Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Asthma / May 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Asthma patients

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
tamparocks29@yahoo.com - 12 May 2006 21:03 GMT
Could treating acid reflux actually help control asthma? Doctors know
that not every asthma patient gets acid reflux, so they don't expect it
to help everyone. But they hope it will help some. It will answer the
question of who you should treat if it works, and almost equally
important, who you shouldn't treat or who you shouldn't falsely give
this medicine to thinking it's going to affect their asthma. Getting
the proper medications and educating patients about asthma can save
lives. Every year, about five thousand people die from asthma. Experts
say most of those deaths are preventable. Check out the video about
this study:
http://www.groundhog.tv/apps/editor/staticplayer.jsp?clip=1147464200420.wmv"><img
src="
00doc - 13 May 2006 15:50 GMT
> Could treating acid reflux actually help control asthma?

Right now it looks like probably not - but it still may be worth a shot and
the refulx itself is probabnly a good reason for treatment even without the
asthma.

> Doctors know
> that not every asthma patient gets acid reflux,

No, but more than would be randomly expected do.

> so they don't expect it
> to help everyone.

Actually, they did expect that treating it would help. recent research has
cast doubt on that.

> Check out the video about
> this study:

And then look at my video about a bridge for sale.

Signature

00doc

miles - 15 May 2006 00:07 GMT
>> Could treating acid reflux actually help control asthma?
>
> Right now it looks like probably not - but it still may be worth a shot and
> the refulx itself is probabnly a good reason for treatment even without the
> asthma.

The connection between acid reflux and asthma is well known.  There are
numerous causes of asthma and acid reflux is a rather common cause.

> Actually, they did expect that treating it would help. recent research has
> cast doubt on that.

What research?  If acid reflux is the primary cause of asthma in a
patient then controlling it will help considerably.
rchrdcarlisle@NOTyahoo.com - 15 May 2006 00:27 GMT
>>> Could treating acid reflux actually help control asthma?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>The connection between acid reflux and asthma is well known.

Connection does not mean acid reflux causes asthma. Sneezing is
connected with the common cold and yet no one suggests that sneezing
cause the cold. They are associated with each other in a noncausal
fashion.

> There are
>numerous causes of asthma and acid reflux is a rather common cause.

Common "cause"? Please provide the evidence that acid reflux *causes*
asthma. Remember that correlation does not imply causation.

>> Actually, they did expect that treating it would help. recent research has
>> cast doubt on that.
>
>What research?  If acid reflux is the primary cause of asthma in a
>patient then controlling it will help considerably.

The operative word is "if". Where is the evidence of this causality.

RC
miles - 15 May 2006 05:13 GMT
> Connection does not mean acid reflux causes asthma. Sneezing is
> connected with the common cold and yet no one suggests that sneezing
> cause the cold. They are associated with each other in a noncausal
> fashion.

So it is your belief that acid reflux plays no role in causing asthma?
I beg to differ.  Why?  From my own experience.  I have GERD.  When it
acts up for an extended time my asthma gets extremely serious.  In such
asthma attacks treating the acid reflux is the only thing that is ever
effective with me.  Like many people there is often multiple
contributing factors that trigger their asthma.  GERD is one of them.

>Remember that correlation does not imply causation.

What are you saying?  Asthma causes GERD rather than the other way
around?  In people who's asthma is triggered or aggravated by GERD are
you saying treating them for GERD will have zero effect on their asthma?

> The operative word is "if". Where is the evidence of this causality.

Studies have been done for many years.  ACG's studies show very positive
results in treating GERD to reduce asthma in patients that suffer from both.

Heres another group who firmly believe in acid reflux induced asthma.
http://www.infantrefluxdisease.com/reflux_asthma.php

I could list 100's of websites but I also realize that Dr's never ever
agree on anything.  20 years ago Dr's said positively that asthma could
not be cause by GERD.  Today I see quite the opposite.  Much of what I
have seen is my own experience and in talking with my specialists as
well as numerous other patients.
rchrdcarlisle@NOTyahoo.com - 15 May 2006 06:43 GMT
>> Connection does not mean acid reflux causes asthma. Sneezing is
>> connected with the common cold and yet no one suggests that sneezing
>> cause the cold. They are associated with each other in a noncausal
>> fashion.
>
>So it is your belief that acid reflux plays no role in causing asthma?

No. It is my belief that a causal connection has not been objectively
demonstrated.

>I beg to differ.  Why?  From my own experience.

Anecdotes are a dime a dozen.

> I have GERD.  When it
>acts up for an extended time my asthma gets extremely serious.

So it may be that GERD exacerbates your asthma. That does not mean
that it caused it.

>  In such
>asthma attacks treating the acid reflux is the only thing that is ever
>effective with me.

So you control your asthma completely with treatment of your acid
reflux? You don't use steroid inhalers or bronchodilator to treat it?

> Like many people there is often multiple
>contributing factors that trigger their asthma.  GERD is one of them.

As I said, there is a difference between something that exacerbates
asthma and something that causes it.

>>Remember that correlation does not imply causation.
>
>What are you saying?  Asthma causes GERD rather than the other way
>around?

No. I don't know the exact relationship between asthma and GERD in you
or anyone else. All I am saying is that because there my be a
correlation between the two illnesses does not indicate causality.

> In people who's asthma is triggered or aggravated by GERD are
>you saying treating them for GERD will have zero effect on their asthma?

I never said that.

>> The operative word is "if". Where is the evidence of this causality.
>
>Studies have been done for many years.  ACG's studies show very positive
>results in treating GERD to reduce asthma in patients that suffer from both.

Citations please.

>Heres another group who firmly believe in acid reflux induced asthma.
>http://www.infantrefluxdisease.com/reflux_asthma.php

There are many people who believe many things. This does not make it
so. Your link just gives someone's opinion but there are no citations
in peer reviewed literature. I remain open minded but await further
studies.

>I could list 100's of websites but I also realize that Dr's never ever
>agree on anything.  20 years ago Dr's said positively that asthma could
>not be cause by GERD.  Today I see quite the opposite.  Much of what I
>have seen is my own experience and in talking with my specialists as
>well as numerous other patients.

Maybe it is. But I have not seen the objective evidence of it.
Anecdotes are not proof of anything.

RC
miles - 15 May 2006 07:33 GMT
> So it may be that GERD exacerbates your asthma. That does not mean
> that it caused it.

Well heck, dust exacerbates my asthma, so does pollens, exercise and a
host of other items.  Do any of them 'cause' my asthma?  What causes
asthma is an unknown.  So GERD is no different that everything else that
exacerbates asthma.

> So you control your asthma completely with treatment of your acid
> reflux? You don't use steroid inhalers or bronchodilator to treat it?

Steroids have zero effect with me.  Short term drugs like Albuterol
provide minimal relief.  Long term drugs provide zero benefit for me.
My asthma for the most part is not controlled.  However, the most
benefit I can get is with controlling acid reflux.  Since doing so my
days in the ER have drastically diminished and my overall strength and
quality of life have gone up.

> As I said, there is a difference between something that exacerbates
> asthma and something that causes it.

But you seem to put acid reflux in a different category than anything
else that contributes to asthma.  Nobody knows what causes asthma.  Acid
reflux is on the same list as allergies, exercise induced etc.

> Maybe it is. But I have not seen the objective evidence of it.
> Anecdotes are not proof of anything.

What objective evidence is there to show what causes asthma?  Nobody
knows exactly.  GERD is in the same place as anything else with regards
to asthma.
NorthShoreCEO - 15 May 2006 13:19 GMT
Miles, a pharmacist I know had surgical treatment for GERD at
Mayo Clinic a few years ago, and was pleasantly surprised to find
that his asthma greatly improved as a result of it.  He went from
needing medication and inhalers on daily basis to needing an
emergency inhaler once in a while.  His problem wasn't as severe
as yours.

If you find steroids don't do much and you've tried a lot of
different combinations of medication, it's possible that bacteria
has made your asthma worse.  We sometimes post stating that
asthma can be caused by bacteria, forgetting that it can also
make asthma unmanageable.  If you get sick a lot and find that
your illnesses result in chest infections, it might be that GERD
and a bacterial infection are both ganging up on you.

Slightly off the wall, but at www.asthmastory.com, there's a post
by a guy who took Dr. Hahn's protocol for infectious asthma
(meaning bacteria related) and found his acid reflux had
disappeared.

