Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Asthma / September 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Years off your life for polluters

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
mcs - 14 Sep 2006 19:17 GMT
in addition to all the links I gave before the new longevity study by state
shows that pollution is a factor in determning old age too in some if not
all places although the study authors didn't directly mention pollution..
The study conveniently left out pollution as a factor .This is such a giant
conspiracy to not tell people i think its absolutely criminal . I think
lawyers can add this study to the ammunition they already could get to show
pollution is associated to added risk of death and ill health. There is not
a place that has high amount of particle pollution with people who live
longest. In fact your more likely to not live longest and live shorter lives
when everything else in polluted areas s the same like diet and rates of
addiction (thats my theory),

If someone were to tell you or your family you were going to loseup to  five
years of life or more  for something you had no control of, or because of
where you lived would you or should you
be concerned? Should be warned? Should have politicians or gov policy to
protect you equally with expectations to live without undue risks? Well
thats what is happening and no one is warning you. Its ok to murder people
for oil , coal and energy . The sad facts are more can be done but isn't.
.Of course the issue of condition of health is not even factored in either
like the rate of cancer or asthma.
mcs - 14 Sep 2006 19:23 GMT
in addition to all the links I gave before the new longevity study by state
shows that pollution is a factor in determning old age too in some if not
all places although the study authors didn't directly mention pollution..
The study conveniently left out pollution as a factor .This is such a giant
conspiracy to not tell people i think its absolutely criminal . I think
lawyers can add this study to the ammunition they already could get to show
pollution is associated to added risk of death and ill health. There is not
a place that has high amount of particle pollution with people who live
longest. In fact your more likely to not live longest and live shorter lives
when everything else in polluted areas s the same like diet and rates of
addiction (thats my theory),

If someone were to tell you or your family you were going to loseup to  five
years of life or more  for something you had no control of, or because of
where you lived would you or should you
be concerned? Should be warned? Should have politicians or gov policy to
protect you equally with expectations to live without undue risks? Well
thats what is happening and no one is warning you. Its ok to murder people
for oil , coal and energy . The sad facts are more can be done but isn't.
.Of course the issue of condition of health is not even factored in either
like the rate of cancer or asthma.

> in addition to all the links I gave before the new longevity study by
> state
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> .Of course the issue of condition of health is not even factored in either
> like the rate of cancer or asthma.
Fred - 14 Sep 2006 23:19 GMT
> in addition to all the links I gave before the new longevity study by state
> shows that pollution is a factor in determning old age too in some if not
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
> > .Of course the issue of condition of health is not even factored in either
> > like the rate of cancer or asthma.

Women in third world countries often have to gather dung or shrubs to
fuel the fires for cooking and heat.  The fires that are produced are
always smokey.  They live,  work and breath  in this polluted mess.  If
they have any lung sensitivities, they will die very young.
mcs - 16 Sep 2006 04:15 GMT
>> in addition to all the links I gave before the new longevity study by
>> state
[quoted text clipped - 66 lines]
> always smokey.  They live,  work and breath  in this polluted mess.  If
> they have any lung sensitivities, they will die very young.

and the point is not to throw the baby out with the water. I am not saying
we don't need energy or even coal and of course cars, its that certain
places accumulate more heat ( trapped) cause of location and located in
areas close to polluters like near major highways and coal plants. One can't
the gov warn the people of potential risks, can't the news media do the
same? Can't the polluters come to some sort of an agreement to lower the
emissions faster and I know its possible. The govt can help soften the costs
while expecting greater income from productivity . This is just some of the
things our  govt might do to protect its most important resource, its
people.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.