Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Breast Cancer / July 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Heart Tests: Flaws & Failings of MUGA

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
su-texas@webtv.net - 28 Jun 2005 01:04 GMT
I spoke with the cancer center, & the MUGA test doesn't actually check
very good for heart damage.

All that the MUGA report states, the only sentence in it, ..... is about
the left ventricular (ventricle ?) ejection fraction, the percent.

The MUGA test checks only one thing.

It does NOT adequately check for heart damage or malfunction.

Before (or if) starting any cancer treatments, I would recommend the
ECHOcardiogram, which can check this & many other things about heart
function, ...... & which is a simple, non-invasive, not-radiation-based,
not-chemical-based, ultrasound test.

Susan, Su_Texas  my opinions
allan grossman - 28 Jun 2005 23:13 GMT
>The MUGA test checks only one thing.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>function, ...... & which is a simple, non-invasive, not-radiation-based,
>not-chemical-based, ultrasound test.

Susan, I've had you in my twit filter for a heck of a long time but
decided recently to check things out to see if they've changed.  When
you start spouting misinformation and recommending that misinformation
to other cancer survivors it's time for me to speak up.

Rant and whine all you like, but your information above is medically
inaccurate.  If you don't know what a MUGA scan does, why the LVEF
measurement is important or what else the doctor can see I suggest you

This is a cancer *support* newsgroup.  Lying to people or making up
stories to fill the gaps in your own limited medical knowledge isn't
support.  Before you start passing out advice perhaps it'd be good to
make sure your information is solid - and in this case it isn't.

And now, back to the twit filter you go.

*plonk*

Signature

allan

we don't see things as they are, we see them as we are.
-- Anais Nin

su-texas@webtv.net - 29 Jun 2005 00:17 GMT
From: su-texas@webtv.net

I spoke with the cancer center, & the MUGA test doesn't actually check
very good for heart damage.

All that the MUGA report states, the only sentence in it, ..... is about
the left ventricular (ventricle ?) ejection fraction, the percent.

The MUGA test checks only one thing.
It does NOT adequately check for heart damage or malfunction.

Before (or if) starting any cancer treatments, I would recommend the
ECHOcardiogram, which can check this & many other things about heart
function, ...... & which is a simple, non-invasive, not-radiation-based,
not-chemical-based, ultrasound test.

=====================================From: wizard@no_spam.pointbeing.com (allan grossman)

Susan, I've had you in my twit filter for a heck of a long time but
decided recently to check things out to see if they've changed.
When you start spouting misinformation and recommending that
misinformation to other cancer survivors it's time for me to speak up.

Rant and whine all you like, but your information above is medically
inaccurate.
If you don't know what a MUGA scan does, why the LVEF measurement is
important or what else the doctor can see I suggest you

This is a cancer *support* newsgroup.

Lying to people or making up stories to fill the gaps in your own
limited medical knowledge isn't support.

Before you start passing out advice perhaps it'd be good to make sure
your information is solid - and in this case it isn't.

And now, back to the twit filter you go.

*plonk*

Signature

allan

we don't see things as they are, we see them as we are. -- Anais Nin

======================================Su_Texas writes:

I'm posting from personal experience, & from what the Cancer Center just
told me about the MUGA. They said the report contains one sentence, &
that all it says is the LVEF percentage.

If this information is incorrect, then the Cancer Center lied to me
about it. And I doubt they did.

Also, a whole lot more than the LVEF needs to be checked, ..... before,
during & after chemotherapy, ..... & the ECHOcardiogram can do this.
It's the preferred heart test by cardiologists.

If you can't face or deal in facts, truth & reality, allan, then that's
your problem, ..... of which you seem have many, including the need to
act f-ugly in public, to encourage others to do so, & to brag about it.

Since you've always acted nasty to me here, I don't expect your behavior
to change for the better, ..... nor (as you well know), do I value your
opinions or bad games, the harm you try to do.

Please keep trying Not to read my posts. Learn to practice some impulse
control, self-control, OK? You'll be a better person for it.

Susan, Su_Texas  my opinions

allan grossman - 29 Jun 2005 00:46 GMT
>Please keep trying Not to read my posts. Learn to practice some impulse
>control, self-control, OK? You'll be a better person for it.

Nah.  That wouldn't be any fun.

I think maybe instead I'll start reading your posts and pointing out
the inaccuracies - along with providing the correct information.  It
was kinda amusing that when your fallacy was pointed out you accused
the medical facility of lying to you.

They're not the ones who's credibility's shot here, Susan  :-)

Most people here are trying to support each other and IMO your posts
are completely self-serving.  Anyone capable of searching on your
email address can find out exactly what kind of person you are.  Suck
a search is highly recommended.

Have fun.  I know I will  ;-D

Signature

allan

we don't see things as they are, we see them as we are.
-- Anais Nin

su-texas@webtv.net - 29 Jun 2005 01:52 GMT
From: su-texas@webtv.net

I spoke with the cancer center, & the MUGA test doesn't actually check
very good for heart damage.

All that the MUGA report states, the only sentence in it, ..... is about
the left ventricular (ventricle ?) ejection fraction, the percent.

The MUGA test checks only one thing.

It does NOT adequately check for heart damage or malfunction.

Before (or if) starting any cancer treatments, I would recommend the
ECHOcardiogram, which can check this & many other things about heart
function, ...... & which is a simple, non-invasive, not-radiation-based,
not-chemical-based, ultrasound test.

=======================================

From: wizard@no_spam.pointbeing.com (allan grossman)

Susan, I've had you in my twit filter for a heck of a long time but
decided recently to check things out to see if they've changed.
When you start spouting misinformation and recommending that
misinformation to other cancer survivors it's time for me to speak up.

Rant and whine all you like, but your information above is medically
inaccurate.

If you don't know what a MUGA scan does, why the LVEF measurement is
important or what else the doctor can see I suggest you

This is a cancer *support* newsgroup.

Lying to people or making up stories to fill the gaps in your own
limited medical knowledge isn't support.

Before you start passing out advice perhaps it'd be good to make sure
your information is solid - and in this case it isn't.

And now, back to the twit filter you go.
*plonk*

Signature

allan

we don't see things as they are, we see them as we are. -- Anais Nin

========================================

Su_Texas wrote:

I'm posting from personal experience, & from what the Cancer Center just
told me about the MUGA.

They said the report contains one sentence, & that all it says is the
LVEF percentage.

If this information is incorrect, then the Cancer Center lied to me
about it. And I doubt they did.

Also, a whole lot more than the LVEF needs to be checked, ..... before,
during & after chemotherapy, ..... & the ECHOcardiogram can do this.
It's the preferred heart test by cardiologists.

If you can't face or deal in facts, truth & reality, allan, then that's
your problem, ..... of which you seem have many, including the need to
act f-ugly in public, to encourage others to do so, & to brag about it.

Since you've always acted nasty to me here, I don't expect your behavior
to change for the better, ..... nor (as you well know), do I value your
opinions or bad games, the harm you try to do.

Please keep trying Not to read my posts. Learn to practice some impulse
control, self-control, OK? You'll be a better person for it.

===================================From: wizard@no_spam.pointbeing.com (allan grossman)

Nah. That wouldn't be any fun.

I think maybe instead I'll start reading your posts and pointing out the
inaccuracies - along with providing the correct information.

It was kinda amusing that when your fallacy was pointed out you accused
the medical facility of lying to you.

They're not the ones who's credibility's shot here, Susan :-)

Most people here are trying to support each other and IMO your posts are
completely self-serving.

Anyone capable of searching on your email address can find out exactly
what kind of person you are.

Suck a search is highly recommended.

Have fun. I know I will ;-D

===================================Su_Texas writes:

You've proved to be a common troll & stalker, allan.

You play the Determinedly-Dumb & Dastardly game over & over, & act like
(in your mind), it makes you wonderful somehow. ???

