Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Asthma / July 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Deadly Inhalers

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Richard Friedel - 22 Jun 2006 09:29 GMT
See http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/June06/AsthmaDeaths.kr.html
Regards, Richard Friedel

"Common asthma inhalers cause up to 80 percent of asthma-related
deaths, Cornell and Stanford researchers assert
By Krishna Ramanujan

Three common asthma inhalers containing the drugs salmeterol or
formoterol may be causing four out of five U.S. asthma-related deaths
per year and should be taken off the market, researchers from Cornell
and Stanford universities have concluded after a search of medical
literature.

They base these conclusions on a statistical analysis of 19 published
trials involving 33,826 patients. This so-called meta-analysis found
that patients who inhaled the long-acting beta-agonists salmeterol
(trade names Serevent and Advair, both made by GlaxoSmithKline) or
formoterol (trade name Foradil, made by Novartis Pharmaceuticals) were
3.5 times more likely to die from asthma and 2.5 times more likely to
be hospitalized (whether or not death resulted), compared with those
taking a placebo.

The reason, say the researchers, is because although these medications
relieve asthma symptoms, they also promote bronchial inflammation and
sensitivity without warning.

Nevertheless, asthma death is relatively rare -- 15 patients in the
meta-analysis who were taking the beta-agonists died, compared with
three in the placebo group, over a six-month period.

"In total, there are about 5,000 deaths a year due to asthma, whether
or not a person is taking a long-acting beta-agonist," said Edwin
Salpeter, the J.G. White Distinguished Professor of Physical Sciences
Emeritus at Cornell, who led the statistical analysis in the study. An
eminent astrophysicist, Salpeter has more recently focused his
attention on medical statistics. "We can show that overall it is
statistically significant that, compared to patients taking a placebo,
these long-acting beta-agonists kill a lot of people," he said.

"These asthma deaths are generally in healthy young adults," said his
daughter, Shelley Salpeter, the lead author of the paper appearing
online and in the June 20 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine. She is
a clinical professor of medicine at Stanford's School of Medicine and a
physician at Santa Clara Valley Medical Center in San Jose, Calif.

"We estimate that approximately 4,000 out of the 5,000 asthma deaths
that occur in the U.S. each year are actually caused by these
long-acting beta-agonists, and we urge that these agents be taken off
the market," she added.

Adding an anti-inflammatory drug to a long-acting beta-agonist adds
little benefit, report the Salpeters. Advair, for example, (the fourth
bestselling drug in the world with $5.6 billion in annual sales),
combines salmeterol with an anti-inflammatory drug to provide some
protection against bronchial inflammation associated with
beta-agonists. But hospitalizations still doubled for patients inhaling
a long-acting beta-agonist combined with an anti-inflammatory drug
compared with asthma patients taking a placebo and an anti-inflammatory
drug by itself.

Of the 19 studies surveyed in the meta-analysis, the largest -- the
Salmeterol Multicenter Asthma Research Trial with 26,000 participants
-- reported a fourfold increased risk for asthma-related deaths and a
twofold increase in life-threatening asthma events in patients using
salmeterol. If older people who also suffered from chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease were removed from the analysis, the Salpeters report,
salmeterol would be associated with a six times greater risk for
asthma-related deaths.

The meta-analysis found that 53 of 3,083 patients inhaling
beta-agonists were hospitalized for an asthma attack compared with 12
of 2,008 patients who received a placebo, meaning that there was one
hospitalization for every 71 patients treated with a long-acting
beta-agonist per year.

The Salpeters say that these two long-acting beta-agonists can result
in death because tolerance to them develops over time.

"These agents can improve symptoms through bronchodilation at the same
time as increasing underlying inflammation and bronchial
hyper-responsiveness, thus worsening asthma control without any warning
of increased symptoms," said Shelley Salpeter.

"It is particularly frightening that long-acting beta-agonists are
detrimental, whether salmeterol or formoterol, whether taken alone or
with anti-inflammatory drugs, both for children and for adults," said
Ed Salpeter.

