Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Arthritis / December 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Help with PORT?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
kwendt - 26 Dec 2005 07:39 GMT
I'm hoping someone can tell me the upside and downside of having a port
put in.
I get remicade every 6 weeks and my veins have gotten so bad that it's
agony to be poked so many times even by an ER nurse.
Does it have to be in  your uper chest area or can be put in on the
underside of the arm?
If any of you have had this procedure - would sure like to hear from you
pros and cons.
Thanks
K
spodosaurus - 26 Dec 2005 11:12 GMT
> I'm hoping someone can tell me the upside and downside of having a port
> put in.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Thanks
> K

Upper chest has less infection risk, IIRC. A port, as opposed to a
catheter, allows the skin to be intact (aside from when they're
accessing it for your infusion) which massively reduces the infection
risk. The port will remove the need for them to access your veins,
unless you're having frequent blood tests (twice weekly or so), in which
case they might not want to overuse the skin above the port, I don't know.

I have a tri-lumen catheter in my upper chest. It's far better than my
veins considering I was having at least one transfusion per week, two
blood tests per week, and 24 hour infusions two out of every three days!
However, it's an external thing that almost always has to be removed
within four weeks due to infection because it spans the skin. My
experience with microbiology at university has enabled me to know how to
keep it going (it's been in since April), but only because I never ever
deviate from the care and cleaning requirements and I am extremely
dedicated to its preservation. Nobody in the medical field here can
believe how long I've kept it going given the infection risk of these
devices and my lack of immune cells plus immunosuppression medication.

For you a port is the only way to go for the longevity you need. Keep
your veins good for emergencies and the future.

Cheers,

Ari

Signature

spammage trappage: remove the underscores to reply

I'm going to die rather sooner than I'd like. I tried to protect my
neighbours from crime, and became the victim of it. Complications in
hospital following this resulted in a serious illness. I now need a bone
marrow transplant. Many people around the world are waiting for a marrow
transplant, too. Please volunteer to be a marrow donor:
http://www.abmdr.org.au/
http://www.marrow.org/

Donald Whitely - 26 Dec 2005 18:28 GMT
I have had a port for about seven months now. I previously had a picc
line but it became infected and was not particularly convenient.
I had a port to administer my chemo infusions and also for the monthly
blood test.  I love it, it is in my upper chest, but, I was told it
could   be put other places.  There are still some procedures that
require an IV and for that procedure they usually call in the special IV
Team to do it since my 23 years of Prednisone has left me with very bad
veins.  I was told my port can stay in place for years as long as it is
flushed regularly once a month with saline and heparin and it does not
develop an infection.  You are hardly aware that it is there.  You can
feel it through your skin, a little larger than a quarter.  I say go for it.

Don Whitely

>> I'm hoping someone can tell me the upside and downside of having a
>> port put in.
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> Ari
HIKER4LIFE - 27 Dec 2005 01:59 GMT
My Mother received chemo, off and on for three years and that port was truly
a blessing!  No probing for that tiny little vein, barely could feel the
stick when the port was accessed - truly, a good choice to make.

There should be no "down" side as long as there's no infection and that's an
individual thing, I expect.

Good luck and may God Bless,

Hiker

>I have had a port for about seven months now. I previously had a picc line
>but it became infected and was not particularly convenient.
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
>>
>> Ari
Navy1 - 30 Dec 2005 13:25 GMT
Me, too.  The only real discomfort I felt was when they "accessed"
after it was installed, but that only lasted for a short time.  It
certainly was a lot easier than having my veins get stuck.  I had
cryptococcal sinusitis in 1990, and at that time, it was treated with
daily 2 hour IV for six weeks.  I could do it at home, which was very
nice.  I believe they have pills now for the condition.  They
believed, at that time, that it was caused by taking prednisone for
poison ivy and sinus infections, so I can't take the prednisone pills.

Loujean

>I have had a port for about seven months now. I previously had a picc
>line but it became infected and was not particularly convenient.
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
>>
>> Ari
spodosaurus - 30 Dec 2005 17:11 GMT
> Me, too.  The only real discomfort I felt was when they "accessed"
> after it was installed, but that only lasted for a short time.  It
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Loujean

Cryptococcal infections are not uncommon in
immunocompromised/immunosuppressed patients. HIV patients need to take
care to make sure they get emergency care if they show the symptoms of
cryptococcal meningitis. It's treated, either accutely or
prophylactically, with Diflucan (fluconazol). We think I may have
started to get this infection during a period of time where we tried to
remove the Diflucan from my drug regimen and I became extremely ill
(from more than just this infection, if it indeed was cryptococcus).
Corticosteroids, such as prednisone, predispose people to fungal
infections. The pills did NOT cause the infection, they made you
vulnerable to it. Thrush (candida) infections are often a problem with
mid to high dose corticosteroid treatments. You probably can take
prednisone as long as you take a daily Diflucan 200mg tablet. Even the
100mg variety might be sufficient. I find I need the 200mg type for safety.

Ari

>>I have had a port for about seven months now. I previously had a picc
>>line but it became infected and was not particularly convenient.
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
>>>
>>>Ari

Signature

spammage trappage: remove the underscores to reply

I'm going to die rather sooner than I'd like. I tried to protect my
neighbours from crime, and became the victim of it. Complications in
hospital following this resulted in a serious illness. I now need a bone
marrow transplant. Many people around the world are waiting for a marrow
transplant, too. Please volunteer to be a marrow donor:
http://www.abmdr.org.au/
http://www.marrow.org/


Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.