I didn't make a false statement, "fallacy" as you've claim, ...... about
my experience with the MUGA test, or about what the Cancer Center just
told me about it.

Do all the searches you want. That's what the Google Archives are for.

But don't use it as a lame excuse or justification to stalk, pester &
harass me, ...... because of your obvious inability to read & comprehend
the written word, your inability to think & reason, your lack of good
morals & mindset, ...... because of Your problems, allan.

This is a breast cancer support group, Not your hunting & preying
ground.

Susan, Su_Texas   my opinions

Mary Fisher - 29 Jun 2005 09:38 GMT
> This is a breast cancer support group, Not your hunting & preying
> ground.

Yes, please remember that, Susan.

If you can't SUPPORT readers on this group just stay away.

Mary
allan grossman - 29 Jun 2005 09:59 GMT
>This is a breast cancer support group, Not your hunting & preying
>ground.

Signature

allan

we don't see things as they are, we see them as we are.
-- Anais Nin

Mary Fisher - 29 Jun 2005 10:31 GMT
Self Pity

I never saw a wild thing
sorry for itself.
A small bird will drop frozen dead from a bough
without ever having felt sorry for itself.

D. H. Lawrence
Tim Jackson - 29 Jun 2005 12:06 GMT
> Self Pity
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> D. H. Lawrence

How does he know?

Tim
Mary Fisher - 29 Jun 2005 12:17 GMT
>> Self Pity
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>>
> How does he know?

He DOESN'T :-)

He's dead too ... it gets us all whether we feel sorry for ourwelves or not.

Mary

> Tim
marilyn@utrillo.ac - 29 Jun 2005 13:20 GMT
>Self Pity
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>D. H. Lawrence

Thank you. I wonder if he wrote that after he became ill with TB.
Which reminds me that I have a tape of Kenneth Branagh playing a young
Lawrence in "Coming Through" that I should rewatch while doing this
interminable spring cleaning of the kitchen.

Marilyn
Mary Fisher - 29 Jun 2005 13:57 GMT
>>Self Pity
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Thank you. I wonder if he wrote that after he became ill with TB.

I've no idea, I was looking up something else (not DHL) and it leapt off the
page.

> Which reminds me that I have a tape of Kenneth Branagh playing a young
> Lawrence in "Coming Through" that I should rewatch while doing this
> interminable spring cleaning of the kitchen.

I really should begin mine :-) Life's so full of more interesting things to
do though!

Mary
marilyn@utrillo.ac - 29 Jun 2005 15:35 GMT
>> Which reminds me that I have a tape of Kenneth Branagh playing a young
>> Lawrence in "Coming Through" that I should rewatch while doing this
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Mary

This month is the first time in about 6 years that I haven't had
student tenants living here full time, so I've been able to take
everything out of a room, clean it properly,  and put everything back.
You can't ask paying tenants to climb over a bunch of upside-down
furniture.

This cleaning process has been working really well, except that a lot
of things I need to  find places for are all ending up in one room,
which will probably have to be bulldozed. <g>

Freecycling has been a lifesaver. People have taken books, a filing
cabinet, bedding, a mattress and boxspring, and cleaning products.

And to keep me motivated, I made a bargain with myself that on days
when I clean or paint a room  I don't have to go to the gym.

When I get to the nasty basement in a couple of weeks I'll be saying
if I go to the gym I won't have to clean the basement...

Marilyn


Mary Fisher - 29 Jun 2005 15:42 GMT
> Freecycling has been a lifesaver.

It's a wonderful scheme :-)

> And to keep me motivated, I made a bargain with myself that on days
> when I clean or paint a room  I don't have to go to the gym.

LOL!

> When I get to the nasty basement in a couple of weeks I'll be saying
> if I go to the gym I won't have to clean the basement...

I have no basement and no gym so I haven't that motivation :-(

Making meals, however, is!

Pasta tonight, still have leftovers (i.e. too much bought in) from the
party. And once the courgettes start you have to keep up with them! Last
night's rain has brought everything in the garden on, it's like a miracle.
It IS a miracle.

Marilyn, you're a woman after my own heart!

Mary
A. P. Thorsen - 29 Jun 2005 17:14 GMT
>>Which reminds me that I have a tape of Kenneth Branagh playing a young
>>Lawrence in "Coming Through" that I should rewatch while doing this
>>interminable spring cleaning of the kitchen.
>
> I really should begin mine :-) Life's so full of more interesting things to
> do though!

I'm curious . . . what is this mysterious "spring cleaning" thing of
which you speak? <g>

Ann T.
Remove 'dontsendspam' from address to reply by email
Mary Fisher - 29 Jun 2005 17:40 GMT
>>>Which reminds me that I have a tape of Kenneth Branagh playing a young
>>>Lawrence in "Coming Through" that I should rewatch while doing this
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> I'm curious . . . what is this mysterious "spring cleaning" thing of which
> you speak? <g>

Well, yes, only sluts need to clean. I'll not bother. Or perhaps I'll wait
until spring.

Or it could be the spring on the weighing scales which have a bit of dust on
it. Yes, that'll be it...

My old neighbour used to say that only mucky people have baths :-)

Mary

> Ann T.
> Remove 'dontsendspam' from address to reply by email
marilyn@utrillo.ac - 29 Jun 2005 18:32 GMT
>I'm curious . . . what is this mysterious "spring cleaning" thing of
>which you speak? <g>
>
>Ann T.

I just read that Charlotte Church, the singer who does that horrible
chin wobble when she sings, moved out of her flat and into a new one
because the old one was dirty and she couldn't be bothered to clean
it.  Must be nice to be so wealthy.

I'm obviously not getting any work done in this heat.  Maybe a quart
of  ice cream would make me feel better. You are all invited to join
me.

Marilyn
Eva - 29 Jun 2005 22:31 GMT
> >>Which reminds me that I have a tape of Kenneth Branagh playing a young
> >>Lawrence in "Coming Through" that I should rewatch while doing this
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> I'm curious . . . what is this mysterious "spring cleaning" thing of
> which you speak? <g>
------------
When I was terribly sick and weak from chemo, for the first time in my life
I engaged the services of a "cleaning lady."  She comes and cleans my
apartment every two weeks.  This is absolute paradise, well worth the
expense.  I am now well enough to clean....er, to feel guilty about not
cleaning....but I decided that life is literally too short to spend any more
time feeling guilty about having a dirty apartment.  I am really, really
happy with my nice clean apartment and my wonderful cleaning lady.  I am
even inspired to start cleaning out closets and boxes and back shelves
myself, because I don't have to bother about dusting, mopping, and vacuuming
any more.

Eva
marilyn@utrillo.ac - 30 Jun 2005 01:01 GMT
>------------
>When I was terribly sick and weak from chemo, for the first time in my life
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Eva

This sounds really tempting.

Marilyn
Pamela Cook - 30 Jun 2005 17:25 GMT
> >------------
> >When I was terribly sick and weak from chemo, for the first time in my life
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Marilyn

Then do it...I have had me cleaner for about 5 years now...Once a week my
house is 'done'...I was working a lot of extra hours at the time and it was
stressing me  (Not a lot !!!)   She is a semi -retired farmer's widow, and
'does' for a few folks round here..she charges less than 3 packs of ciggies
(Which I gave up 12 years ago)  to finance her coach holidays...Which I'm
accompanying her on as soon as I've done radiation....  She's become a real
friend  and does anything I ask...dead down to earth......We go to bingo
together now and again as she don't like driving to town ...Well
reccommended.

pam xx
marilyn@utrillo.ac - 30 Jun 2005 19:37 GMT
>Then do it...I have had me cleaner for about 5 years now...Once a week my
>house is 'done'...I was working a lot of extra hours at the time and it was
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>pam xx

I haven't cleaned well since chemo started in 2002, and really, for
the last three years I've felt too blah and foggy  to even make
decisions about what to clean and how to do it.  I did enough to get
by, barely.

