See http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/full/123/1/261?ck=nck
"It is well established that macrolide antibiotics are efficacious in
treating sinopulmonary infections in humans. However, a growing body of
experimental and clinical evidence indicates that they also express
distinct salutary effects that promote and sustain the reparative
process in the chronically inflamed upper and lower respiratory tract.
Unlike the anti-infective properties, these distinct effects are
manifested at lower doses, usually after a relatively prolonged period
(weeks) of treatment, and in the absence of an identifiable, viable
pathogen. Long-term, low-dose administration of macrolide antibiotics
has been used most commonly for sinusitis, diffuse panbronchiolitis,
asthma, bronchiectasis, and cystic fibrosis. It is associated with
down-regulation of nonspecific host inflammatory response to injury and
promotion of tissue repair. Although large-scale trials are lacking,
the prolonged use of these drugs has not been associated with emergence
of clinically significant bacterial resistance or immunosuppression.
Long-term, low-dose administration of 14- and 15-membered ring
macrolide antibiotics may represent an important adjunct in the
treatment of chronic inflammatory sinopulmonary diseases in humans."
"Asthma
Macrolide antibiotics, especially troleandomycin and erythromycin, have
been studied since the 1950s and have been shown to decrease
corticosteroid requirement in patients with corticosteroid-dependent
asthma. For instance, Spector et al reported a double-blind, crossover
trial comparing troleandomycin to placebo in 74
corticosteroid-dependent patients with severe asthma and chronic
bronchitis. Sixty-seven percent of patients had a marked improvement in
sputum production, pulmonary function measurements, need for
bronchodilators, and subjective evaluations. Much of this effect,
however, was attributed to troleandomycin-induced inhibition of
methylprednisolone and theophylline metabolism by the hepatic
cytochrome P450 complex.
In vitro studies have suggested that macrolide antibiotics have
beneficial anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects in patients
with asthma who are independent of the corticosteroid metabolism.
Macrolide antibiotics inhibit lymphocyte proliferation in response to
phytohemagglutinin, decrease neutrophil accumulation through decrease
chemotactic activity, decreased mucus secretion, and decrease
contraction of isolated bronchial tissue.
Open-label studies with troleandomycin in methyprednisolone-dependent
patients with asthma (adults and children) have demonstrated greater
reduction in corticosteroid doses than would be predicted by hepatic
inhibition of corticosteroid metabolism.. Gotfried et al. showed a
significant improvement in pulmonary function test results and quality
of life measures in prednisone-dependent patients with asthma
administered a 6-week course of clarithromycin without any change in
prednisone requirements. In a small case series of patients
administered clarithromycin for 1 year, two of three
prednisone-dependent patients were able to discontinue prednisone
entirely.
Macrolide antibiotics are efficacious measures in asthmatic patients
without corticosteroid dependency by reducing airway hyperreactivity. A
10-week course of low-dose erythromycin was associated with a
significant decrease in bronchial hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic
patients tested by histamine challenge. Similar effects were observed
when hospitalized children were treated with roxithromycin. Tamaoki et
al showed that erythromycin, "roxithromycin, and clarithromycin
attenuated the contractile response of human isolated bronchial strips
to electrical field stimulation. They hypothesized that macrolide
antibiotics inhibit the cholinergic neuroeffector transmission in human
airway smooth muscle.
Another possible explanation for the efficacy of macrolide antibiotics
in patients with asthma is the role of chronic infectious diseases,
particularly Chlamydia pneumoniae. These infectious agents may underlie
acute asthma exacerbations and the initiation and maintenance of asthma
in previously asymptomatic patients. The anti-infective vs. tissue
reparatory effects of macrolide antibiotics in asthma will require
further controlled studies to unravel these pathways." Regards,
Richard Friedel
aroberts - 02 Nov 2006 03:55 GMT
> See http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/full/123/1/261?ck=nck
>
[quoted text clipped - 71 lines]
> further controlled studies to unravel these pathways." Regards,
> Richard Friedel
Thanks for the post. I am currently undergoing this protocol, and it seems
to be helping so far (4 weeks).
Richard Friedel - 02 Nov 2006 08:22 GMT
The cited article also mentions the effect of macrolide antibiotics on
nose/sinus disorders.
The article "Sinusitis and its relationship to asthma" by Dr.
Barbara A. Muller
http://www.postgradmed.com/issues/2000/10_00/muller.htm goes a long way
to saying that asthma is caused by sinusitis, but stops short of
calling asthma part of sinusitis and/or rhinitis. The connection
between nose damage and hyperresponsiveness seems to have been known
since 1870 (paper by Kratschmer, Vienna, not Kratchmer in France as
often stated) and Greenfield Sluder of St. Louis stated (1919) that
asthma could be caused by nose damage.
Macrolides might act on asthma by dealing with nose disorders.
In view of ongoing research about the role of nitric oxide in
respiration (Lundberg and Weitzberg), I guess it would be more logical
to give much more priority to rhinitis/sinusitis treatment and review
the status of classical asthma drugs as only seemingly being the
logical answer to the disease, and whose "side effects" can never
be tackled. Cortisone sprays might just be a makeshift substitute for
lack of endogenous nitric oxide from the nose. Maybe selftreatment with
the sometimes ridiculed nasal douches and humming (see recent studies)
would be worth considering for some. Regards, Richard Friedel
Richard Friedel - 25 Nov 2006 08:02 GMT
Swedish and other research claims that asthma is a subsidiary part of
nose diseases, in particular simus trouble. To get rid of asthma,
first treat the nose. Despite centuries of tradition, asthma may not be
an independent disease.
This is in part borne out by the use of macrolide antibiotics as an
asthma cure without the effect on sinusitis being mentioned. See review
article " Macrolides for the Treatment of Chronic Sinusitis, Asthma,
and COPD" Mark H. Gotfried, MD, FCCP
(http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/full/125/2_suppl/52S).
So the logical, theoretical conclusion would be for asthmatics to pay
more attention to the condition of the nose as possibly being the
controlling factor in asthma. I guess that a less drastic treatment of
sinusitis, f. i. nasal irrigation or humming (see recent publications)
might be worth considering, but there would then be the objection that
the possibly more scientific treatment was being delayed. Regards,
Richard Friedel