Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Breast Cancer / August 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

New treatment questions...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
allan grossman - 29 Jul 2004 17:54 GMT
Hi, family  ;-)

My friend Susan has a sister who's been recently diagnosed with IBC -
I told y'all about her a couple weeks back.

Anyway, she got her treatment plan yesterday.  Chemo before surgery
and radiation, which is good in my book.  Apparently treatments are
changing so I thought I'd share and see what y'all thought -

Carol has IBC, ER- and PR-, Her2 strongly positive.

AC every *two* weeks plus Neulasta (instead of Neupogen) 24 hours
after treatment x 4 treatments;

then weekly (I assume) Herceptin plus biweekly Taxotere x 4, then I
assume Herceptin alone for the rest of the year - surgery and
radiation to follow chemotherapy.

I have a couple observations - first, the two-week interval between
treatments.  They've decided to go dose-dense for her and this looks
like it might be kinda tough chemo.  You don't see that real often.

Has anyone had experience with Neulasta?  As an alternative to
Neupogen it looks pretty attractive - one shot per cycle instead of
eight or nine daily injections.

Anyway, observations are welcome.  What do y'all think?

hugs to all -

allan
Guess Who - 30 Jul 2004 00:34 GMT
It is used all the time here in Boston, the major barrier is getting
insurance to cover.  Sounds like she is being offered top notch treatment.
I hope she responds well to the herceptin, I also posted a link to a second
generation drug in clinical trials which is a pill. It is posted in living
beyond breast cancer.

> Hi, family  ;-)
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> allan
Kaye301 - 31 Jul 2004 03:45 GMT
Ålex wrote: << It is used all the time here in Boston, the major barrier is
getting
insurance to cover.   >><BR><BR>

What is used all the time in Boston?
Guess Who - 31 Jul 2004 04:20 GMT
Neulasta...I know since I often have to fax the prescriptions to the
pharmacies for the patients.

> ?lex wrote: << It is used all the time here in Boston, the major barrier
is
> getting
> insurance to cover.   >><BR><BR>
>
> What is used all the time in Boston?
allan grossman - 31 Jul 2004 14:32 GMT
Thanks, everyone - I've forwarded your responses to my friend Susan,
who is forwarding them to her sister,

Eva, they can't tell what size her tumor is; it's very poorly
differentiated and doesn't show up on a mammogram.  Orange-peel skin
is what got Carol to her doctor.

Signature

we don't see things as they are, we see them as we are.
-- Anais Nin

Denise - 30 Jul 2004 01:38 GMT
> Hi, family  ;-)
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> allan

Hi,  Allan,  My best friend is receiving dose dense sequential
chemo..adriamycin q2weeks..taxol q2weeks...cytoxan q2weeks. She gets
neulasta on day 2 of each treatment.  The idea was to give less
medication at more frequent intervals.  Giving each one individually
does draw the chemo out but her side effects have been minimal.  The
neulasta brings the white count back up in seven days following the
injection.  It does cause some flu-like aches but nothing intolerable.
It has kept her count up to 7.0 (she's had 2 treatments thus far..s/p
lumpectomy/node dissection for stage 2 ductal Ca). I wish Carol
strength and faith during the challenge ahead.  Denise
•*•Annie•*• - 30 Jul 2004 05:59 GMT
I had Neulasta after every chemo treatment excpet the very first one
{1/10/03}. My onco wanted to see what my response would be if I didn't
get it.
I was on AC for 4 rounds {1/10/03-3/14/03} and Taxotre for the last 4
rounds {4/4/03-6/6/03}.
I had no problems with this.I didn't have the "flu like" symptoms that
others have talked about. I had my treatments on Friday's, and went in
for my Neulasta shots on Monday's. The only reason there was 2-3 days in
between is the onco area wasn't open on the weekends., otherwise I'm
sure I would've had it sooner then I did.
My counts were very low last time {8/99-1/00} I was on CMF and they
dropped to a very low level a few times during that time. They did
rebound prior to the next treatment, but it took most of the 3 week
interval to do that. There was only one time that I had to be retested
within a a couple days to make sure that I was going to be ready to have
next treatment.
I always had my bloodwork done on Friday's in bwt treatment days, and
the onbe time I'm speeaking of, I had to repeat the test again on
Monday.

