Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Arthritis / January 2006
CTLA4-Ig - Abatacept - Orencia approved by the FDA
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Gaetan Michiels - 04 Jan 2006 22:40 GMT Abatacept (Orencia) Approved for the Treatment of Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis
On Dec. 27, the FDA approved abatacept (Orencia injection, made by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company), for reducing signs and symptoms, inducing major clinical response, slowing the progression of structural damage, and improving physical function in adult patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Abatacept is indicated for use in patients who have had inadequate response to one or more disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDS) such as methotrexate or tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists. It may be used alone or concomitantly with DMARDs other than TNF antagonists; concurrent use of anakinra is not recommended.
A selective costimulator modulator, abatacept binds to CD80 and CD86 to block the interaction with CD28 required for full T lymphocyte (T cell) activation. Activated T cells have been found in the synovium of patients with RA and are implicated in the pathogenesis of the disease.
The approval was based on data from three double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical studies: Abatacept in Inadequate responders to Methotrexate (AIM); Abatacept Trial in Treatment of Anti-TNF Inadequate responders (ATTAIN); and Abatacept Study of Safety in Use with other RA thErapies (ASSURE).
Results of the two efficacy studies (AIM and ATTAIN) showed that the addition of abatacept to methotrexate or non-biologic DMARDs yielded significant and sustained improvements in RA signs and symptoms, relative to use of the respective agents alone, as measured by ACR 20, 50, and 70 scores at 6 months.
Significant improvements in physical function were also observed in the abatacept arm of both trials, and patients reported significant improvements in health-related quality of life for all 8 domains of the short form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire.
In addition, a significant proportion of patients receiving abatacept plus methotrexate (MTX) in the AIM study achieved a major clinical response (defined as maintaining an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 70 score for 6 consecutive months), compared with those receiving MTX alone (14% vs 2%, P < .001).
The most commonly observed adverse events occurring in at least 10% of patients treated with abatacept included headache, upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis, and nausea. Infusion reactions occurred in 9% of patients, and the incidence of dizziness, headache, and hypertension ranged from 1 to 2%. Significant infection, experienced by 3% of those taking abaracept compared with 1.9% of those taking placebo, is one of the most serious adverse reactions, as is a higher rate of lymphoma and other malignancies when compared to the general population. Live vaccines should not be given within 3 months of use of abatacept and caution should be exercised when using this drug in those with an underlying condition that predisposes them to infections. Treatment should be discontinued if serious infection develops.
Abatacept is administered as a 30-minute infusion at a fixed dose based on weight range (approx. 10-mg/kg) at day 0, 2 weeks, and every 4 weeks thereafter. Although premedication was not required in clinical trials, appropriate support measures should be available for immediate use in the event of a hypersensitivity reaction.
According to a company news release, the product is expected to be available for commercial use by the end of February 2006.
I was in the trial during 2 years.
Wil
Belgium
Gwen Love - 04 Jan 2006 23:39 GMT Good news, Wil. Gwen
> Abatacept (Orencia) Approved for the Treatment of Refractory Rheumatoid > Arthritis [quoted text clipped - 66 lines] > > Belgium Diane - 05 Jan 2006 01:00 GMT how did you do, wil? and does anyone know how KJ is farting on this drug?
diane
Diane - 05 Jan 2006 01:02 GMT oh no. LOL. i meant "faring"!!!!!!!!!!!!
diane
Joan Carter - 05 Jan 2006 01:10 GMT >oh no. LOL. i meant "faring"!!!!!!!!!!!! > >diane Well, I did rather wonder. I love it! Some drugs do that. ROFL --- Joan
RoseB - 05 Jan 2006 01:14 GMT >oh no. LOL. i meant "faring"!!!!!!!!!!!! > >diane HAHAHAHAH Can't stop giggling.
I hope that she is not having THAT problem.
Is that a freudian slip?? LOL
(no offence, Diane, but you know about laughter being the best medicine) Rose @}>->-- Being educated means that rather than fearing the unknown, one seeks to understand it. RB
Please remove "Ima" to reply.