Co-authors of the study include Shelley Salpeter's son, Nicholas
Buckley, a student at Sequoia High School in Redwood City, Calif., and
Thomas Ormiston, a physician at Santa Clara Valley Medical Center in
San Jose, Calif."
mcs - 22 Jun 2006 11:03 GMT
Um, I think it might be more important to detemine some kind of quotient in
determining the damage Particulates and ozone play in generating disease in
people. My theory is it does and we are not told about it in major news.
Many towns are worried about rip tides, ticks and paving roads when they are
losing their health to continuing amounts of poor air which is 1000s of
times more important for families.. My town now has much more days in  bad
air as oppossed to good air and also has more violent crime. Every time I go
to doctors ( asthma) there is large number of people. I think if some
internet sites ( selected) and epa warn people of the damage and others
ignore it, ( most every major news station on tv) there is a reason for
that. You can't have government promoting exercise in one statement and
telling others not to exercise in it the next. Again I think the damage can
be proven if the statistians wanted to... for instance comparing the number
of people on disability , or in ill health in polluted areas versus non
polluted areas. ...comparing the percentage of individuals paying more for
health costs based only on the pollution levels. The overall damage from
these things would show in my view if they wanted to why states have won in
selective cases to stop Bushs pro oil and pollution regulations . If they
can only show this in civil court....
> See http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/June06/AsthmaDeaths.kr.html
> Regards, Richard Friedel
[quoted text clipped - 88 lines]
> Thomas Ormiston, a physician at Santa Clara Valley Medical Center in
> San Jose, Calif."
buteykoscotland.co.uk - 22 Jun 2006 12:15 GMT
Hello Richard

Thank you for your post

I support these findings

If anyone is on long acting relievers and would like to come off them
Please do it in conjunction with your doctor

Regards

Alex

"Live at a pace of life that is comfortable to breathe through your
nose"
Buteykoscotland.co.uk

> See http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/June06/AsthmaDeaths.kr.html
> Regards, Richard Friedel
[quoted text clipped - 88 lines]
> Thomas Ormiston, a physician at Santa Clara Valley Medical Center in
> San Jose, Calif."
Richard Friedel - 23 Jun 2006 15:32 GMT
> "Live at a pace of life that is comfortable to breathe through your
> nose"
> Buteykoscotland.co.uk

"Live at a pace of life that is comfortable to breathe through your
nose"
Buteykoscotland.co.uk

Depends on what you mean by comfortable nose breathing.  If you do
oceanic breathing intentionally increasing inspiration suction, then
the result, with some practice, is a very pleasant feeling, the
opposite to the feeling in asthma.  You have to get a sound like the
distant waves on the sea shore in your head. My guess is that this is
reasonably safe for asthmatics given proper instruction and  is a
causal treatment. Note that medical accounts of breathing leave out the
suction aspect of breathing in, though it is of critical importance as
I keep on posting here. It seems that oceanic breathing is a more
effective way of overcoming impaired distribution of air and blood
supply in the lungs in asthma than breath-holds and is 100 times more
pleasant.

It seems to me that corrected breathing can cure allergies if they
affect breathing.  Regards, Richard Friedel
Keith Winkler - 24 Jun 2006 02:58 GMT
>> "Live at a pace of life that is comfortable to breathe through your
>> nose"
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> It seems to me that corrected breathing can cure allergies if they
> affect breathing.  Regards, Richard Friedel

Hey, I don't know about "oceanic breathing" but I do know that Advair has
worked really well for me.  It would be devastating to a lot of people if
the Salpeter family succeeded in their campaign to get FDA to take it off
the market.
Nancy - 30 Jun 2006 06:02 GMT
>>>"Live at a pace of life that is comfortable to breathe through your
>>>nose"
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> the Salpeter family succeeded in their campaign to get FDA to take it off
> the market.

They will have to pry the Advair out of my cold, dead fingers.  And even
then I might rise up and slap them silly for trying.  This medication is
the reason I have a life, period.  The Salpeter family and all you B*
scammmers can go to hell, leave me and my Advair alone.

Life is uncertain............eat dessert first!!!

Nancy
8=: )
00doc - 30 Jun 2006 11:05 GMT
> They will have to pry the Advair out of my cold, dead fingers.  And even
> then I might rise up and slap them silly for trying.  This medication is
> the reason I have a life, period.  The Salpeter family and all you B*
> scammmers can go to hell, leave me and my Advair alone.

Unfortunately, if other product withdrawls are any guide, most likely it
will not be an issue of FDA regulations. If the manufacturer perceives the
legal liability as too great they will pull it from the market. How
dangerous it really is or is not is irrelevant. The good news (to those who
wish to keep it on the market) is that it is a very profitable drug and the
number of asthma deaths is low so they may be willing to take the hit and
lose a lot of those suits and keep making it.

Signature

00doc

mcs - 05 Jul 2006 17:10 GMT
a few suits they lose, others might claim it did them damge, although they
didn't die .

>> They will have to pry the Advair out of my cold, dead fingers.  And even
>> then I might rise up and slap them silly for trying.  This medication is
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> and the number of asthma deaths is low so they may be willing to take the
> hit and lose a lot of those suits and keep making it.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.