Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Breast Cancer / October 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

New Research Results Explain How Dormant Tumor Cells Become Active in  Later Years

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
J - 23 Oct 2008 00:15 GMT
http://www.cancer.gov/newscenter/pressreleases/ crossposted to
sci.med.diseases.cancer
New Research Results Explain How Dormant Tumor Cells Become Active in
Later Years

Scientists using a three-dimensional cell culture system have identified a
mechanism by which dormant, metastatic tumor cells can begin growing again
after long periods of inactivity. The new findings indicate that the
switch from dormancy to proliferative, metastatic growth may be regulated,
in part, through signaling from the surrounding microenvironment, which
leads to changes in the skeletal architecture of dormant tumor cells.
Targeting this mechanism may also provide strategies for inhibiting the
switch from dormancy to proliferation. The results of this study by
National Cancer Institute (NCI) scientists and their collaborators,
appears in the August 1, 2008, issue of Cancer Research. NCI is part of
the National Institutes of Health.

The recurrence of breast cancer often follows a long latent period in
which there are no signs of cancer, and metastases may not become
clinically apparent until many years after removal of the primary tumor
and follow-up therapy. According to NCI's Jeffrey E. Green, M.D., one of
the lead researchers of this study, "Recent evidence suggests that, in
many cases, tumor cells have already seeded metastatic sites even when the
primary tumor is diagnosed at an early stage." Approximately 30 percent of
breast cancer patients diagnosed with early-stage disease have been found
to have breast cancer cells in their bone marrow. However, these cells
seem to exist primarily as micrometastases that do not manifest themselves
clinically in any way.

Although many of these disseminated tumor cells may not survive for
extended periods of time, a subset of them may represent dormant but
viable cells that could begin to proliferate years later. These dormant
cells are resistant to conventional therapies such as chemotherapy that
target actively dividing cells. Such cells could account for disease
recurrence after apparently successful treatment of primary tumors.

It has been proposed that tumor cells can switch from a dormant state to
become active micrometastases, but the size of the resulting tumors may be
limited by the availability of an adequate blood supply, which is needed
to provide oxygen and nutrients for cell growth. Discerning the mechanisms
that either maintain prolonged cellular dormancy or activate dormant tumor
cells to a proliferative stage has been a goal of scientists for many
years. The development of therapeutic approaches to eliminate these
inactive micrometastatic tumor cells has been hampered by the absence of
models in living systems that mimic cellular dormancy and the emergence of
clinical metastatic disease.

The tumor microenvironment has been increasingly recognized as a critical
regulator of cancer progression. The extracellular matrix (ECM), a key
component of the microenvironment, is in immediate contact with tumor
cells. The ECM significantly affects tumor biology and progression by
providing factors for cell growth and survival and for stimulating the
growth of new blood vessels to feed the tumor. Also, cell adhesion to the
ECM triggers signaling pathways that can regulate various phases of cell
growth.

In this study, NCI investigator Dalit Barkan, Ph.D., and colleagues
characterized a novel application of a three-dimensional culture system in
which the growth of several different types of tumor cells in the ECM
correlated with the dormant or proliferative behavior of the tumor cells
at metastatic, secondary sites in a living system. A three-dimensional
system can be used to culture a variety of different cells and tissues in
the laboratory for prolonged periods of time. The results revealed that a
stage of prolonged tumor cell inactivity, presumably preceding a later
stage that is dependent on blood vessel formation for metastatic growth,
exists due to a brake being applied to the cell division cycle, which is
the regulated series of steps that a cell goes through when it replicates.
The researchers were also able to demonstrate that the switch from
inactive to proliferative, metastatic growth is strongly influenced by
interactions with the ECM.

Specifically, the interactions that the researchers identified affect the
activity of an enzyme called MLC kinase. Inhibition of this particular
enzyme causes a chain reaction that limits alterations of the skeletal
architecture in dormant tumor cells and thus inhibits proliferative growth
in the living system model.

"We hope that, with additional studies, we can begin to discover new ways
to therapeutically keep the dormant-to-active switch in the 'off'
position, thus limiting the chance that micrometastases become active in
later life," said Green.

###

Reference: Barkan D, Kleinman H, Simmons JL, Asmussen H, Kamaraju AK,
Hoenorhoff MJ, Liu Z, Costes SV, Cho EH, Lockett S, Khanna C, Chambers AF,
Green JE. Inhibition of metastatic outgrowth from single dormant tumor
cells by targeting the cytoskeleton. Cancer Research. August 1, 2008.