Somehow in May this year I woke up and starting cleaning and getting
rid of excess stuff.  Two rooms (the worst two) and the basement to
do, which will probably take till mid August if the basement needs new
cement on the floor.

I'm actually enjoying it right now. If I get someone to do a weekly or
bi-weekly basic cleaning all winter, which I hate doing,  and then I
spend my summers doing the deep cleaning, repairing, painting, sorting
and decluttering, room by room, which I like doing, then I'll have the
best of both worlds. And I can probably pick up some cleaning tips
too.

Thanks for putting this in my  head. And good luck with radiation.
Hope it goes as well for you as it did for me.

Marilyn, getting ready to clean the "food shelves" in my kitchen.
Maybe there's some chocolate hidden away.
Mary Fisher - 30 Jun 2005 19:43 GMT
> Somehow in May this year I woke up and starting cleaning and getting
> rid of excess stuff.

Have you heard of freecycle?

Mary
marilyn@utrillo.ac - 30 Jun 2005 22:17 GMT
>> Somehow in May this year I woke up and starting cleaning and getting
>> rid of excess stuff.
>
>Have you heard of freecycle?
>
>Mary

I adore Freecycle. We've only had it a few months in my little city
but I've given away an old double mattress and box spring to someone
who was sleeping on the floor, a little space heater to a senior
living in a basement apartment, shoes, hair conditioner, a filing
cabinet, a glass cutting board, dishes, my old push mower, a
humidifier, a comforter, old carpet, cleaning supplies and lots of
books.

And even better news is that I haven't brought anything extra into the
house.  <g>

Today I found lots of little things in the kitchen to give away but
there isn't any kind of theme to them so I don't know if anyone will
want them -chopsticks, water glasses, a couple of old antique saucers,
mugs,  a plastic water pitcher, measuring spoons. I have three more
shelves to clean so I'll just keep everything until I've finished.
Maybe if I have a box full somebody will take it.

Why does a single person living alone have 24 chopsticks?

Marilyn


Mary Fisher - 30 Jun 2005 22:25 GMT
>>> Somehow in May this year I woke up and starting cleaning and getting
>>> rid of excess stuff.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> I adore Freecycle.

So do I.

> We've only had it a few months in my little city

I don't know how long it's been in my city but I've only been a freecycler
since May. It's amazing what's offered! The other night I was given a
Japanese cucumber plant,  a butternut plant and something else the donor
couldn't remember. It will be fun finding out! I wish FC had been around
years ago, I've tipped so much stuff which I KNOW someone else could have
used. I've also made some good, like-minded friends. It's making me WANT to
give away perfectly good things I've acquired and don't need. Like all those
towels from dead parents in law which are now cut up to use as nappies! Wish
I'd thought of that ;-)

> but I've given away an old double mattress and box spring to someone
> who was sleeping on the floor, a little space heater to a senior
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> And even better news is that I haven't brought anything extra into the
> house.  <g>

That's the key, isn't it!

> Today I found lots of little things in the kitchen to give away but
> there isn't any kind of theme to them so I don't know if anyone will
> want them -chopsticks, water glasses, a couple of old antique saucers,
> mugs,  a plastic water pitcher, measuring spoons. I have three more
> shelves to clean so I'll just keep everything until I've finished.
> Maybe if I have a box full somebody will take it.

I hope so.

> Why does a single person living alone have 24 chopsticks?

er - pass!

Mary
Tim Jackson - 01 Jul 2005 20:17 GMT
> Why does a single person living alone have 24 chopsticks?

Regularly visits Chinese restaurants and habitually pockets the sticks?

Check whether you also perhaps have 17 airline salt packets, 13 mini
cartons of non-dairy creamer, 3 single portions of jam/jelly, 7 hotel
soap bars and a polythene shower cap.

Tim

Who has a 3-year-old portion pack of Macdonalds ketchup in the kitchen
for reasons long forgotten.
marilyn@utrillo.ac - 01 Jul 2005 21:22 GMT
>> Why does a single person living alone have 24 chopsticks?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>cartons of non-dairy creamer, 3 single portions of jam/jelly, 7 hotel
>soap bars and a polythene shower cap.

>Tim

LOL.  I used to work as a traveling auditor for the government and
stayed in hotels where you got the cute little bottles of shampoo and
shower gel. I couldn't resist those. At one point I had about 40
little bottles.

Now that I'm retired those little bottles come in handy for packing my
own shampoo and gel in, because I stay in bed and breakfast hotels
that don't provide them.  But I've whittled them down to about 6.

I gave the chopsticks away yesterday to a nice single mom with two
little boys who came to pick up some cleaning supplies I was
freecycling. I had the top of my deacon's bench covered with extra
glasses, mugs, spoons and things and she took that all as well.  And
was thrilled to get it. One of her children is in French immersion so
I was able to give him a TinTin book that I don't read any more.

Now I'm cleaning out my food shelves.  I wonder how old does coconut
and cooking chocolate have to be before I won't eat it?  I'll probably
never know!

Marilyn
Bea - - 01 Jul 2005 21:57 GMT
>Now I'm cleaning out my food shelves. I
> wonder how old does coconut and cooking
> chocolate have to be before I won't eat it? I'll
> probably never know!
>Marilyn

Try checking out this site Marilyn.  Wouldn't want you getting sick
eating spoiled coconut.

http://www.ext.vt.edu/pubs/foods/348-960/348-960.html

Bea
Mary Fisher - 01 Jul 2005 21:58 GMT
>> Why does a single person living alone have 24 chopsticks?
> Regularly visits Chinese restaurants and habitually pockets the sticks?
>
> Check whether you also perhaps have 17 airline salt packets, 13 mini
> cartons of non-dairy creamer, 3 single portions of jam/jelly, 7 hotel soap
> bars and a polythene shower cap.

LOL!

We have none of any of the above - but we don't eat out or up!

> Tim
>
> Who has a 3-year-old portion pack of Macdonalds ketchup in the kitchen for
> reasons long forgotten.

If I were you I'd stand clear, it might explode at any time!

Mary
allan grossman - 29 Jun 2005 10:06 GMT
>You've proved to be a common troll & stalker, allan.

I think just about everybody in this group would disagree with that
statement, so I think I'll go with the majority  :-*

>You play the Determinedly-Dumb & Dastardly game over & over, & act like
>(in your mind), it makes you wonderful somehow. ???

Neither determinedly, dumb or dastardly are proper nouns - there's no
need to capitalize them, honest  ;-)

>I didn't make a false statement, "fallacy" as you've claim, ...... about
>my experience with the MUGA test, or about what the Cancer Center just
>told me about it.

Horsefeathers.

>Do all the searches you want. That's what the Google Archives are for.

They do turn up some amazing things - the most amusing was when you
told the cycling group that you thought you may have rabies.  That was
the same post where you said that Arimidex caused your lymphedema.
It's a good thing you didn't say that here - you probably wouldn't get
away with it  ;-)

>But don't use it as a lame excuse or justification to stalk, pester &
>harass me, ...... because of your obvious inability to read & comprehend
>the written word, your inability to think & reason, your lack of good
>morals & mindset, ...... because of Your problems, allan.

My comprehension of the written word is as good as just about
anyone's, Susan.  Far as I can tell my ability to think and reason is
pretty darned good too.  And morals?  You're talking out your hat.

>This is a breast cancer support group, Not your hunting & preying
>ground.

Then may I suggest you give up the self-serving garbage and try and
provide a little support instead of all the misinformation and public
whining?  I hate professional victims.

Have a nice day :-*

Signature

allan

we don't see things as they are, we see them as we are.
-- Anais Nin

Mary Fisher - 29 Jun 2005 10:20 GMT
> Horsefeathers.

