Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Breast Cancer / July 2005
A bit concerned......
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Barb - 24 Jun 2005 01:12 GMT Hello Group, Went for my annual mammogram yesterday and thought that when they didn't ask for additional pics, things were A-ok. My pcp's office called this afternoon to tell me that there were some calcifications that have been present for a couple of years that seem "more apparent" now. The type of calcification suggests that this is a benign thing, but they want a repeat mammogram in six months. I called back to ask if there were something more definitive they could do now. Nurse said Dr. would call tomorrow. Well, Dr. called at about six this evening and said that she is going on vacation tomorrow, so she called today.....Upshot is that her office is scheduling an appointment for me at the breast health center for a stereotactic biopsy (soon I hope). I believe that it's being scheduled for my mental health's sake as much as any dire need to check on the calcifications right now.. I'm grateful, as nerves are a bit frazzled at the moment.
Has anyone in the group had the stereotactic biopsy? I'm not so concerned about the procedure itself.....wonder how long it takes to get any pathology back? Any information would be most welcome.
Barb
P.S. It's been almost 22 years since my bc diagnosis.
su-texas@webtv.net - 24 Jun 2005 01:51 GMT Hi Barb,
I seem to have had major amounts of calcification in the breasts, as well as cysts & fibro-whatever, for most of my life. Uh, I did until the cancer & mastectomies.
Before that, the biopsies from surgically removing maybe a dozen(?) lumps each time, were all benign.
The best I can remember, the lumps starting developing & growing when I was about eleven or twelve, before my breasts did.
Back then, I'd also get hit in the chest, so this might have affected things.
---------------------
After the left breast was removed, & the cancer treatments finished, ...... the calcifications started to multiply rapidly in the right breast, so it was removed too.
There was no cancer found in it.
There were a lot of lumps (plus a new large-ish one), & the right breast was so heavy & dense, ..... that they couldn't tell anything about the lumps or the many calcifications, so I had the breast removed to be safe.
The docs kept scaring me with: "If the cancer returns, you're a goner, so you have to have mammograms, biopsies & such over & over."
I was so exhausted & sick, & so tired of wasting all my time, money, resources & effort on cancer care, ..... that I said: "Forget that. Just remove the breast."
The docs super-did-Not-want-to-do-that, but I kept insisting until it was done.
It was much cheaper in the long run, in every way possible, for me & the insurance company.
[Unfortunately, the surgeon wasn't any good, so about a third or so of the breast is still with me, in various places. Mostly the middle part is gone.]
--------------------
In other words, one calcification may be cancer, while another may not be.
I don't remember how long the stereotactic test took, maybe thirty minutes once they were set up & had me positioned.
I don't remember how long it took to get my biopsy results back, but it's probably in the Google archives. I remember I asked for a second opinion.
I'll try to search the archives, & try to remember more.
I wish you the very best of luck.
Susan, Su_Texas my opinions
Barb - 24 Jun 2005 02:49 GMT Thanks for responding, Su. I'm hoping for an appointment very soon, so that I don't have to wonder.....
Barb
> Hi Barb, > [quoted text clipped - 58 lines] > > Susan, Su_Texas my opinions bartalo@webtv.net - 24 Jun 2005 03:09 GMT Hi Barb,
I had to have the stereotactic biopsy last year because they saw "something" on my mamogram in my affected bc breast. It is supposed to be much easier on us than a regular biopsy. However, I must have had some really bad technicians because they turned what should have been a very easy 30 minutes into over an hour procedure and made it a very bad experience for me. I have a back problem and having to lie on my stomach the entire time without moving was painful for me. I know others have had it and breezed through it without any problems and you probably will too. I don't think my bad experience is the norm for this procedure.
You are awake during the procedure and there was no real pain involved. You also do not have any drug after effects. I think it took about a week for them to give me the results. It turned out to be benign calcifications.
I think you can do a search on the internet and it will give you lots of details and information about how the procedure is done.
Best of luck on your test and with the results.
Bea
Barb - 24 Jun 2005 12:06 GMT Hello Bea, Thank you for responding. I had done a bit of looking on the net, but found nothing about how long it takes to get a pathology report. The info I read did say that being on one's tummy for the entire procedure could be uncomfortable. (I sleep on my tummy, so I'm hoping I'll be ok with that part!). Like anyone anticipating test reports, I hate the wait. Trying to think that this is benign, but nervous, nevertheless. Thanks again.
