alex ha scritto:
> Chiara,
> With your history I would ask for a biospy now, I don't think that is
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> all again! Hopefully it is a cyst...did they drain it during the ultrasound?
> Alex
It has not been drained, however, at least it DID look like a cyst and
not a diffuse mass. I'll keep my fingers crossed and think that the
cyst that had been drained last year may be filling up again.
However, my annual follow-up is next Tuesday - I'll insist that they
take this bloody thing off of me anyway, and keep you posted.
P.S. In case it is a recurrence (knocking on wood), would chemo be the
same? My guess is that if it did zilch on the first time they would be
going for stronger drugs.
Thanks,
Chiara
Tim Jackson - 08 Nov 2005 17:09 GMT
> It has not been drained, however, at least it DID look like a cyst and
> not a diffuse mass. I'll keep my fingers crossed and think that the
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Thanks,
> Chiara
I'd guess at the same.
No-one knows what the first chemo did or did not do - there were no
signs or symptoms before or after. This is "adjuvant" therapy, that is
it is essentially prophylactic, done to reduce the *risk* of recurrence,
so its benefit or otherwise can never be demonstrated in any individual
case, only statistically across a large population.
If this did turn out to be a recurrence then it is probably a cancer
cell which was for some reason dormant at the time of chemo, but has
since become active. Chemo can generally only attack active, dividing
cells.
Tim Jackson