You and Doc are right, there's definitely a connection that the
experts have been writing about for years.
miles - 15 May 2006 14:38 GMT
> Miles, a pharmacist I know had surgical treatment for GERD at
> Mayo Clinic a few years ago, and was pleasantly surprised to find
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> You and Doc are right, there's definitely a connection that the
> experts have been writing about for years.

Thats an interesting concept that I plan to talk to my Dr. about next
time I see him.  My guess is that he's never heard of that mainly
because it is not discussed in the asthma medical update reports that
are published quarterly.  I get those reports to read as well.

I noticed talk about a blood test for such bacteria.  Is that test
pretty much conclusive?  Is there more than just 1 bacteria to test for?

I do get colds very easy and have trouble fighting them off.  The last
bout has stayed with me for almost 2 months.  Dr. thinks I must have
gotten some sort of chest infection and put me on Biaxin.  That stuff
always helps me quickly.
NorthShoreCEO - 15 May 2006 15:43 GMT
> Thats an interesting concept that I plan to talk to my Dr.
> about next time I see him.  My guess is that he's never heard
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> thinks I must have gotten some sort of chest infection and put
> me on Biaxin.  That stuff always helps me quickly.

No tests are conclusive, in fact, if you go to the
www.asthmastory.com website, on the bottom left of the home page
you'll see a document from Dr. Hahn to other doctors, and in it
he states he doesn't recommend testing.  He also gives his
protocol.  You might want to print that out and show it to your
doctor.
miles - 16 May 2006 00:47 GMT
> No tests are conclusive, in fact, if you go to the
> www.asthmastory.com website, on the bottom left of the home page
> you'll see a document from Dr. Hahn to other doctors, and in it
> he states he doesn't recommend testing.  He also gives his
> protocol.  You might want to print that out and show it to your
> doctor.

I'm not sure exactly which article you are referring to.
NorthShoreCEO - 16 May 2006 01:31 GMT
>wrote:
>> I'm not sure exactly which article you are referring to.

Go to www.asthmastory.com.  Look on the bottom left side of the
home page for a document titled 'Asthma and Infection'.
rchrdcarlisle@NOTyahoo.com - 15 May 2006 17:00 GMT
>> So it may be that GERD exacerbates your asthma. That does not mean
>> that it caused it.
>
>Well heck, dust exacerbates my asthma, so does pollens, exercise and a
>host of other items.  Do any of them 'cause' my asthma?

No, none of them cause your asthma. They all may cause your asthma to
get worse.

> What causes
>asthma is an unknown.

Exactly.

> So GERD is no different that everything else that
>exacerbates asthma.

Bingo.

>> So you control your asthma completely with treatment of your acid
>> reflux? You don't use steroid inhalers or bronchodilator to treat it?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>days in the ER have drastically diminished and my overall strength and
>quality of life have gone up.

So even when you control your acid reflux you still have asthma
symptoms. This means that the acid reflux may just be a contributing
factor in worsening your asthma. And it may not be the acid reflux per
se that is making the asthma worse. There may be psychologic factors
associated with the acid reflux that is causing the problem.

>> As I said, there is a difference between something that exacerbates
>> asthma and something that causes it.
>
>But you seem to put acid reflux in a different category than anything
>else that contributes to asthma.

I do? If someone said dust causes asthma I would disagree with that
statement too.

>  Nobody knows what causes asthma.  Acid
>reflux is on the same list as allergies, exercise induced etc.

Yep. All things that make asthma worse in some people.

>> Maybe it is. But I have not seen the objective evidence of it.
>> Anecdotes are not proof of anything.
>
>What objective evidence is there to show what causes asthma?  Nobody
>knows exactly.  GERD is in the same place as anything else with regards
>to asthma.

We agree. I disagreed with your use of the term "cause" to describe
the relationship between GERD and asthma. YOu seemed to be suggesting
that if you got rid of the acid reflux that your asthma would be cured
instead of just being better controlled.

RC
miles - 16 May 2006 00:55 GMT
> So even when you control your acid reflux you still have asthma
> symptoms. This means that the acid reflux may just be a contributing
> factor in worsening your asthma.

About 20 years ago I had a very serious stomach infection that lasted 2
months.  It caused massive amounts of acid reflux.  That is the time my
asthma went from controlled to uncontrollable.  During that time Dr.s
felt there was no connection to my stomach problems and asthma.  It is
my belief acid came up and caused scaring of the brochial tubes. My Dr.
feels if that happened it may increase sensitivity to allergens and
other issues that exacerbate my asthma.  The damage per my Dr. would be
for the most part permanent and not likely to improve much over the
years.  So all I can do is attempt to control those things that trigger
attacks.

> And it may not be the acid reflux per
> se that is making the asthma worse. There may be psychologic factors
> associated with the acid reflux that is causing the problem.

I doubt that.  I firmly believe acid reflux is a major contributing
factor for asthma.  You may have to experience such issues for an
extended period of time to understand.
rchrdcarlisle@NOTyahoo.com - 16 May 2006 01:42 GMT
>> So even when you control your acid reflux you still have asthma
>> symptoms. This means that the acid reflux may just be a contributing
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>felt there was no connection to my stomach problems and asthma.  It is
>my belief acid came up and caused scaring of the brochial tubes.

Anatomy is not your strong suit is it? How the hell could acid reflux
scar your bronchial tubes? What did you do, aspirate your stomach
contents as this is the *only* way to scar your bronchii from stomach
acid?

And if you did aspirate your stomach contents to cause scarring of
your bronchii you would have likely experienced a chemical pneumonitis
and pulmonary fibrosis making asthma the least of your problems. And
if that is the case then it is the direct result of the acid being
*aspirated* that is causing the problem and not acid reflux per se.

> My Dr.
>feels if that happened it may increase sensitivity to allergens and
>other issues that exacerbate my asthma.  The damage per my Dr. would be
>for the most part permanent and not likely to improve much over the
>years.  So all I can do is attempt to control those things that trigger
>attacks.

Actually my hypothesis (assuming you did not aspirate and you made not
mention of that in your post) is that you happened to have a bad flare
up of your asthma at the exact same time you had bad acid reflux. You
may have psychologically connected the two such that when you had a
flare up of acid reflux you would experience hypersensitivity in your
airway from the stress associated with worrying about having an asthma
attack.

Now my hypothesis is pure speculation but think it may offer an
explanation for why you keep having worsening asthma when your acid
reflux acts up when there is no direct physical connection.



>> And it may not be the acid reflux per
>> se that is making the asthma worse. There may be psychologic factors
>> associated with the acid reflux that is causing the problem.
>
>I doubt that.

See above for possible explanation of how psychologic factors may have
played a role in your pathophysiologic reaction.

> I firmly believe acid reflux is a major contributing
>factor for asthma.  You may have to experience such issues for an
>extended period of time to understand.

I have no doubt you believe this. I am simply saying that I am
skeptical and have offered an alternative explanation to yours.

RC
miles - 16 May 2006 02:39 GMT
> Anatomy is not your strong suit is it? How the hell could acid reflux
> scar your bronchial tubes? What did you do, aspirate your stomach
> contents as this is the *only* way to scar your bronchii from stomach
> acid?

When acid is refluxed into the throat, it can get into the lungs and
cause an aspiration pneumonia or asthma symptoms. Chronic acid reflux
into the lungs may eventually produce permanent lung damage, called
pulmonary fibrosis or bronchiectasis.

Please try to control your argumentative nature.  My knowledge of
anatomy is not at issue.  GERD can and does cause acid to get into the
lungs.  Do some reading on the subject as to how and why and then come
back.  Otherwise this type of discussion helps noone.

> I have no doubt you believe this. I am simply saying that I am
> skeptical and have offered an alternative explanation to yours.

My Dr's feel strongly otherwise.  So does my experience.  Your belief it
is psychological in nature is in my view without merit.  My asthma
started as a direct result of serious stomach issues.  It is not
psychological.
rchrdcarlisle@NOTyahoo.com - 16 May 2006 03:04 GMT
>> Anatomy is not your strong suit is it? How the hell could acid reflux
>> scar your bronchial tubes? What did you do, aspirate your stomach
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>When acid is refluxed into the throat, it can get into the lungs and
>cause an aspiration pneumonia or asthma symptoms.

