Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Breast Cancer / June 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Has anyone else in USA had these experiences?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mary Fisher - 18 Jun 2005 13:52 GMT
As below.

It would be very interesting to know and possibly even have some support for
American doctors from those of you here (on the ng) who've been treated by
them.

Mary

> Avoid Texas & Louisiana
>
> The best I can remember, Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, is
> heavily involved in using/testing Arimidex, ..... so they'll push it
> regardless, no matter how much harm it's doing.
>
> -----------------
>
> Avoid Universities
>
> It's best to avoid the universities (medical schools) if at all
> possible, when seeking medical care, ...... mostly because of their
> special interests (PHARMA grant money for the school, students &
> professors), ...... their over-pushing of whatever experimental drugs
> they're paid to, ...... & their use of students (the un- or
> under-skilled) as doctors.
>
> Many doctors can't do a semi-decent job of medical care, much less
> students.
>
> And at Parkland/Aston/SWMed in Dallas, they basically let their students
> run wild, ..... run some clinics, such a Spine & Joint, without
> adult/teacher supervision. ?! The profs would rather be elsewhere.
>
> It's shocking how bad (a total waste of time & $$$, how lacking &
> harmful) the medical care at universities can be.
>
> I can't see how Parkland could get a good rating anywhere, esp. not in
> Best Hospitals. ?!  It's a charity hospital in Dallas, that's run as
> such. The area & bldgs are quite dangerous, esp. riding the elevators.
>
> No quality care for patients who do have money or good insurance.
>
> It's one lie, meanness & run-around after another, while you get no
> medical care for years.
>
> And they do NOT care about complaints.
>
> -----------------
>
> Since Medicare & other insurance companies have agreed to pay docs, no
> matter how bad, inferior, or lacking the care, ...... there's no quality
> control.
>
> For the most part, you can't convince the insurance Not to pay.
>
> This needs to be changed.
>
> The laws which prevent us from suing the docs, & which limit damages,
> also need to be changed.
>
> There needs to be some accountability, for the major misconduct, fraud &
> harm being done by the doctors, universities, hospitals.
>
> -----------------
>
> Since the Breast Clinic at Methodist Hospital in Houston, is run by the
> Baylor College of Medicine there, ..... it's Not going to be a good
> place for info or help.
>
> M D Anderson was worse.
>
> LSU (a charity hospital) much, much worse.
>
> ----------------
>
> What I was told, is that Baylor/Methodist & MDA work on the same
> projects for the PHARMA companies, so there's not much difference in the
> two, ..... except that people with good insurance or with money, choose
> Methodist.
>
> Both places have proved losers.
>
> Avoid Texas & Louisiana if at all possible, when seeking health care.
>
> ----------------
>
> Political Fraud & Graft/Greed
>
> When politicians want to waste taxpayer money in large amounts, then
> they'll hire their buddies to build something, usually badly, ..... such
> as the unnecessary bombing out & then "rebuilding" (ain't gonna happen)
> of Iraq, ...... such as the building & promotion of the huge Texas
> Medical Center in Houston, ..... such as the building of rehabilitation
> centers around Texas, which are basically holding-cells for the injured,
> rather than places to get testing, diagnosis & good care, ..... such as
> building schools.
>
> Just because MDA or any other place is billed as "good" by the media (by
> another university), ..... does Not make it so.
>
> Susan, Su_Texas  my opinions
>
> PS   Some Justice Please!
>
> At this point, I feel very angry & hurt, very badly betrayed by the MDs
> & their ongoing BS, their lies, cons, swindles.
>
> I think the oncologists should be force-ted their own poisons, then put
> in stocks on the public square for people to spit at, throw things at,
> pee on, jeer.
>
> They deserve no respect, no rewards, for the harm they're doing.
>
> They deserve only the worse.
>
> And I'm hoping & praying, they get it, both in this life & the next.
>
> May they suffer horribly, fester & rot in their own vile/bile.
>
> May the spirits of those they've horribly harmed & murdered, haunt them
> for the rest of their days, ..... & be waiting to grab & rip their sorry
> souls apart in the most painful of ways, at their moment of death,
> ..... to torture & punish them for all eternity & beyond.
>
> May these hellish, lying, thieving vermin (docs) from hell, never know
> one moment's peace.
>
> May they face only justice without mercy.
Bea - - 18 Jun 2005 15:24 GMT
>As below.
>It would be very interesting to know and
> possibly even have some support for
> American doctors from those of you here (on
> the ng) who've been treated by them.
>Mary

You won't get that support from me, Mary!  I keep wanting to think that
Su-Texas is some nutcase just trying to scare people but my own horrible
experiences with doctors and our local hospital tells me she is not.
If I tell a doctor I can't take a certain type drug, he gives me samples
of another in the same class category which causes me the same horrible
side effects.  My innocence and trust in them in earlier years was my
downfall.  Now, I check out all their drugs and dump most in the garbage
when I find out it's not what I was told it would me.  

When I told my Oncologist of my concerns about the Arimidex, his
attitude was that I had no choice but to take it if I wanted to try to
live.  His scare tactics worked because I take it and just pray I won't
end up like Su-Texas and others who have taken it.   It is also a
running joke here that the worse thing that can happen to someone is to
have to go to the Emergency Room of our local  "not for profit"
hospital.   The bottom line is it truly seems to be all about money and
not the best patient care.  BTW, I live in one of the states Su-Texas is
groaning about and have fought my own battles with the doctors and
hospital here.    