Barb
A. P. Thorsen - 24 Jun 2005 15:26 GMT > Hello Bea, > Thank you for responding. I had done a bit of looking on the net, but found [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > part!). Like anyone anticipating test reports, I hate the wait. Trying to > think that this is benign, but nervous, nevertheless. Thanks again. I think the "how long to get results" thing may be pretty local: Depends on the procedures of the facility where you have it done, how much of a backlog their pathology lab is, how effective their process for communicating with you or your doctor is (snail mail, phone, instant electronic availability of report when complete, who knows).
A few days to a week seems to be the norm for a lot of places/cases for biopsy results.
I'm not a medical professional, but can't see any reason why examining tissue from a stereotactic biopsy would be dramatically faster or slower than any other kind of biopsy, so if you had biopsies from this facility before, I'd assume you're looking at a similar lag time this time around.
Assume I'm out here with my fingers crossed for you -- I know how hard it is to wait!
Ann T. Remove 'dontsendspam' from address to reply by email
Barb - 24 Jun 2005 19:43 GMT Hello Ann, Thanks for answering. I've never had a biopsy at the breast center, so don't know how long it might take for pathology results. I assume that if they do the path there is will take less time than if they have to send the tissue sample out. I can know quite rationally, that it isn't doing one iota of good to fret the amount of time......It will take as long as it takes. I can even know that if there is a problem, it's been developing for a while and the amount of time it takes for pathology to come back isn't going to make any difference at all. Why is it that as soon as one suspects trouble, it can't come out soon enough and results can't come back soon enough either?
I appreciate the finger crossing...now, cross your ankles, toes, arms, legs and eyes!
Barb
> I think the "how long to get results" thing may be pretty local: Depends > on the procedures of the facility where you have it done, how much of a [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > Ann T. > Remove 'dontsendspam' from address to reply by email Hoosier - 24 Jun 2005 20:02 GMT I had stereotactic biopsy. He made return appointment before the procedure was done so I don't know when he actually got the results. Mine were not good and I had to have lumpectomy for 3 small calcifications, then reexcision, then I got to do the MammoSite instead of 30 days of radiation.
I did have some pain when they put needles in but nothing you can't tolerate. They put a pillow under my feet to raise them which made it much more comfortable. I went by myself so he made me stay about a half hour, I suppose to be sure I didn't get sick or anything.
Very nice surgeon but he was going to take piece out size of tangerine so I got another opinion and had only very small specimen removed with inch scar, so if you get to this stage you may want to check around a little.
All in all it was not a bad experience. Good luck. PD
> Hello Ann, > Thanks for answering. I've never had a biopsy at the breast center, so [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > > Ann T. > > Remove 'dontsendspam' from address to reply by email Barb - 25 Jun 2005 00:00 GMT Thanks for your wishes for luck. Appreciate your reply.
Kaye301 - 04 Jul 2005 05:22 GMT Hi Barb--don't have any experience with the procedure but wanted to send you good thoughts and wish you all the best. I have been thinking of you and wondered how things have been going. This is the first opportunity I have had to come here since aol discontinued newsgroups. (I can't get on here w/aol either--but had opportunity to get online elsewhere). Please feel free to email me. Take care and wishing you all the best! {{{Hugs}}}
> Thanks for your wishes for luck. Appreciate your reply. A. P. Thorsen - 24 Jun 2005 22:39 GMT > I've never had a biopsy at the breast center, so > don't know how long it might take for pathology results. I assume that if [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > trouble, it can't come out soon enough and results can't come back soon > enough either? I have no idea . . . and I seem to take it even further than that. Even if I start out totally convinced nothing serious is wrong, but some doc decides to run a test (I call this phenomenon the "doctor vacation fund"), then I don't particularly worry in the run-up to the test, but fret like crazy until the results are back. Even though I'm *sure* there's nothing wrong! (I hate when I can't even control my own doggone brain! <grin>
> I appreciate the finger crossing...now, cross your ankles, toes, arms, legs > and eyes! You've got it!
Ann T. Remove 'dontsendspam' from address to reply by email
Pat from Apple Valley, CA - 24 Jun 2005 22:44 GMT > Hello Ann, > Thanks for answering. I've never had a biopsy at the breast center, so [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] >>Ann T. >>Remove 'dontsendspam' from address to reply by email Eyes are crossed. Hope the tests show NO problem....Pat from Apple Valley...
Barb - 24 Jun 2005 23:59 GMT Thanks, Pat. Appointment is Tuesday at 3:00. Barb
> Eyes are crossed. Hope the tests show NO problem....Pat from Apple > Valley...
|
|
|