AGain how the hell can acid refluxed into your throat get into your
lungs without aspirating it? And if you did aspirate stomach acid to
causing scarring (your words, not mine) of the bronchial tubes you
would have had a very serious problem with chemical pneumonitis and/or
pulmonary fibrosis. Were you diagnosed with either of these maladies?

> Chronic acid reflux
>into the lungs may eventually produce permanent lung damage, called
>pulmonary fibrosis or bronchiectasis.

This is true if you aspirate the acid. But aspiration is pretty
uncommon. Did you aspirate? Just having reflux is not enough to cause
lung damage.

>Please try to control your argumentative nature.  My knowledge of
>anatomy is not at issue.

Sorry but your knowledge of anatomy is certainly an issue. You cannot
get lung damage from acid reflux unless you aspirate.

> GERD can and does cause acid to get into the
>lungs.

See above.

> Do some reading on the subject as to how and why and then come
>back.  Otherwise this type of discussion helps noone.

I have done reading on the subject. Why don't you provide me with a
link  that shows that GERD causes acid to get into the lungs. I have
done a search and other than aspiration  this does not happen. So I
ask you again did you ever aspirate your stomach contents into your
lungs causing pneumonitis?

>> I have no doubt you believe this. I am simply saying that I am
>> skeptical and have offered an alternative explanation to yours.
>
>My Dr's feel strongly otherwise.

Your doctors think that acid reflux caused scarring of your lungs? Are
these MDs we are talking about? You might want to get a second
opinion.

>  Your belief it
>is psychological in nature is in my view without merit.

It is not my belief. I offered it as a possible explanation, nothing
more.

> My asthma
>started as a direct result of serious stomach issues.  It is not
>psychological.

It is your opinion that there is a causal relationship between your
GERD and your asthma. I admit that there is a temporal relationship
between the two. You are making a common logical fallacy called post
hoc, ergo propter hoc.

RC
miles - 16 May 2006 03:14 GMT
> AGain how the hell can acid refluxed into your throat get into your
> lungs without aspirating it?

Sigh.  You seem to think this is something unusual.  Do some reading.

> And if you did aspirate stomach acid to
> causing scarring (your words, not mine) of the bronchial tubes you
> would have had a very serious problem with chemical pneumonitis and/or
> pulmonary fibrosis. Were you diagnosed with either of these maladies?

Your assumption is only partly correct.  Yes it CAN cause such issues.
Saying it WOULD cause such issues in all cases is incorrect.

> This is true if you aspirate the acid. But aspiration is pretty
> uncommon.

Here you continue your completely naive knowledge of GERD and how and
why it triggers asthma through bronchial tube irritation.

> Sorry but your knowledge of anatomy is certainly an issue.

Your knowledge of GERD and effects on asthma are whats at issue.  Acid
comes up to the throat and down into the lungs.  Often while sleeping.
Please educate yourself on GERD before mouthing off about it being
psychological, uncommon or some other complete BS that helps nobody.
rchrdcarlisle@NOTyahoo.com - 16 May 2006 03:39 GMT
>Your knowledge of GERD and effects on asthma are whats at issue.  Acid
>comes up to the throat and down into the lungs.  Often while sleeping.
>Please educate yourself on GERD before mouthing off about it being
>psychological, uncommon or some other complete BS that helps nobody.

Please cite reference to support this assertion. If you are unable to
provide a reference then I shall assume it is just your opinion.
Others can decide how educated your opinion is.

RC
miles - 16 May 2006 04:27 GMT
> Please cite reference to support this assertion. If you are unable to
> provide a reference then I shall assume it is just your opinion.
> Others can decide how educated your opinion is.

Oh geez, I have to educate you or you decare yourself a winner of
nothing.  You appear here to argue and seem to have no desire to educate
yourself, otherwise you would have.  I already did post a URL with one
such reference.  Do a quick google on GERD or Acid Reflux and Asthma.
Learn!  Ya, the relationship of GERD and Asthma is purely psychological.
 Geez, are you reading 25 year old medical journals?
rchrdcarlisle@NOTyahoo.com - 16 May 2006 22:21 GMT
>Ya, the relationship of GERD and Asthma is purely psychological.
>  Geez, are you reading 25 year old medical journals?

 I never said that. I proposed a possible explanation for your
symptoms. I did not imply or suggest that the relationship between
GERD and asthma is *purely* psychological. I even admitted that I did
not know if there was a causal relationship. I only said that I have
not seen such a relationship objectively supported by the peer
reviewed literature.

I will ask one more time. Please post the best objective evidence that
GERD results in aspiration of stomach acids while sleeping that causes
asthma.

If you still cannot provide evidence in peer reviewed journals of what
you are saying this will be my last post. Maybe one of more doctors in
this group can be of help.

It is pretty pointless to try to discuss this topic with individuals
who can only make straw man arguments and not provide any peer
reviewed journal to support their POV.

RC
NorthShoreCEO - 16 May 2006 04:22 GMT
> When acid is refluxed into the throat, it can get into the
> lungs and cause an aspiration pneumonia or asthma symptoms.
> Chronic acid reflux into the lungs may eventually produce
> permanent lung damage, called pulmonary fibrosis or
> bronchiectasis.

Miles, sounds like these three blurbs I found are in agreement
with your doctor:

Symptoms of GERD may include:

 a.. Heartburn----a burning feeling in the upper abdomen. It can
travel through the chest and into the throat and neck. It is
believed to be caused by an acid irritating the esophagus.
 b.. Regurgitation-a warm, salty, bitter taste in the mouth. It
occurs when stomach contents flow back into the esophagus and
into the mouth. It frequently occurs with belching.
 c.. Chest pain----pain in the chest is believed to reflect
spasm in the esophagus. It is caused by acid irritating the
esophagus. This can mimic a heart attack.
 d.. Hoarseness or laryngitis----these can develop if the acid
and/or stomach contents reach the mouth and throat.
 e.. Dental disease----occurs because of the effects of the acid
on teeth.
 f.. Choking/Wheezing---may occur especially at night when
stomach contents may enter the lungs. This is called aspiration.
In patients with asthma, wheezing and shortness of breath may be
aggravated by reflux.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Refluxed liquid that passes the larynx can enter the lungs. The
reflux of liquid into the lungs (called aspiration) often results
in coughing and choking. Aspiration, however, can also occur
without producing these symptoms. With or without these symptoms,
aspiration may lead to infection of the lungs and result in
pneumonia. This type of pneumonia is a serious problem requiring
immediate treatment. When aspiration is unaccompanied by
symptoms, it can result in a slow, progressive scarring
(fibrosis) of the lungs that can be seen on chest x-rays.
Aspiration is more likely to occur at night because that is when
the processes (mechanisms) that protect against reflux are not
active and the coughing reflex that protects the lungs also is
not active.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease occurs when the lower esophgeal
sphincter (a valve) between the stomach and esophagus weakens.
Most probably, affected people are born with this condition. This
will lead to leakage of stomach contents (acid, bile, and
semi-digested food) into the esophagus, causing heartburn, chest
pain and esophagitis. The acid may reach the throat, leading to
reflux laryngitis and hoarseness, chronic mostly one-sided sore
throat and chronic dry cough. The refluxed acid may enter the
windpipe specially when sleeping at night and lead to asthma,
recurrent pneumonitis, or chronic lung disease and fibrosis as a
result of inflammation of the lungs from aspiration.
miles - 16 May 2006 04:37 GMT
Yep. It's quite common and well documented.  The common drugs used are
often pump-inhibitors.  However, recent studies suggest that long term
use of pump-inhibitors can aggravate asthma in some people.  I'll have
to re-read the studies to find the mechanism that would cause
pump-inhibitors to do that.  Reglan seems to work better for me.

> Miles, sounds like these three blurbs I found are in agreement
> with your doctor:
>
> Symptoms of GERD may include:

>   f.. Choking/Wheezing---may occur especially at night when
> stomach contents may enter the lungs. This is called aspiration.
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> recurrent pneumonitis, or chronic lung disease and fibrosis as a
> result of inflammation of the lungs from aspiration.
00doc - 16 May 2006 17:43 GMT
You've touched upon another controversial area in GERD, the acid
suppressing meds make the GERD less symptomatic and probably lessen
damage by making the stomach contents less acidic but they do nothing
to stop the stuff from going up into the esophagus. Some believe that
they make the reflux worse but I haven't seen proof of that. Some
believe that this continued, possibly worse, reflux of less acidic
contents is still causing problems and that therefore we should be
using motility agents (like Reglan) instead or in addition.