I will be reading this thread with great interest to see if it is truly
just Texas and Louisiana where medical care is in the garbage can.  If I
did not have family here, I would gladly move to any state where others
can show one does get good medical care nowadays.

Bea  
Mary Fisher - 18 Jun 2005 17:08 GMT
> >As below.
>>It would be very interesting to know and
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> You won't get that support from me, Mary!

Hey! I wasn't asking for support - UK is so far from USA in geography and
culture that I wondered if all medical teams were the same. I would find
that heard to belive, to be honest, but it just might be so. Two of my great
friends wereGeneral Practicioners in Ohio and Washington State and I'm sure
they always had the best interests of their patients at heart. One
contracted lung cancer many years ago and is still alive and active, and
very grateful for the experimental and previously untried care she received.

But if it is so bad everywhere I wonder why so many people continue to seek
medical advice.

>  I keep wanting to think that
> Su-Texas is some nutcase just trying to scare people

I don't want to think that, I'm prepared to hear what others say, which is
why I asked.

Mary
Bea - - 18 Jun 2005 20:43 GMT
>I don't want to think that, I'm prepared to hear
> what others say, which is why I asked.
>Mary

My apologies, Mary.  I did not mean for my distain for too many in the
medical profession in the US to be misunderstood as a reaction towards
your post. I, too, would love to hear if ours are just isolated cases
and what others have as their experience with their doctors.  

I think most doctors start out with great dedication to giving the best
medical care they can but with their offices packed to the walls and
snowed under in paperwork, I feel, it is the rare doctor who can really
give their patient the good medical care they need.     Unfortunately,
as the old saying goes "they bury their errors" and I wonder how many
errors need to be buried before the US gets better medical care for it's
citizens.   You are very fortunate if you can have confidence in the
care you get in the UK.

Bea
Mary Fisher - 18 Jun 2005 21:36 GMT
> >I don't want to think that, I'm prepared to hear
>> what others say, which is why I asked.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> citizens.   You are very fortunate if you can have confidence in the
> care you get in the UK.

I imagine that some people in UK don't like the service they receive,
nobody's perfect. But if we don't like what we get we can change, it doesn't
cost anything. Of course there are always those discontented patients who
complain about everything, sometimes their opinions are difficult to
believe. They do tend to be the same people who are discontended by every
service, not just the medical ones.

I'm especially fortunate to be on the panel of a group practice at the
bottom of our street. Their philosophy is to give service rather than make
money, they have limited the number of patients on the list so that they can
do that, at the expense of reducing their income. In my experience our
private service is also excellent.

It couldn't be done in some parts of the country, such as London, where
there's an enormous pressure on GPs.

Mary

> Bea
Joan Kaapke - 18 Jun 2005 16:01 GMT
> As below.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Mary

I live in West Texas, and I think I had very good care.  My surgeon was
highly skilled, and took the time to explain my options to me before I
decided on a lumpectomy.  She referred me to the nicest radiation oncologist
and I received excellent care at her clinic, with a very caring and
experienced staff.  I had 35 treatments using the latest technology, IMRT.
I actually looked forward to my treatments, because it was such a pleasant
place to go.  They served free coffee, tea and snacks to those in the large,
comfortable waiting room.  The atmosphere was more like a country club than
a treatment center.  I had one chemo treatment, with a different oncologist,
and had such negative feelings about having any more, that I made a decision
not to take chemo.  I also did not want a porta-cath.  I agreed to take
Tamoxifen, and have had no side effects from it.  All of my treatments were
covered by Medicare and my other insurance.  I did not go to a teaching
hospital, and I was consulted and given options regarding my treatment.

Joan

>> Avoid Texas & Louisiana
>>
[quoted text clipped - 115 lines]
>>
>> May they face only justice without mercy.
alex - 18 Jun 2005 21:23 GMT
I have been employed as RN for the past 28 years, and I have ultimate faith
in the  US medical care. Are there issues ? Of course! Do people travel to
the US to seek care  every day.
Texas has several medical centers that are the best in the world, two I can
think of are MD Anderson and Baylor Medical Center. Louisiana has Tulane.

> As below.
>
[quoted text clipped - 123 lines]
>>
>> May they face only justice without mercy.
Anthony - 19 Jun 2005 13:43 GMT
>I have been employed as RN for the past 28 years, and I have ultimate faith
>in the  US medical care. Are there issues ? Of course! Do people travel to
>the US to seek care  every day.
> Texas has several medical centers that are the best in the world, two I
> can think of are MD Anderson and Baylor Medical Center. Louisiana has
> Tulane.

A sensible response.  The Su person continually produces rabid posts
unsupported by facts and she/he/it has been in my killfile for some time.
My wife has been dealing with cancer, first lung then breast, for about ten
years and we have had very good experiences at Duke Medical Center and at
Shands, both hospitals associated with a major university, which in the US
is generally the way to go for the best medicine.  Professionals working in
academic sacrifice financially for the opportunity to be where the best
medicine is practiced and their dedication shows.  That said, do they make
mistakes?  Of course.  But we have always felt very well treated and, most
important, my wife is alive and in fine fettle despite the severely
threatening nature of her illnesses.
su-texas@webtv.net - 19 Jun 2005 15:49 GMT
The Su person continually produces rabid posts unsupported by facts

============================

And you Anthony, are a lying piece of selfish, sadistic scum, ..... of
which you seem quite proud. ?!

