I don't yet know whether what my gyn found yesterday is nothing or something.
He detected a lump in my left breast. I could feel it, but I think I have
others that feel similarly in both my breasts. The mamogram from last week
detected nothing, but he is sending me now to a sonogram. He also mentioned
biopsy -- you know, taking fluid with a horrible huge needle. And he wants
me to see the surgeon, which tells me that he thinks it's serious, yet he
tried to calm me down with "it might be only a cyst". At this point I am
confused and don't know what's going on.
I will face things as they come. Right now I want to know what are the
procedures and tests that precede surgery. Needless to say, I am scared...
Thanks for any feedback, I am totally new to this.
> I don't yet know whether what my gyn found yesterday is nothing or something.
> He detected a lump in my left breast. I could feel it, but I think I have
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> procedures and tests that precede surgery. Needless to say, I am scared...
> Thanks for any feedback, I am totally new to this.
Some 80% of lumps biopsied turn out to be benign, so it really is not
yet time to panic.
Biopsies come in a variety of forms and are nothing to be scared of.
The simplest is a fine needle aspiration, which basically involves
sampling any fluid in the lump, and examining any particles that stick
to the needle in the event that the lump is solid. This is really
little different from having an injection.
More sensitive tests of solid lumps are done with a core biopsy, which
actually removes a thin strip of tissue about 1mm diameter. It is also
a quick and simple procedure, and just requires a sticking plaster and
causes a small bruise. It's about equivalent in injury terms to
scraping your knee.
Where the lump is deep, difficult to find of not detectable by feel,
they can use x-rays or ultrasonics to insert a wire close to the lump,
which is then used to guide the biopsy tool. This is somewhat
uncomfortable and awkward, and involves a lot of lying on a special
table and being poked at while the surgeon effectively plays a game of
battleships. I suppose you could compare that to a dental procedure in
terms of discomfort.
If the results do come back positive for cancer, (and remember most
don't) then exactly what follows depends on the size of the lump and
microscopic details observed, but they will perform an operation to
remove the lump, and also one or more lymph nodes from under the armpit.
They will then examine these microscopically and decide on further
treatment on that basis. This would commonly mean a course of
chemotherapy followed by a number of daily radiation treatments to the
operated site; and daily hormone therapy tablets for five years thereafter.
Good luck, I hope it's nothing too.
Tim Jackson
I too hope that it is nothing. But one thing I have learned (with some
difficulty) is to try to stay calm until all the facts are in and studied.
Warm thoughts for you.
Greta
Hi, MsBrainy,
Couple comments interspersed below.
>I don't yet know whether what my gyn found yesterday is nothing or
>something.
> He detected a lump in my left breast. I could feel it, but I think I have
> others that feel similarly in both my breasts. The mamogram from last
> week
> detected nothing, but he is sending me now to a sonogram.
As Tim said, odds are excellent that the lump is benign. Any betting
person would put down a pack of money on it, given the odds. But, in the
unlikely event that it does turn out to be breast cancer, you'll be OK.
These days, BC is usually caught early, when odds of permanent remission are
also excellent. And treatments for more advanced stages are also steadily
improving, and probably not as onerous as popular media might have led you
to believe. I'm getting on toward seven years out from a Stage III
(locally advanced) BC, and no evidence of disease (NED) at this point.
> He also mentioned
> biopsy -- you know, taking fluid with a horrible huge needle. And he
> wants
> me to see the surgeon, which tells me that he thinks it's serious, yet he
> tried to calm me down with "it might be only a cyst". At this point I am
> confused and don't know what's going on.
The needle-type biopsies really aren't a big deal, discomfort-wise. And
they deliver peace of mind. So, your doc may *not* think it's serious . .
. he may simply be ultra-cautious (which is good), and not want you to have
continuing worry.
> I will face things as they come. Right now I want to know what are the
> procedures and tests that precede surgery. Needless to say, I am
> scared...
> Thanks for any feedback, I am totally new to this.
Most of us go through scans similar to what you're doing, but it varies
based on results of each. In less dense breasts, mammograms may deliver a
more unambiguous view, and certain images on a mammo are more cancer-like
than others.
I had mammograms, then a fine needle biopsy. This led to surgery
(mastectomy in my case; most have a choice). Along the way, they found a
suspicious area in my other breast. Right before the mastectomy, they did a
wire-location procedure (similar to what Tim described) to flag the location
for the surgeon. While I was having the mastectomy, the surgeon followed
the wire & did a lumpectomy on that other breast, sent the lump off for
tests while I was on the operating table, and did the second mastectomy (as
per our pre-surgery agreement) when it proved malignant.
If you want to learn a lot, members of this group usually recommend "Dr.
Susan Love's Breast Book", available from Amazon or at most larger
bookstores. It covers breast cancer very well, but also describes the
various benign conditions that can affect breast health -- the kinds of
conditions that it's much more likely you have.
I'm sending positive wishes your way. Please keep us posted about how
things are going with you -- we especially loooove to hear good news, but
are here to help in any way we can in the unlikely event the news isn't all
that you hope for.
Take care,
Ann T.
Remove 'dontsendspam' from address to reply by email
MsBrainy - 14 Jun 2007 21:49 GMT
Thanks for all the responses. I already dislike it!!!!!!
I am going Monday to ultrasound. Will report to you the results, before I
decide to run away and hide from all the needles and knives.