The counter arguments are:

1) The acid reducers seem to work, both symptomatically and in terms of
esophagitis.

2) Reglan is taken several times per day and has significant side
effects, particularly in the elderly.

Many surgeons insist that it is an anatomical problem and so the
treatment is surgical and call treating with drugs at all complete
folly. I think that is probably taking it a bit too far.

But it does make it interesting with discussions as it relates to
asthma. Maybe GERD triggers asthma by some other ingredient of stomach
contents and not acid and so the study I mentioned looked at the wrong
drug.

Signature

00doc

00doc - 16 May 2006 17:36 GMT
"And if you did aspirate your stomach contents to cause scarring of
your bronchii you would have likely experienced a chemical pneumonitis
and pulmonary fibrosis making asthma the least of your problems. And
if that is the case then it is the direct result of the acid being
*aspirated* that is causing the problem and not acid reflux per se. "

The GERD can cause a reflex constriction of the airways (in theory
anyway) or small amount sof aspriation could do something similar but
presumably worse without leaving a lot of scarring. I agree that if he
was dumping large volumes of stomach contents into his lungs that there
would be more to see.

Signature

00doc

Jason Johnson - 16 May 2006 02:41 GMT
rchrdcarlisle@NOTyahoo.com wrote:
> So even when you control your acid reflux you still have asthma
> symptoms. This means that the acid reflux may just be a contributing
> factor in worsening your asthma.

About 20 years ago I had a very serious stomach infection that lasted 2
months.  It caused massive amounts of acid reflux.  That is the time my
asthma went from controlled to uncontrollable.  During that time Dr.s
felt there was no connection to my stomach problems and asthma.  It is
my belief acid came up and caused scaring of the brochial tubes. My Dr.
feels if that happened it may increase sensitivity to allergens and
other issues that exacerbate my asthma.  The damage per my Dr. would be
for the most part permanent and not likely to improve much over the
years.  So all I can do is attempt to control those things that trigger
attacks.

> And it may not be the acid reflux per
> se that is making the asthma worse. There may be psychologic factors
> associated with the acid reflux that is causing the problem.

I doubt that.  I firmly believe acid reflux is a major contributing
factor for asthma.  You may have to experience such issues for an
extended period of time to understand.

I am not a doctor but I agree with you. I believe that acid reflux is
one of the causes of asthma and that bacteria is also a cause of asthma.
Perhaps someone could provide a list of all of the possible causes
of asthma or the URL of a website that has that information. I don't
care whether or not people agree with me.
Jason
Jason Johnson - 15 May 2006 18:26 GMT
rchrdcarlisle@NOTyahoo.com wrote:
> Connection does not mean acid reflux causes asthma. Sneezing is
> connected with the common cold and yet no one suggests that sneezing
> cause the cold. They are associated with each other in a noncausal
> fashion.

So it is your belief that acid reflux plays no role in causing asthma?
I beg to differ.  Why?  From my own experience.  I have GERD.  When it
acts up for an extended time my asthma gets extremely serious.  In such
asthma attacks treating the acid reflux is the only thing that is ever
effective with me.  Like many people there is often multiple
contributing factors that trigger their asthma.  GERD is one of them.


>Remember that correlation does not imply causation.

What are you saying?  Asthma causes GERD rather than the other way
around?  In people who's asthma is triggered or aggravated by GERD are
you saying treating them for GERD will have zero effect on their asthma?


> The operative word is "if". Where is the evidence of this causality.

Studies have been done for many years.  ACG's studies show very positive
results in treating GERD to reduce asthma in patients that suffer from both.

Heres another group who firmly believe in acid reflux induced asthma.
http://www.infantrefluxdisease.com/reflux_asthma.php

I could list 100's of websites but I also realize that Dr's never ever
agree on anything.  20 years ago Dr's said positively that asthma could
not be cause by GERD.  Today I see quite the opposite.  Much of what I
have seen is my own experience and in talking with my specialists as
well as numerous other patients.

I read the posts in this thread about acid reflux and wanted to mention a
book that deals with the problems related to high acid levels. My niece
has acid reflux disease and breathing problems. She has read the book.
I have high acid problems and had a serious case of breathing problems and
the information in the book helped me to reduce the level of acid.
"The Acid-Alkaline Diet" by Christopher Vasey, N.D.
www.innertraditions.com
or google
Healing Arts Press
Inner Traditions International
rchrdcarlisle@NOTyahoo.com - 15 May 2006 21:36 GMT
> rchrdcarlisle@NOTyahoo.com wrote:
> > Connection does not mean acid reflux causes asthma. Sneezing is
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> So it is your belief that acid reflux plays no role in causing asthma?

My belief is that I don't know the answer to that question. But being
afflicted with  both asthma and GERD and having asthma improve when
GERD improves is hardly proof of causality. It is no more proof that
dust causes allergies if someone's asthma improves when dust is not
around or whatever other triggers there might be.

> I beg to differ.  Why?  From my own experience.  I have GERD.  When it
> acts up for an extended time my asthma gets extremely serious.  In such
> asthma attacks treating the acid reflux is the only thing that is ever
> effective with me.  Like many people there is often multiple
> contributing factors that trigger their asthma.  GERD is one of them.

Your experience hardly proves that GERD causes asthma. It might
indicate that GERD exacerbates pre-exisiting asthma but those are two
different things.

>I read the posts in this thread about acid reflux and wanted to mention a
>book that deals with the problems related to high acid levels. My niece
>has acid reflux disease and breathing problems. She has read the book.
>I have high acid problems and had a serious case of breathing problems and
>the information in the book helped me to reduce the level of acid.
>"The Acid-Alkaline Diet" by Christopher Vasey, N.D.

That book is pure quackery. It was written by some naturopathic quack.

There is no such thing as changing the pH of your body by a diet.
Your blood pH is tightly controlled by the body. Certain diseases can
change the blood pH but diet cannot. You can eat a lot of baking soda
and not change your blood pH even though your urine pH may change
quite through the effort of the body to maintain the tightly
controlled pH. Have not we had this discussion before. Deja vu.

RC


Jason Johnson - 15 May 2006 22:48 GMT
On Mon, 15 May 2006 10:26:04 -0700, jason@nospam.com (Jason Johnson)
wrote:

>In article <PdT9g.18195$XV5.14948@fed1read10>, miles <nope@nopers.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> So it is your belief that acid reflux plays no role in causing asthma?  
My belief is that I don't know the answer to that question. But being
afflicted with  both asthma and GERD and having asthma improve when
GERD improves is hardly proof of causality. It is no more proof that
dust causes allergies if someone's asthma improves when dust is not
around or whatever other triggers there might be.



> I beg to differ.  Why?  From my own experience.  I have GERD.  When it
> acts up for an extended time my asthma gets extremely serious.  In such
> asthma attacks treating the acid reflux is the only thing that is ever
> effective with me.  Like many people there is often multiple
> contributing factors that trigger their asthma.  GERD is one of them.
Your experience hardly proves that GERD causes asthma. It might
indicate that GERD exacerbates pre-exisiting asthma but those are two
different things.
 
>I read the posts in this thread about acid reflux and wanted to mention a
>book that deals with the problems related to high acid levels. My niece
>has acid reflux disease and breathing problems. She has read the book.
>I have high acid problems and had a serious case of breathing problems and
>the information in the book helped me to reduce the level of acid.
>"The Acid-Alkaline Diet" by Christopher Vasey, N.D.


That book is pure quackery. It was written by some naturopathic quack.

 There is no such thing as changing the pH of your body by a diet.
Your blood pH is tightly controlled by the body. Certain diseases can
change the blood pH but diet cannot. You can eat a lot of baking soda
and not change your blood pH even though your urine pH may change
quite through the effort of the body to maintain the tightly
controlled pH. Have not we had this discussion before. Deja vu.

RC

 

Needless to say, I disagree with you. If one person eats high acids foods
and drinks high acid drinks for a week--their urine pH levels would be
lower than another person that ate low acid foods and drank low acid foods
during that same week. At least three doctors agree that "urine pH is
crude indicator of the acid-base balance of the body."
source: "Laboratory Test Handbook" by  
David Jacobs M.D, Wayne DeMott, MD and Dwight Oxley M.D
rchrdcarlisle@NOTyahoo.com - 15 May 2006 23:05 GMT
> On Mon, 15 May 2006 10:26:04 -0700, jason@nospam.com (Jason Johnson)
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
>lower than another person that ate low acid foods and drank low acid foods
>during that same week.

