Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Breast Cancer / January 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

4th annual: Are shoes the cause of breast cancer?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
James Semmel - 10 Jan 2007 15:52 GMT
TO: All breast cancer researchers, doctors, and patients.

The purpose of this yearly post is to stimulate interest and discussion
about the biomechanical effects of shoes on "age-related" degenerative
diseases, such as breast cancer.  Chiropodist Dr. Simon J. Wikler
pioneered efforts to understand the influences of shoes in the 1950's,
but his work was neglected during the subsequent drug- and diet-based
approaches to medicine.  However, the prolific footwear historian and
podiatrist Dr. William A. Rossi clearly demonstrated throughout his
publications that shoes influence the posture of the human body.
Therefore, using the posture-based approaches to medicine of the
distinguished orthopedist Dr. Joel E. Goldthwait, I have expanded Dr.
Wikler's insightful work to include a variety of illnesses and
conditions whose causes remain unknown.

Breast cancer is just one example of diseases that are related to the
use of footwear.  Dr. Wikler observed that rounding of the shoulders in
humans puts tissue at a mechanical disadvantage.  He explains, "The
breast is slung between strong fibrous bands (fascia) that arise from
the breast and collarbones.  As long as the shoulders are thrust back
and the chest held erect, breasts can become very heavy and sag
considerably without undue strain to these fibrous bands.  In the
characteristic posture of unbalanced feet, however, the shoulders slump
forward and, instead of the breast bone being prominent, the armpits
are now more forward.  It becomes mechanically impossible for the
breast-and-collarbone fascia to support the breast.  Weak fibers from
the outer side of the chest attached to the armpits must now do the
job.  But these fibers are incapable.  So there is a constant straining
and tearing at these tissues on the upper outer part of the breast.  It
is exactly in this site that more than 90% of breast cancer is found,
and it can be reasonably concluded that the deformation of the feet may
be an important cause."

You may find my thesis regarding shoes and disease on the Internet at:
http://www.shoebusters.com
Thank you very much for considering my novel approach.

James Semmel
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Mary Fisher - 10 Jan 2007 16:07 GMT
> TO: All breast cancer researchers, doctors, and patients.
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> and it can be reasonably concluded that the deformation of the feet may
> be an important cause."

On the prostate cancer ng this last para was changed to:

"Prostate cancer is just one example of diseases that are related to the
use of footwear.  The postural changes from wearing shoes include
sagging abdominal contents, visibly producing a potbelly in some men.
Of the internal damage lurking beneath the surface in all men, Dr.
Wikler writes, "Not all the pressure of the sagging diaphragm and
abdominal organs is dispersed through the anteriorly bulging abdomen; a
considerable portion of this pressure is directed backward against the
pelvic organs.  These organs, lying in a bony bowl, cannot escape the
injury and pressure from above.  In the male the prostate, being the
firmest organ, is particularly prone to injury.  Such mechanical forces
also cause a squeezing of the lower abdominal blood and lymph vessels
in the process, interfering with drainage of the prostate."  Diminished
circulation must surely influence hormonal balance and regulation, but
poor posture would also seem to disturb muscular control in the pelvic
region, such that the prostate cannot be fully voided or drained,
likewise contributing to male sterility.  Possible outcomes from faulty
body mechanics thus include congestion, hypertrophy, infection,
inflammation, irritation, or malignancy of the prostate gland."
Bob - 11 Jan 2007 06:55 GMT
> TO: All breast cancer researchers, doctors, and patients.

<snip>

> The purpose of this yearly post is to stimulate interest and discussion
> about the biomechanical effects of shoes on "age-related" degenerative
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> James Semmel
> Albuquerque, New Mexico

Personally, I think the bra is a contributer.