That's polite ...

>>Do all the searches you want. That's what the Google Archives are for.
>
> They do turn up some amazing things - the most amusing was when you
> told the cycling group that you thought you may have rabies.

What cycling group is that?

>>But don't use it as a lame excuse or justification to stalk, pester &
>>harass me, ...... because of your obvious inability to read & comprehend
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> anyone's, Susan.  Far as I can tell my ability to think and reason is
> pretty darned good too.

Yes - and I'm a stickler for such things.

Mary
one of the majority
allan_grossman@hotmail.com - 29 Jun 2005 13:19 GMT
Mary, the cycling posts are at

http://www.cyclingforums.com/showthread/t-83204.html

;-)
Mary Fisher - 29 Jun 2005 14:07 GMT
> Mary, the cycling posts are at
>
> http://www.cyclingforums.com/showthread/t-83204.html
>
> ;-)

Well, this was in 2004.

Did Susan have the shots?

Or did she get rabies?

Did the cat survive?

What happened to the other animals?

I'm on the edge of my chair ... but really must go and hem those
handkerchieves ...

Mary
su-texas@webtv.net - 29 Jun 2005 12:32 GMT
allan wrote;

They do turn up some amazing things - the most amusing was when you told
the cycling group that you thought you may have rabies. That was the
same post where you said that Arimidex caused your lymphedema.

====================================

Cats

At that time, the almost-grown male cat Chocolate was acting very sick,
off, aggressive. [Much later, I figured out he must have distemper or
some such, partly by his BM.] It was horrible to watch him suffer, act
aggressive & off, lurch around, howl & snarl.

When I first saw something was wrong, I tried to pet & comfort him, then
realized it was serious, that I was in danger, & backed away from him.
And he started to foam a lot at the mouth, snarl, aggressively go after
stuff (including me), stagger around, collapse.

[He had been my favorite, the one who always greeted me when I got home,
or came out of the house. So sweet, kind & caring.]

He appeared to have rabies, & "for the good of the many", he needed to
be put down, but I didn't have anything to do it with, & didn't know how
to do it.

Animal control wouldn't help. And I was concerned that if Chocolate were
rabid, this would put others (including people) at risk.

I tried to get Chocolate in a cage, & get him to the vet, but he tried
to attack me each time, so I gave up.

I was raising six puppies to be dogs for disabled. They hadn't had
rabies shots, & I had to get them to the vet for that, ..... while
dodging the sick cat & other cats.

At the same time, a female cat came into heat, & some male cats showed
up, were howling, competing & acting ugly. I didn't realize all this, &
didn't understand what was happening until later. They made the most
awful howling, & were aggressive & fighting each other, attacking. And
the mama cat turned on her almost-grown kittens, attacking them, acting
ugly. ???

The younger cats were very upset & acting off, & would rush at me, when
they saw me, screaming.

For safety reasons, I moved away for a few days or so.

I'd come back, sit in the truck, ..... try to get out over & over, to
get things done, .... & then jump back in the truck each time the cats
rushed at me.

Most of them were younger cats. Chocolate had been their major
companion, care giver, source of fun, .... next to their mother, who was
also rejecting them. And they were completely terrified, freaked out, &
would run at me.

Chocolate was from the mama cat's first litter.

I was concerned Chocolate had rabies, concerned I might get it, the dogs
might, the other cats might, that it might spread.

Since there's no help here, I had to figure out what was wrong, & do
what was necessary, as much as I could, ...... but I didn't know what to
do.

I'd pitch the cat food, as far as I could, to help get the cats back,
.... then try to tend to the dogs. I managed to keep the dogs fed &
watered, & to get them one by one, to the vet for rabies shots.

Eventually, I figured out that the stray cats who were acting aggressive
& off, were howling something fierce, snarling, acting ugly, & were
terrorizing the young cats, ...... were there because the mama cat was
in heat.

I live on the edge of a small city, there is a lot of rural area here, &
there is rabies.

-----------------

I don't know what you're trying to make of this. ???

You allan, seem unable to read & process information, & seem rather
narrowly focused & intent on harassing & harming others, ..... on
throwing as much sh*t as possible (slander, lies, innuendo), hoping some
of it will stick & do damage, ...... & you're choosing to do this at a
breast cancer support group. You want to start & lead a gang-bang here.

What happened with the cats, has nothing to do with the MUGA &
ECHOcardiogram tests under discussion. And nothing said about it, can
help Chocolate now, nor change what happened back then.

If you are interested in cat diseases & behavior, then you might search
for, read & post at a cat newsgroup.

-----------------------

As added info;

I don't particularly like cats. An elderly dog who was dying, took up
with a stray kitten, & shared his food with her. Since he liked her, I
let the kitten stay, & she started to reproduce. I'd little experience
with cats. Since she was semi-wild, she wasn't catch-able. And since I
had cancer, I had to be careful not to get scratched by her.

In time, Chocolate did get better, & was himself again (loving &
caring), but extremely weak. When I saw this, & saw him trying to eat
dry cat food, I put out some canned cat food, mixed with water.

He didn't make it.

------------------------

As for the lymphedema, I did get sudden acute lymphedema, about a year &
a half or so after I started taking Arimidex (to which I had severe
adverse reactions), ..... & the lymphedema kept getting worse, until I
stopped taking Arimidex.

FYI: The docs say, that when you have cancer and/or lymphedema, it's
important Not to get scratched by cats.

Susan, Su_Texas  my opinions
Mary Fisher - 29 Jun 2005 12:59 GMT
<snip irrelevant stuff>

> You allan, seem unable to read & process information, & seem rather
> narrowly focused & intent on harassing & harming others, ..... on
> throwing as much sh*t as possible (slander, lies, innuendo), hoping some
> of it will stick & do damage, ...... & you're choosing to do this at a
> breast cancer support group. You want to start & lead a gang-bang here.

Oh do stop being silly, Susan.

> What happened with the cats, has nothing to do with the MUGA &
> ECHOcardiogram tests under discussion. And nothing said about it, can
> help Chocolate now, nor change what happened back then.

Quite.

> FYI: The docs say, that when you have cancer and/or lymphedema, it's
> important Not to get scratched by cats.

But all doctors are liars so you don't believe them ...

Mary

> Susan, Su_Texas  my opinions
su-texas@webtv.net - 29 Jun 2005 01:24 GMT
Heart Tests

At the Cancer Center here, they do the MUGA test before you start
chemotherapy.

Then they assure you, that based on this one test, your heart is in
tip-top shape & ready for chemo, ..... that there won't be a problem
with your heart.

Then they refuse to do the MUGA test again, & do Not order an
ECHOcardiogram, ...... no matter how sick or weak you get while on
chemo, or stay after chemo.

The oncologists here are super-Not-checking for the damage that chemo
does. This makes me Not trust any statistics concerning this issue, Nor
the "success rates" of chemo.

------------------

The oncs do keep ordering one CAT scan (with contrast) after another,
.... a test which (for me) has never, ever shown anything wrong!

The docs say that the important thing to focus on, is looking for new
lumps, ...... because that's super bad in breast cancer care, & if they
form, then you don't have a chance, ..... at which time, they'll have to
basically pull out all the stops, in trying to help & save you (???),
.....

..... instead of their testing to see why you're so sick & weak after
chemo.

They refuse to tell you about or do legitimate testing, ..... testing
which might find what's wrong.

I super-don't-like the terrorizing & traumatizing of patients, which the
oncologists do, ..... in order to get your cooperation in whatever BS
(nonsense) they insist on doing, on selling you.

--------------

The MUGA can test for LVEF.

The ECHOcardiogram checks that & many other things.

If you want to have both tests, then you can ask for them.

I did not know to ask for the ECHOcardiogram before chemo, ..... nor to
insist on tests during & after chemo, to check for heart damage.

