 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Breast Cancer / November 2004Stereotactic biopsy needs MRI to confirm?
I read somewhere else that someone needed both to diagnose calcifications. Is this true and in which order? I had stereotactic biopsy and there was no MRI ordered and I don't see why there would be as the material removed at biopsy is examined for carcinoma. > I read somewhere else that someone needed both to diagnose > calcifications. Is this true and in which order? > I read somewhere else that someone needed both to diagnose > calcifications. Is this true and in which order? You would need some sort of biopsy to confirm a positive MRI or other imaging result, but not the other way around. Tim Jackson |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.