Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Asthma / July 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Experts to Consider Withdrawal of Asthma Drugs - Advair, Serevent, Foradil

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Don Brady - 13 Jul 2005 04:10 GMT
FYI:

"Experts to Consider Withdrawal of Asthma Drugs"

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/13/health/13asthma.html?ex=1278907200&en=910e05d7
98cb5479&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss


(blogger link does not  require registration)

"A panel of lung experts is being convened today to advise the government on
whether three popular asthma drugs should stay on the market or be withdrawn
because of safety concerns.

The drugs are Advair and Serevent, made by GlaxoSmithKline, and Foradil, made
by Novartis and sold in the United States by Schering Plough. Advair and
Serevent contain the same drug, salmeterol; in Serevent, salmeterol is alone,
while in Advair it is combined with another medicine. Foradil does not contain
salmeterol; its active ingredient is formoterol.

The drugs are inhaled to keep the airways open, preventing asthma attacks.
Patients are to take them every day even if they are feeling well. The drugs
are different from the inhaled medicines used to treat attacks.

Concerns have arisen about the three drugs, the Food and Drug Administration
said, because in a small number of patients they "have been associated with
severe asthma exacerbations."

Advair and Serevent already carry warnings about a study that showed a small
but significant increase in deaths among people who added the drugs to their
usual asthma treatment: 13 deaths in 13,176 patients who took the drugs, versus
3 in 13,179 who took placebos. Foradil was not part of the study and does not
carry such a warning.

Serevent was one of the drugs singled out by Dr. David Graham, a drug agency
reviewer who began speaking out in November about what he called the F.D.A.'s
inability to protect the public from unsafe drugs."
Rae - 13 Jul 2005 19:42 GMT
| Dr. David Graham, a drug agency
| reviewer who began speaking out in November about what he called the F.D.A.'s
| inability to protect the public from unsafe drugs."

.... Not really just their "inability" but their refusal to go up against
the big drug companies who have Bush to protect them ....
(imo)
Steven L. - 13 Jul 2005 21:33 GMT
> | Dr. David Graham, a drug agency
> | reviewer who began speaking out in November about what he called the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> .... Not really just their "inability" but their refusal to go up against
> the big drug companies who have Bush to protect them ....

take your political comments and ram them up your a.s with my compliments.

Signature

Steven D. Litvintchouk
Email:  sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net

Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.

Allen L. - 13 Jul 2005 22:13 GMT
>>> Dr. David Graham, a drug agency
>>> reviewer who began speaking out in November about what he called
>>> the F.D.A.'s inability to protect the public from unsafe drugs."

>>Rae wrote:

>> .... Not really just their "inability" but their refusal to go up
>> against the big drug companies who have Bush to protect them ....

>In news:3UeBe.7689$8f7.7493@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net,
>Steven L. <sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net> typed:

> take your political comments and ram them up your a.s with my
> compliments.

By golly, I bet that took that smile off Rae's face! Good one there Steven
:) Maybe a 'little' harsh, but good none the less...at least *I* liked it!

...Allen
Guy - 14 Jul 2005 02:14 GMT
What a typical comment from an average Bush supporter.

It shows once again the level of intelligence (or lack of) and class
(or lack of) a typical Bush supporter. Good show. Keep it up! Shows
your true colors.

Better look out Rea or they might send the bulldog Rover - oops meant
Rove - after you. This administration doesn't believe in free speech
except when it suits them. Look at what they did to CIA agent Wilson's
wife. (oops, gosh, I sure hope I didn't give away her cover with that
statement).
Rae - 14 Jul 2005 17:58 GMT
Guy,

I don't think you can call this type of behavior "typical" in all fairness.

I have friends/family who voted for this administration and they would never
say or post something like that just because someone didn't agree with their
guy's politics.

Trashy/vulgar behavior can come from either side. It's too bad it had to be
posted in this newsgroup. But anonymous people can get away with a lot.
Kinda like Al-Quida's way of fighting - cowardly.

And for what its worth Allan, people like you two, and remarks like that,
don't steal my sunshine. :)

Rae

| What a typical comment from an average Bush supporter.
|
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
| wife. (oops, gosh, I sure hope I didn't give away her cover with that
| statement).
Becca - 18 Jul 2005 20:35 GMT
> Guy,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> would never say or post something like that just because someone
> didn't agree with their guy's politics.

