Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Breast Cancer / August 2004
New treatment questions...
|
|
Thread rating:  |
allan grossman - 29 Jul 2004 17:54 GMT Hi, family ;-)
My friend Susan has a sister who's been recently diagnosed with IBC - I told y'all about her a couple weeks back.
Anyway, she got her treatment plan yesterday. Chemo before surgery and radiation, which is good in my book. Apparently treatments are changing so I thought I'd share and see what y'all thought -
Carol has IBC, ER- and PR-, Her2 strongly positive.
AC every *two* weeks plus Neulasta (instead of Neupogen) 24 hours after treatment x 4 treatments;
then weekly (I assume) Herceptin plus biweekly Taxotere x 4, then I assume Herceptin alone for the rest of the year - surgery and radiation to follow chemotherapy.
I have a couple observations - first, the two-week interval between treatments. They've decided to go dose-dense for her and this looks like it might be kinda tough chemo. You don't see that real often.
Has anyone had experience with Neulasta? As an alternative to Neupogen it looks pretty attractive - one shot per cycle instead of eight or nine daily injections.
Anyway, observations are welcome. What do y'all think?
hugs to all -
allan
Guess Who - 30 Jul 2004 00:34 GMT It is used all the time here in Boston, the major barrier is getting insurance to cover. Sounds like she is being offered top notch treatment. I hope she responds well to the herceptin, I also posted a link to a second generation drug in clinical trials which is a pill. It is posted in living beyond breast cancer.
> Hi, family ;-) > [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > allan Kaye301 - 31 Jul 2004 03:45 GMT Ålex wrote: << It is used all the time here in Boston, the major barrier is getting insurance to cover. >><BR><BR>
What is used all the time in Boston?
Guess Who - 31 Jul 2004 04:20 GMT Neulasta...I know since I often have to fax the prescriptions to the pharmacies for the patients.
> ?lex wrote: << It is used all the time here in Boston, the major barrier is
> getting > insurance to cover. >><BR><BR> > > What is used all the time in Boston? allan grossman - 31 Jul 2004 14:32 GMT Thanks, everyone - I've forwarded your responses to my friend Susan, who is forwarding them to her sister,
Eva, they can't tell what size her tumor is; it's very poorly differentiated and doesn't show up on a mammogram. Orange-peel skin is what got Carol to her doctor.
 Signature we don't see things as they are, we see them as we are. -- Anais Nin
Denise - 30 Jul 2004 01:38 GMT > Hi, family ;-) > [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > allan Hi, Allan, My best friend is receiving dose dense sequential chemo..adriamycin q2weeks..taxol q2weeks...cytoxan q2weeks. She gets neulasta on day 2 of each treatment. The idea was to give less medication at more frequent intervals. Giving each one individually does draw the chemo out but her side effects have been minimal. The neulasta brings the white count back up in seven days following the injection. It does cause some flu-like aches but nothing intolerable. It has kept her count up to 7.0 (she's had 2 treatments thus far..s/p lumpectomy/node dissection for stage 2 ductal Ca). I wish Carol strength and faith during the challenge ahead. Denise
*Annie* - 30 Jul 2004 05:59 GMT I had Neulasta after every chemo treatment excpet the very first one {1/10/03}. My onco wanted to see what my response would be if I didn't get it. I was on AC for 4 rounds {1/10/03-3/14/03} and Taxotre for the last 4 rounds {4/4/03-6/6/03}. I had no problems with this.I didn't have the "flu like" symptoms that others have talked about. I had my treatments on Friday's, and went in for my Neulasta shots on Monday's. The only reason there was 2-3 days in between is the onco area wasn't open on the weekends., otherwise I'm sure I would've had it sooner then I did. My counts were very low last time {8/99-1/00} I was on CMF and they dropped to a very low level a few times during that time. They did rebound prior to the next treatment, but it took most of the 3 week interval to do that. There was only one time that I had to be retested within a a couple days to make sure that I was going to be ready to have next treatment. I always had my bloodwork done on Friday's in bwt treatment days, and the onbe time I'm speeaking of, I had to repeat the test again on Monday.
I hope this helps. My thoughts and prayers go out to your friend. {friends relative?} I also hope Deb is doing well, and please let her know that I'm thinking of her. Well, you too dear. ;-)) My thoughts and prayers are with you both. Take care/God bless annie
Ultimately.....we know deeply that the other side of every fear is a freedom.
"Courage"...is *fear* that has said it's prayers.
*Annie* - 30 Jul 2004 06:12 GMT I forgot to mention that I was told that if that one blood test when repeated was no better then I'd be given Neupogen. As it turned out it came back up and wasn't needed. This last time {2003} I approached the Onco about the Neulasta shots. He told me that he would order them, and I'd get them afer my treatments. I presented the arguement that my counts were very low last time all through treatment, and I really didn't want to take the chance of having treatments stalled because of low blood counts. I was in NO moo to be told "sorry you have to wait" NOT! This was my second dance through cancerland and didn't want _anything_ to halt thr progress of this treatment schedule. That and I told him that "if I feel better, I'll do better" He agreed and I got them like I said after ech one, except for the very first AC. Someone mentioned the cost an they are for sure very costly, but our insurance picked up the cost of ll of them. I had 7 all together and it was told to me that they cost $4,250 PER shot. Whew! Thank God for the HMO...although I don't always feel that way. {lol!} As in recently, but this too shall pass.... Take care there my friend and give my best To Deb. God bless you both annie
Ultimately.....we know deeply that the other side of every fear is a freedom.
