Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Asthma / January 2007
Beta-Agonists may cause thousands of asthma-related deaths each year
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Roman Bystrianyk - 02 Jan 2007 03:27 GMT http://www.healthsentinel.com/org_news.php?event=org_news_print_list_item&id=116 Roman Bystrianyk, "Beta-Agonists may cause thousands of asthma-related deaths each year", Health Sentinel, January 2, 2007,
Long-acting beta-agonists are part of a group of medications call bronchodilators which act to open up constricted airways. Long-acting beta-agonists, such as salmeterol (Serevent) and formoterol (Foradil) are used to control moderate to severe asthma and prevent nighttime symptoms. Salmeterol is one of the most widely prescribed medications in the world, with an estimated 3.5 million adults treated in the United States in 2004.
Advair is the brand name drug combining fluticasone (a steroid) and salmeterol to prevent wheezing, shortness of breath, and breathing difficulties caused by asthma. Made by GlaxoSmithKline Advair contains salmeterol that is found alone in Serevent. In 2004, Advair's U.S. sales reached $2.4 billion, and its worldwide sales of more than $4.5 billion made it the third best selling drug in the world.
But just how safe are these products in treating asthma?
In May 2005, the FDA requested manufacturers of these medications (Advair Diskus, Foradil Aerolizer, and Serevent Diskus) to update their product warning labels that these products "increase the chance of severe asthma episodes, and death when those episodes occur."
However, controversy has surrounded the use of beta-agonists in asthma patients ever since their introduction over 50 years ago. Numerous studies over many years have shown regular use of beta-agonists are associated with tolerance to the drug's effects and worsening of disease control. Observational studies have consistently shown that the risk of life threatening and fatal asthma attacks increase with the use of these medications.
After receiving post marketing reports of several asthma-related deaths associated with Salmeterol a Multi-center Asthma Research Trial (SMART) was undertaken. The study followed more than 26,000 participants for 6 months and found a 4-fold increased risk for asthma-related deaths.
Beta-agonists are also widely used to treat Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, or COPD. A recent meta-analysis pooled the results of 22 randomized trials, which followed more that 15,000 participants with COPD. The study found that beta-agonists increased respiratory deaths by more than 2-fold.
In November 2004, whistleblower Dr. David Graham indicated that salmeterol (Serevent, A&H) was one of the drugs currently on the market that may be endangering patients. The other drugs Dr. Graham named were the weight loss drug sibutramine (sold as Reductil in Britain and Meridia in the United States), the lipid lowering drug rosuvastatin (Crestor; made by AstraZeneca), and the acne drug isotretinoin (Roaccutane; Roche).
A recent study published in Annals of Internal Medicine, performed a meta-analysis to determine the effect of long-acting beta-agonists on severe asthma exacerbations requiring hospitalization, life-threatening asthma attacks, and asthma-related deaths. They analyzed salmeterol and formoterol in children and adults examining all randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials on long-acting beta-agonist use in patients with asthma that were published between 1966 and December 2005. The authors were able to pool the results of 19 trials with 33,826 participants.
The authors found that "long-acting beta-agonists increased the risk for hospitalization for an asthma exacerbation, life-threatening asthma attacks, and asthma-related deaths compared with placebo. Hospitalizations increased among adults and children with salmeterol and formoterol."
Regular use of beta-agonists has been shown to increase bronchial hyperactivity regardless of some degree of bronchodilation. This effect along with the reduction in response to later rescue beta-agonist use "may worsen asthma control without giving any warning of increased symptoms."
The authors determined that because these medications are so widely used throughout the United States and the world that "salmeterol may be responsible for approximately 4,000 of the 5,000 asthma-related deaths that occur in the United States each year."
Asthma deaths increased worldwide in the 1960s when beta-agonists were introduced onto the market. In New Zealand asthma related deaths increased when the beta-agonist drug fenoterol was introduced. Asthma related deaths rapidly decreased when use of the drug was severely cut back. "If long-acting beta-agonists were removed from the market in the United States, we might witness a reduction in asthma mortality rates here."
