> type of pollution their cities get and everything else was the same like
> diet, the people who consistently get moderate or worse (not
> good)pollution are in worse health for any number of categories.Obviously
> the ratings epa use is not adequate or worse blindly harming people by
> making people feel moderate is not dangerous when in fact it VERY well may
> be causing people to lose their health faster. The conspiracy to allow
> this to go on without adequately warning people or diminishing the threat,
> or showing such studies, or allowing harmed people to sue epa or polluters
> shows that a, there are millions of people that are not protected from the
> dangers of pollution in America, b, that the measures to reduce pollution
> are not matched by the extent of the damage relevant to potential danger,
> thus making the policy to lower pollution useless in some areas, and c,
> and those unprotected people not only usually lose their health faster in
> any number of categories of ailments, but they then have to pay for
> conditions that basically they are not responsible for getting and usually
> they can't sue . The media calls all this basically global warming and
> energy reduction instead of the conspiracy to not allow rules to do more
> faster to protect them equally like others that don't get this pollution
> are protected. Why don't the media do more? Because they are eagerly
> taking the money from the companies and pharmacies that treat you after
> people are poisoned, like from cancer clinics and heart hospitals and old
> age homes, and pharmaceuticals especially for asthma and nebulizers and
> power chairs. Its almost surreal to listen to the lies the news casters
> call beautiful days of good air.Yes sometimes they say gorgeous and good
> air when the particulate rates are approaching warning level. This is the
> lies and protection that begets big money while politicians remain silent.

>> Ever see a reporter  ask  Bush why he is not concerned about rules that
>> make
>> polluters and energy earn more money while many people suffer and are not
>> allowed to sue or can't move?  Ever see a reporter ask Bush if we could
>> see a penny fon the
>> ground rom space in the 1960s how we can't defeat  or track a group of
>> terrorists who don't have  planes or coordinated communication system?
>> Ever see a reporter ask if we are worried about terrorists why do we
>> allow
>> so many people from terrorist countries  into this country?
>> Discrimination
>> is not
>> good, but when only those people are a threat to blow up people enmass,
>> and constantly conspire to try, one
>> might ask why millions or close are allowed to come over and then worry
>> afterwards of the potential danger?
>> You think there are no conspiracies? Yahoo took the message boards off
>> because too much free information , that which we tell other countries to
>> have is not really prudent. I was on a blog about my city and when I
>> talked
>> about pollution I was off.. There goes the hypocrisy of freedom.of
>> speech.
>> You think reporters would talk about pollution, the descrepency between
>> rich
>> and poor, the tens of thousands who are murdered and nothing much is ever
>> done about it or why its never a coordinated effort to do more about yet
>> we
>> criticize those countries that have people killing each other there?
>> You don't believe in conspiracies ?
>> Since I lost my health to pollution, I had my real estate taxes go up,
>> had
>> my
>> taxes reviewed by Irs and made to pay money although we are apealling,
>> and
>> pay more money to treat conditions that are not my fault without any free
>> press to go over why?
>> You don't believe in conspiracies in the US are you sure?
>> Incidentally in case you were not aware,, yahoo often knew what you were
>> writing before you even sent it and could adequately block it if it went
>> against govt or own rules for whatever the hell reason!!!!! Thats how
>> advanced intelligence is now but I am sure your not going to believe
>> that...
>>
>>In case you need proof pollution harms get statiscians backed up by other
>>professional the comparisons of health and lung function and even stress
>>test levels between people having to breathe pollution and those that
>>don't. I have and so often the differences are ignored and families are
>>allowing toxic levels into their life because they foolishly believe gov
>>will and are protecting them and they are not. There are many links
>>between
>>pollution and harm and some places are getting much more of this toxic
>>mess
>>then others and nothing is being told to the people or nothing more is
>>being done to diminish it in those areas. Shameful!