"Courage"...is *fear* that has said it's prayers.
Eva - 30 Jul 2004 12:28 GMT Can I just ask, what is the advantage of Neulasta over Neupogen? I am taking Neupogen. Eva
*Annie* - 31 Jul 2004 06:32 GMT Eva... The Neupogen is from I was told here {nw ohio} has to be taken for 5-10 days depending on the severity of the drop of the blood counts. {norm is no less then 5 days here/most times 7-10} Neulasta is a "timed release" type of injection. I'm not all that crazy about getting poked, so I opted for the one time shot. This was given to me on Monday after my chemo on Friday's. Hope this helps... Take care there dear/God bless annie p/s if you need any other info, don't hesitate to ask or email..would be fine also. @
Ultimately.....we know deeply that the other side of every fear is a freedom.
"Courage"...is *fear* that has said it's prayers.
Eva - 31 Jul 2004 13:08 GMT > Eva... > The Neupogen is from I was told here {nw ohio} has to be taken for 5-10 [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > about getting poked, so I opted for the one time shot. > This was given to me on Monday after my chemo on Friday's. ----------- Okay, thanks. I have chemo on Thursdays, then take the Neupogen the following Monday through Friday. I couldn't bring myself to stick the needle into my stomach, but I'm able to do it in my thigh. Eva
Kaye301 - 02 Aug 2004 11:14 GMT Eva wrote: << I couldn't bring myself to stick the needle into my stomach, but I'm able to do it in my thigh. >>
I used to feel the same way. I take injections for an M.S. (multiple sclerosis) medication. I started out giving them in my thigh. The idea of doing it in the abdominal area was not too pleasant. However, one time I had a bad reaction in my thigh. I must have hit a nerve. For the next few weeks I would get this horrible pain--felt like someone was ripping a large bandaid off a hairy area of about 4-inches square. This weird pain was sudden but unpredictable and occurred many times during the day. After that I switched to giving the injections in the abdominal area. I found it much more pleasant since it barely caused any discomfort since there are minimal nerve endings there.
Kaye301 - 02 Aug 2004 11:09 GMT Annie wrote: << The Neupogen is from I was told here {nw ohio} has to be taken for 5-10 days depending on the severity of the drop of the blood counts. {norm is no less then 5 days here/most times 7-10}
It has been awhile since I had Neupogen (last done in 11/01) but was given it starting the 7th day of chemo and is given through the 11th day if needed. A few times I was only given it 3 or 4 times, and my blood was tested to see if I still needed it. Since I did the injecting myself I was given it to take home but maximum amount was for 5 days. Still, I had my blood tested on the 3rd of the days that I took it and was told I didn't need any more.
allan grossman - 31 Jul 2004 14:30 GMT >Can I just ask, what is the advantage of Neulasta over Neupogen? I am >taking Neupogen. Neulasta is ten times as expensive as Neupogen but you only get one shot instead of daily Neupogen for about a week.
 Signature we don't see things as they are, we see them as we are. -- Anais Nin
Eva - 31 Jul 2004 16:21 GMT > >Can I just ask, what is the advantage of Neulasta over Neupogen? I am > >taking Neupogen. > > Neulasta is ten times as expensive as Neupogen but you only get one > shot instead of daily Neupogen for about a week. ----------- Ten times as expensive?!?! Good grief! The Neupogen was over $2,000 for 10 doses.
Eva
allan grossman - 01 Aug 2004 01:03 GMT >Ten times as expensive?!?! Good grief! The Neupogen was over $2,000 for 10 >doses. Twice as expensive per treatment, then. Somebody else posted a shot of Neulasta was more than $4300.
 Signature we don't see things as they are, we see them as we are. -- Anais Nin
Eva - 30 Jul 2004 12:25 GMT > I have a couple observations - first, the two-week interval between > treatments. They've decided to go dose-dense for her and this looks > like it might be kinda tough chemo. You don't see that real often. ----------- That's what I'm getting too. Does she have a very large tumor? That was the rationale with me.
I just had my 2nd treatment yesterday (and coincidentally lost my hair). I was able to walk out of the treatment session and take care of some important personal business. I was able to eat supper last night but this morning I'm nauseated as hell and have to go take my pills .
So my point is that the two-week interval may not be as rare as you thought.