The typical sociopath. Narcissistic & Antisocial moral disorder.

Susan, Su_Texas  my opinions
mariestrack@yahoo.com - 19 Jun 2005 18:47 GMT
That was uncalled for Susan.

It is obvious you are angry and scared, but your choice of words the
last couple of days are really over the top.  Perhaps you should get in
to see your counselor and talk about your "newest" diagnosis until the
anger and fear subside a bit and you can be civil to others.

BTW, my grandmother lived 20+ years with CHF, and never ever
complained.  She conducted herself with dignity and grace and never
tried to place blame upon her doctors or priest or society for her
ills.  

Just food for thought...

Marie
alex - 19 Jun 2005 18:59 GMT
> ============================
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Susan, Su_Texas  my opinions

Susan, I feel bad that the medical system has let you down but insulting
others is not right. If  I went to a doctor or hospital where I was
mistreated I would stop going! Not everyone believes in the mainline medical
system, but the undisputable fact is people are living longer. There is no
law mandating that  you have to seek medical care. So your choices are to go
it on your own or try to live with the system. Alex
Mary Fisher - 19 Jun 2005 19:51 GMT
...

> And you Anthony, are a lying piece of selfish, sadistic scum, ..... of
> which you seem quite proud. ?!
>
> The typical sociopath. Narcissistic & Antisocial moral disorder.

Su, that was uncalled for and, as far as I can see, unjustified. If you want
to make accusations about someone you should give evidence.

Mary

> Susan, Su_Texas  my opinions
su-texas@webtv.net - 19 Jun 2005 21:30 GMT
From: su-texas@webtv.net

Anthony wrote:

The Su person continually produces rabid posts unsupported by facts

============================

And you Anthony, are a lying piece of selfish, sadistic scum, ..... of
which you seem quite proud. ?!

The typical sociopath. Narcissistic & Antisocial moral disorder.

Susan, Su_Texas my opinions

==========================

Su_Texas writes:

It's alarming to me, that people wouldn't find the nasty & negative
posts that Anthony writes to be wrong here, or the lies he's trying to
spread.

At this point, I think it was right to confront him for it.

If you disagree, then that's your problem.

Perhaps until he lies about & slanders you, you won't be able to see the
problem? Experience is a great teacher.

And sadistic little trolls like Anthony (the same as with bad children),
shouldn't be encouraged or rewarded, when they lie & act ugly in public.

Susan, Su_Texas  my opinions

PS  My Focus

I'm very concerned at the misinformation that's been put out about
Breast Cancer Care, ...... about the chemotherapy, about the "trust your
doctor & the medical system" nonsense, ..... esp. now that these lies &
super-silly-and-stupid blind-faith total-bullsh*t-type statements have
harmed me so badly & permanently.

And these lies (trust & blind faith in docs; which can do so much harm!)
have been overly-pushed at & by this "support" group. ??? So this is one
place to address it.

The facts are, that the lying super-sleazy low-life verminous docs, have
now destroyed my heart & health, which is a BIGGIE on the survival
scale. And this has put my pets (dogs, my children) in danger too, which
I can never forgive.

I'm posting about my experiences, no matter what flack & BS it draws
from the determinedly-dumb, ..... because I don't want other women to go
through such a horrible & horrifying experience in the Medical System,
... to waste so much time, money & effort on such harm-filled cr*p.

People with Breast Cancer should be told the truth, should have this
information up-front, ..... & then be able to make a much-more-informed
choice than I got to, concerning treatments for breast cancer.

As far as I can see, there's NOTHING available from the Medical
Industry, that can help with Breast Cancer, ..... but there's a whole
lot of poisons there, that can do serious harm, can maim & murder, can
cost mucho $$$.

I'd NOT recommend chemotherapy, because it's not yet proven to help.
There are no tests to show it works.

I'd recommend that women NOT trust the oncologists (Oinkers), not trust
their GPs/FPs.
They belong to & are loyal to special interest groups, that somehow,
someway do NOT have the patient's interest or welfare in mind at all.
Most will only lie, cheat, con, go for the $$$, .... will harm you &
then walk away smirking, snickering.

As long as the docs' determinedly dumb, dastardly & destructive acts
work on the patients, ..... as long as they bring in $$$, & we can't sue
for harm done, ..... then the Oinkers & Medical Industry won't change.

If I were to start over from the beginning, I'd NOT get any breast
cancer care from an Oinker, ..... & would check into alternative
treatments.

It's important that the insurance companies acknowledge the many flaws,
failings & failures, sadistic greed of the Medical Industry, ......
their total botching of breast cancer treatments, & the harm they do,
..... & start paying for alternative treatments instead.

------------------------

The Importance of Screaming in Reaction to Crimes

What's the oncologists here are doing, is sleazy & sadistic beyond
words. It's a crime.