Harvey R. Stone - 05 Jan 2006 15:04 GMT > oh no. LOL. i meant "faring"!!!!!!!!!!!! > > diane LOLOLOLL Now that was funny and she would say,,,,, quite well thank you..... LOLOL SomBodyElse
Gwen Love - 05 Jan 2006 05:29 GMT I know what you meant, Diane, but this is funnnier! Gwen
> how did you do, wil? > and does anyone know how KJ is farting on this drug? > > diane Nann Bell - 06 Jan 2006 15:14 GMT > I know what you meant, Diane, but this is funnnier! > Gwen [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >> >> diane I agree with Gwen! Made me think of Arava again........ (man, it's nice to be off that and able to eat fiber again! LOL)
 Signature Nann remove the Gator cheer to email me Simply the thing I am shall make me live --- William Shakespeare
~kenny - 05 Jan 2006 06:31 GMT >how did you do, wil? >and does anyone know how KJ is farting on this drug? > >diane Funnist thing I've seen posted here in a long time. :)
~Kenny
Squirrely - 05 Jan 2006 07:21 GMT Diane,
I am going to have to get you for that one. I am sorry I was reading that one now. It sure as heck hurts to laugh. I have flu and costo is at the max.
But it sure was cute even though I was cussing while coughing and laughing.
I knew what you meant too. but it was so cute. I love typos. But sometimes I read them the way they are suppose to be and then miss out on why others are laughing about it.
Yeah we do need an update on KJ.
 Signature Hugs, prayers, good thoughts, Warm fuzzies, TLC, and Love Squirrely Jo
> how did you do, wil? > and does anyone know how KJ is farting on this drug? > > diane Gaetan Michiels - 05 Jan 2006 08:28 GMT When I was on Abatacept + MTX it was a very goed time (RA wise) with no pain at all. Unfortunately I developed a pneumonia with water in my left lung. Always the same problem with the biologicals...infection! ! ! Wil
Belgium
> how did you do, wil? > and does anyone know how KJ is farting on this drug? > > diane Diane - 05 Jan 2006 15:35 GMT ugh, wil, does that mean you can no longer take it?
diane, trying not to make any more typos
Gaetan Michiels - 05 Jan 2006 16:24 GMT ... ugh, wil, does that mean you can no longer take it?
My ra-doc stopped immediately the abatacept and switched me to medrol. So, now I am on 15 mg MTX and 3 mg medrol. I am doing fairly well at the moment. Maybe later I can receive again abatacept if I need it..
Wil Belgium
diclidophora@yahoo.co.uk - 05 Jan 2006 17:01 GMT Have I missed something?
Does jet propulsion really have an effect on RA?
Peter
> how did you do, wil? > and does anyone know how KJ is farting on this drug? > > diane Harvey R. Stone - 05 Jan 2006 22:03 GMT > Have I missed something? > > Does jet propulsion really have an effect on RA? > > Peter LOLOL,,,,, hmmm not sure. I know that fast elevators that go up in tall buildings does though. When I was at my worst and on my 2d RD, my ears would pop and my shoulders and knees would go THROBBB as we reached the 26th floor. I mean everytime. I was out of that elevator like a herd of turtles groaning all the way. That RD always was running a half to a hour behind which meant another groaning when it finally was my turn to leave the waiting room to go to another room to wait for the doctor. I really didn't mind the wait there. I got to watch the medical helicopters come and go from the medical center across the street. Hhhhhm, what were we talking about,,, oh yes,,,, KJ being jet propelled and needing a low flying license.
Harv
diclidophora@yahoo.co.uk - 06 Jan 2006 16:02 GMT Harv.
I don't think I have ever been to the 26th floor of anything. London was relatively low rise when I worked there and the local council had a fire regulation which said that nobody could occupy a building higher than a few floors up. It has all changed now of course and they are building a lot higher, tho not as high as places like NY ot maybe even Houston.
Best wishes for 2006
Peter
|
|
|