How quickly you forgot the Clinton years.  In fact, Clinton is still
blamed for everything that is wrong in this country.  This morning
someone told me that Osama Bin Laden was still alive because of Bill
Clinton.

As far as our politicians, the pharmaceutical companies own all of them,
republicans and democrats alike.  They are all gutless wonders who have
sold us out in exchange for campaign contributions.  I travel and I buy
drugs all over the world, and the prices are higher in the USA than they
are anywhere else.

Becca
Colin Campbell - 19 Jul 2005 02:42 GMT
>> Guy,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>someone told me that Osama Bin Laden was still alive because of Bill
>Clinton.

Actually Osama is still alive because Clinton felt that watching a
basketball game was more important than listening to the military
officers who had his location pinpointed and only needed permission to
strike.

--
There can be no triumph without loss.
No victory without suffering.
No freedom without sacrifice.
afdr9lk - 19 Jul 2005 03:01 GMT
>> Guy,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Becca

Same with sugar.
Becca - 20 Jul 2005 14:02 GMT
> Same with sugar.

Almost all of the confectionary manufacturers have moved to Canada (such
as Brachs) and Mexico because our government supports the artificially
high price of sugar.  Unfortuantaly, thousands of American jobs are lost
when these companies close.  Soft drink manufacturers started using high
fructose corn syrup to avoid the high sugar prices.

Read the Sugar Shaft.

http://www.fff.org/freedom/0498d.asp

Becca
Donald Link - 21 Jul 2005 02:10 GMT
Who gives a sh.t about sugar.

>> Same with sugar.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Becca
Rae - 19 Jul 2005 04:53 GMT
Becca: You missed my point. I was referring to the vulgar comments made
which Guy responded to and that you can't stereotype everyone that way.

And yeah, money talks.... and the BS flies.....
And FDA is another of  their puppets.

Rae

| > Guy,
| >
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
|
| Becca
Woody Long - 15 Jul 2005 01:23 GMT
http://www.drugs.com/advair.html

·  Before using Advair, tell your doctor if you have
     · a viral, bacterial, or fungal infection of any kind;
     · ever had an allergic reaction to fluticasone (Flovent,
Flonase) or salmeterol (Serevent);
     · heart disease or high blood pressure;
     · epilepsy or another seizure disorder;
     · diabetes;
     · glaucoma;
     · tuberculosis;
     · an overactive thyroid (hyperthyroidism); or
     · liver disease.
·  You may not be able to use Advair inhalation or you may require a
dosage adjustment or special monitoring during treatment if you have
any of the conditions listed above.

With more and more evidence coming out all the time that asthma is
caused by a fungal infection, nobody should be using this treatment,
according to the manufacturer's own package insert
Keith Winkler - 15 Jul 2005 03:10 GMT
What evidence is there that asthma is caused by a fungal infection?

http://www.drugs.com/advair.html

·  Before using Advair, tell your doctor if you have
     · a viral, bacterial, or fungal infection of any kind;
     · ever had an allergic reaction to fluticasone (Flovent,
Flonase) or salmeterol (Serevent);
     · heart disease or high blood pressure;
     · epilepsy or another seizure disorder;
     · diabetes;
     · glaucoma;
     · tuberculosis;
     · an overactive thyroid (hyperthyroidism); or
     · liver disease.
·  You may not be able to use Advair inhalation or you may require a
dosage adjustment or special monitoring during treatment if you have
any of the conditions listed above.

With more and more evidence coming out all the time that asthma is
caused by a fungal infection, nobody should be using this treatment,
according to the manufacturer's own package insert
TRN - 15 Jul 2005 03:28 GMT
Mayo came out with that theory years ago. It is an offshoot of the Chronic
Sinusitis theory. ARoberts posted recently the results of a study in
Manchester.
http://www.manchester.ac.uk/press/title,33787,en.htm
Joy
> What evidence is there that asthma is caused by a fungal infection?
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> caused by a fungal infection, nobody should be using this treatment,
> according to the manufacturer's own package insert
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.