Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Breast Cancer / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Anyone taking Arimidex??

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
bartalo@webtv.net - 29 Dec 2003 03:39 GMT
Are any of you taking Arimidex and can share with me your experiences
with it, good or bad?
I thought it would be the Tamoxifen for me but was recently told it has
to be Arimidex.   I can't take anti-inflammatory drugs due to stomach
problems so will I have a problem with Arimidex?   My Onc just pats me
and says I'll be fine but he also said that about my Chemo treatments
and I was sick as a dog the entire time.     So if you have any info
(especially "good" stuff to share <g) would you please give me an idea
of what I can expect since I'll be living with it in me for 5 years.
Thanks so much!

Bea
Kaye301 - 29 Dec 2003 06:19 GMT
Hi Bea, I have been on it for almost 2 years and haven't had a problem with the
medicine per se other than the effects from what it is supposed to be
doing--reducing estrogen.  I counteract those effects with exercise, reducing
consumption of foods with sugar, and the anti-inflammatory (Celebrex) which you
said you can't tolerate.  Interestingly, I am also on prophylactic Doxycycline.
The first time I had that, soon after that came out it gave me stomach
problems--bad enough where I almost had to stop it.  Currently, I am on several
different medications.  There are some occasions where I do start feeling
effects--heartburn, nausea, and abdominal discomfort.  When that happens I
drink Aloe Vera gel (made for oral use) that I buy in a health foods store.
The brand I buy is Lily of the  Desert (made in Texas).  It is certified
organic and contains 99.5% aloe vera gel.  It also has .5% citric acid as a
preservative.
I was quite surprised to  learn that it was something that was consumable.  I
had only used gel for the areas of my body that received radiation--the only
thing I was allowed and told to use several times/day while undergoing
radiation.  About a year later I saw fresh aloe vera juice as well as gel at
one of our local health foods store in their section of fresh juices.  That's
when I learned that it was consumable.
I figured if it helped with burns externally that it might have similar healing
properties internally.  I then did some research on it and found that was what
it was used for.  I recommended it to a friend's mom who was having alot of
difficulty pain-wise after having to stop taking an anti-inflammatory for
arthritis after she developed an ulcer.
Much to my surprise, when I do experience discomfort, I expect that I will have
to take it over an extended period of time. However, for me all it takes is
about 2 to 4 ounces which I either drink straight or mix with an equivalent
amount of grape juice.  The next day I am fine and don't need it. I don't know
if it would help you but I am guessing it wouldn't hurt to try to see if it
might be of assistance.
janhig - 29 Dec 2003 10:29 GMT
Hi Bea,

I've been taking Arimidex for almost a year now.  I had mild joint pain for
about the first 6 weeks, but a Dexa-Scan taken just before starting
Arimidex, showed osteopenia.  I started weekly Fosamax at the same time I
started the Arimidex.  After that first 6 weeks the joint pain went away
completely.  I did have hot flashes, several times a day at first (never
really bad), and now I just feel very warm about once a day.  In reality, I
feel great!  No stomach problems (or any other problems) at all.  Arimidex
can be taken on a full stomach, if that helps with your stomach problems.

Don't assume that you will have a problem with this drug.  Your OB/GYN can
suggest a cream to use for the vaginal atrophy, if that bothers you.
bartalo@webtv.net - 29 Dec 2003 16:51 GMT
Thanks ladies for the good helpful advice about the Arimidex.   I will
certainly get and try your Aloe Vera drink, Kaye.   My biggiest concern
is stomach problems and joint pain and I appreciate all of the help and
suggestions.   If I have other problems, I will certainly take Su's
advice and bring it to the attention of my Onc.
BTW....I cannot take doxycycline.  I tried it one time and it set my
stomach on fire for weeks!  I now have it listed with ALL my doctors
that I am not to be given it.
Bea
Kaye301 - 30 Dec 2003 00:30 GMT
Bea  wrote: << BTW....I cannot take doxycycline.  I tried it one time and it
set my
stomach on fire for weeks!  I now have it listed with ALL my doctors
that I am not to be given it.>>

The first time I took it, it tore up my stomach pretty badly but I made myself
stick it out (fortunately, it did not cause any permanent damage--at least as
far as I know) and, in time, it became tolerable.  I am NOT recommending that
anyone do that but just reporting my personal experience with it.
su-texas@webtv.net - 29 Dec 2003 15:32 GMT
These drugs work differently for everyone.  You  may have no problems
with it.

If you do have serious problems, then insist that your doctor take this
seriously.  Repeatedly insist, if they act dumb & keep ignoring you.

Susan, Su_Texas  my opinions
Marilyn - 29 Dec 2003 17:36 GMT
>Are any of you taking Arimidex and can share with me your experiences
>with it, good or bad?

