>MCS may be "on a tear" but that doesn' make her necessarily incorrect
>or invalidate her contribution, does it?
Clean air good. Air pollution not good. Can we move on now?
> MCS may be "on a tear" but that doesn' make her necessarily
> incorrect
> nor invalidate her contribution, does it?
I see where you're coming from, Jack, but when people ignore
other contributors to asthma and state that they're invalid, and
when they post ad nauseum that asthma is caused by one thing, and
can't provide links to concrete medical studies that show that to
be the case, it kind of makes everything else they post look
conspiratorial and incorrect, as well.