Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Asthma / January 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Zyrtec and Allegra - no RX required in Canada

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
NorthShoreCEO@aol.com - 15 Jan 2005 01:45 GMT
I didn't know this until today, but in Canada, Zyrtec and Allegra can
be purchased without a prescription and the prices are quite a bit
cheaper than they are here (no surprise there).  I'm switching
insurance carriers (finally getting off Illinois' high risk pool at
nearly $700 a month just for me) and trying to find the cheapest way to
get either Zyrtec or Allegra and flonase since my allergies will be
considered a pre-existing condition.  I think it won't be long before
they're over the counter drugs and not covered by insurance anyway, but
I was still surprised to learn this.
00doc - 15 Jan 2005 15:15 GMT
> I didn't know this until today, but in Canada, Zyrtec and
> Allegra can
> be purchased without a prescription

As they should be.

The FDA has several criterion for determining whether a drug
should be OTC. The first is that the disease it treats must
be one that a normal person can diagnose and manage without
the input of a doctor. Clearly, by making Benedryl,
Claritin, etc OTC they have established that allergies
qualify. Secondly, the drug in question must be safe enough
to take without monitoring by a doctor. The newer agents
much safer than the Benedryl and chorpheniramine that are
already OTC so there would seem to be no argument there
either.

Alas, the third is that someone needs to petition them to
change the status (if it is not launched OTC in the first
place - like Abreva was). This is expensive and likely to be
all the more expensive if someone opposes it (such as the
drug company that wants to remain on prescription status.

Claritin is illustrative. A few years ago they had about two
years left on their patent and it was widely assumed that
they would go OTC as soon as off patent. A bunch of
insurance carriers took the novel approach of petitioning
the FDA for OTC status (so they would not have to pay for
the drug). It was the first time anyone other than the
manufacturer of a drug had done this. They won but had to
fight the objections of Claritin's manufacturer.

Claritin found itself in the interesting position of having
to argue that they should not be OTC......yet......while not
shooting themselves in the foot for their own petition that
was sure to come in two years. So they argued that it was
probably safe but a few more studies were needed that were
underway and were expected to be finnished in.......you
guessed it...... two years. Obviously, it was a rediculous
argument and they lost. But I'm sure they did succeed in
jacking up the price of the petition (and hence, cooling off
futute attempts) and delaying it enough to make a few
million in sales.

> and the prices are quite a bit
> cheaper than they are here (no surprise there).

Its probably true - being Canada and all - but you have to
watch the quantities and consider whether you are paying a
co-pay or not. In the US when products like Claritin and
Prilosec*  have gone OTC they were packaged in quantities of
less than 30 (often 12) and priced just below what most
people were paying for a co-pay. So if they did not do the
math they would not realize that they were actually paying
more per pill. If you are paying full price then it was
chaper but for most people with insurance coverage it was
not.

*Prilosec is another illustrative case into the workings of
our FDA/big pharma system that I won't go into here.

> I'm switching
> insurance carriers (finally getting off Illinois' high
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> allergies will be
> considered a pre-existing condition.

Canada is probably a good bet. Have you tried generic
Claritin (Alavert)?

> I think it won't be long before
> they're over the counter drugs and not covered by
> insurance anyway,
> but I was still surprised to learn this.

I'm sure of it. If memory serves Allegra did not follow too
far behind Claritin so they probably don't have much patent
life left. When it runs out they will certainly go OTC.

Signature

00doc

NorthShoreCEO@aol.com - 16 Jan 2005 01:37 GMT
I wasn't thinking of copay, but out of pocket, because at the time I
was considering switching insurance plans.  The allergies would be
pre-existing for me, and therefore, meds would be on me.   I know what
you're saying though, for the benefit of others who have insurance,
they may be better off using the insurance and just worrying about the
copay, depending on what their benefit is.

Joy, here are the links I found:

http://www.rxdiscount.net/prescription.php?letter=A

http://www.getcanadiandrugs.com/

http://www.jandrugs.com/

I just got some bad news on a biopsy that was done last week, so all of
this is moot now for me.    I won't be switching carriers for years.
:-(
Scarlettmom - 16 Jan 2005 18:11 GMT
>I wasn't thinking of copay, but out of pocket, because at the time I
>was considering switching insurance plans.  The allergies would be
>pre-existing for me, and therefore, meds would be on me.   I know what
>you're saying though, for the benefit of others who have insurance,
>they may be better off using the insurance and just worrying about the
>copay, depending on what their benefit is.

actually pre existing only applies only if you had *no* previous insurance.
when you switch companies your old company will send you a letter of credible
coverage which you send to the new company and they cannot deny your claims (I
work in a hospital business office)
Maureen - 18 Jan 2005 15:26 GMT
I don't have full time employees, I have part time contracted employees, which means no group insurance.  So in my case, I had planned to go from the high risk Illinois CHIP plan to another private plan.  This means that there are pre-existing clauses and conditions involved
pavane - 19 Jan 2005 20:08 GMT
> >I wasn't thinking of copay, but out of pocket, because at the time I
> >was considering switching insurance plans.  The allergies would be
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> coverage which you send to the new company and they cannot deny your claims (I
> work in a hospital business office)

Does prior coverage include VA?

pavane
Joy - 15 Jan 2005 16:07 GMT
Maureen,

Do you have a line on a good source? Email me.

Joy
> I didn't know this until today, but in Canada, Zyrtec and Allegra can
> be purchased without a prescription and the prices are quite a bit
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> they're over the counter drugs and not covered by insurance anyway, but
> I was still surprised to learn this.
Patrick - 15 Jan 2005 22:14 GMT
NorthShoreCEO@aol.com wrote in news:1105753506.683441.155900
@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:

> I didn't know this until today, but in Canada, Zyrtec and Allegra can
> be purchased without a prescription and the prices are quite a bit
> cheaper than they are here (no surprise there).  

Allegra is the more expensive one in Canada since there is no generic.  
For Zyrtec (Reactine in Canada) - there is a generic available.  I don't
often buy antihistamines in the winter but in the spring/summer I saw
boxes of 30 generic Zyrtec/Reactine going for $11 (Cdn) or so for the 10
mg ones (that is about $9/US for a months worth).
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.