Signature
MsBrainy
Mary E. - 16 Jun 2007 01:42 GMT
Hi MsBrainy
Good luck and best wishes. I will be praying for you. I hope Im not too
nosey, but how old are you?
Mary E.
> Thanks for all the responses. I already dislike it!!!!!!
>
> I am going Monday to ultrasound. Will report to you the results, before I
> decide to run away and hide from all the needles and knives.
MsBrainy - 20 Jun 2007 02:59 GMT
Today I got the final verdict: All clear -- benign, benign, benign!
Followup in 3 months.
Thank you all for your help and kind wishes. There is nothing better than
such a happy ending. My best wishes to all of you here.
Ms. Brainy

Signature
MsBrainy
x{yz}enophil44@hotmail.com - 20 Jun 2007 11:13 GMT
>Today I got the final verdict: All clear -- benign, benign, benign!
>Followup in 3 months.
Hurrah! I'm so glad.
>Thank you all for your help and kind wishes. There is nothing better than
>such a happy ending. My best wishes to all of you here.
Thank you.

Signature
"It's easier to get forgiveness than permission."
Rear Admiral "Amazing" Grace Hopper
A.P. Thorsen - 21 Jun 2007 03:21 GMT
> Today I got the final verdict: All clear -- benign, benign, benign!
> Followup in 3 months.
YayYayYayYAAAAY!
> Thank you all for your help and kind wishes. There is nothing better than
> such a happy ending. My best wishes to all of you here.
Thanks for coming back to share the good news. We looooooooove good news!
Lovely to meet you -- may you never need us again!
Ann T.
Remove 'dontsendspam' from address to reply by email
Mary E. - 22 Jun 2007 09:00 GMT
Ditto!!!! Keep up the checks!! Better to be safe!!!
Mary E.
>> Today I got the final verdict: All clear -- benign, benign, benign!
>> Followup in 3 months.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Ann T.
> Remove 'dontsendspam' from address to reply by email
MsBrainy - 22 Jun 2007 18:36 GMT
>Ditto!!!! Keep up the checks!! Better to be safe!!!
>Mary E.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>> Ann T.
All that I have experienced was one week of mild anxiety. It gave me only a
glimplse of what most of you are going through. I am touched by the gestures
of care from you all. It seems that hard times bring out the best in us.
One of the findings in my "case" was calcification in the left breast.
Although I understand the words I don't know the meaning of it. Does anybody?
Next week I will have an eye surgery -- the third since last October. About
a year ago I noticed a central "blob" in my right eye. It turned out to be a
macular hole that required surgery. The hole was closed successfully, but 2
months later I had a retinal detachment in the same eye (a complication from
the first procedure) and was rushed to an emergency surgery. The retina was
re-attached, but my vision in that eye deteriorated substantially. Presently
I am legally blind in that eye, but I see well through the other eye. Next
week surgery will remove my natural lens and replace it with an artificial
one. This will not restore my vision completely, but will (hopefully)
improve it significantly, however the probability of having future similar
problems with the other eye have increased thousands times.
Facing possible blindness (or even partial blindness) was a shock for me. I
have always taken my vision for granted, but no more. Vision is such an
essential thing that life without it is almost unimaginable to me. I am full
of hope of my vision restoration, but I know that this is probably not the
end of it.
I wish you all recovery and health. Your support is greatly appreciated.

Signature
MsBrainy
Tim Jackson - 22 Jun 2007 19:28 GMT
> One of the findings in my "case" was calcification in the left breast.
> Although I understand the words I don't know the meaning of it. Does anybody?
Calcifications are a crystalline residue left where cells have died and
been reabsorbed, that is visible on x-ray. So a cluster of
microcalcifications may outline some change that has been going on in
the area. It might be a result of injury, weight change or various
other abnormalities including cancer.
As cancer tends to destroy rather than push aside surrounding tissue,
the are likely to grow in a characteristic and eponymous crab-like
manner. Clusters of calcifications that follow such a pattern can be
recognised by radiographers as requiring further investigation.
Tim Jackson
Fluid is usually a good thing ( no cancer) ....good luck with your
ultrasound.
Alex
>I don't yet know whether what my gyn found yesterday is nothing or
>something.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> scared...
> Thanks for any feedback, I am totally new to this.