Signature

Enter any 11-digit prime number to continue...

bobert

Mary Fisher - 11 Jan 2007 10:08 GMT
Apparently it's not just prostate and breast cancers. Someone on the
prostate ng found these <VBG> :

It's not just breast cancer. With the help of Google, searching geoups, I
found the following from this prolific spammer:

3rd annual: Are shoes the cause of obesity?
alt.support.diet

2nd annual: Are shoes a cause of colon cancer?
alt.support.cancer

3rd annual: Are shoes the cause of Alzheimer's disease?
alt.support.alzheimers

2nd annual: Are shoes a cause of multiple sclerosis?
alt.support.mult-sclerosis

3rd annual: Are shoes the cause of diabetes?
alt.support.diabetes

2nd annual: Are shoes a cause of osteoporosis?
sci.med.diseases.osteoporosis

3rd annual: Are shoes the cause of vision problems?
sci.med.vision

3rd annual: Are shoes the cause of heart disease?
alt.support.mult-sclerosis

2nd annual: Are shoes a cause of Alzheimer's?
alt.support.alzheimers

3rd annual: Are shoes the cause of asthma?
alt.support.asthma

Are shoes a cause of rosacea?
Rosacea

All of which leads to the question: are shoes a cause of SPAM?

Ernie
Tim Jackson - 11 Jan 2007 12:17 GMT
> Apparently it's not just prostate and breast cancers. Someone on the
> prostate ng found these <VBG> :
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Ernie

It would be very leathery Spam!
:-(

Tim
allan - 11 Jan 2007 12:57 GMT
> It would be very leathery Spam!

Can I have her Spam instead of the baked beans?
Mary Fisher - 11 Jan 2007 13:31 GMT
>> It would be very leathery Spam!
>
> Can I have her Spam instead of the baked beans?

?

I don't understand!

Mary
Tim Jackson - 11 Jan 2007 18:12 GMT
>>> It would be very leathery Spam!
>> Can I have her Spam instead of the baked beans?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Mary

It's Monty Python, Mary.  A line from the "Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam,
Spam, Eggs and Spam" sketch.  From which apparently, and deviously,
comes the name spam for unwanted mail.

Tim
Mary Fisher - 12 Jan 2007 10:37 GMT
>>>> It would be very leathery Spam!
>>> Can I have her Spam instead of the baked beans?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Spam, Eggs and Spam" sketch.  From which apparently, and deviously, comes
> the name spam for unwanted mail.

Oh I remember the Monty Python song but still don't understand the baked
beans preference ...

Mary

> Tim
allan - 12 Jan 2007 13:31 GMT
> ?
>
> I don't understand!

Man:    You sit here, dear.

Wife:    All right.

Man:    Morning!

Waitress:    Morning!

Man:    Well, what've you got?

Waitress:    Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and
spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam; spam bacon
sausage and spam; spam egg spam spam bacon and spam; spam sausage spam
spam bacon spam tomato and spam;

Vikings:    Spam spam spam spam...

Waitress:    ...spam spam spam egg and spam; spam spam spam spam spam spam
baked beans spam spam spam...

Vikings:    Spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam!

Waitress:    ...or Lobster Thermidor a Crevette with a mornay sauce served
in a Provencale manner with shallots and aubergines garnished with
truffle pate, brandy and with a fried egg on top and spam.

Wife:    Have you got anything without spam?

Waitress:    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much
spam in it.

Wife:    I don't want ANY spam!

Man:    Why can't she have egg bacon spam and sausage?

Wife:    THAT'S got spam in it!

Man:    Hasn't got as much spam in it as spam egg sausage and spam, has
it?

Vikings:    Spam spam spam spam... (Crescendo through next few lines...)

Wife:    Could you do the egg bacon spam and sausage without the spam
then?

Waitress:    Urgghh!

Wife:    What do you mean 'Urgghh'? I don't like spam!

Vikings:    Lovely spam! Wonderful spam!

Waitress:    Shut up!

Vikings:    Lovely spam! Wonderful spam!

Waitress:    Shut up! (Vikings stop) Bloody Vikings! You can't have egg
bacon spam and sausage without the spam.

Wife:    I don't like spam!

Man:    Sshh, dear, don't cause a fuss. I'll have your spam. I love it.
I'm having spam spam spam spam spam spam spam beaked beans spam spam
spam and spam!

Vikings:    Spam spam spam spam. Lovely spam! Wonderful spam!

Waitress:    Shut up!! Baked beans are off.

Man:    Well could I have her spam instead of the baked beans then?

Waitress:    You mean spam spam spam spam spam spam... (but it is too late
and the Vikings drown her words)

Vikings:    (Singing elaborately...) Spam spam spam spam. Lovely spam!
Wonderful spam! Spam spa-a-a-a-a-am spam spa-a-a-a-a-am spam. Lovely
spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Spam spam
spam spam!
Mary Fisher - 12 Jan 2007 14:02 GMT
>> ?
>>
>> I don't understand!

