> I've been a member of the prostate cancer newsgroup for a few years and
> they have been a valuable tool for me in my battle against that
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> it is not going to be affected by tamoxafin this time since the drug
> obviously didn't kill it off the first time. Is that correct?
I guess it has somewhat more chance of being ER- in this case than in
the population as a whole, but it doesn't have to be. It could for
example be a completely new cancer that has developed since she went of
Tamoxifen.
> Secondly, with prostate cancer, a recurrence beyond ten years is
> usually a new cancer that develops in residual prostate tissue left
> behind in the original surgery. Is this true with breast cancer too?
Not always, breast cancer can lie dormant for a long time, more so than
prostate.
> Third, my mom has lost about 20 pounds for no reason within the last
> ten months or so, now down to less than 100 pounds. Is this an
> indicator of something more serious with the breast cancer? Except for
> osteoporosis, she seems to be in good health.
It's possible. A CAT scan might reveal any indications, if the biopsy
comes back positive. On the other hand it is also possible that the
microcalcifications are actually associated with whatever is causing the
weight loss and not with cancer at all. At 87 it would be unusual if
there weren't a few (age-related) things going on that would cause some
changes.
> I have more questions but I'll save them for after the biopsy results
> are in. Hopefully I will not need to ask them. Thanks for your time.
> Dave Perry
Fingers crossed for her.
Tim Jackson