After they betray & harm you, basically sadistically murder you for $$$,
..... it's important to scream out loud in outrage & shock, ..... & if
you care about others, to warn them of the danger, the fraud & lies of
the docs, & the harm done.

If the victims of these crimes remain silent, then the docs & Medical
Industry will be able to go on scamming & harming in the same ways.

Scream.

----------------------

Yes, I was very, very stupid to trust the doctors at Baylor College of
Medicine, at Methodist Hospital in Houston, at M D Anderson, at the
Longview Cancer Center, at LSU.

I'd advise people NOT to go to or trust any of these for cancer care,
.... despite what propaganda & BS you hear or read, that's put out by
special interest groups, by universities & MDs, by the corporate-owned
media.

I don't know who we're supposed to trust for medical advice, but it
certainly isn't MDs or DOs, & it's not the media or Medical Industry.
Bea - - 19 Jun 2005 23:30 GMT
>The Importance of Screaming in Reaction to
> Crimes

Su- I agree with you totally that more patients have to speak out and
confront their medical professionals if they receive bad medical care.
However, I disagree with the way you advocate our doing it.  "Screamers"
become quickly tagged as neurotic emotional basket cases and after word
gets out about them, they will lose all credibility and their attempts
to rectify a bad situation will become null and void.  

I have had many of my own confrontations with hospitals and doctors but
I find if I confront them in a professional manner and make sure I do
not stoop to name-calling, I get more cooperation from them.     IMO, if
you can control you anger and change the manner with which you confront
people, they might take you more seriously and you can do much good for
yourself and the rest of us.     What you want for yourself (good
medical care) is a justifiable cause but I think your cause will fall on
deaf ears if you continue to advocate "screaming".  Just my thoughts.

Bea
su-texas@webtv.net - 20 Jun 2005 02:06 GMT
Hi Bea,

Whoops!

In advocating "screaming", I was doing so in connection with writing,
with posts on the internet, ..... Not in person to anyone.

Sorry for the misunderstanding.

---------------------

Right after you've been badly betrayed & harmed, esp. by a
"professional" (such as a doctor), ...... it's important to speak up &
out about it (in writing), to get the feelings out, not keep them
inside, not suffer in silence.

[On the internet, this is beneficial, in that it helps warn others of
danger, so they can be better prepared. "Knowledge is power."

I'm Very grateful for the info that individuals have left in the Google
archives, to help & benefit others.

And I'm trying to do the same, esp. with the subjects I'm most familiar
through personal experience.]

-----------------------

"Screaming" in writing, helps lessen the stress load & shock, & gets you
ready to go back into the fray, in a calm, calculated & logical manner,
..... with the added bonus of new ideas from others, who heard you
scream, who cared, offered prayers & support, who responded or not.

[I read posts, close my eyes, focus & pray for people, without
responding to their posts in writing, & believe they do the same for
me.]

Screaming in writing, gets the truth out in the open with a loud bang, &
blasts away the confetti & cobwebs of lies, deceit, treachery, bad
games.

After dealing with Mom's hypocrite-type, hate & harm-filled
KKKChristians for much of my life, ..... I super dislike liars & lying.

--------------------

As far as I can tell, talking to people in person, when you are upset
(such as after a major crime or harming), is NOT a good idea, ..... Nor
is talking to a counselor at that time.

Basically, they can do nothing to help. They mostly don't or can't
afford to care much. And only one person hears you. So it's frustrating,
draining & a waste of time.

Plus, your being upset, can get them upset, which is bad, wastes energy,
accomplishes nothing.

On the internet, there's a certain distance from the emotions, a wider
base of people (with varying life skills & savvy, experience), & the
chance of getting positive feedback, some sincere & freely-given caring
& concern, .... maybe getting some helpful suggestions & insight, .... &
the feeling that at a hellishly awful time, I've stopped to give info
that might help others, that I could give something (anything!) of value
back to those who've helped me, & to honor those here, who've died.

-------------------

When dealing with people in person, esp. those who are acting as
sociopaths (with a criminal, harmful mindset), ....... I know how
important it is, to be & stay extremely calm, logical, practical.

Since I was tortured & abused from birth, I've found that staying calm
like this, is extremely easy for me, ..... no matter how dastardly &
difficult a sociopath chooses to act.

Sometimes sociopaths freak out around me, get upset, act "off", will
physically attack me, ..... because I can stay so calm & logical,
regardless of the sick stunts & dramas they pull.

[In the hundreds of doctors I've met, since my being badly injured in
Jan. 1998 & having to beg for testing, diagnosis & help over & over,
.... two doctors attacked me like this: Raymond J0rdan & Richard Zw3ig.

After being suddenly & unexpectedly attacked by each of them, I did
start screaming loudly for help, sobbing & crying, ..... but no one
would help me, no nurses or staff, .... & no one would tell the police
what happened.

At LSU, the sick b*tches just stood there & smirked, snickered, .... as
did the head of the dept & the campus cop when they came.  Talk about
betrayal!  (I feel sure there's a special hell waiting for these human
vermin, in the next life.)

Here in Texas & Louisiana, the docs have power & are allowed to do
whatever they want.

When you report a doctor for a crime, the police ignore it, as does the
hospital where the doctor works, as does the Texas State Board of
Medical Examiners. Louisiana is wrose.

