Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Breast Cancer / July 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Study: Estratest doubles breast cancer risk

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ilena Rose - 24 Jul 2006 21:21 GMT
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060724/ap_on_he_me/estrogen_breast_cancer

By CARLA K. JOHNSON, Associated Press Writer
15 minutes ago


CHICAGO - Older women who take hormone pills that combine estrogen and
testosterone more than double their risk of breast cancer, according
to a study of more than 70,000 nurses.

ADVERTISEMENT

"This type of hormone therapy may help with mood, libido and bone
mineral density, but the possible risk of breast cancer may outweigh
these benefits," said study co-author Rulla Tamimi of Harvard Medical
School.

The findings, published in Monday's Archives of Internal Medicine, add
to the evidence that certain types of hormone supplements, such as
estrogen-progestin pills, increase women's risk of breast cancer,
strokes and heart attacks. Earlier research also found a greater
breast cancer risk in women with higher natural levels of
testosterone.

The overall risk of breast cancer among the participants in the latest
study was small, with 17 cases of the disease among the 500 or so
women who took the estrogen-testosterone combination.

Women's natural levels of estrogen and testosterone decline with
menopause.

Only about 2 percent of women taking hormones in the study in 2000
used a form that included testosterone. But usage climbed during the
24 years of the study as evidence appeared linking the hormone
combination to better bone density, improved mood and greater sexual
enjoyment.

Estrogen-testosterone pills are sold under the brand names Estratest
and Estratest H.S. by Solvay Pharmaceuticals of Marietta, Ga. Those
brand names appear on a Washington-based advocacy group's "Worst
Pills" list because of breast cancer risk.

"We strongly urge women not to use this product or similar products
from compounding pharmacists," said Dr. Sidney Wolfe, director of
Public Citizen's Health Research Group, which produces the Worst Pills
list.

The        Food and Drug Administration has asked Solvay for evidence
the drug eases hot flashes in menopausal women, as the label claims.
The company has requested a hearing on the matter.

The drug was approved 30 years ago, before such evidence was required.

The new study used data from the long-running Nurses' Health Study.
The women who took estrogen and testosterone after menopause had a 2
1/2 times higher risk of developing breast cancer than women who never
took hormones. Most of the women taking the combination used
Estratest.

"The company has not yet had the opportunity to review the details of
the study or the content of the article," said Solvay spokesman
Gabrielle Braswell.

The researchers took into account other breast cancer risk factors,
such as family history, weight and age at menopause and still found an
increased risk associated with estrogen-testosterone pills.

~~~~~~~~~~~

www.BreastImplantAwareness.org
madiba - 25 Jul 2006 17:13 GMT
> The drug was approved 30 years ago, before such evidence was required.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> took hormones. Most of the women taking the combination used
> Estratest.
So their risk was increased by 2.5, but how about their QoL? They
probably had a heck of a lot of fun during their menopause, perhaps
those that got BC after taking Estratest thought about it and said "it
was worth it!"  Lifestyle choices are something the committee should
think about before the witch-hunt begins...
Signature

madiba

Steph - 27 Jul 2006 08:53 GMT
>> The drug was approved 30 years ago, before such evidence was required.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> was worth it!"  Lifestyle choices are something the committee should
> think about before the witch-hunt begins...

Relative risk is a deceiver.
Airline pilots have a 1000 relative risk of dying in an airplane crash than
joe public. I don't see them leaving in droves..........
1000 times a very small risk is still a very small risk
madiba - 27 Jul 2006 14:53 GMT
> >> The drug was approved 30 years ago, before such evidence was required.
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> joe public. I don't see them leaving in droves..........
> 1000 times a very small risk is still a very small risk

Precisely, thats another reason the committee should not be too hasty in
going for the company's jugular..
Signature

madiba

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.