Did you bother to read what I wrote? You actually agreed with me.

I said that there *would* be a change in the *urine* pH if one ate
high acid or high base foods but that in the normal individual the
change in urine pH would be irrelevant to the blood pH which would
remain normal except in certain pathologic conditions.

> At least three doctors agree that "urine pH is
>crude indicator of the acid-base balance of the body."
>source: "Laboratory Test Handbook" by  
>David Jacobs M.D, Wayne DeMott, MD and Dwight Oxley M.D

Urine pH *is* a crude indicator. I completely agree. I never denied
this.

It is *crude* because despite urine pH being high or low does not
mean that the blood pH is abnormal. And it is blood pH that must be
kept within a critical narrow range for normal bodily functioning.

The urine pH might be high or low due to dietary causes and completely
irrelevant to the blood pH.

RC
Jason Johnson - 16 May 2006 02:49 GMT
On Mon, 15 May 2006 14:48:00 -0700, jason@nospam.com (Jason Johnson)
wrote:

>In article <f5ph62dks35i3f9713mfnnqiej99ha7oqc@4ax.com>,
>rchrdcarlisle@NOTyahoo.com wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
>lower than another person that ate low acid foods and drank low acid foods
>during that same week.

Did you bother to read what I wrote? You actually agreed with me.

 I said that there *would* be a change in the *urine* pH if one ate
high acid or high base foods but that in the normal individual the
change in urine pH would be irrelevant to the blood pH which would
remain normal except in certain pathologic conditions.



> At least three doctors agree that "urine pH is
>crude indicator of the acid-base balance of the body."
>source: "Laboratory Test Handbook" by  
>David Jacobs M.D, Wayne DeMott, MD and Dwight Oxley M.D


Urine pH *is* a crude indicator. I completely agree. I never denied
this.

 It is *crude* because despite urine pH being high or low does not
mean that the blood pH is abnormal. And it is blood pH that must be
kept within a critical narrow range for normal bodily functioning.

The urine pH might be high or low due to dietary causes and completely
irrelevant to the blood pH.



RC

RC,
You appear to believe that the diet of a person has no effect upon the
blood pH. If you do have this opinion--I disagree with you. I know that
doctors prescribe medications to patients that have acid reflux disorder.
I know that a doctor that is a kidney specialist wrote a book that includes
a diet plan that has various foods that have low levels of acid. He also
recommends that kidney patients take baking soda pill and TUMS to reduce
the acid level of the body. I believe that some doctors would agree that
it's possible to control the blood and urine pH by a change in the diet
and by the use of TUMS and Sodium Bicarbonate pills.
Jason
rchrdcarlisle@NOTyahoo.com - 16 May 2006 03:14 GMT
>RC,
>You appear to believe that the diet of a person has no effect upon the
>blood pH.

Correct.

> If you do have this opinion--I disagree with you.

Disagree all you want. You are wrong. Blood pH is very tightly
controlled in normal adults without some serious metabolic or
respiratory disorder. You can eat quite a bit of baking soda and not
significantly change your blood pH although your urine pH would change
quite a bit.

> I know that
>doctors prescribe medications to patients that have acid reflux disorder.

Yes they do.

>I know that a doctor that is a kidney specialist wrote a book that includes
>a diet plan that has various foods that have low levels of acid. He also
>recommends that kidney patients take baking soda pill and TUMS to reduce
>the acid level of the body.

Please give me the title and author of this book.

> I believe that some doctors would agree that
>it's possible to control the blood and urine pH by a change in the diet
>and by the use of TUMS and Sodium Bicarbonate pills.

Some doctors may also believe that they are Jesus Christ but they
would be suffering from a delusion.

You are making the logical fallacy of Appeal To Authority.

RC

>Jason
Jason Johnson - 16 May 2006 19:36 GMT
On Mon, 15 May 2006 18:49:47 -0700, jason@nospam.com (Jason Johnson)
wrote:

>RC,
>You appear to believe that the diet of a person has no effect upon the
>blood pH.

Correct.


> If you do have this opinion--I disagree with you.

Disagree all you want. You are wrong. Blood pH is very tightly
controlled in normal adults without some serious metabolic or
respiratory disorder. You can eat quite a bit of baking soda and not
significantly change your blood pH although your urine pH would change
quite a bit.


> I know that
>doctors prescribe medications to patients that have acid reflux disorder.
Yes they do.


>I know that a doctor that is a kidney specialist wrote a book that includes
>a diet plan that has various foods that have low levels of acid. He also
>recommends that kidney patients take baking soda pill and TUMS to reduce
>the acid level of the body.

Please give me the title and author of this book.

"Coping With Kidney Disease" by Mackenzie Walser, M.D. (kidney specialist)
Dr. Walser is a Professor of Medicine at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.
He recommends that kidney patients take amino acid supplements (10 g per day).
He also recommends that kidney patients take 2 grams of calcium carbonate
each day--that's the same substance that is in TUMS. Needless to say,
those items mentioned above can raise the urine pH levels but that would
not help kidney patients. They would also raise the body pH levels. As I
have stated in another post, the urine pH is crude indicator of the
acid-base of the body. In other words, when the urine pH is within normal
limits
(6 to 7.5) on a regular basis--that means the body pH is very likely to be
within normal limits. I agree measuring serum pH is a better way of
determining the body pH levels, however, most people (unless they work in
a lab) are not able to test their  serum pH levels on a daily basis.





> I believe that some doctors would agree that
>it's possible to control the blood and urine pH by a change in the diet
>and by the use of TUMS and Sodium Bicarbonate pills.


Some doctors may also believe that they are Jesus Christ but they
would be suffering from a delusion.

You are making the logical fallacy of Appeal To Authority.

RC

>Jason
rchrdcarlisle@NOTyahoo.com - 16 May 2006 22:23 GMT
> On Mon, 15 May 2006 18:49:47 -0700, jason@nospam.com (Jason Johnson)
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>determining the body pH levels, however, most people (unless they work in
>a lab) are not able to test their  serum pH levels on a daily basis.

Unless one has a very specific disease state like kidney failure
checking one's urine pH is likely a waste of time. This book is about
individuals with incipient kidney failure.

It is true that kidney failure can result in an inability of the
kidneys to regulate acid base balance in the body. This is one of the
exceptions to the rule that checking urine pH is largely a waste of
time.

As a result of kidney disease the arterial pH becomes abnormal
(metabolic acidosis) and in this case bicarbonate can help. But absent
kidney failure or other serious conditions that can affect blood pH,
urine pH is a largely worthless lab value.

The naturopathic doctor who wrote a book about acid base diet is pure
quackery as he is suggesting that many people can benefit by making
changes that will alter their body acidity and using urine pH to check
on efficacy.

It is pure bunk.

RC

> > I believe that some doctors would agree that
> >it's possible to control the blood and urine pH by a change in the diet
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> >Jason
Jason Johnson - 16 May 2006 23:46 GMT
On Tue, 16 May 2006 11:36:57 -0700, jason@nospam.com (Jason Johnson)
wrote:

>In article <m2di625sf3ediu79dbj0tu06lrr9jg7m3m@4ax.com>,
>rchrdcarlisle@NOTyahoo.com wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>determining the body pH levels, however, most people (unless they work in
>a lab) are not able to test their  serum pH levels on a daily basis.

Unless one has a very specific disease state like kidney failure
checking one's urine pH is likely a waste of time. This book is about
individuals with incipient kidney failure.

 It is true that kidney failure can result in an inability of the
kidneys to regulate acid base balance in the body. This is one of the
exceptions to the rule that checking urine pH is largely a waste of
time.

 As a result of kidney disease the arterial pH becomes abnormal
(metabolic acidosis) and in this case bicarbonate can help. But absent
kidney failure or other serious conditions that can affect blood pH,
urine pH is a largely worthless lab value.

The naturopathic doctor who wrote a book about acid base diet is pure
quackery as he is suggesting that many people can benefit by making
changes that will alter their body acidity and using urine pH to check
on efficacy.

 It is pure bunk.