There are NO quality controls here, NO recourse for medical malpractice.
The lawyers won't take the cases.

Because of this, & because of the financially & morally impoverished,
extremely corrupt & crime-ridden society here (which keeps getting
worse). the dangers, ..... I'd definitely NOT recommend Texas or
Louisiana, as places to seek medical care.]

-----------------

Sociopaths are extremely used to people losing it emotionally. For them,
it's the norm, & they count & thrive on it. After someone is upset, a
sociopath can easily manipulate, use, control & harm them.

[This technique (upset their emotions, demand trust & blind faith, &
thereby create hypocrites, enforcers for evil/harm in "God's name") is
what some of the churches here use, to catch & then control their
"flocks", ..... as do the corrupt, hate & harm KKKChristian politicians
like Bush.]

---------------------

In person, calmness counts.

Susan, Su_Texas  my opinions
mariestrack@yahoo.com - 20 Jun 2005 11:12 GMT
su-texas wrote:

> In advocating "screaming", I was doing so in connection with writing,
> with posts on the internet, ..... Not in person to anyone.

Susan, "screaming" on the internet has the same effect as walking down
the street screaming.

If you want to be taken seriously and have good input to your
inquiries, then you really need to NOT "scream"  here either.

We aren't robots behind our monitors.  We are people, and you come into
our homes when you post on the internet.  The only difference is you
reach a vaster audience.

If it is important to you to get the rage out by "screaming" then there
are other avenues that are more private, for example myspace.com or
livejournal.com.   You could start a private ranting & raving journal,
and then when you are calmer you can post inquiries to the broader mass
of people.

> Plus, your being upset, can get them upset, which is bad, wastes energy,
> accomplishes nothing.

Please think about these words of yours carefully Susan.  You just
described how people here or other places on the internet feel when you
are "screaming".  Again, there is no difference.

> In person, calmness counts.

Calmness counts here also.

My opinion only,

Marie
Eva - 20 Jun 2005 02:58 GMT
> As far as I can see, there's NOTHING available from the Medical
> Industry, that can help with Breast Cancer, ..... but there's a whole
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I'd NOT recommend chemotherapy, because it's not yet proven to help.
> There are no tests to show it works.
-------------
I had an aggressive Stage 3 tumor the size of a tennis ball.  I had chemo
*before* I had the mastectomy.  By the time I completed the chemo, the tumor
could no longer be felt.  After my mastectomy the pathology report indicated
no active cancer cells in the breast tissue or 15 lymph nodes that were
removed.  I'd say the chemo worked, wouldn't you?  Or do you attribute this
to a miracle?

I have been crippled and disfigured by the chemo BUT IT SAVED MY LIFE.  If I
hadn't had it, I'd be in the ground.  And if you had a Stage 3 tumor, the
same is almost unquestionably true of you.  It damaged you, but if you
hadn't had it you'd be dead now.

This isn't "blind faith."  This is direct personal experience.  And of
course there are *many* studies which demonstrate chemo's effectiveness in
keeping you alive.

It's a human tendency to think in black and white terms.  You live or you
die.  You don't realize how many points there are on the continuum in
between "living" and "dying."  On June 30, 2004 my breast cancer was
diagnosed, and all I could think was "NO! I don't want to die!"  All I cared
about was staying alive.  Right now I'm very unhappy about all the things I
can't do because of the changes in my body due to chemo, surgery, and
radiation....but I have known 3 women in the past 8 years who were diagnosed
with breast cancer and were dead within a year.  At the end of the day, I'm
glad and grateful to be alive now.

Eva
su-texas@webtv.net - 20 Jun 2005 04:12 GMT
Hi Eva,

I had a stage three tumor, because the doctors ignored each year's
mammogram results, lied to me about them & breast cancer, would not
diagnose the lump as cancer, would not help me with it for many years,
.... & because a bad doctor then falsified a lab report in March 2000,
to indicate it wasn't cancer, probably to help cover himself & the other
doctors, & to see that I could get no care.

He (Charles Kilp@trick, a general surgeon in Marshall TX, took fluid
from the two lumps in March 2000, never sent it to the lab, & said the
report came back Not Cancer), ...... proved one sick, sleazy & sadistic,
low-life little b*stard.

When I confronted him in Oct 2001, he wasn't ashamed of what he'd done,
& his nurse/assistant (an old f-ugly-looking hag) thought it was very
fun & funny. She snickered, laughed about it, as she told me they'd
never sent my lab-work in, bragged. ?!  

I was in shock, horrified, turned & left, & screamed in writing later. I
also reported him to the Marshall police & hospital, who didn't care,
who did nothing.

Most people will act as sociopaths/criminals, when given any opportunity
or power to do so (without penalties), & get off on it, get high.

This is basic/primitive human nature. Power corrupts.

The GP/FP doctor Suzane Bl@ke was also involved in this fraud (March
2000), & also quite proud of herself, ..... later bragging about her
role in it & the harm done, once I learned the truth in Oct 2001.

I think there should be a special branch of the AMA in Texas, called the
Skank Ho Doc KKKlub, whose membership is the worst of the worst docs
here, the lowest of the low.