The cardiologists have acted amazed, that the oncologists did not order
these tests during chemo, to check for heart damage.

-----------------

The oncologists acted like the heart damage couldn't happen to me, that
that wasn't a concern at all, ..... & they insisted I trust them, trust
their judgement, choices, experience.

Because I did trust the doctors some, I got repeatedly harmed by them.
These betrayals hurt a lot then, & still hurt now. The damage done is
permanent & painful, disabling & life-threatening.

I'm hoping to help others avoid making the same mistakes, when seeking
cancer care.

Susan, Su_Texas  my opinions

PS   Second-Opinion from Heart Doctor

I met the second cardiologist today.

[I also kept another appt today, & am extremely exhausted! Also, one of
the dogs broke it's chain fastener (a welded ring) early this morning, &
I had to buy & replace some parts before keeping the first appt. Also,
it's very hot weather here, & I've no A/C in the house. Whew!]

The cardiologist said:

heart cath, pacemaker & defibrillator, & possibly a LE-VAD (sp?) in the
stomach.

I'm not too keen on having a heart transplant, & he wasn't too keen on
it either. Yes!

He gave me two meds to go with the Lasix. Inspra & Altace.

----------------

I had to wait an hour or two, after I got to this appt, but I had fun
doing it. :)

There was a guy there who had known my great-Uncle Dud & his twelve
children (mostly the children), ...... who had grown up in this area,
but who moved away & then returned after retirement.

We exchanged a lot of stories about that family (WEHT), as well as
shared some about our own life experiences.

Fun!

-----------------

Time to go get another tub of water, then tend to the dogs & puppies
again.
allan grossman - 29 Jun 2005 01:44 GMT
>Heart Tests
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>does. This makes me Not trust any statistics concerning this issue, Nor
>the "success rates" of chemo.

As we established earlier, the MUGA scan is a more accurate and
consistent diagnostic tool for measuring heart damage than an
echocardiogram.  Your refusal to acknowledge the fact doesn't make it
any less true  :-D

Let's poll our studio audience, Susan.  Since Adriamycin and Herceptin
provide the greatest risk of cardiotoxicity, has anyone received
either without getting regular heart scans?

Signature

allan

we don't see things as they are, we see them as we are.
-- Anais Nin

su-texas@webtv.net - 29 Jun 2005 02:30 GMT
From: wizard@no_spam.pointbeing.com (allan grossman)

As we established earlier, the MUGA scan is a more accurate and
consistent diagnostic tool for measuring heart damage than an
echocardiogram. Your refusal to acknowledge the fact doesn't make it any
less true :-D

[[Reply: You've stated that the MUGA test is more accurate for measuring
one thing, LVEF, ..... than the ECHOcardiogram.

So far, I've not consulted with the Cancer Center or a doctor about your
statement, to see if it is true or not, or to see if this degree of
accuracy concerning that one test (LVEF) matters.

IF it is true, then it might be best to get the LVEF testing done with
the MUGA test.

But you'd still need the ECHOcardiogram, to test for many other kinds of
heart function or heart damage.]]

----------------------------------------------------------

allan wrote:

Let's poll our studio audience, Susan.

[[Reply: I don't like attention & do not play to audiences.

I share information & experiences, & hope for some positive and/or
educated/knowledgeable responses, or hope it helps someone. Knowledge is
power.

I doubt that many people would be interested, in the topics I write
about.

If you enjoy audiences, & imagine you have one somewhere, ..... then
you'll probably play on to them regardless, drama queen allan, ..... to
serve your own sick & selfish needs.

From what you've just written, you give the impression of being
manic-depressive, & on a manic high. ???

Since you act ugly here, try to do harm & enjoy it, i've no sympathy for
you.]]

------------------------------------------------------------

allan wrote:

Since Adriamycin and Herceptin provide the greatest risk of
cardiotoxicity, has anyone received either without getting regular heart
scans?

[[Reply: Yes, I was given Adriamycin, without getting heart scans from
the oncologist, during or after this chemo, ..... even though I was
quite ill from the chemo & then the Arimidex.]]

----------------------------------

Susan, Su_Texas  my opinions
Mary Fisher - 29 Jun 2005 09:58 GMT
> > allan wrote:

> > Let's poll our studio audience, Susan.

> [[Reply: I don't like attention & do not play to audiences.

WHAT??

> I share information & experiences, & hope for some positive and/or
> educated/knowledgeable responses, or hope it helps someone. Knowledge is
> power.

You don't share experiences, you continually bang on and on about what you
say are your experiences and your opinions about the morals and illegal
practices of your medical advisers. If you were in UK you'd probably be sued
for libel for what you've repeatedly said.

> I doubt that many people would be interested, in the topics I write
> about.

So stop posting them.

> If you enjoy audiences, & imagine you have one somewhere, ..... then
> you'll probably play on to them regardless, drama queen allan, ..... to
> serve your own sick & selfish needs.

> From what you've just written, you give the impression of being
> manic-depressive, & on a manic high. ???

On the contrary, Allan is among the most level headed, respected, helpful,
experienced and *loved* posters on this ng and has been for all the years
I've been here. I don't need to list the others, we all know who they are -
but I will add Catharine who is no longer with us so can't speak for
herself. Catharine suffered hugely, not only from her cancer, but she gave
an enormous amount of joy, support and love to the rest of us. And so does
Allan.

> Since you act ugly here, try to do harm & enjoy it, i've no sympathy for
> you.]]

Well, Susan, it's apparent that several of us think that of you. I've tried
not to say it for a long time but you've tried us all to the limit. We've
tried to be patient, helpful, constructive, sympathetic, informative - just
like your doctors, I suspect - and you have consistently been negative, foul
mouthed and offensive.

There's no place here for that sort of attitude.

Yes, from time to time everyone can get angry and upset, none of us minds
people venting from time to time but not all the time. Most of us listen to
what others say, we learn from them and begin to understand that anger is
destructive and that we can be happier if we relax. The calm after the storm
is healing, the storm itself isn't.

You've lost credibility and sympathy. It could be recovered if you stop your
repetitive outbursts and begin to think of others. Why not give it a try?

Mary
Chris - 29 Jun 2005 13:21 GMT
I second what Mary said and appreciate her ability to say it nicely and
accurately. Susan, at times you have been a caring group member. I hope
you can focus on that and not your inability to trust the medical
establishment and use what it offers. The bottom line is that doctors
make their recommendations, you can do what you want.

Chris

> > > allan wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
>
> Mary
Bea - - 29 Jun 2005 04:07 GMT
>Let's poll our studio audience, Susan. Since
> Adriamycin and Herceptin provide the
> greatest risk of cardiotoxicity, has anyone
> received either without getting regular heart
> scans?

-- >allan

I got Adriamycin and was told I did not need a Muga or any other regular
heart scans.  Now you guys have me concerned with this.   I was given
Digitek for palpitations but my cardiologist says it is probably just
anxiety.  Should I be concerned??  Maybe I should just not read these
posts and I'll be ok.

Bea
Mary Fisher - 29 Jun 2005 09:59 GMT
> >Let's poll our studio audience, Susan. Since
>> Adriamycin and Herceptin provide the
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Bea

LOL!

You could be right!

Mary
A. P. Thorsen - 29 Jun 2005 17:21 GMT
> Let's poll our studio audience, Susan.  Since Adriamycin and Herceptin
> provide the greatest risk of cardiotoxicity, has anyone received
> either without getting regular heart scans?

Hi, Allan,

Fundamentally, I'm tracking with you on this whole thing, but have to
admit:

I had AC without the slightest whiff of a heart scan, before, during or
after.  At the time, I didn't know it was standard, so didn't know to
ask about it.

I asked a later medical oncologist about it, and he said (diplomacy mode
fully engaged, I suspect) that perhaps the original onc, who was very
experienced, felt it was unnecessary for someone of my age and general
health.

