Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Asthma / May 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

death from WTC Dust added to 9/11

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
mcs - 24 May 2007 16:20 GMT
After you read how people die from dust, try to understand thats the same
pollution although probably less intense that people downwind from pollution
get for much longer periods of time. People have to demand that damage that
is provable must be allowed in court in much the same way the people who got
damaged from WTC dust are. just because no one had any desire to prove
consequences before don't mean the damages are not there Why are ceratin
people protected and certain
people not protected. The people with the most asthma and respiratory deaths
and prescription then every city in the nation show damage
conclusions.People downwind no matter where they are
and often have the most consistent pollution should be able to sue to stop
this madness and have the same rights of those non smokers and people harmed
from too much dust from industry or 9/11.
We already know that damage from pollution is a known entity why doesn't
damage that shows two air filters getting black be compared with air filters
in clean air city and compare hospital admissions, rates for asthma and
cancer , stress tests etc? I have done some comparisons and its outrageous
that people in worse areas  have to absorb this while being included in
graphs to show cleaner area with rest of nation without ways to seperate
those who are most affected. There is no way to single
out people like me who have their bodies shut down from this pollution and
why?. What
the fk is going on that we only have lung centers to go to and pay for after
we are poisoned!!!! murderers!!!!!
miles - 25 May 2007 01:08 GMT
> every city in the nation show damage
> conclusions.

The top 10 cities for most asthmatics per capita do not correlate to
cities with higher pollution.  There are other factors that you seem to
100% completely ignore.
mcs - 25 May 2007 03:00 GMT
miles stop arguing with me and take 20k and invest it in stkl . I was in
since 6 and they take it down to get people to sell but in the end it goes
up. Iknow it will go up cause I more then you know the damage the
environment is making on millions of people.
>> every city in the nation show damage conclusions.
>
> The top 10 cities for most asthmatics per capita do not correlate to
> cities with higher pollution.  There are other factors that you seem to
> 100% completely ignore.
miles - 25 May 2007 03:32 GMT
> miles stop arguing with me and take 20k and invest it in stkl . I was in
> since 6 and they take it down to get people to sell but in the end it goes
> up. Iknow it will go up cause I more then you know the damage the
> environment is making on millions of people.

Separate issue.  We're talking asthma and particulates for which the
correlations worldwide just don't pan out.  We already agree that
pollution is a bad thing but it's a separate issue.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.