RC

RC,
I don't think that people that do not have any health problems should
waste their time making use of litmus paper to test their urine pH levels.
They should also not waste their time reading the "The Acid-Alkaline Diet
for Optimum Health" by Christopher Vasey, N.D.
However, I believe that people that have medical problems related to the
acid-base balance should read the book and test their urine pH levels.
According to the three medical doctors that wrote "Liboratory Test
Handbook", these disorders are related to acid-base balance problems:
Metabolic Acidosis--also Metabolic alkalosis
diabetes mellitus
Respiratory acidosis
Emphysema
Renal Tubular Acidosis
Renal Failure
Various other types of kidney disease

You may think the book is pure bunk but the information in the book is
helpful to the people that have the upon mentioned medical problems. Only
time will tell if other diseases are related to acid-base balance
problems. It's my opinion that acid reflux disease is an acid base balance
problem. It's also possible that an acid base balance problem is one of
the causes of asthma.
Jason
rchrdcarlisle@NOTyahoo.com - 17 May 2006 00:08 GMT
>It's my opinion that acid reflux disease is an acid base balance
>problem.

You know what they say about opinions? Acid reflux disease is a
problem with an incompetent gastro-esophageal sphincter. The stomach
is normally acidic and there is only a problem when the acid refluxes
up past the sphincter, which when performing normally should prevent
the acid from making its way up the esophagus into the throat.

> It's also possible that an acid base balance problem is one of
>the causes of asthma.

It is also possible that monkeys will fly out of your butt. But I
would not bet on it.

But if you have more than just a hunch that acid-base problem is one
of the causes of asthma then please post the evidence.

What do you think of the large study which did not show a causal
relationship between GERD and asthma?

We don't know what causes asthma. We do know that many things can
exacerbate asthma but exacerbating factors are different from a causal
agent.

RC

>Jason
Jason Johnson - 17 May 2006 00:19 GMT
On Tue, 16 May 2006 15:46:27 -0700, jason@nospam.com (Jason Johnson)
wrote:

>It's my opinion that acid reflux disease is an acid base balance
>problem.

You know what they say about opinions? Acid reflux disease is a
problem with an incompetent gastro-esophageal sphincter. The stomach
is normally acidic and there is only a problem when the acid refluxes
up past the sphincter, which when performing normally should prevent
the acid from making its way up the esophagus into the throat.

> It's also possible that an acid base balance problem is one of
>the causes of asthma.

It is also possible that monkeys will fly out of your butt. But I
would not bet on it.

But if you have more than just a hunch that acid-base problem is one
of the causes of asthma then please post the evidence.

What do you think of the large study which did not show a causal
relationship between GERD and asthma?

We don't know what causes asthma. We do know that many things can
exacerbate asthma but exacerbating factors are different from a causal
agent.

RC

RC,
I have a niece that has Acid reflux disease. Before she started to take
prescribed medications, she used TUMS to treat the problem. It did not
work as well to solve the problem as the medication but it did help.
Someone recently posted the study results that showed that GERD is one of
the possible causes of asthma. Don't ask for proof since I did not make a
hard copy of the post.
Jason
rchrdcarlisle@NOTyahoo.com - 17 May 2006 00:34 GMT
>RC,
>I have a niece that has Acid reflux disease. Before she started to take
>prescribed medications, she used TUMS to treat the problem. It did not
>work as well to solve the problem as the medication but it did help.

It is difficult to draw any conclusions from a single anecdote. There
may be a number of reasons why her condition improved. It might have
been that the TUMS caused the gastro-esophageal sphincter to not be so
incompetent. Or she may have gotten better for some other reason.

>Someone recently posted the study results that showed that GERD is one of
>the possible causes of asthma. Don't ask for proof since I did not make a
>hard copy of the post.

OOdoc said that a large study had negative results.

How can a study show that GERD is one cause of asthma? It might show
that it can exacerbate symptoms of asthma but not necessarily cause
it.

RC

>Jason
Jason Johnson - 17 May 2006 18:10 GMT
On Tue, 16 May 2006 16:19:25 -0700, jason@nospam.com (Jason Johnson)
wrote:


>RC,
>I have a niece that has Acid reflux disease. Before she started to take
>prescribed medications, she used TUMS to treat the problem. It did not
>work as well to solve the problem as the medication but it did help.

It is difficult to draw any conclusions from a single anecdote. There
may be a number of reasons why her condition improved. It might have
been that the TUMS caused the gastro-esophageal sphincter to not be so
incompetent. Or she may have gotten better for some other reason.



>Someone recently posted the study results that showed that GERD is one of
>the possible causes of asthma. Don't ask for proof since I did not make a
>hard copy of the post.

OOdoc said that a large study had negative results.

How can a study show that GERD is one cause of asthma? It might show
that it can exacerbate symptoms of asthma but not necessarily cause
it.

RC

RC,
Good point. I should have said that the study that was mentioned in the
post indicated that GERD was one of the "possible" causes of asthma.
Someone else mentioned another study that indicated that bacteria was also
one of the "possible" causes of asthma. Would you agree that there are
several causes of asthma. I recall when I researched heart attacks--I
found out that there were several different causes of heart attacks.
I have a question for you:
For the purpose of this discussion, a study is done related to two
identical twin brothers that had NO health problems. The two brothers are
60 years
years old. One brother only eats high acid foods for one month. The other
brother eats foods have that very low amounts of acid during that same
month.
At the conclusion of the month, the serum and urine pH levels are taken
after an 18 hour fast. Will those pH levels be the same or different?
It's my opinion that the pH levels of both brothers will be within normal
limits but that the serum and urine pH levels of one of the brothers will
be lower than the pH levels of the other brother.
Jason
NorthShoreCEO - 17 May 2006 19:02 GMT
> Someone else mentioned another study that indicated that
> bacteria was also
> one of the "possible" causes of asthma. Would you agree that
> there are
> several causes of asthma.

Jason, there are actually several studies that indicate bacteria
can cause asthma, and many researchers believe asthma can be a
result of more than one thing.
Jason Johnson - 17 May 2006 20:01 GMT
"Jason Johnson" <jason@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:jason-1705061010350001@66-52-22-64.lsan.pw-dia.impulse.net...

> Someone else mentioned another study that indicated that
> bacteria was also
> one of the "possible" causes of asthma. Would you agree that
> there are
> several causes of asthma.


Jason, there are actually several studies that indicate bacteria
can cause asthma, and many researchers believe asthma can be a
result of more than one thing.

That was my opinion based upon my own research. Thanks for
letting me know the facts that you mentioned in your post.
What are the other possible causes of asthma?
Do you believe that acid-base problems could be a possible
cause of asthma?
I know of one patient that has all sorts of health problems
related that may have been caused because of
acid-base problems--including asthma. The patient has an eating
disorder--obese--and refuses to even consider changing her diet
and eating only low acid foods. She drinks about 5 cups of coffee
per day and drink lots of cokes each day. She takes about a dozen
different medications each day.
Jason
NorthShoreCEO - 17 May 2006 20:18 GMT
> That was my opinion based upon my own research. Thanks for
> letting me know the facts that you mentioned in your post.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> different medications each day.
> Jason

Defective airways can cause asthma, so can smoking or inhaling
chemicals or gases.   There aren't any studies that I know of,
but I've read of several cases where asthma began with exposure
to mold.  I know nothing about acid-based problems, but based on
what you've written with regard to the obese patient, I don't
think I would buy it.  The coke alone can make someone obese, and
the sugar can set off binge eating in people who crave high carb
diets.
Jason Johnson - 17 May 2006 20:41 GMT
"Jason Johnson" <jason@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:jason-1705061201310001@66-52-22-52.lsan.pw-dia.impulse.net...

> That was my opinion based upon my own research. Thanks for
> letting me know the facts that you mentioned in your post.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> different medications each day.
> Jason


Defective airways can cause asthma, so can smoking or inhaling
chemicals or gases.   There aren't any studies that I know of,
but I've read of several cases where asthma began with exposure
to mold.  I know nothing about acid-based problems, but based on
what you've written with regard to the obese patient, I don't
think I would buy it.  The coke alone can make someone obese, and
the sugar can set off binge eating in people who crave high carb
diets.