--------------------

If the first bump had been removed when I found it & asked for it to be
(many years before March 2000), & if I'd had a double mastectomy at that
time, ...... then I'd probably not have needed any chemotherapy, ever.
My heart & health would not have been damaged & destroyed.

Because the docs chose to do the wrong things over & over, to "first do
harm", then do more harm over & over, trying to murder & "bury their
mistakes", ...... the second breast lump (from injury in Jan. 1998) grew
to be about 6 by 6 by 2 inches big, & the breast had turned
yellow-orange, ...... before any doc would acknowledge the lump was
there (in Oct 2001), much less that it was cancer.

Because of the sadistic crimes & meanness of these docs, the cancer was
very advanced, third-stage, before I could get any surgery or treatment.

For their doing this, they should be in prison, but unfortunately,
there's nothing we can do to them in Texas.

There should be some enforceable penalties, for those doctors in Texas &
Louisiana who choose to act as sadistic, snickering sociopaths &
criminals, but there's not.

This has to change!

--------------------

Knowing what I now know, I'd have had the surgery in late 2001 (double
mastectomy), ..... then opted NOT to have chemotherapy, based mostly on
its being NOT proven, its results NOT testable, & its extremely toxic &
destructive nature PROVEN.

I'd have opted for alternative therapy.

I do NOT believe that I'm alive now, because of the chemotherapy,
radiation & Arimidex, ..... but am alive in spite of it, partly because
I have such an intense will & need to live regardless.

---------------------

So far, because of the extreme corruption, crimes & meanness here in
Texas, I've not got to start & live a life yet.

I've worked very steadily, long & hard to survive, to get some rights &
protection, & to get to live a life, ..... & I d*mned well intend to get
to, before the bad docs & corrupt system, can finish murdering me,
finish harming me to death.

And if I don't make it, then I intend that other crime & abuse victims
use the info I've posted, .... to get a better chance to live their
lives.

I'm outraged that anything, any area, can be as horrendously bad as this
one has proved to be.

--------------------

Now that there's the internet, & I can get more information, I might be
moving to a better area, as soon as I can get an investigation into the
crimes & corruption here, the extreme levels of harm done, ..... & get
some $$$-settlements.

Because I've now been harmed so badly by bad docs & others, I'll
probably need to move close to the best medical center I can find.

Few options. (heavy sigh) And definitely not the life I intended,
wanted, planned for.

Susan, Su_Texas  my opinions
Eva - 20 Jun 2005 05:08 GMT
> Now that there's the internet, & I can get more information, I might be
> moving to a better area, as soon as I can get an investigation into the
> crimes & corruption here, the extreme levels of harm done, ..... & get
> some $$$-settlements.
----------
So, your name and your game are the same--SUE.   Nice way to make a living.
Eva
su-texas@webtv.net - 20 Jun 2005 05:47 GMT
So, your name and your game are the same--SUE.   Nice way to make a
living.

=========================

What a sleazy little thing you've proved to be, Eva.

So far, I've not sued anyone, & have worked Very hard for what I had
(before it was stolen & burned last August). Two houses full of stuff.

Because of the extreme harm & crimes that have happened, I now need to
sue for justice, for positive changes here, & for $$$.

It's gonna be great, to see the corrupt DA, police chief, judges get
handcuffed & taken away, to see their trials reported on TV, to know
they'll be doing some serious prison time, to see the smugness & smirks
get permanently wiped off their faces, ..... to get the US & Texas govt
systems to investigate & prosecute public crimes & corruption, to work
for a change.

Susan, Su_Texas  my opinions
Teddy - 21 Jun 2005 12:04 GMT
Good luck with the lawsuits but I'd bet money nothing will come of it.
The lawyers will cover for each other as much as the doctors.
Mary Fisher - 21 Jun 2005 13:21 GMT
Eva wrote:

So, your name and your game are the same--SUE. Nice way to make a
living.

=========================

What a sleazy little thing you've proved to be, Eva.

So far, I've not sued anyone, & have worked Very hard for what I had
(before it was stolen & burned last August). Two houses full of stuff.

Because of the extreme harm & crimes that have happened, I now need to
sue for justice, for positive changes here, & for $$$.

It's gonna be great, to see the corrupt DA, police chief, judges get
handcuffed & taken away, to see their trials reported on TV, to know
they'll be doing some serious prison time, to see the smugness & smirks
get permanently wiped off their faces, ..... to get the US & Texas govt
systems to investigate & prosecute public crimes & corruption, to work
for a change.

       Keep us up to date with the progress.

       Mary
su-texas@webtv.net - 19 Jun 2005 22:06 GMT
From: usenetgirl@gmail.com (alex)

I have been employed as RN for the past 28 years, and I have ultimate
faith in the US medical care. Are there issues ? Of course! Do people
travel to the US to seek care every day.

Texas has several medical centers that are the best in the world, two I
can think of are MD Anderson and Baylor Medical Center. Louisiana has
Tulane.

==========================

Hi Alex,

Because your job is in Cancer Care, I know you need to believe this, so
out of kindness, I did not directly challenge your post.

However, when I answer other posts, I will express my opinions about the
kind of care & advice I got at these facilities, & the harm this did.

If you confront me in a harmful way (such as in the Anthony post), then
I will confront you about it.

