Now I am depressed - only a 30% chance. I am having a blood test
today. I have had nasal spray to treat a possible fungus in my sinuses
but I have never been tested for any. I also have had allergy tests
done and I am not allergic to anything too major. In fact I stopped
receiving allergy shots in 2001 because I did not need them.
The reason for sinus surgery in 2003 was polyps and chronic infections.
My sinus troubles have never caused asthma before. Why should they
now? If I test positive for the chlamydia pne. bacteria; do you think
it is possible that long term azith. will take care of it?
I have been on antibiotics throughout last year but only for a few
weeks at a time - nothing for a long duration. I am afraid that if I
have a wicked bacteria it is probably a very resistant strain. I
tested positive for serratia in August and December, these samples were
pulled from my sinuses. But right now my sinuses seem clear. Thanks
for any more responses. Big A
> Now I am depressed - only a 30% chance.
SOme would say 50% - it hasn;t been firmly worked out but it is
unlikely ot be above that.
> I am having a blood test
> today. I have had nasal spray to treat a possible fungus in my sinuses
> but I have never been tested for any.
I'm not familiar with that one. WHy do they think you might have a
fungal infection? I assume they cultrued for it during the surgeries.
> The reason for sinus surgery in 2003 was polyps and chronic infections.
You're not taking aspirin or Motrin or anythign like that, are you?
> My sinus troubles have never caused asthma before. Why should they
> now?
They can trigger asthma. I'm not sure why it would start now but it
could.
> If I test positive for the chlamydia pne. bacteria; do you think
> it is possible that long term azith. will take care of it?
It might. Then again, like I said before, it is not clear what the
false negative rate is so it is hard to intepret the results.
> I have been on antibiotics throughout last year but only for a few
> weeks at a time - nothing for a long duration.
It depends on the response. Often 2-3 weeks is enough but not always.
It would be worth a sinus CT to find out (they are cheaper than a 3
week course of many antibiotics or surgery.

Signature
00doc
Joy - 27 Mar 2005 13:54 GMT
> > Now I am depressed - only a 30% chance.
>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> It would be worth a sinus CT to find out (they are cheaper than a 3
> week course of many antibiotics or surgery.
Look, the test is not reliable and the rate of STUDY is slow, so you have to
decide if you are going to take matters into your own hands or wait 20
years. You might end up being like Nancy and get no result, you might be
like Maureen and be fixed, or you might be like me and get better, but not
cured. I can only say that if you have no life on regular asthma meds, you
should consider it.
Joy
00doc - 27 Mar 2005 15:22 GMT
> Look, the test is not reliable and the rate of STUDY is
> slow, so you
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> you have no
> life on regular asthma meds, you should consider it.
I'm assuming that this response was to "Big A".

Signature
00doc
Joy - 27 Mar 2005 17:04 GMT
> I'm assuming that this response was to "Big A".
And you, CBI. Thanks for stepping in here while I was out of town. For the
most part, it was a "fair" assessment of the asthma/bacteria debate. I would
like to think that the medical community was working hard on it and that
something would be forthcoming soon.
Joy
BIG A - 29 Mar 2005 17:56 GMT
I just recd results from my blood test for chlamydia pne. bacterium:
IgG 1:256
IgM 1:10
IgA 1:64
my doctor put me on a Z pack. I have not convinced him I will need to
do another one next week. I need to stay on it right?
Joy - 29 Mar 2005 18:22 GMT
> I just recd results from my blood test for chlamydia pne. bacterium:
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> my doctor put me on a Z pack. I have not convinced him I will need to
> do another one next week. I need to stay on it right?
That is right. You need at least 3 months worth or you are wasting your
time. Go to Asthmastory and print out some of the articles by Dr Hahn, take
them in and try and see if he can find his way clear to extend the
antibiotic course. Dr Hahn will also take phone calls from Doctors, so if he
isn't comfortable, encourage him to speak directly to Dr Hahn. Good luck!
Joy
00doc - 29 Mar 2005 18:27 GMT
Different labs have different reference ranges so I could be wrong but
I think that means the IgM (the one that goes up during acute
infections) was negative. The IgG might be positive which would
indicate that you have been infected in the past and leave things a bit
muddy about chronic infections. For future reference he if he does this
again in the future he probably should also test for mycoplasma
pneumoniae.
I personally think that it is pwrth it to send the tests since of they
are positive they really do support the diagnosis and then you can
follow them to monitor therapy and relapses. However, not enough is
known about the sensitivity of the tests in this context to let a
negative result rule out the infection.
If you want to do the treatment that Joy et. al. are talking about you
need to stay on it for more like 12 weeks. What Dr. Hahn does is to
write an rx for #39 250mg tabs and have you take 2 per day for the
first three days then 3 tabs in one dose every week for 12 weeks total.

Signature
00doc