Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Breast Cancer / April 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Red Meat Linked To Breast Cancer

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Roman Bystrianyk - 09 Apr 2007 13:41 GMT
"Red Meat Linked To Breast Cancer", Science Daily, April 8, 2007,
Link: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070407174018.htm

Eating red meat increases a woman's chance of developing breast
cancer, according to new research from the University of Leeds.

The findings are most striking for post-menopausal women - those with
the highest intake of red meat, the equivalent to one portion a day
(more than 57 grams) - run a 56 per cent greater risk of breast cancer
than those who eat none.

Women who eat the most processed meat, such as bacon, sausages, ham or
pies, run a 64 per cent greater risk of breast cancer than those who
eat none.

Researchers at the University's Centre for Epidemiology and
Biostatistics have been tracking the eating habits and health of more
than 35,000 women for the past seven years, and their latest findings
are published in the British Journal of Cancer. Earlier findings,
widely reported in January, showed that pre-menopausal women who have
the greatest intake of fibre have cut their risk of breast cancer in
half.
fortunata - 10 Apr 2007 22:59 GMT
can't blame this for mine, ate red meat ONE time (1986) since the
mid-1970s.

 > "Red Meat Linked To Breast Cancer", Science Daily, April 8, 2007,
 > Link: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070407174018.htm
 >
 > Eating red meat increases a woman's chance of developing breast
 > cancer, according to new research from the University of Leeds.
 >
 > The findings are most striking for post-menopausal women - those with
 > the highest intake of red meat, the equivalent to one portion a day
 > (more than 57 grams) - run a 56 per cent greater risk of breast cancer
 > than those who eat none.
 >
 > Women who eat the most processed meat, such as bacon, sausages, ham or
 > pies, run a 64 per cent greater risk of breast cancer than those who
 > eat none.
 >
 > Researchers at the University's Centre for Epidemiology and
 > Biostatistics have been tracking the eating habits and health of more
 > than 35,000 women for the past seven years, and their latest findings
 > are published in the British Journal of Cancer. Earlier findings,
 > widely reported in January, showed that pre-menopausal women who have
 > the greatest intake of fibre have cut their risk of breast cancer in
 > half.
 >
A.P. Thorsen - 11 Apr 2007 01:44 GMT
>  can't blame this for mine, ate red meat ONE time (1986) since the
> mid-1970s.

Haven't had *any* meat since 1974.  Musta been the milk.  <g>

Ann T.
Remove 'dontsendspam' from address to reply by email.

>  > "Red Meat Linked To Breast Cancer", Science Daily, April 8, 2007,
>  > Link: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070407174018.htm
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>  > half.
>  >
Mary Fisher - 11 Apr 2007 11:14 GMT
>>  > Eating red meat increases a woman's chance of developing breast
>>  > cancer, according to new research from the University of Leeds.

It's interesting that in the last week there have been four reports of
research study at the University of Leeds. The latest, yesterday, was about
the story of King Alfred and the cakes. It seems that it could have been
political spin - but don't ask me how, I've forgotten.

I'm interested in the number of reports they've been wheeling out because I
live in Leeds :-)

Mary
MMH - 11 Apr 2007 15:46 GMT
On Apr 10, 8:44 pm, "A.P. Thorsen" <annthorsendontsends...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

> >  can't blame this for mine, ate red meat ONE time (1986) since the
> > mid-1970s.
>
> Haven't had *any* meat since 1974.  Musta been the milk.  <g>
>
> Ann T.

And I've been eating broccoli almost daily for decades - a supposedly
cancer inhibiting food.  I still eat it simply because it's one of the
few vegetables I can stand but I don't place a great deal of  weight
on diet anymore - too many other factors can trump it. (Not
downplaying the role of diet - just gives one pause.)

MH
fortunata - 11 Apr 2007 16:54 GMT
and I have eaten soy every day for 5-6 years.....kept menopause at bay and
now I wish I hadn't!

 almost no cow's milk.....plenty of mercury and cadmium (via tuna).....not
enough veggies or fruit.....blueberries important...I do eat almonds every
day and have for years.....and dark chocolate.....it's easy to be cavalier
about diet until the big C (or even little C) invades.
 > On Apr 10, 8:44 pm, "A.P. Thorsen" <annthorsendontsends...@yahoo.com>
 > wrote:
 >> "fortunata" <pacif...@gmail.com> wrote in message
 >>
 >> news:0NTSh.278756$5j1.13304@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
 >>
 >> >  can't blame this for mine, ate red meat ONE time (1986) since the
 >> > mid-1970s.
 >>
 >> Haven't had *any* meat since 1974.  Musta been the milk.  <g>
 >>
 >> Ann T.
 >
 > And I've been eating broccoli almost daily for decades - a supposedly
 > cancer inhibiting food.  I still eat it simply because it's one of the
 > few vegetables I can stand but I don't place a great deal of  weight
 > on diet anymore - too many other factors can trump it. (Not
 > downplaying the role of diet - just gives one pause.)
 >
 > MH
 >
fortunata - 11 Apr 2007 20:30 GMT
aspartame.

 > On Apr 10, 8:44 pm, "A.P. Thorsen" <annthorsendontsends...@yahoo.com>
 > wrote:
 >> "fortunata" <pacif...@gmail.com> wrote in message
 >>
 >> news:0NTSh.278756$5j1.13304@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
 >>
 >> >  can't blame this for mine, ate red meat ONE time (1986) since the
 >> > mid-1970s.
 >>
 >> Haven't had *any* meat since 1974.  Musta been the milk.  <g>
 >>
 >> Ann T.
 >
 > And I've been eating broccoli almost daily for decades - a supposedly
 > cancer inhibiting food.  I still eat it simply because it's one of the
 > few vegetables I can stand but I don't place a great deal of  weight
 > on diet anymore - too many other factors can trump it. (Not
 > downplaying the role of diet - just gives one pause.)
 >
 > MH
 >
A.P. Thorsen - 12 Apr 2007 19:03 GMT
>  aspartame.

Not me.  Darn close to never touch the stuff.   I prefer to eat things that
humans have been eating for generations, and stay away from manufactured
weirdness.  Mostly doesn't even taste good, especially "goodies" that
involve fake fat, fake sugar, etc.  Yeah, I'm overweight, but I did it the
old-fashioned way <g>.

Seriously:  I think weight management and excess alcohol consumption were
things I did that increased my breast cancer risk.

Ann T.
Remove 'dontsendspam' from address to reply by email
Mary Fisher - 13 Apr 2007 10:24 GMT
>>  aspartame.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> "goodies" that involve fake fat, fake sugar, etc.  Yeah, I'm overweight,
> but I did it the old-fashioned way <g>.

Same here.

> Seriously:  I think weight management and excess alcohol consumption were
> things I did that increased my breast cancer risk.

Same here :-)

But something's got to get you!

Mary
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.