Susan, Su_Texas  my opinions
Eva - 19 Jun 2005 01:22 GMT
> As below.
>
> It would be very interesting to know and possibly even have some support for
> American doctors from those of you here (on the ng) who've been treated by
> them.
-----------
I believe you should never attribute to malice what can be explained by
stupidity.  I've had doctors and nurses make stupid mistakes involving my
care.  I have not come to the conclusion that they are fiends from hell,
only that they are dumb humans like the rest of us.

Eva
Mary Fisher - 19 Jun 2005 10:13 GMT
> -----------
> I believe you should never attribute to malice what can be explained by
> stupidity.  I've had doctors and nurses make stupid mistakes involving my
> care.  I have not come to the conclusion that they are fiends from hell,
> only that they are dumb humans like the rest of us.

I agree.

Mary
Kathleen Langwell - 20 Jun 2005 17:36 GMT
I've had an onc for the last year that I like very much, BUT......
there's a problem that I consider quite important.

I've had lung mets for about 20 mos., but last spring my femur/hip
started really bothering me. Had a bone scan at the end of April which
showed extensive mets in many places that have yet to bother me, but
also in both femurs/hips. When I saw onc 3-1/2 wks later to discuss scan
report she said she never saw a report. I had gotten my own copy from
the Radiolgy Dept. so I showed it to her. Hmmm, she said. She then
ordered xrays of spine, hips, femurs to check the bone integrity to
prevent fracture. Again, I got my own xray reports. At my reg. appt.
weeks later onc again said "I've never gotten any xray reports. Can I
see yours?" It was at that point that I asked her just who the doctor
was--I had reports and knew my bone integrity, she had never obtained a
report from eitherthe bone scan taken two months ago or the xrays. I
then told her what the reports detailed and she asked if she could see
them. I let her know that I found it very lax and disturbing that my
file contained no reports from tests I had and that I had to rely on
myself to obtain them and interpret them. Her reply was that she didn't
know why she didn't get reports, but it didn't seem to bother her.

I direct my own treatments, she always agrees with me, and I basically
use her to write orders or 'scripts. I've had several docs and my
experience has been that most seem quite happy to talk as little as
possible and avoid any discussion about any questions that might require
more than one sentence. Oh, well, I research, research, and try to do
what I think will be best for me. I think most docs are quite happy to
let the patient direct them.

Kathie
A. P. Thorsen - 20 Jun 2005 22:00 GMT
> It would be very interesting to know and possibly even have some support for
> American doctors from those of you here (on the ng) who've been treated by
> them.

My experiences have been generally good.  No one has been vicious,
venial, or otherwise intentionally or negligently bad.   Some doctors
have been better communicators (both listening & talking), or had more
likeable/approachable personalities, than others.  Some do a better job
of keeping up with new developments than others.

They're all human, and, like all of us, can only do what they can do.
Personally, I don't know how doctors do it -- so much is expected of
them; no one could live up to it.  (Worse than the unmeetable
expectations people have for preachers' wives, even, I think <grin>.)

Overall, I and my family have had good, sometimes excellent, medical
care.   Sometimes I've been quite impressed by how committed, engaged &
involved a particular doctor is.

I'm not saying everything has been uniformly perfect.  I've sometimes
had to be assertive or emphatic to get what I wanted, which I think is
to be expected given the large number of patients that doctors see in
compressed periods of time.

And one can always argue that "if the doctor had only done X, then Y
wouldn't have happened".  Sometimes it's probably even true <g>.

None of the doctors are as absorbed by me & mine, as I am.  I can wish
they were, but realistically, I wouldn't expect them to be.

Perhaps we watch too much TV.  Marcus Welby is necessarily fictional.

Ann T.
Remove 'dontsendspam' from address to reply by email
Mary Fisher - 20 Jun 2005 23:28 GMT
<snip expected reasoned Annpost>

> Perhaps we watch too much TV.  Marcus Welby is necessarily fictional.

Who?

Mary

> Ann T.
> Remove 'dontsendspam' from address to reply by email
marilyn@utrillo.ac - 21 Jun 2005 01:43 GMT
><snip expected reasoned Annpost>
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Mary

The actor Robert Young was the much beloved father in Father Knows
Best, a tv show in the late 50s, I believe. He went on to play a much
beloved doctor, on another series Marcus Welby, MD.

Back in the days when we only had one or two channels available.

Marilyn
Mary Fisher - 21 Jun 2005 09:31 GMT
>><snip expected reasoned Annpost>
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Back in the days when we only had one or two channels available.

Ah, thanks.

I should have realised, most of the things I don't know about are television
related - we don't have one so are even ignorant of much of British culture!

But somehow we survive ... :-)

Mary

> Marilyn
Bea - - 21 Jun 2005 00:50 GMT
>Perhaps we watch too much TV. Marcus
> Welby is necessarily fictional.

Marcus Welby was too nice for my liking.   My dream doctor is "Dr.
House".  He's a real insulting nutcase lunatic but he won't give up on a
patient until he figures out (with his diagnostic team) what is really
their medical problem.  What a joy it would be to be in the hands of
someone like that!  He's NOT a "giver-upper!"  The show is great because
it shows how stressful a doctor's life can really be and how human or
inhuman they can become by their profession.  It's help me be more
understanding of a lot of the neglect I feel from some of my doctors.