The authors conclude, "long-acting beta-agonists use increases the risk for hospitalizations due to asthma, life-threatening asthma exacerbations, and asthma-related deaths. Similar risks are found with salmeterol and formoterol and in children and adults. Concomitant inhaled corticosteroids do not adequately protect against the adverse effects."
"The use of long-acting beta-agonists could be associated with a clinically significant number of unnecessary hospitalizations, intensive care unit admissions, and deaths each year. Black box warnings on the labeling for these agents clearly outline the increased risk for asthma-related deaths associated with their use, but these warnings have not changed prescribing practices of physicians. This information could be used to reassess whether these agents should be withdrawn from the market."
SOURCE: Annals of Internal Medicine, June 2006
Richard Friedel - 11 Jan 2007 07:42 GMT on LABAS. .......
But see: See http://mdredux.blogspot.com/2006/08/more-on-laba-controversy-thoughtful.html "Retired doctor's thoughts" More on the LABA controversy-a thoughtful analysis from an allergist's perspective
Dr. Stuart Henochowicz, an allergist-internist blogger, recently posted some cogent comments about the use of LABAs in asthma including comments regarding the combo inhalers ( steroids and a LABA).
Asthma patients are often treated by allergists or pulmonary docs or sometimes both and as a pulmonary physician I welcome his thoughts regarding the recent flare up of the concern about the safety of the long acting beta-agonists (LABAs). This exacerbation of concern was triggered mainly by the publication of the poorly done SMART trial and what I believe to be a flawed and overblown meta-analysis in the Annals of Internal Medicine by Salpeter.
Some of his key points are: LABAs should not be used in asthma without inhaled steroid coverage. The combo inhalers are very helpful in asthma treatment. There are data supporting the value of those combination products.
I believe his comments reflect what I sense to be a consensus among physicians who treat asthma on a regular basis, allergists and pulmonary docs. I continue to have concerns that the annals' meta-analysis might cause asthma patients to discontinue their long acting beta agonist-steroid combination inhalers with resultant exacerbation of their asthma.In fact, some medical bloggers have commented that has already happened.
toto - 11 Jan 2007 11:13 GMT try looking at the airpollution and direct correlations between worsening asthma . I think if one is able to draw conclusions, , people qgi are systematically made to breathe moderate particulates and ozone over and over again ( see my air filter for example) would show that!, almost more then anything affects the continued ill health of millions of people around the world. What people do to stop it is like putting a band aid on a volcano.
> http://www.healthsentinel.com/org_news.php?event=org_news_print_list_item&id=116 > Roman Bystrianyk, "Beta-Agonists may cause thousands of asthma-related [quoted text clipped - 101 lines] > > SOURCE: Annals of Internal Medicine, June 2006 Roman Bystrianyk - 11 Jan 2007 17:04 GMT > try looking at the airpollution and direct correlations between worsening > asthma . I think if one is able to draw conclusions, , people qgi are [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > the world. What people do to stop it is like putting a band aid on a > volcano. Very true ... this article may be of interest to you.
Roman
Charles Piller in San Francisco and Edmund Sanders in Nigeria, "The Gates cash that keeps people healthy but makes them sick", Sydney Morning Herald, Australia, January 8, 2007, Link: http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/the-gates-cash-that-keeps-people-healthy-but-ma kes-them-sick/2007/01/07/1168104868098.html
JUSTICE ETA, 14 months old, held out his tiny thumb. An ink spot certified that he had been immunised against polio and measles, thanks to a vaccination drive in Ebocha, Nigeria, supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
But polio is not the only threat Justice faces; he has suffered from respiratory ailments since birth. Many people blame this on the flames and smoke that rise 100 metres over a nearby oil plant. The plant is owned by the Italian petroleum giant Eni, whose investors include the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
The makeshift clinic where Justice Eta was vaccinated and the flares spewing over Ebocha represent a head-on conflict for the Gates Foundation. In a contradiction between its grants and its endowment holdings, the foundation reaps vast financial gains every year from investments that contravene its good works.
