Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Breast Cancer / February 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Neoadjuvant

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
R. Fizek - 30 Jan 2006 22:52 GMT
Hi,

Is there anyone out there on the neoadjuvant chemotherapy?  I have a few questions if you can help.

Tamara
Eva - 31 Jan 2006 03:28 GMT
Hi,

Is there anyone out there on the neoadjuvant chemotherapy?  I have a few
questions if you can help.
-------------
I'm not on it now, but I had it in 2004.

Neoadjuvant means you have the chemo before you have surgery.  I had a very
big tumor, so they (surgeon and oncologist) decided the best thing to do
would be to shrink it with chemo before operating.

I got terribly sick from the chemo, but the strategy worked.  The pathology
report after my mastectomy showed no active cancer was left in the breast.
Remember, I said I had a very big tumor!

Anything you want to ask me, don't be shy.
Eva
R. Fizek - 31 Jan 2006 04:00 GMT
Hi Eva,

Thanks for the invite to questions.  I was wondering what chemo you were on and how did you make the decision to go the neo route - doesn't yet seem like it is the most popular route and I guess that I am having some understandable reservations.

Thanks again.

Tamara

 "R. Fizek" <fizkowie1@verizon.net> wrote in message
 news:zMwDf.1469$8U2.1128@trndny06...
 Hi,

 Is there anyone out there on the neoadjuvant chemotherapy?  I have a few
 questions if you can help.
 -------------
 I'm not on it now, but I had it in 2004.

 Neoadjuvant means you have the chemo before you have surgery.  I had a very
 big tumor, so they (surgeon and oncologist) decided the best thing to do
 would be to shrink it with chemo before operating.

 I got terribly sick from the chemo, but the strategy worked.  The pathology
 report after my mastectomy showed no active cancer was left in the breast.
 Remember, I said I had a very big tumor!

 Anything you want to ask me, don't be shy.
 Eva
Eva - 01 Feb 2006 01:05 GMT
Hi Eva,

Thanks for the invite to questions.  I was wondering what chemo you were on
and how did you make the decision to go the neo route - doesn't yet seem
like it is the most popular route and I guess that I am having some
understandable reservations.
----------------
It was Adriamycin+Cytoxan followed by Taxotere.  4 A&C treatments, every 2
weeks, then the Taxotere was also 4 treatments, but every 3 weeks.

The decision was easy to make because, as I said, I had a very large tumor,
and the doctors said they wanted to shrink it with chemo before operating.
This would make it easier to perform the mastectomy.  They also said studies
have shown no significant difference in survival rates between women who
have surgery first and women who have chemo first.

Personally I am glad it was done this way because during the chemo
treatments I was able to see and feel the tumor getting smaller and smaller
until it shrank down to practically nothing.  This way I *knew* the chemo
was working.  It gave me a reason to continue on with the chemo even though
I had unusually bad side effects, and complete all the treatments.

Eva
R. Fizek - 01 Feb 2006 16:03 GMT
Hi Eva,

Did you have (or anyone else) have a side effect that you neck muscles felt weak and sore?  Kind of shaky like after a long period of using them?  I called the clinic and was told that this wasn't common but nothing to worry about - it just feels weird and of course I'm stressed about it -everyone says fatigue but some of these symptoms are hard to define...

Thanks again,

Tamara

 "R. Fizek" <fizkowie1@verizon.net> wrote in message
 news:ShBDf.3981$pO2.735@trndny09...
 Hi Eva,

 Thanks for the invite to questions.  I was wondering what chemo you were on
 and how did you make the decision to go the neo route - doesn't yet seem
 like it is the most popular route and I guess that I am having some
 understandable reservations.
 ----------------
 It was Adriamycin+Cytoxan followed by Taxotere.  4 A&C treatments, every 2
 weeks, then the Taxotere was also 4 treatments, but every 3 weeks.

 The decision was easy to make because, as I said, I had a very large tumor,
 and the doctors said they wanted to shrink it with chemo before operating.
 This would make it easier to perform the mastectomy.  They also said studies
 have shown no significant difference in survival rates between women who
 have surgery first and women who have chemo first.

 Personally I am glad it was done this way because during the chemo
 treatments I was able to see and feel the tumor getting smaller and smaller
 until it shrank down to practically nothing.  This way I *knew* the chemo
 was working.  It gave me a reason to continue on with the chemo even though
 I had unusually bad side effects, and complete all the treatments.

