Thank you all for your responses.
The hexagenarian female to which I referred has had a significant sensitivity
to prednisone, mainly with the side effect of swelling in the abdominal area.
She has not taken prednisone in several years, but was recently diagnosed as
being asthamtic (at age 67, which I understand is not rare, but is not very
common for her age) since she showed no signs of asthma prior to this. She is
take Asmanex as a corticosterioid inhaler, and to date it has been effective
with regard to preventing her astham-specific symptoms, but she is having
similar abdominal swelling apparently from the Asmanex, albeit not as
significant as she had with prednisone (note: the prednisone was taken many
years ago for health issues not related to asthma).
I think that she is very likely just very sensitive to this entire class of
steroids. She is consider switching to Flovent, Pulmicort, or QVAR for cost
mainly as the Asmanex is very expensive (approximately $175 per month even
with insurance) and to see if possibly one of the other corticosteroids might
be less symptomatic w.r.t. the abdominal swelling.
Thank you all,
Gerald
>> My question is based on the experience of a hexagenarian female who is
>> taking
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>much less than with oral prednisone (micrograms rather than milligrams) but
>there can be systemic effects.
00doc - 02 Dec 2006 21:14 GMT
> I think that she is very likely just very sensitive to this entire class
> of
> steroids.
That is quite possible. She could try using Advair or a leukotriende blocker
like SIngulair or Accolate to spare the steroid. Of course these would add
to the expense.
> She is consider switching to Flovent, Pulmicort, or QVAR for cost
> mainly as the Asmanex is very expensive (approximately $175 per month even
> with insurance) and to see if possibly one of the other corticosteroids
> might
> be less symptomatic w.r.t. the abdominal swelling.
Of the newer steroids Pulmicort is the least expensive (at least in the
U.S.). One unit is still expensive but it has 200 doses. This will last over
3 or 6 months depending on if she takes it once or twice daily.

Signature
00doc
gerald - 08 Dec 2006 22:55 GMT
Thank you sincerely for this information, "00doc".
Do you happen to know if there are any specific pharmacological advantages
for Asmanex in relation to Pulmicort, without respect to cost and assuming
that no other steriods/corticosteroids besides Asmanex or Pulmicort are taken?
>> I think that she is very likely just very sensitive to this entire class
>> of
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>U.S.). One unit is still expensive but it has 200 doses. This will last over
>3 or 6 months depending on if she takes it once or twice daily.
00doc - 09 Dec 2006 18:45 GMT
> Thank you sincerely for this information, "00doc".
>
> Do you happen to know if there are any specific pharmacological advantages
> for Asmanex in relation to Pulmicort, without respect to cost and assuming
> that no other steriods/corticosteroids besides Asmanex or Pulmicort are
> taken?
Since most of the information comes from the drug companies it is always
hard to know what to believe.
Mometasone (Asthmanex) tends to have very little systemic absorption.
Budesonide (Pulmicort) has more but it is cleared from the circulation much
more quickly by the liver so what does get absorbed doesn't stay in
circulation as long. In fact, other formulations of budesonide are given
orally for inflammatory bowel disease and seem to have a fairly low systemic
effect in that setting due to the rapid metabolism. Asthmanex claims
superior drug depositition but I'm not sure I buy it.
Of course, which is better is always really two questions:
1) It is any better?
2) Is the improvement worth the additional price?
I'm scheptical about #1. For most people I very much doubt #2.

Signature
00doc
gerald - 09 Dec 2006 19:15 GMT
Thank you so much, "00doc". This has been very helpful. I think this will
provide good points to discussion with this woman's doctor.
>> Thank you sincerely for this information, "00doc".
>>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
>I'm scheptical about #1. For most people I very much doubt #2.