Elekwachi Okey, a local doctor, says hundreds of flares at oil plants in the Niger Delta have caused an epidemic of bronchitis in adults, and asthma and blurred vision in children. Many of the 250 toxic chemicals in the fumes and soot have long been linked to respiratory disease and cancer. "We're all smokers here," Dr Okey said, "but not with cigarettes."
The Gates Foundation has poured $US218 million ($280 million) into polio and measles immunisation and research worldwide, including in the Niger Delta. At the same time it has invested $US423 million in Eni, Royal Dutch Shell, Exxon Mobil, Chevron and Total of France - the companies responsible for blanketing the delta with pollution, beyond anything permitted in the US or Europe.
Local leaders blame oil development for fostering some of the very afflictions the foundation combats. Oil bore holes fill with stagnant water, a breeding ground for mosquitoes that spread malaria. Health inspectors also cite an oil spill clogging rivers as a cause of cholera. The gas flares contain toxic byproducts such as benzene, mercury and chromium and lower immunity, said the area's health commissioner, Dr Nonyenim Solomon Enyidah.
Like most philanthropies, the Gates Foundation gives away at least 5 per cent of its worth every year, thus avoiding paying most taxes. In 2005 it distributed nearly $US1.4 billion.
A policy officer at the foundation, Monica Harrington, said the investment managers had one goal: returns "that will allow for the continued funding of foundation programs and grant making".
An investigation has found that the foundation has holdings in many firms that have failed tests of social responsibility because of environmental lapses, employment discrimination, disregard for worker rights, or unethical practices. The foundation has big holdings in several companies ranked among the worst US polluters, including ConocoPhillips, Dow Chemical and Tyco.
The investments also include pharmaceutical firms that price drugs beyond the reach of AIDS patients the foundation is trying to treat. Hundreds of Gates Foundation investments have been in companies that countered the foundation's charitable goals.
This is "the dirty secret" of many large philanthropies, said Paul Hawken, director of the Natural Capital Institute. "Foundations donate to groups trying to heal the future, but with their investments they steal from the future." Worse, said Douglas Bauer, of Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors, was investing for profit without attempting to improve a company's way of operating.
By contrast, foundations that make social justice, corporate governance and environmental stewardship key considerations in their investment strategies include the $US11.6 billion Ford Foundation, America's second-largest private philanthropy.
The Gates foundation did not respond to written questions about whether it might change its investment policies.
Los Angeles Times
mcs - 14 Jan 2007 14:27 GMT >> try looking at the airpollution and direct correlations between worsening >> asthma . I think if one is able to draw conclusions, , people qgi are [quoted text clipped - 90 lines] > > Los Angeles Times Good Article! how long do you think it will take for a reporter to ask Gates about this?