 Eva
A. P. Thorsen - 06 Feb 2006 19:53 GMT
> Hi Eva,
>  
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> about it -everyone says fatigue but some of these symptoms are hard to
> define...

I had various weird musculo-skeletal things during chemo.  My back gave
me trouble (resulting in more bone scans!).   The left side of my face
in the jaw area felt numb.

I didn't have the specific weak/shaky/sore thing you're talking about,
but that also sounds like it could be musculoskeletal.

In my case, I concluded it was caused by some combination of stress,
weakening due to the general physical effects of chemo, and fatigue.
What helped:  Stretching/yoga, a really swell kind of heating pad called
a "thermophore", exercise, manipulation by an osteopathic physician, and
(especially) massage.  Oh, yeah -- and getting through chemo & getting
stronger again <grin>.

Many of us find we have some strange minor symptoms from the chemo (or
the stress, etc.).  You're doing the right thing by checking with your
onco docs.   Once they tell you not to worry, do try to do that --
there's plenty to worry about on this road without sweatin' the small
stuff.  If that fails, make them give you some Nice Xanax or Ativan or
something <evil grin>.

Take care,

Ann T.
Remove 'dontsendspam' from address to reply by email
R. Fizek - 07 Feb 2006 00:40 GMT
Hi Ann,

Ah -the small stuff - you mean that stuff that I never even gave a thought to before my diagnosis and now suddenly seem overwhelmed and obsessed with?  I already have the Xanax ( had to get after my diagnosis because I lost 7 lbs vomiting and diarrhea from the stress but stupid me - I hate to take it  - you know the "crutch" business.  (My mom had major depression through all of my adult life and I clearly remember the "lost is space" states from the meds and I don't want to be that way both for me and for my husband - I feel like I have to "confess" every time I need to take a Xanax)  That's why I'm going to see the behavioral medicine person at the clinic - maybe she can help me to come to terms with this.

Thanks for your posts - the support is very appreciated.

Tamara
 R. Fizek wrote:
 > Hi Eva,
 >  
 > Did you have (or anyone else) have a side effect that you neck muscles
 > felt weak and sore?  Kind of shaky like after a long period of using
 > them?  I called the clinic and was told that this wasn't common but
 > nothing to worry about - it just feels weird and of course I'm stressed
 > about it -everyone says fatigue but some of these symptoms are hard to
 > define...

 I had various weird musculo-skeletal things during chemo.  My back gave
 me trouble (resulting in more bone scans!).   The left side of my face
 in the jaw area felt numb.

 I didn't have the specific weak/shaky/sore thing you're talking about,
 but that also sounds like it could be musculoskeletal.

 In my case, I concluded it was caused by some combination of stress,
 weakening due to the general physical effects of chemo, and fatigue.
 What helped:  Stretching/yoga, a really swell kind of heating pad called
 a "thermophore", exercise, manipulation by an osteopathic physician, and
 (especially) massage.  Oh, yeah -- and getting through chemo & getting
 stronger again <grin>.

 Many of us find we have some strange minor symptoms from the chemo (or
 the stress, etc.).  You're doing the right thing by checking with your
 onco docs.   Once they tell you not to worry, do try to do that --
 there's plenty to worry about on this road without sweatin' the small
 stuff.  If that fails, make them give you some Nice Xanax or Ativan or
 something <evil grin>.

 Take care,

 Ann T.
 Remove 'dontsendspam' from address to reply by email
alex - 07 Feb 2006 01:26 GMT
Tamara

Don't be hard on yourself, being diagnosed is very life altering. Things will get better, sounds like your doctors are progressive and knowledigible. My kids were school age when I was diagnosed and they were are doing fine in college now.

Alex
Tim Jackson - 01 Feb 2006 08:07 GMT
> Hi Eva,
>  
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>  
> Tamara

It's an interesting question.

There doesn't seem to be any strong logical reason in most cases to do
the surgery before the chemotherapy, but there are some cancers that are
relatively unresponsive to any particular chemotherapy, so doing chemo
first puts this minority of patients at risk of disease progression
before surgery.

However this risk becomes irrelevant where the tumour is large enough
that surgery may not be able to remove it all.  Logically is would seem
that even then, doing surgery to remove what can be removed and then
doing chemo seems equivalent, but the advantage of the 'neo' route in
this case is that the path. lab gets to check that the chemo did its
critical job.

Tim Jackson
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.