> ... I will never bother your group again.
Hooray!
Paul T. Holland - 05 Oct 2006 18:27 GMT
ditto!
notice how these spammers always try to claim that one must be 'angry'
to post opposing them?
and how they rationalize their commercial messages as if the quantity of
them makes a difference?
and how he just won't discuss or admit to the use of sockpuppetry, and
outright lies pretending it wasn't his site(s)
shhheeeeeeeesh but they're all the same.
be well
paul
> > ... I will never bother your group again.
>
> Hooray!
lol
> Hi Paul, thanks for demonstrating your knowledge on sourcing background
> information about users of this newsgroup.
why, you're very welcome spammer
> I still don't understand how you can call my message SPAM.
because of the odor?
> By definition:
> "Spam is flooding the Internet with many copies of the same message, in
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> by the recipient or the carriers rather than by the sender."
> Source http://spam.abuse.net/overview/whatisspam.shtml
hmmmmm...seems you forgot the definition of the 'singular' message - i.e.
'unsolicited commercial email or post'
> Even referring to you very own CHARTER
sure - let's do!
> "The proposed group would be intended for discussions about different
> aspects of arthritis and related autoimmune disorders, such as lupus
> and scleroderma,
note:
> mainly
> from the patient's point of view. Medical
> discussions are supposed to be informational only, not intended for a
> substitute of consulting a properly trained medical practitioner.
gosh - no mention so far about sales pitches from spammers...
> Anyone with an interest in arthritis is free to post, including but
> not limited to patients, their friends and family members, doctors, and
> other medical professionals dealing with different forms of arthritis.
still no mention of purveyors of commercial products...
> The following are examples of intended topics:
>
> - symptoms and causes of different forms of arthritis
> - treatments, both conventional and alternative ..."
gosh - and not word about coming it to sell...that is after all, what has
been proven to be your intent...you tried to claim that you 'found' a site,
when it turned out you 'are' the site - and it's to turn a buck for you...
rule number 1 : spammers lie
> I fail to see how I have violated your charter OR could be considered a
> SPAMMER.
because you're stupid?
> My messages have been personally written with the genuine belief that I
> am able to offer someone some level of relief.
you're messages have been shown to be a pack of lies...your 'belief' was
that you were going to try taking dollars from our pockets and transferring
them to yours. so we do have some 'relief' that you aren't very good at
it...
> Since you seem to be some kind of watch-dog for everyone else in the
> group
ah---poor thing! thought you'd get away with scamming the poor widdle
patients, and got caught...
> and take it on your own to angrily
gosh! why is it that every spammer thinks it is 'anger' that prompts such
action? lololololololol
> jump to conclusions
hmmmm...so, looking up who owned the site that you lied about is jumping to
conclusions?
most would call it prudence.
> making
> grossly inappropriate accusations,
grossly = posting factual information
inappropriate = telling folks you lied thru your teeth, and proving it
accusations = you told the truth about my spamming and now i'm going to
sulk...
> I will never bother your group
> again.
i doubt that anyone is going to try to dissuade you!
> Further proof that I am not a spammer. If I was this message would not
> have been so personal would it?
well, it so closely resembles messages from other spammers that have tried
the same thang that i would have to say: yup! mostly you idjits try to
claim that you're just misunderstood. and yup: most of you get
personal...lol
> It would be more likely to be a
> generated response from my SPAM software or whatever spammers use.
gosh! you think most spammers use special software? sorry bub - most are
just as clueless as you are.
> Jeff (you have the rest of my details).
indeed we do - as well as the response from your isp(s) - which is really
why you're departing - you got spanked and told to stop.
It seems to me I heard somewhere that Cab_Savvy wrote in article
<1160038623.248225.106950@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>:
>Hi Paul, thanks for demonstrating your knowledge on sourcing background
>information about users of this newsgroup.
>I still don't understand how you can call my message SPAM.
That's not all you seem not to understand.
>Even referring to you very own CHARTER
>"The proposed group would be intended for discussions about different
>aspects of arthritis and related autoimmune disorders, such as lupus
>and scleroderma, mainly from the patient's point of view. Medical
>discussions are supposed to be informational only, not intended for a
>substitute of consulting a properly trained medical practitioner.
That doesn't seem to be the "very own" charter for
misc.health.arthritis, where you are posting. Here's what it looks like
(much detail skipped):
[Start]
Charter for the misc.health.arthritis Newsgroup
"Misc.health.arthritis" is intended for discussions about different
aspects of arthritis and related autoimmune disorders, such as lupus
and scleroderma, mainly from the patient's point of view.
[. . .]
Anyone with an interest in arthritis is free to post, including but not
limited to patients, their friends and family members, doctors, and
other medical professionals dealing with different forms of arthritis.
[. . .]
Scientific discussions that are likely to interest arthritis patients in
general are welcome on misc.health.arthritis, even if cross-posted to
sci.med.immunology.
Commercial advertisements may NOT be posted to the group.
[End]
>I fail to see how I have violated your charter OR could be considered a
>SPAMMER.
Do you see it now?

Signature
Don Kirkman
Cab_Savvy - 07 Oct 2006 18:03 GMT
> It seems to me I heard somewhere that Cab_Savvy wrote in article
> <1160038623.248225.106950@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>:
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
>
> Do you see it now?
No
Bud - 07 Oct 2006 19:01 GMT
> ...I will never bother your group
> again.
So your promises aren't worth s**t either, huh? LOL!
Bud
Exorcist - 07 Oct 2006 19:49 GMT
> > ...I will never bother your group
> > again.
>
> So your promises aren't worth s**t either, huh? LOL!
>
> Bud
Don't you have anything better to do?
Do you just sit there and wait for an opportunity to to look smug?
Enjoy
Bud - 07 Oct 2006 19:55 GMT
>> > ...I will never bother your group
>> > again.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Enjoy
Exorcist (aka Cab_Savvy) still trying to pull the 'pure and innocent',
huh? Go away sh.t-for-brains.
> I still don't understand how you can call my message SPAM.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> choose to receive it. Most spam is commercial advertising, often for
> dubious products, get-rich-quick schemes, or quasi-legal services.
Exactly what you did, idiot.
> Even referring to you very own CHARTER
>
> "The proposed group would be intended for discussions about different
> aspects of arthritis and related autoimmune disorders, such as lupus
> and scleroderma, mainly from the patient's point of view. Medical
> discussions are supposed to be informational only,
"Informational only" does not include selling, dipshit.
> The following are examples of intended topics:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I fail to see how I have violated your charter OR could be considered a
> SPAMMER.
You're selling a product, a.shole. You aren't discussing a disease.
> I will never bother your group again.
Son't let the door slam your a.s on the way out.
> It would be more likely to be a generated response from my SPAM
> software
What a confession. You admit that you have spam software.