I use a DeVilbiss PulmoMate nebulizer for COPD, not asthma, but this
is the only newsgroup that discusses nebulizers. My PulmoMate
nebulizer is rather large, heavy, loud, slow and must be plugged in.
I've now seen ultrasonic nebulizers advertised that are very small,
silent, fast and completely portable (battery operated). Does anybody
know if there are any disadvantages to ultrasonic nebulizers for
people who use them for albuterol?
Ken
Jim Malloy - 12 Mar 2004 01:45 GMT
Generally speaking the ultrasonic nebs are good for portability and
convenience but if you are a heavy user of your nebuliser pump then the
ultrasonics will not perform as well for as many years as a mains driven
compressor.
> I use a DeVilbiss PulmoMate nebulizer for COPD, not asthma, but this
> is the only newsgroup that discusses nebulizers. My PulmoMate
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Ken
nonerequired - 12 Mar 2004 19:07 GMT
Often much more expensive, often more fragile, and some need proprietary
(read very expensive) batteries that also need factory replacement (yet
more expensive). The batteries need regular use to maintain charge so if
they are not used for long periods of time will go bad and need
replacement. USN's are usually not paid for by any insurance esp. if
they already bought you a compressor neb.
I haven't tracked them in awhile to see if anything new is out but the
only unit I was somewhat agreeable to was the Omron NE-U03(do a search
on Omron nebulizer) as it used 4AA batteries that were user replaceable.
I am not familiar with what seems to be a newer NE-U22 but it takes AA
batteries also. You need to be careful with the mesh cap and keep it clean.
Don't drop them. They break.
Fritz RCP
> Does anybody
> know if there are any disadvantages to ultrasonic nebulizers for
> people who use them for albuterol?
>
> Ken
jackmallory@webtv.net - 13 Mar 2004 14:30 GMT
Jst received an Omron NE-U22V which uses two double A batteries. This
uses the very delicate "mesh cap". Is that ultrasonic or something new?
Anyway it's about the size of a cellphone but much more fragile.
More later.---Jack
nonerequired - 14 Mar 2004 17:06 GMT
Yes, it's ultrasonic. Sounds like it has a similar part. How's it
working out for you? I assume you have a compressor to compare it to.
Fritz
> Jst received an Omron NE-U22V which uses two double A batteries. This
> uses the very delicate "mesh cap". Is that ultrasonic or something new?
>
> Anyway it's about the size of a cellphone but much more fragile.
>
> More later.---Jack
jackmallory@webtv.net - 15 Mar 2004 15:00 GMT
fmerk wrote
<<<Yes, it's ultrasonic. Sounds like it has a similar part. How's it
working out for you? I assume you have a compressor to compare it to.
Fritz
Jst received an Omron NE-U22V which uses two double A batteries. This
uses the very delicate "mesh cap". Is that ultrasonic or something new?
Anyway it's about the size of a cellphone but much more fragile.
More later.---Jack >>>
Jack replying:
Jury out on NE-U22V. Been using it exclusively
for a few days. Shall comment later. Probably prefer compressor job.
But that may be all in my melon.
jackmallory@webtv.net - 07 Apr 2004 05:10 GMT
Here it is April 6 and I've been using this ultrasonic since the middle
of last month. Doesn't seem so long.
Happy with the nebulizer. Not nearly as much mist escapes into the room
as with the compressor driven units. Use maybe half as much of the
liquid.
And it's silent. And small and light.---Jack
FACE - 15 Apr 2004 23:26 GMT
>Here it is April 6 and I've been using this ultrasonic since the middle
>of last month. Doesn't seem so long.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>And it's silent. And small and light.---Jack
Is there a problem with the mist escaping into the room?
Wife and I have had a Pulmo-Aid since the first of March and I was
thinking that when she uses it nightly and morningly, i get some benefit
from being in the same room. (I also have breathing problems, but mostly
take care of them with an MDI and have used the compressor/nebulizer for
myself twice though i often take a few puffs when she is using it.)
Comments welcomed.
FACE