>"A.P. Thorsen" wrote (& other posters said same)
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/bone-density-tests/WO00024 , including
> comparison to bone scan.)
I did mean the bone density test, something friends and family suggested
for me after age 50 (but before all my cancer was found).
> The bone scan we sometimes get to detect bone mets (or hidden fractures & some
> other conditions) is a different critter, a nuclear medicine test in which one
> is injected with a small amount of radioactive tracer, then scanned.
I did question why they didn't do that with me given they found a second
primary (adrenal) with the initial C/T and Pet scans. Hopefully I'll never
need one????
> My doctors wanted me to have a baseline bone density test around the time I
> started on Tamoxifen, and my insurance covered it even though I wasn't the usual
> age at which it's done. (I'm now on Arimidex and haven't had a follow-up scan
> since switching.) I've had two or three bone scans, too.
That was my presumption for a baseline bone denisty test, given that some
osteoporosis and scoliosis runs in my family. That on top of the Arimidex
might be a reason. But as y'all can relate, I don't like going to doctors
anymore -- nothing personal; I love all my doctors, just tired of being
stuck!
Marsha
Mari@net.ac - 08 Mar 2007 20:09 GMT
>That was my presumption for a baseline bone denisty test, given that some
>osteoporosis and scoliosis runs in my family. That on top of the Arimidex
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Marsha
The bone density test is quite pleasant, relatively speaking. <g>
You just lie on a bed, they stick a block under your legs, and then they
move a camera thingy over you. You are never closed in. And not a needle
in sight.
Marilyn