Happily, the piper has not requested pay:  I've maxed my heart rate more
than once on the erg (rowing machine), somewhere North of 183BPM, with
no evil consequences other than a red face and a period of post-exercise
gasping for breath (!), so I guess the "experienced" onc was correct (or
lucky).

Ann T.
Remove 'dontsendspam' from address to reply by email
su-texas@webtv.net - 29 Jun 2005 16:02 GMT
I'm thinking of consulting a third cardiologist, before making a
decision.

I feel slightly better today, & am hoping to be able to get up, walk,
move around a bit more. But mostly, be able to breathe, to get my
breath.

Susan, Su_Texas  my opinions
mariestrack@yahoo.com - 30 Jun 2005 13:17 GMT
> I spoke with the cancer center, & the MUGA test doesn't actually check
> very good for heart damage.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> The MUGA test checks only one thing.

You forgot to update your http://community-2.webtv.net/su-texas/ site
with the newest medical test that you don't recommend.
su-texas@webtv.net - 30 Jun 2005 13:53 GMT
mariestrack wrote:

You forgot to update your http://community-2.webtv.net/su-texas/ site
with the newest medical test that you don't recommend.

===========================

Done.

Susan, Su_Texas

PS  I need some help taking out trash, & tending to puppies. Any
volunteers?
allan_grossman@hotmail.com - 30 Jun 2005 15:37 GMT
Now that's funny  ;-)
Bea - - 30 Jun 2005 18:13 GMT
>You forgot to update your
> http://community-2.webtv.net/su-texas/ site
> with the newest medical test that you don't
> recommend.
===========================

>Done.

>Susan, Su_Texas

Wowie!  I just took a look at your site, Su and all I could think of was
how many reincarnations did you have to have to see all those medical
professionals!!  I cannot imagine any human seeing so many doctors in
just "one" lifetime.  
Not trying to get personal but you are either very old or have
constantly returned to earth to fulfil your mission of doctor hunting,
IMO.  

You are fortunate that the medical profession has not found a way to
post your photo in the Louisiana and Texas post offices to warn each
other you may be in town.  What amazes me is that you can find "any"
doctor who will still take you as a patient.   What you are trying to do
to warn and help others may be just the reason you are not getting the
medical care you seek and seem to need so badly.  

I was so thrilled that none of my doctors were on your list!    I live
in one of your "do not go to States".   I'm sure everyone has doctors
they would not recommend (including myself) but it amazes me you
actually saw so many in one lifetime.  

BTW, if you are elderly, there might be some organization for the Aged
which will send someone to your home to help you with heavy tasks.   You
can find them listed in your phone book.    

Bea
su-texas@webtv.net - 30 Jun 2005 19:32 GMT
From: bsmp59@webtv.net (Bea -)

Wowie! I just took a look at your site, Su and all I could think of was
how many reincarnations did you have to have to see all those medical
professionals!! I cannot imagine any human seeing so many doctors in
just "one" lifetime.
Not trying to get personal but you are either very old or have
constantly returned to earth to fulfil your mission of doctor hunting,
IMO.
You are fortunate that the medical profession has not found a way to
post your photo in the Louisiana and Texas post offices to warn each
other you may be in town. What amazes me is that you can find "any"
doctor who will still take you as a patient.   What you are trying to
do to warn and help others may be just the reason you are not getting
the medical care you seek and seem to need so badly.
I was so thrilled that none of my doctors were on your list!   I live
in one of your "do not go to States".   I'm sure everyone has doctors
they would not recommend (including myself) but it amazes me you
actually saw so many in one lifetime.
BTW, if you are elderly, there might be some organization for the Aged
which will send someone to your home to help you with heavy tasks.  
You can find them listed in your phone book.
Bea

==================================Gee, Bea, if you only had a working brain & some good morals.

I realize that at every newsgroup, there is a nasty bunch of trolls who
will play the determinedly-dumb & dastardly game over & over, ....... &
then break their arms patting their own backs, snickering & acting "off"
in their delusions of gory, glory.

They get off on acting ugly, getting away with it, getting high on it,
.... & on grouping with other trolls, bullies & cowards to act ugly, &
do much the same. It seems to be the only power & control they have in
their lives.

This seems to be a primitive, social (emotional, Not
intellectual/thinking), knuckle-dragging type of thing, similar to what
Chimps do in the wild, to better bond as a group, ...... based on their
harming, destroying, killing for pleasure ("fun"), done together as a
group.

I've no respect or liking for gang-bangers, for group followers, nor for
their Chimp-style bonding stunts. They try to do a lot of damage to
others, to enforce it, & act proud of it.

They live in lies, cons, meanness, .... a worthless, empty existence.
Nothing.

BTW, the information I've posted, was never intended for someone such as
yourself.  I suggest you ignore it.

Susan, Su_Texas  my opinions
Mary Fisher - 30 Jun 2005 20:25 GMT
<snip>

Bea, Allan, others, why do yu always have a response to yourposts to Susan
and I don't?

I'm feeling neglected, out of things,  it's not FAIR!

Mary
Bea - - 30 Jun 2005 21:01 GMT
>Bea, Allan, others, why do yu always have a
> response to yourposts to Susan and I don't?
>I'm feeling neglected, out of things, it's not
>FAIR!

>Mary

Oh Mary, it must be because we are so "brain dead" and "immoral". <g
She would never accuse a delightful intelligent person as youself of
being in such a  low class.  Maybe it was my nice post to Allen that
made her think I was immoral.  I did ask to "clone" him.  Thank goodness
"Allen" has a sense of humor.<g

Oh well.....I don't like to correspond with people who don't have a
sense of humor so I won't respond to her  posts in the future.

Isn't it great that this group is just one big brain dead, immoral,
happy family.  We can fight and call each other names and still be back
tomorrow for more.  After all, family is family.

Bea      
Mary Fisher - 30 Jun 2005 21:59 GMT
> >Bea, Allan, others, why do you always have a
>> response to yourposts to Susan and I don't?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> She would never accuse a delightful intelligent person as youself of
> being in such a  low class.

Oh, you've not noticed that I'm a troll :-)

> Maybe it was my nice post to Allen that
> made her think I was immoral.  I did ask to "clone" him.  Thank goodness
> "Allen" has a sense of humor.<g

He has. He always has. He's a lovely man. I have his photo - and Tim's. Not
yours though ...

> Oh well.....I don't like to correspond with people who don't have a
> sense of humor so I won't respond to her  posts in the future.
>
> Isn't it great that this group is just one big brain dead, immoral,
> happy family.

Well, you're wrong. It's not100%. There's one poster who's right. It's
everyone else who's out of step.

> We can fight and call each other names and still be back
> tomorrow for more.  After all, family is family.

Indeed. And no matter what the in-fighting, families close ranks when
attacked from outside ...

Mary

> Bea
allan grossman - 30 Jun 2005 22:59 GMT
>Bea, Allan, others, why do yu always have a response to yourposts to Susan
>and I don't?

It's because Bea and I are meanies and you're not, Mary.

:-)

Signature

allan

we don't see things as they are, we see them as we are.
-- Anais Nin

Mary Fisher - 30 Jun 2005 23:04 GMT
>>Bea, Allan, others, why do you always have a response to yourposts to
>>Susan
>>and I don't?
>
> It's because Bea and I are meanies and you're not, Mary.

I YAM.

<stamps foot>

And anyway, I'm a troll so there, nyer nyer!

Mary
Bea - - 01 Jul 2005 02:47 GMT
>And anyway, I'm a troll so there, nyer nyer!
>Mary

But are you an "immoral" troll, Mary?  If not, you can't be a part of
our club.   Frankly, I have a wee feeling you are a lassie of many
dispositions.  So welcome to our Den of Iniquity!<g

Bea
Mary Fisher - 01 Jul 2005 11:13 GMT
> >And anyway, I'm a troll so there, nyer nyer!
>>Mary
>
> But are you an "immoral" troll, Mary?