My contention is rather conspiracy laden and its probably too late for me and I really don't or didn't have power to back up my own presumptions by protecting myself . But there are some people who think the biggest cause of illness and death today is air pollution, refineries, coal plant, and too much car exhauset concentrated in too small areas. Now you can tell me what am I going to do about it or what have i done about it, as an argument of you can just accept the premise that where you live and how much pollution is in your area might be the most important decisions in your lives instead. . I am not sure by telling people to correlate the importance of air pollution, or and global warming then makes it my responsibility to do something about it but thats basically the only argument people give me I think now that Yahoo discussion pages has ended, the only places left to complain are on newsgroups and by telling each other of this dilemma. Do other places in other countries have it as bad or worse? Sure Again the heart attack or cancer one might have may also because of that accumulation of toxins in the air and doesn't just have to have a bad respiratory system to prove its ill effects , and it might not besomething that is genetically misplaced. When that little girl is dying from cancer, or that middle age guy at age 58 has had a heart attack the important thing to figure out is how many people like that there are where they live, to figure out why they got sick to begin with. I personally think this is by far the biggest killer and reason get sick in many areas and can be proven. Show me anyone where studies were done correlated to amounts of pollution ( all pollution ) people absorbed by showing the risk factors of all illness corresponded to a persons daily exposure to pollution andhow much. whether on the job or where they lived. You tell me by now experienced lawyers and doctors and staticians can't compare say people living on a heavy congested street in heavy polluted city and compared that guy to someone who lives on a farm in Oklahoma ( clean air state). I think there is nothing more compelling than the accumulated air and pollution and gases that rendeer people sick and senile faster then most any cause except maybe cholesterol laden foods or smoking. Will any lawyer or any person ever get compensated for getting sick by not being protected ? I doubt it. This is the biggest reason of people getting sick and dying and getting ill in life today or one of the biggest reasons. I can come up with ten other studies at least to prove the same.
Roman Bystrianyk - 14 Jan 2007 15:58 GMT > Show me anyone where studies were done correlated to amounts of pollution > ( all pollution ) people absorbed by showing the risk factors of all illness > corresponded to a persons daily exposure to pollution andhow much. whether > on the job or where they lived. Here is one news story that may be of interest - there are many more showing the relationship to pollution and health problems.
Enjoy your day. Roman
Roman Bystrianyk, "Outdoor Air Pollution Increases Deaths from Stroke", Health Sentinel, February 24, 2005,
Stroke is the third leading cause of death, ranking just behind heart disease and cancer. A study in the journal Stroke examines the relationship between outdoor air pollution and stroke.
The study authors examined the air pollution in the city of Sheffield England. Using air pollution data they mapped particulate matter (PM10), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and carbon dioxide (CO) throughout the area. They created five pollution categories. The highest category had pollution values of NOx at 61.9 ?g/m3 (micrograms per cubic meter), PM10at 23.3 ?g/m3, and CO at 482 ?g/m3. The lowest category had pollution values of NOx at 47.6 ?g/m3 (micrograms per cubic meter), PM10at 16.0 ?g/m3, and CO at 360 ?g/m3.
Over a 5-year period the authors analyzed 2,979 deaths and 5,122 hospital admissions from stroke. The deaths and hospital admissions were mapped according to the established pollution categories. After adjusting for smoking, age, sex, and socioeconomic deprivation the authors found pollution levels were significantly connected with increasing deaths from stroke. In fact, the authors determined that if there were no other unknown factors that 11% of stroke deaths were due to outdoor air pollution.
The authors discuss how pollution could be related to increase in the risk of stroke. They note that experimental evidence shows that ultrafine pollution particles are able to enter the blood through the lungs. Other studies have shown that pollution does play a part in damage to the blood vessel walls, which is associated with the progression of cardiovascular disease.
The authors conclude that, "if we assume causality and use NOx as an indicator of outdoor air pollution, 11% of stroke deaths in Sheffield would have been attributable to the adverse effects of outdoor air pollution. Although this population attributable risk fraction is not large, outdoor air pollution is important, because it is a potentially modifiable risk factor for stroke. Our results suggest that targeting policy interventions at high pollution areas may be a feasible option for stroke prevention. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings."