Eva
Tim Jackson - 30 Jul 2004 16:45 GMT > > I have a couple observations - first, the two-week interval between > > treatments. They've decided to go dose-dense for her and this looks [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Eva There was a study last year which showed a significant benefit in dose-dense treatment. There was also a smaller earlier study which showed no benefit at all. I feel that the study that showed the benefit was flawed, there were worrying statistical anomalies in the results, but that doesn't necessarily mean it was wrong. I daresay quite a few oncologists have latched onto this idea as giving their patients the best chance, if they (/their insurance) can afford it, although I think the benefits are still far from proven. Some have argued that while logically the increased dose density ought to be more damaging to the cancer, it is possible that the immune-stimulating drugs (eg neupogen) may also promote the cancer, as they encourage cell division.
I think one can say "it's only money": it may be beneficial and it seems pretty certain that it isn't harmful.
Tim
Pat from Apple Valley, CA - 31 Jul 2004 01:32 GMT > > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > On one phone session on Cancercare.org, there was one Dr.( I believe from New York Johns Hopkins?) that said chemo at 2 week intervals rather than 3 was more effective. I guess so the cancer cells can't get strong again waiting for the next dose. Yo can listen to it online. The address for the telephone workshops is: http://www.cancercare.org/TelephoneEducationWorkshopArchive/TelephoneEducationWo rkshopArchiveList.cfm?c=413 I have found them to be very interesting...Pat from Apple Valley, CA
Guess Who - 31 Jul 2004 04:22 GMT Thanks for the link Pat
Eva wrote:
So my point is that the two-week interval may not be as rare as you thought.
Eva
On one phone session on Cancercare.org, there was one Dr.( I believe from New York Johns Hopkins?) that said chemo at 2 week intervals rather than 3 was more effective. I guess so the cancer cells can't get strong again waiting for the next dose. Yo can listen to it online. The address for the telephone workshops is: http://www.cancercare.org/TelephoneEducationWorkshopArchive/TelephoneEducationWo rkshopArchiveList.cfm?c=413 I have found them to be very interesting...Pat from Apple Valley, CA
*Annie* - 31 Jul 2004 06:35 GMT Were you given anti-nausea meads prior to your treatment starting? Also are you taking the pills after your treatment as directed by your doctor or waiting till the nausea starts? I'm sure you know this, but if you don't take the meds they give you as directed by your onco or onco nurses. Don't wait for the nausea to get hold of you. It's very hard to get a handle on iy after it starts..I had mine through my IV prior to treatment and then had to take it every 12 hours for 3 days after treatments. Take care there dear/God bless annie
Ultimately.....we know deeply that the other side of every fear is a freedom.
"Courage"...is *fear* that has said it's prayers.
Eva - 31 Jul 2004 13:10 GMT > Were you given anti-nausea meads prior to your treatment starting? Also > are you taking the pills after your treatment as directed by your doctor [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > treatment and then had to take it every 12 hours for 3 days after > treatments. ----------- Yes, it's exactly the same for me. This time she gave me 4 days of pills instead of 3. Eva
Kaye301 - 02 Aug 2004 10:58 GMT Allan wrote << I have a couple observations - first, the two-week interval between treatments. They've decided to go dose-dense for her and this looks like it might be kinda tough chemo. You don't see that real often.
Has anyone had experience with Neulasta? As an alternative to Neupogen it looks pretty attractive - one shot per cycle instead of eight or nine daily injections.
Anyway, observations are welcome. What do y'all think?
hugs to all -
allan >>
About a month or so I wrote about my colleague who was recently dx'd with bc. She had a 2 cm tumor and felt a very large axillary lymph node --it was 3 cm. She opted for lumptectomy and surgeon removed 30 axillary nodes. He/they were surprised that only one of the nodes was positive. The tumor was ER- and high grade (as well as Her2-). Recommended treatment which she has started included dose dense chemo and she is also being given Neulasta. She seems to be having it a bit rougher than those who had chemo every 3 weeks but not "too" bad. She threw up the first time--not alot--only once with the Zofran. However, her 2nd dose of Zofran was delayed because by the time she got out of chemo (on a Thursday night) the pharmacy was closed. I think she went into work the next day for an hour or two and then did so again the following Monday. She also worked from home and during treatment whenever she could (writing reports). She had her 2nd treatment last Thursday and said they switched the anti-nausea medication to Amend (sp?). She said she read the insert and it said that it should be given with Dexamethasone at given intervals. She showed that to either the nurse or dr. and they prescribed some Dexamethasone but told her that wasn't usually done. She did not get any dexamethasone with the Zofran. I am wondering if that contributed to the greater difficulty with nausea that she reported. I recall having to take Dexamethasone for a day or two after each chemo along with the Zofran. I wonder if the Zofran may have worked a little better if she had the Dexamethasone? I don't have any experience with Neulasta but think it is a single shot rather than series (Neupogen) and it is automatically given with dose dense chemo.
Liz & Martin Walton - 02 Aug 2004 14:13 GMT Like Kaye, I also have to take Dexamethasone along with my Zofran? (Ondansetron) both before my chemo starts and for three days following. After that I have Compazine? (Prochlorperazine) to take as required. Take care. Liz.
> Allan wrote << I have a couple observations - first, the two-week interval > between [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > I don't have any experience with Neulasta but think it is a single shot rather > than series (Neupogen) and it is automatically given with dose dense chemo.
|
|
|