I hope this helps. My thoughts and prayers go out to your friend.
{friends relative?}
I also hope Deb is doing well, and please let her know that I'm thinking
of her. Well, you too dear. ;-))
My thoughts and prayers are with you both. Take care/God bless
annie    

Ultimately.....we know deeply that the other side of every fear is a
freedom.

"Courage"...is *fear* that has said it's prayers.
•*•Annie•*• - 30 Jul 2004 06:12 GMT
I forgot to mention that I was told that if that one blood test when
repeated was no better then I'd be given Neupogen. As it turned out it
came back up and wasn't needed.
This last time {2003} I approached the Onco about the Neulasta shots. He
told me that he would order them, and I'd get them afer my treatments. I
presented the arguement that my counts were very low last time all
through treatment, and I really didn't want to take the chance of having
treatments stalled because of low blood counts. I was in NO moo to be
told "sorry you have to wait" NOT! This was my second dance through
cancerland and didn't want _anything_ to halt thr progress of this
treatment schedule. That and I told him that "if I feel better, I'll do
better" He agreed and I got them like I said after ech one, except for
the very first AC.
Someone mentioned the cost an they are for sure very costly, but our
insurance picked up the cost of ll of them.
I had 7 all together and it was told to me that they cost $4,250 PER
shot. Whew!
Thank God for the HMO...although I don't always feel that way. {lol!} As
in recently, but this too shall pass....
Take care there my friend and give my best To Deb.
God bless you both
annie

Ultimately.....we know deeply that the other side of every fear is a
freedom.

"Courage"...is *fear* that has said it's prayers.
Eva - 30 Jul 2004 12:28 GMT
Can I just ask, what is the advantage of Neulasta over Neupogen?  I am
taking Neupogen.
Eva
•*•Annie•*• - 31 Jul 2004 06:32 GMT
Eva...
The Neupogen is from I was told here {nw ohio} has to be taken for 5-10
days depending on the severity of the drop of the blood counts. {norm is
no less then 5 days here/most times 7-10}
Neulasta is a "timed release" type of injection. I'm not all that crazy
about getting poked, so I opted for the one time shot.
This was given to me on Monday after my chemo on Friday's.
Hope this helps...
Take care there dear/God bless
annie
p/s if you need any other info, don't hesitate to ask or email..would be
fine also. @

Ultimately.....we know deeply that the other side of every fear is a
freedom.

"Courage"...is *fear* that has said it's prayers.
Eva - 31 Jul 2004 13:08 GMT
> Eva...
> The Neupogen is from I was told here {nw ohio} has to be taken for 5-10
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> about getting poked, so I opted for the one time shot.
> This was given to me on Monday after my chemo on Friday's.
-----------
Okay, thanks.  I have chemo on Thursdays, then take the Neupogen the
following Monday through Friday.  I couldn't bring myself to stick the
needle into my stomach, but I'm able to do it in my thigh.
Eva
Kaye301 - 02 Aug 2004 11:14 GMT
Eva wrote: <<   I couldn't bring myself to stick the
needle into my stomach, but I'm able to do it in my thigh. >>

I used to feel the same way.  I take injections for an M.S. (multiple
sclerosis) medication.  I started out giving them in my thigh.  The idea of
doing it in the abdominal area was not too pleasant.  However, one time I had a
bad reaction in my thigh.  I must have hit a nerve.  For the next few weeks I
would get this horrible pain--felt like someone was ripping a large bandaid off
a hairy area of about 4-inches square.  This weird pain was sudden but
unpredictable and occurred many times during the day.
After that I switched to giving the injections in the abdominal area.  I found
it much more pleasant since it barely caused any discomfort since there are
minimal nerve endings there.
Kaye301 - 02 Aug 2004 11:09 GMT
Annie wrote: << The Neupogen is from I was told here {nw ohio} has to be taken
for 5-10
days depending on the severity of the drop of the blood counts. {norm is
no less then 5 days here/most times 7-10}