Hi Bea,

I've been taking Arimidex for a year now and haven't had any problems at
all, other that a few very weak hot flashes.  I don't take any other
medication. I asked my doctor for a baseline calcium test this year,
because Arimidex apparently depletes calcium and my results were high
normal.

Good luck with it.

Marilyn
janhig - 30 Dec 2003 10:16 GMT
> >Are any of you taking Arimidex and can share with me your experiences
> >with it, good or bad?
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Marilyn

Hi Marilyn,

What do you mean when you say a baseline calcium test?  Was this a blood
(serum) test?  You need a bone density (Dexa Scan) test to determine bone
loss (osteopenia or osteoporosis).  Blood (serum) calcium levels are usually
normal in osteoporosis.  Serum calcium will increase with bone mets.  You
need a Dexa Scan or other bone density tests to determine if the Arimidex is
causing bone loss.  A normal serum calcium does not mean that your bones are
OK.

Janet
Marilyn - 30 Dec 2003 20:08 GMT
Janet, thanks a lot for that.  I didn't know that a calcium test was
worthless and my doctor didn't say anything about it, other than my calcium
levels were good.   I probably won't see him until my annual visit next
December, but I've made a note on my calendar to start nagging for a
bone-density test at that visit

Marilyn  

 

>> >Are any of you taking Arimidex and can share with me your experiences
>> >with it, good or bad?
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
>Janet
DebITRC - 30 Dec 2003 20:36 GMT
>   I probably won't see him until my annual visit next
>December, but I've made a note on my calendar to start nagging for a
>bone-density test at that visit

Marilyn, why not call your doctor?  Why wait a year? This is not an emergency,
but bone loss can be serious and there are things to do about it if Arimidex is
affecting your bone density.

It's possible that you have to be on the drug awhile before negative things
start happening, but I know I had a baseline text when I started the drug and a
year later I was diagnosed with ostopenia (sp?) and started on Fosamax.
Deb
Marilyn - 30 Dec 2003 22:59 GMT
>>   I probably won't see him until my annual visit next
>>December, but I've made a note on my calendar to start nagging for a
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>year later I was diagnosed with ostopenia (sp?) and started on Fosamax.
>Deb

One good thing about breast cancer is that if you miss something when you
see one doctor there is another one along in a few months. I have to see a
doctor from my local oncology dept in January for a check-up, and then in
June I see my radiology oncologist in another city for a final check-up.
I'll ask them what they think and one of them will probably recommend a
bone marrow test and then I can ask my family doctor for it.  I'm not very
assertive on my own.  :(    

Marilyn
bartalo@webtv.net - 31 Dec 2003 00:26 GMT
>I'll ask them what they think and one of them
> will probably recommend a bone marrow test
> and then I can ask my family doctor for it. I'm
> not very assertive on my own. :(

>Marilyn

I'm assertive but my problem is unless I read about a test on this site,
I don't know what to ask my Onc for.  I was diagnosed 8/03 had surgery,
Chemo, and now radiation and no one has ever recommended any tests I
need.  I am hoping that is a "good" sign.  When I asked my Onc about
testing my heart before Chemo (got Adriamycin etc.) he said it wasn't
really necessary  because he had a copy of an EKG my cardiologist had
done many months ago.

 What are we supposed to do when we mention certain tests and they
"fluff" us off or say "they" don't think the tests are necessary? We
don't want to come off looking like hypochondriacs.  

Am I supposed to have any type tests before he puts me on Arimidex?   I
typed out a long sheet with all my medical problems and medications on
it for him to read and put in my file but when I saw him last visit he
said he "thought" he had read it.   I think I have the same "old" Onc
another poster mentioned.  I sure hope doctors don't get senile! <g

Bea
DebITRC - 31 Dec 2003 16:53 GMT
>>I'll ask them what they think and one of them
>> will probably recommend a bone marrow test

It's not a bone marrow test--it's a bone density test.
Deb
bartalo@webtv.net - 31 Dec 2003 17:31 GMT
>It's not a bone marrow test--it's a bone density
> test.

>Deb

I had a bone density test some months before I was diagnosed with bc.
Other than showing some spots where I had Osteoarthritis, what good are
they with reference to our bc?  My doctor knew I could not take Fosamax
or even the Miacalcin nosespray due to my stomach problems so he just
told me to drink lots of milk.
Is another bone density test done before they prescribe Arimidex?  

Bea  
madiba - 31 Dec 2003 20:33 GMT
> >It's not a bone marrow test--it's a bone density
> > test.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> to drink lots of milk. Is another bone density test done before they
> prescribe Arimidex?