She has been to several different doctors in search of some magic
cure. Her doctors are not sure of the source of her asthma problems.
They treat each of her 5 (or more) health problems with 5 or more
types of medications. It's my guess that many of her problems are
related to an acid-base problem. She may now have Addison's disease
as a direct result of medications she is taking to treat asthma.
Since she refuses to change her diet, I doubt that her health problems
will ever improve. Thanks for answering my questions.
Jason
rchrdcarlisle@NOTyahoo.com - 17 May 2006 20:59 GMT
>RC,
>Good point. I should have said that the study that was mentioned in the
>post indicated that GERD was one of the "possible" causes of asthma.
>Someone else mentioned another study that indicated that bacteria was also
>one of the "possible" causes of asthma. Would you agree that there are
>several causes of asthma.

No I would not. I would agree that there are many things that can
exacerbate and trigger as asthma attack but as far as the cause I just
don't know. It could be one thing or several.

It might just be that individuals who develop asthma get it due to
genetic factors and that there is not much they can do to prevent it
other than to avoid those things that exacerbate it. Perhaps they will
find the genetic cause in the future. Anyone who thinks that they know
the cause of asthma is just speculating.

> I recall when I researched heart attacks--I
>found out that there were several different causes of heart attacks.

There is one cause of heart attack and that is lack of oxygen to the
heart. Now there are many things that can cause this lack of oxygen
such as an embolus or narrowing of coronary arteries but the proximate
cause is the same.

>I have a question for you:
>For the purpose of this discussion, a study is done related to two
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>At the conclusion of the month, the serum and urine pH levels are taken
>after an 18 hour fast. Will those pH levels be the same or different?

Probably different.

>It's my opinion that the pH levels of both brothers will be within normal
>limits but that the serum and urine pH levels of one of the brothers will
>be lower than the pH levels of the other brother.

I agree. So what?

The body deals with the excess acid by excreting it in the urine in
order to maintain blood pH within a narrow limit that is important for
good health.

RC
>Jason
Jason Johnson - 18 May 2006 00:52 GMT
On Wed, 17 May 2006 10:10:35 -0700, jason@nospam.com (Jason Johnson)
wrote:


>RC,
>Good point. I should have said that the study that was mentioned in the
>post indicated that GERD was one of the "possible" causes of asthma.
>Someone else mentioned another study that indicated that bacteria was also
>one of the "possible" causes of asthma. Would you agree that there are
>several causes of asthma.

No I would not. I would agree that there are many things that can
exacerbate and trigger as asthma attack but as far as the cause I just
don't know. It could be one thing or several.

It might just be that individuals who develop asthma get it due to
genetic factors and that there is not much they can do to prevent it
other than to avoid those things that exacerbate it. Perhaps they will
find the genetic cause in the future. Anyone who thinks that they know
the cause of asthma is just speculating.

> I recall when I researched heart attacks--I
>found out that there were several different causes of heart attacks.

There is one cause of heart attack and that is lack of oxygen to the
heart. Now there are many things that can cause this lack of oxygen
such as an embolus or narrowing of coronary arteries but the proximate
cause is the same.



>I have a question for you:
>For the purpose of this discussion, a study is done related to two
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>At the conclusion of the month, the serum and urine pH levels are taken
>after an 18 hour fast. Will those pH levels be the same or different?

Probably different.



>It's my opinion that the pH levels of both brothers will be within normal
>limits but that the serum and urine pH levels of one of the brothers will
>be lower than the pH levels of the other brother.


I agree. So what?

The body deals with the excess acid by excreting it in the urine in
order to maintain blood pH within a narrow limit that is important for
good health.

RC

RC,
Do you now agree that diet can have an effect upon the blood and urine pH
levels?
Jason
NorthShoreCEO - 17 May 2006 00:28 GMT
> On Tue, 16 May 2006 15:46:27 -0700> wrote:

> You know what they say about opinions?

Am I the only one laughing at the irony?
Nancy - 16 May 2006 04:49 GMT
>  rchrdcarlisle@NOTyahoo.com wrote:
>  > Connection does not mean acid reflux causes asthma. Sneezing is
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> Healing Arts Press
> Inner Traditions International

Oh Lord help us.  First the B* brigade, the ozone charlatans, the Juice
people, the cell salt maniac, the iron loony, and now we have Jason the
acid wacko.

I shudder to think of who is next.

Life is uncertain............eat dessert first!!

Nancy
8=: )
NorthShoreCEO - 16 May 2006 04:54 GMT
> Oh Lord help us.  First the B* brigade, the ozone charlatans,
> the Juice people, the cell salt maniac, the iron loony, and now
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Nancy
> 8=: )

You forgot the broken record on hidden food allergies.
miles - 16 May 2006 04:59 GMT
> You forgot the broken record on hidden food allergies.

Oh I found my hidden food allergy.  I used to drink orange juice and
vodka and I got sick the next morning.  So I switched to orange juice
and gin but I got sick too.  So then I changed to orange juice and
tequila.  But, once more the next morning I felt awful.  So I realized
it must be the orange juice I'm allergic too.
NorthShoreCEO - 16 May 2006 05:03 GMT
>> You forgot the broken record on hidden food allergies.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> felt awful.  So I realized it must be the orange juice I'm
> allergic too.

You should write a book!  And get your license in naturopathy!!
And then advertise in the yellow pages!!!
00doc - 16 May 2006 13:07 GMT
You had me there for a minute - good one.

Signature

00doc

00doc - 16 May 2006 17:44 GMT
Aaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
NorthShoreCEO - 17 May 2006 00:29 GMT
> Aaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yeah, I'm at this point, too....lol.
00doc - 16 May 2006 17:30 GMT
There certainly is an association between asthma and GERD. It has never
been well established if one (or its treatments) casues the other or if
something else is predisposing to both There are plausible theories to
explain both how asthma might worsen GERD and how GERD might worsen
asthma. Despite a dearth of supporting evidence it has been widely
assumed that GERD worsens asthma and so GERD has been aggressively
sought and treated, especially in recalcitrant asthma cases.

Recently, there was a large randomised trial loking at treating GERD in
asthma patients that showed no benefit. Some editorialists have
declared it a death knell for the GERD triggering asthma theory but I
am not so sure for several reasons:

1) Although it was large and well done it is still only one study.
Always be cautious about generalizing the results of any one study.

2) IIRC it was done in kids so it might not generalize to adults.

3) I don't think it can exclude the possibility that there is a subset
od asthmatics who are triggered by GERD ans who will benefit from
treatment.

My take is that the study has causes me to wonder a little more about
the theory and be much less aggressive about looking for it and trying
meds but I still consider it worth a try in some cases, especially if
the person is having GERD symptoms. Besides the symptoms often warrant
treatment independant of the asthma.

I think another thing that may be provoking some angst is the word
"causes". On this group claims of knowing the cause of asthma are often
followed by sales pitches for quack cures. I know you are not selling
anything but it does make people nervous. It would probably be more
accurate to say it exacerbates asthma symptoms.

Signature

00doc

rchrdcarlisle@NOTyahoo.com - 16 May 2006 22:24 GMT
>It would probably be more
>accurate to say it exacerbates asthma symptoms.

Indeed. And that was my main point when someone said that GERD caused
asthma.

Thanx for the information about the study that is negative for
improvement in asthma after treatment for GERD. You are also correct
that definitive conclusions cannot be arrived at since it is only one
study. But it does call into question the original hypothesis.
Hopefully the study will be repeated to confirm the negative result.
Repeatability is important.

But there are those who are so convinced based upon personal
experience that GERD exacerbates asthma that no number of negative
studies would be sufficient to convince them otherwise.

I still contend that psychologic factors may be at work to explain the
phenomenon. If someone has GERD and happens to have a flare up of
their asthma they may understandably connect the GERD to the asthma so
the next time the GERD flares up, anxiety about asthma may worsen that
condition. Anxiety may either exacerbate bronchial hypersensitivity or
lead to a panic attack that results in perception of inability to
catch one's breath.

Over time the connection between GERD and asthma may become ingrained
causing exacerbation of the asthma symptoms.

RC

00doc - 18 May 2006 01:55 GMT
> But there are those who are so convinced based upon personal
> experience that GERD exacerbates asthma that no number of negative
> studies would be sufficient to convince them otherwise.

It really is a firmly entrenched belief. I breifly tried to search for the
study I mentioned but on general search engines it is hard to find terms
that do not leave you swamped with websites discussing how GERD triggers
asthma. It is amazing how this is stated so far and wide with absolutely no
objective evidence to support it.