Oh, I can't remember. And I can't be bothered trawling (not trolling)
through all those posts to find out. I suppose that makes me an idle troll.

> If not, you can't be a part of
> our club.   Frankly, I have a wee feeling you are a lassie of many
> dispositions.  So welcome to our Den of Iniquity!<g

Oh,thank you!

Idleness has paid off :-)

Mary
who's mum still tells her it won't ...
Bea - - 30 Jun 2005 20:50 GMT
>Gee, Bea, if you only had a working brain &
> some good morals.

And maybe if you answered the question without having to start name
calling, your info might be more helpful and believeable.   I think it
is a logical question to ask of someone like yourself.  When you make a
site available on the internet people like myself just might take a look
at it and have questions.  I think I understand it better now, Su.  It's
ok for you to post tons of negative info about the medical profession
but not ok for anyone to disagree with you or ask questions about what
you post.

I think my question was a legitimate question and it's obvious you don't
have a sense of humor.  I will refrain from responding to your posts in
the future.

BTW, my brain seems to work ok considering what I do and my MORALS have
never been in question by anyone.  What amazes me is how my "morals"
became a part of this post.  I guess living in one of your infamous
states must automatically give me bad morals.

Bea    
su-texas@webtv.net - 30 Jun 2005 20:47 GMT
Bea wrote:

Wowie! I just took a look at your site, Su and all I could think of was
how many reincarnations did you have to have to see all those medical
professionals!!

[[Reply: What you've written, comes across as Very insulting. And I'm
tired of getting that here.

In fact, today I'm tired, stressed, have a lot to get done (esp.
concerning puppies, which I'm trying to care for & give away), am sick
at stomach & throwing up, .....  & didn't expect a post like this from
you.

As for the # of docs, I was severely injured in Jan. 1998. I was shocked
at being refused all medical care, & at the docs' lame excuses for this.

I have good insurance. I felt it was my duty to keep looking, until I
found any legitimate medical care that was still left in Louisiana &
Texas, & to tell people where & what it is. (And there surely isn't
much!)

Every month for many years, I put everything I had into seeking medical
care, made a lot of sacrifices & took a lot of risks, ..... trying to
find any legitimate medical care for injuries & cancer. It was & is a
nightmare, & deadly serious. Definitely Not something to joke about.

On the newsgroups, I've written about his many times.

Also, the doctors said I never should have survived the injuries in Jan.
1998, nor should I want to live in this much pain, with this many
injuries. I do want to.

The injuries are very severe. I had two strokes from them, & from the
lack of medical care, in 2000.]]

-----------------

Bea wrote:

I cannot imagine any human seeing so many doctors in just "one"
lifetime.

Not trying to get personal but you are either very old or have
constantly returned to earth to fulfil your mission of doctor hunting,
IMO.

[[Reply: That's insulting.]]

-------------------

Bea wrote:

You are fortunate that the medical profession has not found a way to
post your photo in the Louisiana and Texas post offices to warn each
other you may be in town.

What amazes me is that you can find "any" doctor who will still take you
as a patient.  

What you are trying to do to warn and help others may be just the reason
you are not getting the medical care you seek and seem to need so badly.

[[Reply:  That's insulting. It's also the Denial & Blame game.

Also, I didn't get WebTV & start to caution people using my site, until
after Feb. 2000, I believe.  I didn't learn about the internet, until
Aug. 1998.]]

-----------------

Bea wrote:

I was so thrilled that none of my doctors were on your list!  

[[Reply: Good. You've been lucky.]]

-----------------

Bea wrote:

I live in one of your "do not go to States".   I'm sure everyone has
doctors they would not recommend (including myself) but it amazes me you
actually saw so many in one lifetime.

BTW, if you are elderly, there might be some organization for the Aged
which will send someone to your home to help you with heavy tasks.  
You can find them listed in your phone book.

[[Reply: I'm not.

There seem to be a lot of things you don't know about, Bea, concerning
the abuse I've been & am going through, ..... & you managed to hit some
serious nerves, concerning that, ..... including that my family tried to
take over, see I got no medical care, take everythting I had, &
incarcerate me in a nursing home, right after I was injured in Jan.
1998.

I've written about this at alt.abuse & other places, but I'd suggest you
not read that, ..... that you focus on positive things instead, on
getting & staying healthy.]]

Bea

=================================While I expect BS from trolls like allan grossman, Mary Fisher, Annie &
such, I wasn't expecting a negative post from you.

Maybe you didn't realize, how this post would come across?

I've taken my duty to use my good insurance (which I've fought hard to
get & keep), Very seriously, ..... to find & report on anything good I
find in the Medical Industry. This has cost me an awful lot!  

I'm hopeful that people will use the information I've gained from this &
have posted, & that it will prove helpful.

Susan, Su_Texas   my opinions

PS  I'm in severe abuse & danger, in hardship living conditions, have no
safety & protection, ..... am struggling desperately to survive, & to
keep the dogs & puppies alive, to do what's best for them.

Today, I've been trying to get cardboard boxes, which I can use to
transport one set of puppies to Longview, to be given away. Otherwise,
I'll have to buy a large cage which I can't afford. The weather is very
hot, & I don't have A/C. Also, I have to move the dog & younger puppies
out of the rent house next door, because for some reason it's getting
too hot in there, even though the house is shaded by a tree.

Yesterday, I met with police officers again, concerning the ongoing
abuse, threats, robbed & looted trust fund, harm done, ..... & I am
still working to get an investigation into the public corruption, that
allows & supports crimes & abuse here.

The IRS is still coming after me, about the fraud my sister Nancy pulled
with my trust fund. And these workers are Not bright, rational,
reasonable, nor nice. They demand I furnish copies of the trust fund
accounts, which I can't get. ?!  Nancy has them, & has refused the
courts & me a copy. So the IRS ignores Nancy, & keeps coming after me.
??? This has been going on, since about Jan. 2004. And I just got
another letter/threat from the IRS.

Yesterday, I phoned & spoke with Nancy, for the first time since she
filed false charges against me last August, ..... since she had me
arrested & incarcerated, since she robbed my home & burned my things,
harmed my pets, stole my truck, etc.

This is a horrible situation, & it's very stressful, difficult &
dangerous, trying to deal wih the criminally insane (Nancy, Mom,
Robert), in order to survive for now. I never know what sick stunt
they'll think up & pull next.

I'm also trying to keep appts, & get to medical care for CHF. I intend
to survive!,

And that is just part of it.

--------------------

When you make comments about situations like this, please be careful.

I apologize that my comments in response are harsh, but sometimes .....
allan grossman - 30 Jun 2005 23:02 GMT
>While I expect BS from trolls like allan grossman, Mary Fisher, Annie &
>such, I wasn't expecting a negative post from you.

Look, Mary - you made the cut!

Signature

allan

we don't see things as they are, we see them as we are.
-- Anais Nin

Bea - - 01 Jul 2005 02:42 GMT
>Look, Mary - you made the cut!
>allan

Be care Allen.  Have you forgotten our dear fellow poster has a lot of
dogs!   If we are not careful we just might make "the bite!"<g

Su----if you are reading this--- please know we are just kidding with
you.  I am not against dogs.  I used to have one about 40 years ago and
understand your love for your doggies.

Bea
Annie - 01 Jul 2005 05:31 GMT
I'm not against dogs either. It's the human's I've got a problem
with...
Infact, I just got one back in May {actually for Mother's Day}
Take care there dear/God bless
annie
Mary Fisher - 01 Jul 2005 11:16 GMT
> >Look, Mary - you made the cut!
>>allan
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> you.  I am not against dogs.  I used to have one about 40 years ago and
> understand your love for your doggies.

