tamox for only two years. She had a scare which turned out to be arthritis on a bond scan and her doctors at S-Kettering changed her to femara.
 Signature Erik Friedlander erikf@_nospam_erikfriedlander.com http://www.erikfriedlander.com
|
|
|