> Hi,
> My onc. told me today that starting next month I will be changed to
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Just thought I'd share this.
> Greta
Greta - are you talking about chemo?
I know very little about chemo but didn't think it went on for years :-(
Mary
Greta - 11 Jan 2007 15:53 GMT
Mary,
What I am getting is not called chemo in the traditional sense. It is a
bio-phosphate product that is supposed to help the bones resist further
cancer spread. I have one bone area involved.
Greta
Mary Fisher - 11 Jan 2007 17:06 GMT
> Mary,
> What I am getting is not called chemo in the traditional sense. It is a
> bio-phosphate product that is supposed to help the bones resist further
> cancer spread. I have one bone area involved.
> Greta
Ah, thank you.
Mary
Hi Greta,
The cancer doc recommended this (Aredia?) to me on Friday, when I saw
him.
I asked about pills (raloxifen or some such?) for osteoporosis & cancer,
which I'd read about. And he suggested this IV treatment, refused to
consider the pills. ???
I don't want to try any more of the dangerous & deadly IVs. None have
worked so far, none have done any good, .... they've only done major
harm, so I've no confidence in them.
What is the risk factor for this (Aredia?)? The chance for success in
controlling or slowing down bone mets, or for pain control? Do you know?
He also suggested a testosterone IV.
He listed three or four things real fast. I was too sick & weak to
remember much, or write them down. I couldn't even sit up to speak to
him. And had to ask for wheelchair, to make it to my truck.
When I asked if the treatments were toxic & risky, would sicken & weaken
me even further, .... he said: Yes. That they were all pretty bad,
risky.
So I decided to ignore the new info for now, esp. until I can get into
better health. I've got very inflamed & painful injuries, bladder or
kidney infection (now taking Cipro), possible abscess tooth, ....
Got very sick on Wednesday. Got to doc on Friday.
Will get results of bloodwork on Tuesday probably. I'm esp. interested
in knowing the CA-2729.
Susan Wms, Su_Texas my opinions
Greta - 15 Jan 2007 01:40 GMT
Hi Sue,
From what my onc. explained: Aredia was used prior to Zometa coming out. Now
that there is more data on Zometa the risk of jaw necrosis is of concern.
Aredia is basically the same but has a bit less risk on kidneys while doing
the same thing - developing some bone resistance. There is much more data on
Aredia because it was used for so long and he considers it safer all around.
Most all of his patients at the Cancer Center will be changed. His decision
was based on some medical conferences - one in Orlando, FL.
Now to my personal unprofessional opinion: Zometa takes 30 minutes for the
infusion - Aredia takes at least 2 hours - add the $ figures for the
hospital costs in time and one might "guess" how the pharmaceutical firms
pushed it. I admit I am a bit of a cynic!
Hope this info helps
Greta