It has been awhile since I had Neupogen (last done in 11/01) but was given it
starting the 7th day of chemo and is given through the 11th day if needed.  A
few times I was only given it 3 or 4 times, and my blood was tested to see if I
still needed it.  Since I did the injecting myself I was given it to take home
but maximum amount was for 5 days.   Still, I had my blood tested on the 3rd of
the days that I took it and was told I didn't need any more.  
allan grossman - 31 Jul 2004 14:30 GMT
>Can I just ask, what is the advantage of Neulasta over Neupogen?  I am
>taking Neupogen.

Neulasta is ten times as expensive as Neupogen but you only get one
shot instead of daily Neupogen for about a week.

Signature

we don't see things as they are, we see them as we are.
-- Anais Nin

Eva - 31 Jul 2004 16:21 GMT
> >Can I just ask, what is the advantage of Neulasta over Neupogen?  I am
> >taking Neupogen.
>
> Neulasta is ten times as expensive as Neupogen but you only get one
> shot instead of daily Neupogen for about a week.
-----------
Ten times as expensive?!?!  Good grief!  The Neupogen was over $2,000 for 10
doses.

Eva
allan grossman - 01 Aug 2004 01:03 GMT
>Ten times as expensive?!?!  Good grief!  The Neupogen was over $2,000 for 10
>doses.

Twice as expensive per treatment, then.  Somebody else posted a shot
of Neulasta was more than $4300.

Signature

we don't see things as they are, we see them as we are.
-- Anais Nin

Eva - 30 Jul 2004 12:25 GMT
> I have a couple observations - first, the two-week interval between
> treatments.  They've decided to go dose-dense for her and this looks
> like it might be kinda tough chemo.  You don't see that real often.
-----------
That's what I'm getting too.  Does she have a very large tumor?  That was
the rationale with me.

I just had my 2nd treatment yesterday (and coincidentally lost my hair).  I
was able to walk out of the treatment session and take care of some
important personal business.  I was able to eat supper last night but this
morning I'm nauseated as hell and have to go take my pills .

So my point is that the two-week interval may not be as rare as you thought.

Eva
Tim Jackson - 30 Jul 2004 16:45 GMT
> > I have a couple observations - first, the two-week interval between
> > treatments.  They've decided to go dose-dense for her and this looks
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Eva

There was a study last year which showed a significant benefit in dose-dense
treatment.  There was also a smaller earlier study which showed no benefit
at all.  I feel that the study that showed the benefit was flawed, there
were worrying statistical anomalies in the results, but that doesn't
necessarily mean it was wrong.  I daresay quite a few oncologists have
latched onto this idea as giving their patients the best chance, if they
(/their insurance) can afford it, although I think the benefits are still
far from proven.  Some have argued that while logically the increased dose
density ought to be more damaging to the cancer, it is possible that the
immune-stimulating drugs (eg neupogen) may also promote the cancer, as they
encourage cell division.

I think one can say "it's only money": it may be beneficial and it seems
pretty certain that it isn't harmful.

Tim
Pat from Apple Valley, CA - 31 Jul 2004 01:32 GMT
>  
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>  

On one phone session on Cancercare.org, there was one Dr.( I believe
from New York Johns Hopkins?) that said chemo at 2 week intervals rather
than 3 was more effective. I guess so the cancer cells can't get strong
again waiting for the next dose. Yo can listen to it online.
   The address for the telephone workshops is:
http://www.cancercare.org/TelephoneEducationWorkshopArchive/TelephoneEducationWo
rkshopArchiveList.cfm?c=413

I have found them to be very interesting...Pat from Apple Valley, CA
Guess Who - 31 Jul 2004 04:22 GMT
Thanks for the link Pat

 Eva wrote:

 

So my point is that the two-week interval may not be as rare as you thought.