<snip spam>

Thank you, darling, I obviously missed something, it couldn't possibly be my
memory :-)

Mary
Mary Fisher - 11 Jan 2007 13:31 GMT
>> Apparently it's not just prostate and breast cancers. Someone on the
>> prostate ng found these <VBG> :
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> It would be very leathery Spam!
> :-(

Gives us something to chew on.

Keeps our feet firmly on the ground.

Gets righ ... NO! I feel a thread of puns coming on :-)

Mary
James Semmel - 11 Jan 2007 16:45 GMT
Mary,

All of those questions can be summarized in a single one:

Are shoes a cause of disease in humans?

james

> Apparently it's not just prostate and breast cancers. Someone on the
> prostate ng found these <VBG> :
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>  Are shoes a cause of rosacea?
> Rosacea
Mary Fisher - 11 Jan 2007 17:05 GMT
> Mary,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> james

See other group.
Annie - 12 Jan 2007 07:14 GMT
I'm shocked! I go around in my stocking feet and have had cancer, twice
even, I've got allerigies, and I'm also a diabetic as well. I guess
that blows the theory about wearing shoes. I bet I put on shoes, MAYBE
once a week. I'm a homebody..
Take care there/God bless
annie

> Apparently it's not just prostate and breast cancers. Someone on the
> prostate ng found these <VBG> :
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
> Ernie
Mary Fisher - 12 Jan 2007 10:38 GMT
> I'm shocked! I go around in my stocking feet and have had cancer, twice
> even, I've got allerigies, and I'm also a diabetic as well. I guess
> that blows the theory about wearing shoes. I bet I put on shoes, MAYBE
> once a week. I'm a homebody..
> Take care there/God bless
> annie

But Annie - stockings are far WORSE than shoes - as you've proved!

Mary
x{yz}enophil44@hotmail.com - 12 Jan 2007 12:15 GMT
>> I'm shocked! I go around in my stocking feet and have had cancer, twice
>> even, I've got allerigies, and I'm also a diabetic as well. I guess
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>But Annie - stockings are far WORSE than shoes - as you've proved!

I didn't even wear socks until I got dire beates, when they threatened
me with all sorts of vague threats if I didn't wear slippers around the
house.

So, obviously, wearing the slippers must have given me BC ;d
Mary Fisher - 12 Jan 2007 12:24 GMT
>>> I'm shocked! I go around in my stocking feet and have had cancer, twice
>>> even, I've got allerigies, and I'm also a diabetic as well. I guess
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> So, obviously, wearing the slippers must have given me BC ;d

Come to think of it I never wear socks or stockings. Or slippers. You're all
wrong, it's sandals wot do it.

You've just reminded me who talked about Studio - I'll go and count :-)

Mary
A.P. Thorsen - 13 Jan 2007 02:39 GMT
>>>> I'm shocked! I go around in my stocking feet and have had cancer, twice
>>>> even,
>> I didn't even wear socks until I got dire beates, when they threatened
>> me with all sorts of vague threats if I didn't wear slippers around the
>> house.

> Come to think of it I never wear socks or stockings. Or slippers. You're
> all wrong, it's sandals wot do it.

Uh oh!  I'm seeing a pattern here.

I wear shoes as little as possible - bare feet when I can, sock feet if I
must.  Mama said I wouldn't even leave booties on when I was a baby.

Evidently, *not* wearing shoes must cause BC!

Ann T.
Remove 'dontsendspam' from address to reply by email
Strobe - 13 Jan 2007 07:39 GMT
>>>>> I'm shocked! I go around in my stocking feet and have had cancer, twice
>>>>> even,
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>Evidently, *not* wearing shoes must cause BC!

Naah, it's cutting your toenails that does it.
In EVERY case of BC, the victim had previously cut her nails.

You can't argue with statistics like that!
Mary Fisher - 13 Jan 2007 10:53 GMT
>>>>>> I'm shocked! I go around in my stocking feet and have had cancer,
>>>>>> twice
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> You can't argue with statistics like that!

Except that until my bc treatment I BIT my toe-nails.

I do hope that all this is being added to James' research.

Mary
Jon Bilec - 11 Jan 2007 18:47 GMT
www.researchmangosteen.org
www.mymangosteen.com/roybilec
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.