Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Asthma / September 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

It's about time...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
aroberts - 27 Sep 2005 20:12 GMT
The FDA is finally starting to crack down on pharma advertising.  We'll
see how aggressively they do this.  It certainly took them long enough.

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/513085?src=mp
00doc - 27 Sep 2005 21:12 GMT
""Industry can make efforts to better present risk information"

Hence the problem. The FDA still sees it as industry's problem and not
theirs.

They should make all adds include some standard format for risk that
includes what info is contained and how it is presented (including font
size) - kind of like the nutition labels. The companies should also
have to submit all ads to the FDa for approval so that tthe FDA is not
then stuck playing catch-up.
aroberts - 27 Sep 2005 21:20 GMT
>Industry can make efforts to better present risk information"

>Hence the problem. The FDA still sees it as industry's problem and not
>theirs.

>They should make all adds include some standard format for risk that
>includes what info is contained and how it is presented (including font
>size) - kind of like the nutition labels. The companies should also
>have to submit all ads to the FDa for approval so that tthe FDA is not
>then stuck playing catch-up.

All good points.  As long as they fail to enforce standards in the
presentation of risk information, this will not help much (thus the
"how aggressively" caveat).  It reminds me of the FAA, who has assumed
the role of cheerleader for the aviation industry instead of a
protector of the public interest.
jackmallory@webtv.net - 29 Sep 2005 15:01 GMT
This a tremendous subject.  Is freedom of the press freedom to
advertise?  I regard advertising as pornography.  Think Sharper
Image.---Jack
Bob - 29 Sep 2005 16:24 GMT
>This a tremendous subject.  Is freedom of the press freedom to
>advertise?  I regard advertising as pornography.  Think Sharper
>Image.---Jack

Now that you mention it, there does seem to be a whetted
resemblance...

http://www.ibqairpurifiers.com/ionic-breeze-quadra-245.jpg
jackmallory@webtv.net - 30 Sep 2005 07:29 GMT
Good picture Bob.  These people are smart marketeers.  When first I
heard their pitch on late-night TV I sure as hell wanted to go out and
buy one.

They may be sharper but I ain't that dull.---Jack
Bob - 27 Sep 2005 22:29 GMT
>The FDA is finally starting to crack down on pharma advertising.  We'll
>see how aggressively they do this.  It certainly took them long enough.
>
>http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/513085?src=mp

While valet parking for our local highschools's homecoming dance last
Saturday night, I spoke with a friend who is an FDA muckymuck in the
midwest and he felt (as he said many do in the FDA) that Commissioner
Lester Crawford's recent resignation resulted from the FDA being more
interested in politics than in science.  He was encouraged.

If that's the rank and file's feeling, then maybe, just maybe...
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.