SOURCE: Stroke, February 2005
http://www.healthsentinel.com/org_news.php?id=028&title=Outdoor+Air+Pollution+In creases+Deaths+from+Stroke&event=org_news_print_list_item
mcs - 14 Jan 2007 22:38 GMT Roman I know they exist, I know exactly of the consequences. I smoked for twelve years , then running and eating good. The worse thing in my life has not been things I can control, its things I can't controll and asthma and air quality and everything gets worse in moderate particulate pollution days. I then say how they would advertise for meds in bad air areas like mine but never tell you why you needed them.Studies , if you look hard on the net are there and starting to be published and tens of more could show the same ill effects AT LEAST , . So then the question is why is it allowed and why have the polluters not been sued? They had to know of their effects. The price we pay are in the billions and if its the leading cause of illness besides bad foods and bad habits like smoking, then what that say about why food and bad habits are important to talk about and not pollution? We do have alternatives. its time to inform families they are quite possibly in harms way and they better do something , instead of just talking about how good a cars bumper is or if we have global warming.. anyway .. nothing will ever change me about what I have seen with correlations of air pollution and ill health . There is virtually nothing good about moderate particulates or worse of pollution except to pretend it don't exist in the first place.
mcs wrote:
> Show me anyone where studies were done correlated to amounts of pollution > ( all pollution ) people absorbed by showing the risk factors of all > illness > corresponded to a persons daily exposure to pollution andhow much. whether > on the job or where they lived. Here is one news story that may be of interest - there are many more showing the relationship to pollution and health problems.
Enjoy your day. Roman
Roman Bystrianyk, "Outdoor Air Pollution Increases Deaths from Stroke", Health Sentinel, February 24, 2005,
Stroke is the third leading cause of death, ranking just behind heart disease and cancer. A study in the journal Stroke examines the relationship between outdoor air pollution and stroke.
The study authors examined the air pollution in the city of Sheffield England. Using air pollution data they mapped particulate matter (PM10), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and carbon dioxide (CO) throughout the area. They created five pollution categories. The highest category had pollution values of NOx at 61.9 µg/m3 (micrograms per cubic meter), PM10at 23.3 µg/m3, and CO at 482 µg/m3. The lowest category had pollution values of NOx at 47.6 µg/m3 (micrograms per cubic meter), PM10at 16.0 µg/m3, and CO at 360 µg/m3.
Over a 5-year period the authors analyzed 2,979 deaths and 5,122 hospital admissions from stroke. The deaths and hospital admissions were mapped according to the established pollution categories. After adjusting for smoking, age, sex, and socioeconomic deprivation the authors found pollution levels were significantly connected with increasing deaths from stroke. In fact, the authors determined that if there were no other unknown factors that 11% of stroke deaths were due to outdoor air pollution.
The authors discuss how pollution could be related to increase in the risk of stroke. They note that experimental evidence shows that ultrafine pollution particles are able to enter the blood through the lungs. Other studies have shown that pollution does play a part in damage to the blood vessel walls, which is associated with the progression of cardiovascular disease.
The authors conclude that, "if we assume causality and use NOx as an indicator of outdoor air pollution, 11% of stroke deaths in Sheffield would have been attributable to the adverse effects of outdoor air pollution. Although this population attributable risk fraction is not large, outdoor air pollution is important, because it is a potentially modifiable risk factor for stroke. Our results suggest that targeting policy interventions at high pollution areas may be a feasible option for stroke prevention. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings."
SOURCE: Stroke, February 2005
http://www.healthsentinel.com/org_news.php?id=028&title=Outdoor+Air+Pollution+In creases+Deaths+from+Stroke&event=org_news_print_list_item
mcs - 14 Jan 2007 14:42 GMT sorry my grammer and spelling
Good Article! how long do you think it will take for a reporter to ask Gates
> about this? > [quoted text clipped - 63 lines] > has been my contentions for ten years.. > I can come up with ten other studies at least to prove the same. ----- Original Message ----- From: "mcs" <mcs@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: alt.support.asthma Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 9:27 AM Subject: Re: Beta-Agonists may cause thousands of asthma-related deaths each year
>> toto wrote: >>> try looking at the airpollution and direct correlations between [quoted text clipped - 93 lines] >> >> Los Angeles Times
>> try looking at the airpollution and direct correlations between worsening >> asthma . I think if one is able to draw conclusions, , people qgi are [quoted text clipped - 90 lines] > > Los Angeles Times
|
|
|