Eva

 
 On one phone session on Cancercare.org, there was one Dr.( I believe from New York Johns Hopkins?) that said chemo at 2 week intervals rather than 3 was more effective. I guess so the cancer cells can't get strong again waiting for the next dose. Yo can listen to it online.
     The address for the telephone workshops is:
 http://www.cancercare.org/TelephoneEducationWorkshopArchive/TelephoneEducationWo
rkshopArchiveList.cfm?c=413

 I have found them to be very interesting...Pat from Apple Valley, CA
•*•Annie•*• - 31 Jul 2004 06:35 GMT
Were you given anti-nausea meads prior to your treatment starting? Also
are you taking the pills after your treatment as directed by your doctor
or waiting till the nausea starts? I'm sure you know this, but if you
don't take the meds they give you as directed by your onco or onco
nurses. Don't wait for the nausea to get hold of you. It's very hard to
get a handle on iy after it starts..I had mine through my IV prior to
treatment and then had to take it every 12 hours for 3 days after
treatments.
Take care there dear/God bless
annie

Ultimately.....we know deeply that the other side of every fear is a
freedom.

"Courage"...is *fear* that has said it's prayers.
Eva - 31 Jul 2004 13:10 GMT
> Were you given anti-nausea meads prior to your treatment starting? Also
> are you taking the pills after your treatment as directed by your doctor
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> treatment and then had to take it every 12 hours for 3 days after
> treatments.
-----------
Yes, it's exactly the same for me.  This time she gave me 4 days of pills
instead of 3.
Eva
Kaye301 - 02 Aug 2004 10:58 GMT
Allan wrote << I have a couple observations - first, the two-week interval
between
treatments.  They've decided to go dose-dense for her and this looks
like it might be kinda tough chemo.  You don't see that real often.

Has anyone had experience with Neulasta?  As an alternative to
Neupogen it looks pretty attractive - one shot per cycle instead of
eight or nine daily injections.

Anyway, observations are welcome.  What do y'all think?

hugs to all -

allan >>

About a month or so I wrote about my colleague who was recently dx'd with bc.
She had a 2 cm tumor and felt a very large axillary lymph node --it was 3 cm.
She opted for lumptectomy and surgeon removed 30 axillary nodes.  He/they were
surprised that only one of the nodes was positive.  The tumor was ER- and high
grade (as well as Her2-).
Recommended treatment which she has started included dose dense chemo and she
is also being given Neulasta.
She seems to be having it a bit rougher than those who had chemo every 3 weeks
but not "too" bad.  She threw up the first time--not alot--only once with the
Zofran.  However, her 2nd dose of Zofran was delayed because by the time she
got out of chemo (on a  Thursday night) the pharmacy was closed.  I think she
went into work the next day for an hour or two and then did so again the
following Monday.  She also worked from home and during treatment whenever she
could (writing reports).
She had her 2nd treatment last Thursday and said they switched the anti-nausea
medication to Amend (sp?).  She said she read the insert and it said that it
should be given with Dexamethasone at given intervals.  She showed that to
either the nurse or dr. and they prescribed some Dexamethasone but told her
that wasn't usually done.  She did not get any dexamethasone with the Zofran.
I am wondering if that contributed to the greater difficulty with nausea that
she reported.  I recall having to take Dexamethasone for a day or two after
each chemo along with the Zofran.  I wonder if the Zofran may have worked a
little better if she had the Dexamethasone?
I don't have any experience with Neulasta but think it is a single shot rather
than series (Neupogen) and it is automatically given with dose dense chemo.
Liz & Martin Walton - 02 Aug 2004 14:13 GMT
Like Kaye, I also have to take Dexamethasone along with my Zofran?
(Ondansetron) both before my chemo starts and for three days following.
After that I have Compazine? (Prochlorperazine) to take as required.
Take care.
Liz.
> Allan wrote << I have a couple observations - first, the two-week interval
> between
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> I don't have any experience with Neulasta but think it is a single shot rather
> than series (Neupogen) and it is automatically given with dose dense chemo.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.