Maybe Tim can sort out the new findings.
J
<http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20050720/HBREAST2
0/TPHealth/>
Breast cancer risk linked to sleep patterns
By ANDRÉ PICARD
Wednesday, July 20, 2005 Page A13
One of the most effective ways to reduce the risk of breast cancer may be
to regularly get a good night's sleep -- in the dark.
A new study shows that women with the highest levels of melatonin -- a
hormone the body produces only when a person is sleeping at night, in the
dark -- have a breast cancer risk that is 40 per cent lower than those
with low levels of melatonin.
Dr. Eva Schernhammer, an epidemiologist at Brigham and Women's Hospital in
Boston, said the research suggests that "melatonin secretion may play an
important role in breast cancer development."
She said that when and how well a woman sleeps may also influence whether
she develops breast cancer, and that sleep patterns could also have an
impact on tumour development and, by extension, on the effectiveness of
treatment.
The research, published in today's edition of the Journal of the National
Cancer Institute, seems to confirm the long-held hypothesis about the
cause of sharply higher breast cancer rates among shift workers.
A number of studies have shown that workers who regularly toil on the
late-night shift, such as nurses, are about twice as likely to develop
breast cancer as those who work day shifts.
Disruption of melatonin production was long suspected as the culprit, but
it was only a theory, based on a retrospective look at the work habits of
cancer patients.
The new study by Dr. Schernhammer and a team at Harvard University is
different in that the researchers actually measured levels of melatonin in
the urine of women before and after they developed breast cancer.
The research is an offshoot of the massive Harvard Nurses Study, in which
the health of almost 120,000 nurses has been tracked since 1989. As part
of that project, more than 30,000 women have provided regular urine
samples.
The new study by Dr. Schernhammer focused on 147 women who developed
breast cancer; they were compared with 291 women of similar background who
did not develop it.
Melatonin production peaks at night, and exposure to light at night
interrupts production of the hormone. When this occurs, it also stimulates
a women's ovaries to produce extra estrogen; excess production of the
female sex hormone is a known risk for breast cancer.
The idea that too much exposure to light can raise a woman's cancer risk
derives from earlier research on blind women, who are half as likely to
develop breast cancer as sighted women. In blind women, melatonin levels
do not fluctuate and, as a result, their estrogen levels are more stable.
In the new study, researchers found that melatonin levels were sharply
lower in women who developed breast cancer, even well before their
diagnosis. Among the 25 per cent of women with the lowest levels of
melatonin, 50 developed breast cancer; by comparison, among the 25 per
cent with the highest levels of melatonin, 23 developed breast cancer.
Dr. Schernhammer said the results suggest that the melatonin is
influencing risk, not the shift work itself.
This year, an estimated 21,600 women and 150 men will be diagnosed with
breast cancer, according to the Canadian Cancer Society, and an estimated
5,300 women and 45 men will die of the disease.
Eva - 21 Jul 2005 00:16 GMT
> Maybe Tim can sort out the new findings.
---------
I hope someone can, because this kind of thing is maddening for me. I sleep
like a top, all night, every night. Every time they come out with a new
risk factor for BC, it's something I don't have. By all rights I should
never have gotten this disease!
Eva
Mark - 21 Jul 2005 11:09 GMT
Eva,
If you study most of the risk factors that increase your BC risk, estrogen
seems to be a key. In other words, most things that increase estrogen
production, increase the odds of BC. Early menstrous (sp), being overweight
(fat cells store more estrogen), aborted pregnancies and now melatonin
levels to name a few.
My wife who's forty-five has had BC for 10 1/2 years now. It recurred 3 1/2
years ago w/mets to her brain and lung. She's 5'4", 110 lbs. w/no family
history. If there's anyone who shouldn't have gotten the disease it's her.
That's not what happens with this disease though. Bad things happen and
they can happen to anyone. Try not to spend energy asking why, but using it
to deal with treatment/improving your life instead.
We were told she would live "a year maybe two" by some of the most renowned
experts in the Boston area. Since that time we have traveled to France with
our daughter, Ireland with her parents, Italy (just the two of us) and have
just finished a Mediterranean cruise. Is life perfect, of course it isn't
(but then again is it ever?). We both know what's probably in the cards and
just try to enjoy the time we have together b/c both of us realize that's
it's finite.
Mark
> > Maybe Tim can sort out the new findings.
> ---------
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Eva
Eva - 22 Jul 2005 00:34 GMT
> Eva,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> (fat cells store more estrogen), aborted pregnancies and now melatonin
> levels to name a few.
---------
Well, the link between abortions and BC is controversial, but it's
irrelevant to me as I never had one. I also had one ovary removed in 1992
(not malignant), so you'd think I would have less estrogen than the average
woman. And I have never been overweight either.
----------
> My wife who's forty-five has had BC for 10 1/2 years now. It recurred 3 1/2
> years ago w/mets to her brain and lung. She's 5'4", 110 lbs. w/no family
> history. If there's anyone who shouldn't have gotten the disease it's her.
> That's not what happens with this disease though. Bad things happen and
> they can happen to anyone. Try not to spend energy asking why, but using it
> to deal with treatment/improving your life instead.
----------
I'm sorry if I gave you the impression I was moaning about "Why me?"--that
wasn't my intention. I was aiming for wry humor. Guess I missed the Mark.
----------
> We were told she would live "a year maybe two" by some of the most renowned
> experts in the Boston area. Since that time we have traveled to France with
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> just try to enjoy the time we have together b/c both of us realize that's
> it's finite.
----------
This sounds very much like the story of a book I just read, _Janet And Me_
by Stan Mack. The couple in the book also did a lot of world traveling
after Janet's cancer recurred. I have never traveled and wish I had the
resources to do so. I think what you're doing is great and wish you the
best.
Eva