I don't like dogs. I'm not frightened of them even though I hav been bitten.
I can appreciate the beauty of someand how people get attached to them(even
without the bite) but I'd rather have my hens. The very worst thing about
dogs is their tongues. And their hair. And having to be 'exercised' (an odd
euphemism).

Trouble is, dogs like me. Like children. I try to keep aloof and ignore them
but they still try to get on my lap.

Mary

> Bea
Tim Jackson - 01 Jul 2005 20:25 GMT
>>Look, Mary - you made the cut!
>>allan
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Bea

I'm against dogs.  Today I am anyway.  My daughter's childminder just
got herself a pedigree terrier pup, and I am now inundated with demands
for a puppy.  It'll pass.  We'll be back to demands for body piercings
again soon.  Then I'll be against body piercings.

Tim
Mary Fisher - 01 Jul 2005 22:00 GMT
> I'm against dogs.  Today I am anyway.  My daughter's childminder just got
> herself a pedigree terrier pup, and I am now inundated with demands for a
> puppy.  It'll pass.  We'll be back to demands for body piercings again
> soon.  Then I'll be against body piercings.

Compromise. Agree to body piercings for the dog ;-)

Mary

> Tim
Annie - 01 Jul 2005 05:29 GMT
Whoa! I did too! I was feeling neglected there for awhile.
I thought maybe she didn't like me anymore. I can't wait for the next
installment.
I'm also like "Mary" on the edge of my chair. But for now I'll go back
to my corner and wait for "the rest of the story" ;-}
Ahhhh......to feel needed, ain't life great?
Allan, I'm also signing on with the "majority" in here.
So stick around cuz' we like your sense of humor...
Take care dear/God bless
annie
Mary Fisher - 01 Jul 2005 11:14 GMT
>>While I expect BS from trolls like allan grossman, Mary Fisher, Annie &
>>such, I wasn't expecting a negative post from you.
>
> Look, Mary - you made the cut!

I know!

<PRIDE>

Mary
Eva - 01 Jul 2005 12:30 GMT
> >You forgot to update your
> > http://community-2.webtv.net/su-texas/ site
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Not trying to get personal but you are either very old or have
> constantly returned to earth to fulfil your mission of doctor hunting,
----------
The more doctors she visits, the more doctors she can sue for neglecting and
injuring her.  It's amazing, even the old posts to the "cycling group"
contained references to being injured by the negligence of a shopping mall.
She has made her agenda quite clear.   She wants to make money from lawsuits
so she can move to a better neighborhood.  It don't *get* no sleazier than
that.

Drive drunk, get in an accident, sue the bar that served you the liquor when
they *knew* you were already three sheets to the wind.  Sue the car
manufacturer for not installing a breathalyzer device that shuts down the
car when the driver is drunk.  Sue the distillery because the warning label
on the bottle was only in English, and your primary language is...whatever.

Eva
Annie - 01 Jul 2005 05:46 GMT
Maria,
I'm wondering when Webtv is going to catch wind of this and ban/dump
her website due to the problems they could get themselves into with the
info [lawyers/doctors name and locations] she's got out there. This
could possibly bounce back on them, as they're supporting her site with
their servers. This is slander and she and Webtv could be held
accountable and "sue-d" for libel.This is more then likely covered in
her terms of service. But she's so busy posting/attacking/harrassing
here and about a gazillion other newsgroups to take the time to look
into this.
I've also got a Webtv [and had one since 8/97] and others have gotten
in trouble for exactly this time of behavior.
"Freedom of speech" is one thing, but most of this behavior is WAY over
the top. Hmmm.....Annie's up all night, myswell have something to do,
maybe a letter to either my server or Webtv might be order now. It's
not like she's not been warned to stop this and find a new hobby.
Take care there/God bless
annie
mariestrack@yahoo.com - 01 Jul 2005 12:57 GMT
> Maria,
> I'm wondering when Webtv is going to catch wind of this and ban/dump
> her website due to the problems they could get themselves into with the
> info [lawyers/doctors name and locations] she's got out there.

(rest of post snipped...)

Annie,

It looks like that won't be necessary.  It appears that the authorities
are already watching her on the newsgroups and such.  (Check out the
latest in alt.abuse - her "law enforcement" thread).

It is a shame that she has to be watched like this, but at the same
time I feel very little pity as the misinformation she keeps posting
here and elsewhere could cause a new person to panic and not believe in
the medical information they've been given.

I will pray that Susan receives the help she so desperately needs and
will someday be able to lead a life without they hysteria that seems to
surround her.  It surely can't be a happy way of life now for her or
her family.
Mary Fisher - 01 Jul 2005 14:43 GMT
...

> It is a shame that she has to be watched like this, but at the same
> time I feel very little pity as the misinformation she keeps posting
> here and elsewhere could cause a new person to panic and not believe in
> the medical information they've been given.

That's been my concern for a long time :-(

> I will pray that Susan receives the help she so desperately needs and
> will someday be able to lead a life without they hysteria that seems to
> surround her.  It surely can't be a happy way of life now for her or
> her family.

No ...

Mary
allan_grossman@hotmail.com - 01 Jul 2005 15:02 GMT
I went over and read the "law enforcement" thread.  This is my favorite
part -

"From an early age, my brother Robert had to kill at least one animal
every day. And Mom loved & encouraged this, seemed to have orgasms
concerning it, & then she was driven to seek & have more, to get
higher.
She loved cruelty."
Mary Fisher - 01 Jul 2005 15:07 GMT
>I went over and read the "law enforcement" thread.  This is my favorite
> part -
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> higher.
> She loved cruelty."

You take your pleasures in unusual ways, Allan!

Mary
Bea - - 01 Jul 2005 15:44 GMT
>You take your pleasures in unusual ways,
>
>Allan!
>Mary

I agree Mary.  In fact, I don't think I will clone him afterall.  His
reading material is too raunchy for me.<g

Seriously, many people have tales about their families they could tell
but my dear beloved mom always taught us not to "air our dirty linens
for the neighbors to see".  Is Su aware that this personal stuff about
her family is going world-wide over the internet??  Somethings don't
need to be shared with the entire world, IMO.    If it is serious abuse
than it should go in private to the right authorities but world-wide on
a website ???  

Bea
Mary Fisher - 01 Jul 2005 16:28 GMT
> >You take your pleasures in unusual ways,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I agree Mary.  In fact, I don't think I will clone him afterall.  His
> reading material is too raunchy for me.<g

LOL!

> Seriously, many people have tales about their families they could tell
> but my dear beloved mom always taught us not to "air our dirty linens
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> than it should go in private to the right authorities but world-wide on
> a website ???

Well  ... you're making an assumption of veracity ... I think Allan and I
are more sceptical.

Mary

> Bea
allan_grossman@hotmail.com - 01 Jul 2005 16:05 GMT
Sadly, Deborah's said that for years, Mary.

;-)
Mary Fisher - 01 Jul 2005 16:29 GMT
> Sadly, Deborah's said that for years, Mary.
>
> ;-)

Well, she should know.

<chortle>

Mary
mariestrack@yahoo.com - 02 Jul 2005 12:47 GMT
> I went over and read the "law enforcement" thread.  This is my favorite
> part -
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> higher.
> She loved cruelty."

I'm glad I've had 2 cups of coffee :-)  Otherwise I may not have
believed what I just read.  I missed it the first time around reading
her post.

Her poor mother..(I feel sorry for her family, especially since she has
posted their real names many many times.  The & or @ or whatever symbol
she uses surely doesn't disguise their names much!)
Mary Fisher - 02 Jul 2005 13:27 GMT
> Her poor mother..(I feel sorry for her family, especially since she has
> posted their real names many many times.  The & or @ or whatever symbol
> she uses surely doesn't disguise their names much!)

Ae they intended to?

I thought is was an affectation.

M@ry F!sher

<G>