>Industry can make efforts to better present risk information"
>Hence the problem. The FDA still sees it as industry's problem and not
>theirs.
>They should make all adds include some standard format for risk that
>includes what info is contained and how it is presented (including font
>size) - kind of like the nutition labels. The companies should also
>have to submit all ads to the FDa for approval so that tthe FDA is not
>then stuck playing catch-up.
All good points. As long as they fail to enforce standards in the
presentation of risk information, this will not help much (thus the
"how aggressively" caveat). It reminds me of the FAA, who has assumed
the role of cheerleader for the aviation industry instead of a
protector of the public interest.
This a tremendous subject. Is freedom of the press freedom to
advertise? I regard advertising as pornography. Think Sharper
Image.---Jack
Bob - 29 Sep 2005 16:24 GMT
>This a tremendous subject. Is freedom of the press freedom to
>advertise? I regard advertising as pornography. Think Sharper
>Image.---Jack
Now that you mention it, there does seem to be a whetted
resemblance...
http://www.ibqairpurifiers.com/ionic-breeze-quadra-245.jpg
jackmallory@webtv.net - 30 Sep 2005 07:29 GMT
Good picture Bob. These people are smart marketeers. When first I
heard their pitch on late-night TV I sure as hell wanted to go out and
buy one.
They may be sharper but I ain't that dull.---Jack