My radiation stopped two years ago. Does anyone here know why I still need
to see the radiologist? I feel fine. Plus if something should go wrong,
what is he going to do, take the radiation away? I just can't afford all
these doctors. I am in debt to the max and never will get out.
I still see the oncologist every six months along with my general
practitioner about four times a year or more. (This is because I have
thyroid problems, high blood pressure and high cholesterol)
I sure would appreciate your comments.
Betty
Balsey - 08 Dec 2003 06:01 GMT
Hello Betty, That's something that always worried me why do you see the
radiologist the oncologist the dr . Here in Australia we see one dr , we can
choose between all of them I chose my surgeon I figured he took them off so
he knows what he is looking for , I see him twice a year for 2 years then
once a year only ,I still see my gp for all other medical things, Take Care
Balsey
> My radiation stopped two years ago. Does anyone here know why I still need
> to see the radiologist? I feel fine. Plus if something should go wrong,
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Betty
Tim Jackson - 08 Dec 2003 09:39 GMT
> My radiation stopped two years ago. Does anyone here know why I still need
> to see the radiologist? I feel fine. Plus if something should go wrong,
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Betty
UK practice would to see only one consultant during the follow-up period,
and any problems not directly and definitely cancer-related are taken up the
GP.
Tim Jackson
bell-lady - 08 Dec 2003 13:00 GMT
Here in PA I see the radiologist 2X/year for the first 2 years, then once a
year until 5 years out. Same for oncologist. Oncologist orders blood tests;
radiologist tracks mammograms & blood tests. All 3 docs get all 3's records.
GP for all other things, and he keep ALL records from ALL doctors also, to
have things in one place. I have chosen my radiologist to replace my ob/gyn
for breast exams, and will switch that to GP after 5 years. GP also now does
gyn exams after hysterectomy. One less doctor!
Ann in PA
A. P. Thorsen - 08 Dec 2003 14:44 GMT
> Here in PA I see the radiologist 2X/year for the first 2 years, then once a
> year until 5 years out. Same for oncologist. Oncologist orders blood tests;
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> for breast exams, and will switch that to GP after 5 years. GP also now does
> gyn exams after hysterectomy. One less doctor!
Perhaps most of the US does similarly -- my routine (in MI) is pretty
close to yours, with some variation in who orders which tests, and with
the surgeon still in the mix on a 1x/year basis. If the original poster
wants to reduce doctors, she might try discussing this with them & see
whether one of them can cover all the bases?
Ann T.
Remove 'dontsendspam' from address to reply by e-mail
Mary Fisher - 09 Dec 2003 22:16 GMT
> UK practice would to see only one consultant during the follow-up period,
> and any problems not directly and definitely cancer-related are taken up the
> GP.
I never see my GP about anything cancer related although he's kept informed
about what's gong on.
But I attend the surgeon's clinic once a year (in June, the anniversary of
the surgery) and the radiologist's clinic once a year (in December).
I've often wondered why I see the radiologist, the examinations seem to be
the same after five years.
Yesterday's visit was to the radiologist. Because of hip pain I'm to have a
bone scan in the new year. That should be interesting!
Mary
> Tim Jackson
Betty - 08 Dec 2003 22:11 GMT
> My radiation stopped two years ago. Does anyone here know why I still need
> to see the radiologist? I feel fine. Plus if something should go wrong,
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Betty
I see that most of us are still seeing all the same doctors, but why? Why
is it necessary to see a radiologist? If there is a problem it seems it
would have shown up by now. He can't take the radiation away, what is done
is done.
My dad had cancer many years ago and once his treatments were done he never
saw that doctor again.
Betty