For more information on Dr. Green's research, please go to
http://ccr.cancer.gov/staff/staff.asp?profileid=13662
Eva - 24 Oct 2008 01:59 GMT
> http://www.cancer.gov/newscenter/pressreleases/ crossposted to
> sci.med.diseases.cancer
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> position, thus limiting the chance that micrometastases become active in
> later life," said Green.
------------------
Wow, I hope so too.  This is very exciting, gives me more hope.  Thanks for
posting it.

Eva
Trice M - 24 Oct 2008 13:54 GMT
>Wow, I hope so too. This is very exciting,
> gives me more hope. Thanks for posting it.
>Eva

To each his own but all this new info does for me is take away my "one"
hope that there are bc survivors who really have survived this damnable
disease!  It's really telling us we are just playing Russian roulette
with our lives and we just don't know when the bullet will get us.
Too bad.  It was nice thinking those who have posted they have survived
it for so many years really had.  Now we all are just waiting in line
from what this post says to me.  

To face reality, we have to know by the time the researchers find a way
to protect us after this "new" info, it will be too late for most of us.
It takes years for them to figure out how to win against an enemy who
seems to be stronger than any of them.  Sorry my post is not optomistic,
but I did not need to read more bad news about bc.  Just my opinion and
I at least still have a right to that, inspite of our conditions.

Trice

NO SPAM OR FORWARDS, PLEASE.
Tim Jackson - 24 Oct 2008 17:42 GMT
 > To each his own but all this new info does for me is take away my "one"
> hope that there are bc survivors who really have survived this damnable
> disease!  It's really telling us we are just playing Russian roulette
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> but I did not need to read more bad news about bc.  Just my opinion and
> I at least still have a right to that, inspite of our conditions.

This research does not introduce a new risk for cancer patients: what it
does is offer some insight into the mechanism behind a risk factor we
knew all along from the epidemiology.  It is not in any respect "bad news".

If we all lived by this attitude we would all be waiting in line to be
hit by a bus.  We all have to die of something sometime.  Meanwhile we
get on with our lives.  Cancer occurrence or recurrence is just another
road accident or electrical fault or lightning strike or terrorist bomb
or bird flu or asteroid impact or whatever.  Wasting your life waiting
to die is not a sensible option whatever the risks.

You know what.  My mum is 84, she had a mastectomy 7 years ago, and she
doesn't worry about breast cancer recurrence, she's pretty sure
something else will get her first, and she's probably right.  Then again
my friend's mum got a fatal recurrence after 20 years.  S**t happens.

Some doctors believe that *all* men over 70 have prostate cancer. It
just doesn't kill most of them because it grows slowly and they die of
something else first.  So what? it doesn't mean that all men over 70
should be "waiting in line" to die.  *Life* is a terminal disease.

Tim Jackson
Ixia - 24 Oct 2008 18:44 GMT
> >Wow, I hope so too. This is very exciting,
> > gives me more hope. Thanks for posting it.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> it for so many years really had.  Now we all are just waiting in line
> from what this post says to me.  

Well, Trice, that's one way of looking at it, but not the only way.

A few days ago, I saw my oncologist for a check-up, after finally
finishing the treatment I started  1 1/2 years ago, when diagnosed.

My oncologist is so confident that I will now be disease free for the
next 4-5 years, that she wants me to have my port removed. Yay!

She also told me that the type of cancer I had/have, is notorious for
coming back - 5-10-15 even 20 years later. I understand that, and
since I was relatively young when diagnosed, my chance of dying at an
old age of other causes is diminished. But, I could also be one of the
lucky ones...

I spend no time speculating about either outcome: I am in perfect
health and feeling great /now/. That is a lot better than I was before
I was diagnosed, and a lot better than many other 56 year olds. I am
grateful and I really enjoy life, friends, family. None of us know how
long we are going to live - breast cancer or not.

Ixia
Trice M - 24 Oct 2008 22:11 GMT
I think my earlier post may have been misunderstood.  I certainly don't
spend my time even thinking about bc except for when I pop in here to
read how everyone is doing or if Tim has more education to share.  I
have other people in my life I have to care for so I don't have time to
waste thinking about that stray "bullet" getting me.  Like some of you
posted, so many other things can cause our demise first.

Life is for the living so live we must!

Trice

NO SPAM OR FORWARDS, PLEASE.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.