GERD is a tough subject. It is hard to diagnose - 25% of cases show no
changes in the esophagus (called NERD - non-erosive reflux disease) so the
only reliable way is with a pH probe study combined with symptom diaries but
very few studies look at those. They usually just do upper endoscopies and
presumably miss a lot of cases. Some studies just look at symptoms but those
are notoriously innaccurate. Then they use acid blocking meds which reduce
the acidity of refluxed material but not the material from refluxing (and
assume it is the acid that is having the effect). The acid blocking drugs
also make it hard to follow the patients since they will nullify symptoms,
turn pH probe studies negative, and reduce esophagitis all without reducing
reflux.

So basically you have a population that is hard to characterise, hard to
treat and hard to monitor treatment. is it any wonder that good data is
lacking? What I would love to see them do is a study that truly reduced
reflux, either by surgery or pro-kinetic agents (like Reglan, Propulcid, or
Zelnorm), used pH probes to prove they did reduce the reflux, and then
follow objective asthma markers. One problem with that is that it would be
nearly impossible to blind (although I have a few ideas of how that could be
done).

Signature

00doc

rchrdcarlisle@NOTyahoo.com - 18 May 2006 02:08 GMT
>> But there are those who are so convinced based upon personal
>> experience that GERD exacerbates asthma that no number of negative
>> studies would be sufficient to convince them otherwise.
>
>It really is a firmly entrenched belief.

It appears to border on the delusional. Simply my *questioning*
whether what they say is not true results in tremendous anger in some
people.

> I breifly tried to search for the
>study I mentioned but on general search engines it is hard to find terms
>that do not leave you swamped with websites discussing how GERD triggers
>asthma.

Why search on general engine? Medline is your friend.

>It is amazing how this is stated so far and wide with absolutely no
>objective evidence to support it.

Not really. There is a lot of sh.t on the internet with no supporting
data. Just look at all the anti-vac whackos. Do a general search for
vaccination and you will see how many loons there are out there. You
would think by reading some of this garbage that if you vaccinate your
kid that they will either immediately die or get some godforaken
disease.

>GERD is a tough subject. It is hard to diagnose - 25% of cases show no
>changes in the esophagus (called NERD - non-erosive reflux disease) so the
>only reliable way is with a pH probe study combined with symptom diaries but
>very few studies look at those.

And if you don't do these studies then the Dx is made based upon
subjective complaints which is notoriously fraught with problems.


>So basically you have a population that is hard to characterise, hard to
>treat and hard to monitor treatment. is it any wonder that good data is
>lacking?

Not surprising at all.  

> What I would love to see them do is a study that truly reduced
>reflux, either by surgery or pro-kinetic agents (like Reglan, Propulcid, or
>Zelnorm), used pH probes to prove they did reduce the reflux, and then
>follow objective asthma markers. One problem with that is that it would be
>nearly impossible to blind (although I have a few ideas of how that could be
>done).

Why would it be hard to blind if you used medication? Surgery is a
different matter altogether although there have been studies with sham
surgery. Not sure how they got past the ethics committee on that
though.

RC
00doc - 18 May 2006 17:31 GMT
> Why search on general engine? Medline is your friend.

If I get real serious that is what I will have to do. It is recent
enough that I may be able to jst look at some recent stuff I have at
home. Sometiems the computer gives too much info.

> Just look at all the anti-vac whackos. Do a general
> search for vaccination and you will see how many
> loons there are out there. You would think by reading
> some of this garbage that if you vaccinate your
> kid that they will either immediately die or get
> some godforaken disease.

I used to read misc.kids.health. I could give you the names of several
of those whackos off the top of my head.

>Why would it be hard to blind if you used medication?
> Surgery is a different matter altogether although there
> have been studies with sham surgery. Not sure how
> they got past the ethics committee on that though.

Sham surgeries can be ethical. Just do little enough cutting that it is
not much of a risk to the patient. The problem with blinding the meds
is that all the motility drugs have significant side effects. You would
need to use a placebo that causes similar side effects. It is doable
but would take more thought.

Signature

00doc

NorthShoreCEO - 18 May 2006 05:35 GMT
> It really is a firmly entrenched belief. I breifly tried to
> search for the study I mentioned but on general search engines
> it is hard to find terms that do not leave you swamped with
> websites discussing how GERD triggers asthma. It is amazing how
> this is stated so far and wide with absolutely no objective
> evidence to support it.

You must be talking about the study theyr'e doing at Ohio State
Medical Center?

I think it's entrenched because studies have shown there's a
relationship between GERD and asthma - they just don't know how
it works.
NorthShoreCEO - 20 May 2006 14:12 GMT
Yoohooo - Mr. Busyman.  I take that to mean NO?  It's not the OSU
study?

>> It really is a firmly entrenched belief. I breifly tried to
>> search for the study I mentioned but on general search engines
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> relationship between GERD and asthma - they just don't know how
> it works.
00doc - 22 May 2006 02:22 GMT
> Yoohooo - Mr. Busyman.  I take that to mean NO?  It's not the OSU study?

I finally had time to look for it.

It was done in Norway:
Acid suppression does not change respiratory symptoms in children with
asthma and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Stordal K, Johannesdottir GB, Bentsen BS, Knudsen PK, Carlsen KC, Closs O,
Handeland M, Holm HK, Sandvik L.

Dept of Paediatrics, Ostfold County Hospital, 1602 Fredrikstad, Norway.
ketil.stoerdal@c2i.net

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies have shown an association between
gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and asthma, and oesophageal acid
perfusion may cause bronchial constriction. However, no causative relation
has been proven. AIM: To assess whether acid suppression would lead to
reduced asthma symptoms in children with concomitant asthma and GORD.
METHODS: Thirty eight children (mean age 10.8 years, range 7.2-16.8; 29
males) with asthma and a reflux index > or =5.0 assessed by 24 hour
oesophageal pH monitoring were randomised to 12 weeks of treatment with
omeprazole 20 mg daily or placebo. The groups were similar in age, gender,
mean reflux index, and asthma severity. Primary endpoints were asthma
symptoms (daytime wheeze, symptoms at night, in the morning, and during
exercise) and quality of life (PAQLQ). Secondary endpoints were changes in
lung function and the use of short acting bronchodilators. At the end of the
study a repeated pH study was performed to confirm the efficacy of acid
suppression. RESULTS: The change in total symptom score did not differ
significantly between the omeprazole and the placebo group, and decreased by
1.28 (95% CI -0.1 to 2.65) and 1.28 (95% CI -0.72 to 3.27) respectively. The
PAQLQ score increased by 0.62 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.95) in the omeprazole group
compared to 0.50 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.70) in the placebo group. Change in lung
function and use of short acting bronchodilators were similar in the groups.
The acid suppression was adequate (reflux index <5.0) under omeprazole
treatment. CONCLUSION: Omeprazole treatment did not improve asthma symptoms
or lung function in children with asthma and GORD.

However, while look for that one I also came across this:
The influence of gastroesophageal reflux disease and its treatment on
asthmatic cough.

Bocskei C, Viczian M, Bocskei R, Horvath I.

Koranyi National Institute for TB and Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary.
csbockei@freemail.hu

Gastroesophageal reflux is known to cause chronic cough and is also
implicated in worsening of asthma. We conducted a prospective study to
examine the clinical significance of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)
in asthmatic patients with chronic cough to analyze the temporal
relationship between reflux events and coughing and to assess the effect of
esomeprazole treatment on respiratory symptoms and lung function in these
patients. Asthmatic patients (126) with chronic dry cough were studied.
Diagnosis of GERD was based on typical symptoms and the effectiveness of
therapeutic test or on pH monitoring. Patients without GERD (negative pH
results) consisted of the control group. The results of pH monitoring showed
that 64% of cough episodes were related to acid reflux and in 91% of reflux
events preceded coughing. Esomeprazole treatment (40 mg/day for 3 months)
not only diminished GERD symptoms but also improved asthma outcome Baseline
FEV(1) and PEF values increased significantly together with a decrease in
symptom scores and the use of rescue medication. In most patients included
in the extended part of the study for another 3 months, the dose of inhaled
steroids could be reduced with sustained GERD therapy. Our data showing that
reflux events preceded coughing in most cases and that treatment of GERD
resulted in an improvement in different outcome measures of asthma suggest
that GERD worsens asthma, and its treatment is of clinical importance to
effectively manage these patients.

Whether it is a difference between adults and children of something else I
don't know.

Signature

00doc