So many tests and so little time...  
There are 3 different bone tests (well 4 actually) on the table now:
Bone density uses xrays/CT to check for osteoporosis
Bone marrow uses cold hard steel to check one's blood-building capacity
Bone scan uses injected isotopes to test for bone metastases, active
arthritis is also seen.
A normal x-ray is the usual way to diagnose arthritis.
I think you probably had the bone scan Bea because arthritis is not
normally seen in the bone density test. So it would be a good idea to
get one before you start Arimidex, as increased osteoporosis is a known
side effect of this otherwise very useful drug.

Signature

madiba

Kaye301 - 02 Jan 2004 19:19 GMT
Bea wrote << Other than showing some spots where I had Osteoarthritis, what
good are
they with reference to our bc?   >>

It's important to have a baseline to monitor.  I am guessing that at some pt.,
some bone mets may be hard to distinguish from osteoporosis.
I feel that if what is going on is known at any point in time, that better or
more optimal treatment options will be available
Marilyn - 31 Dec 2003 23:29 GMT
>>>I'll ask them what they think and one of them
>>> will probably recommend a bone marrow test
>
>It's not a bone marrow test--it's a bone density test.
>Deb

I should probably not do any typing while listening to Clay Aiken.

Marilyn
shaz - 27 Mar 2005 00:39 GMT
Bea,
Thanks for raising this issue, regarding whether we should have any tests
before being put on such meds as Arimidex.
I am not on this but am on Tamoxifen instead. This has got me thinking about
whether I should've been given some kind of tests before being given this
med. I know it's a bit late now, coz i've been on it for 6mths but at least
in the future, if i'm due to be given anymore meds like these, i'll know now
to ask for these tests. I only know this from reading info from others posts
about their treatment and the various tests that they were given. Otherwise
I'd be in the dark and ignorant about such tests being available. Also I
think I should've been given a heart test before being given A/C chemo. As
i've already had a course of this as a child. This was over 30 yrs ago but
surely, it still must of had some affect on my heart? I was aware of some
kind of side effects from A/C chemo, on my heart, as my onc. did mention
this briefly, before starting me on it.
Like many other people on here, I haven't been told much by my doctors,
unless i've asked for information. Doctors, especially here in the UK, don't
seem to like to volunteer information. Maybe it's time they changed their
policies?

Take care,

Shaz x
> >I'll ask them what they think and one of them
> > will probably recommend a bone marrow test
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Bea
Tim Jackson - 03 Jan 2004 20:48 GMT
> Bea,
> Thanks for raising this issue, regarding whether we should have any tests
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Shaz x

I don't think it is usual to give any particular test before starting
Tamoxifen or Arimidex.  It is common to get the ER status from the tumour
pathology, but in my experience in the UK they don't always even do that for
Tamoxifen, after all it has been shown to be beneficial even to patients
with ER- tumours, so one only really needs that information where the
situation is marginal.  The serious side effects are rare enough that unless
there is some pre-existing condition which contra-indicates this treatment,
it is unlikely that any tests will alter the prescribing decision.

As regards Adriamycin, yes it has some long term effect on the heart but
within the scope of a standard chemotherapy treatment this is not considered
sufficient to justify testing heart function in advance.  In the case of
someone who has had chemotherapy before, then there might be an argument for
some sort of test, I don't know, that would be something to put to the
oncologist.

One must remember that many tests (bone scans, CAT scans, etc) involve
exposure to radiation and carry their own risk of causing cancer, so one has
to carefully justify the risk against the potential benefit before ordering
them.

Tim Jackson
Kaye301 - 03 Jan 2004 23:08 GMT
Tim wrote: <<   It is common to get the ER status from the tumour
pathology,  >>

I had thought that was how it is done?  What other way is there?
Tim Jackson - 04 Jan 2004 00:01 GMT
> Tim wrote: <<   It is common to get the ER status from the tumour
> pathology,  >>
>
> I had thought that was how it is done?  What other way is there?

I didn't mean there was any other way.  I meant that this is the only test
done to predict the benefits from hormone therapy, and this test is not,
strictly speaking, done on the patient.

Read it as "It is common to get the ER status (from the tumour pathology)."

Tim
Kaye301 - 04 Jan 2004 08:00 GMT
Tim wrote << I didn't mean there was any other way.  I meant that this is the
only test
done to predict the benefits from hormone therapy, and this test is not,
strictly speaking, done on the patient.>>

Thanks for clarifying, Tim.  In the states it is supposed to be done on all
b.c. patients.  They are also supposed to check PR status, I think, although
mine wasn't done.
alexk - 04 Jan 2004 16:02 GMT
Yes checking hormone status is the standard of care in the US.
> Tim wrote << I didn't mean there was any other way.  I meant that this is the
> only test
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> b.c. patients.  They are also supposed to check PR status, I think, although
> mine wasn't done.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.