I was unable to access the newsgroups for a while but now I'm back. In
January I wrote that I had to go back a second time to the radiology place
as they found something in my mammogram they were concerned about The
second time they took a second set of pictures and then did an ultrasound
but still couldn't conclude anything and recommended a six-month follow-up.
However, my ob/gyn referred me to a surgeon as I was concerned. The surgeon
specialized in the breast and confirmed that it was not cancer (no surgery
needed - he just examined me under an orange light)
A. P. Thorsen - 26 Apr 2006 17:39 GMT
> I was unable to access the newsgroups for a while but now I'm back. In
> January I wrote that I had to go back a second time to the radiology place
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> specialized in the breast and confirmed that it was not cancer (no surgery
> needed - he just examined me under an orange light)
Great news, Deborah! Thanks for letting us know: This is a group that
loooves to hear good news.
Take care,
Ann T.
Remove 'dontsendspam' from address to reply by email
pami - 28 Apr 2006 21:43 GMT
pursue it...I just found out my results today and I have cancer...last year
my mammo was clean as well as my sonogram and I have it so bad in the breast
I need to get the breast off. I have a grade3 tumor and it had EIC in in
it...so it would reoccur.
Pami