Bea
Tony Lima - 28 Jun 2005 17:37 GMT
>>Perhaps we watch too much TV. Marcus
>> Welby is necessarily fictional.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>inhuman they can become by their profession.  It's help me be more
>understanding of a lot of the neglect I feel from some of my doctors.

Bea, please correct me if I'm wrong but I believe the show
you're talking about is "Scrubs."  Despite the network's
best attempts to kill it by randomly moving it all over the
schedule it remains one of the best shows on TV. - Tony
Bea - - 28 Jun 2005 20:25 GMT
>Bea, please correct me if I'm wrong but I
> believe the show you're talking about is
> "Scrubs." Despite the network's best attempts
> to kill it by randomly moving it all over the
> schedule it remains one of the best shows on
> TV. - Tony

No, no, no, Tony!  Not "Scrubs".  We tried to watch that but it is
mainly a comedy.  My kid adores it and has tried to get us to watch it
but it's not our cup of tea.  

If you haven't discovered the "House" show on the Fox network you are
missing the greatest show to hit tv in years, IMO. The leading character
is Dr. Gregory House who has a limp and is, very weird looking in a sexy
way. He  eats pain killers which he promises to "kick" but keeps
sneaking handfuls all through the show as he cures his patients of the
most confusing and strangest medical problems.   It is hilarious, sad,
and teaches us great lessons on how "human" doctors really are.
Sometimes we forget they actually were born to real moms and have
families and eat hamburgers like the rest of us.    After seeing Dr.
House I actually had to hug my own doctor!   (Usually my appointments
are 3 hours of seeing who can insult the other the most.<g)

Bea
Mary Fisher - 28 Jun 2005 20:51 GMT
...

> and teaches us great lessons on how "human" doctors really are.

I saw one of ours in a DIY supermarket buying wall paper - it reminded me of
when I was at school and a fellow pupil said she'd seen Miss Soandso buying
FOOD!

> Sometimes we forget they actually were born to real moms and have
> families and eat hamburgers like the rest of us.    After seeing Dr.
> House I actually had to hug my own doctor!   (Usually my appointments
> are 3 hours of seeing who can insult the other the most.<g)

You have three hour appointments???

Cor!

Mary

> Bea
Bea - - 28 Jun 2005 21:54 GMT
>You have three hour appointments???
>Cor!
>Mary

Sorry about the misunderstanding.  My brain goes goofy when I talk about
Dr. House.  What I meant was that 3 hours is basically the "wait" time
for the doctor.  When he appears it usually is a couple of "quickie"
minutes so by the time I have waited 3 hours to see him, I am all gunned
up with juicy insults and he fires them back at me.   Actually I think
we have a good relationship considering he said he looks forward to our
visits.<g

Bea
Mary Fisher - 28 Jun 2005 22:32 GMT
> >You have three hour appointments???
>>Cor!
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> we have a good relationship considering he said he looks forward to our
> visits.<g

Ah, I understand now!

I don't think I could wait that long. Many years ago I was sent to see the
bc consultant because I found a soft lump in my breast and we were always
exhorted to have any lump checked. About 1990 I think it was. I wasn't
worried.

I waited for over two hours and was more than impatient. My husband had
taken the afternoon off school to be with me. When I protested I was told
that Mr Pratt (yes, his real name) was a very important man. I expressed my
disatisfaction with the system of block booking (everyone at 2 p.m.).
Everyone in that waiting room was important, some people were distressed but
daren't say anything. They shouldn't have had to wait like that.

When I was seen by the very great and important man he said that it wasn't
cancer but his advice was to have it out. I asked why I should have it out
if it wasn't cancer? He said that he knew ladies and that I'd worry about
it.

I said that he didn't know me and left, walking tall (5' 3") and dignified.
I don't do dignified often. I hoped that my snub might make him think or
spoil his tea or something but I don't suppose it did.

Pratt by name and Prat by nature. He knew ladies indeed. Pah!

When I was actually diagnosed - eight years later - I dreaded the thought
that Mr Pratt might still be there and, worse, remember me but he wasn't,
instead I had St Kieran Horgan, a lovely, young, HUMAN, Irish surgeon who
didn't claim to know ladies and wouldn't let me make a decision about the
procedure to be undertaken until I'd thought about it - with full
information from him and an invitation to ask as many questions as I wanted.

I didn't have to wait more than a few minutes for my appointment and haven't
had to wait since - for any appointment to do with bc. I know that there are
some places where waiting times are a problem but we're very well served for
bc in Leeds.

Being on the list for hearing tests (18 months) and hammer toes is another
story :-)

Mary

> Bea
alex - 29 Jun 2005 02:34 GMT
My primary care doctor is community based rarely have to wait more than 15
minutes. If I go into Boston to the Cancer Center it can be an all day
experience for one appointment.
Tony Lima - 29 Jun 2005 01:51 GMT
>>Bea, please correct me if I'm wrong but I
>> believe the show you're talking about is
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>mainly a comedy.  My kid adores it and has tried to get us to watch it
>but it's not our cup of tea.  

Well, since I haven't watched broadcast TV in over a year I
guess I'll have to pass.  My apologies for the misdirection
(although I'll still maintain my loyalty to Scrubs). - Tony
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.